neighborhood. the public component a balance including the execution of the agricultural. i could say the same thing about the cathedral hillside i live close by and have a villain but the hospital we're fully support. but i believe that what we see today in the form that was presented shows a much softer and toned down believe. it doesn't necessarily speak to the money contrary believe that is stoned by colors including

the surrounding areas. the other committal which is outstanding is reflecting open the neighborhood who are displays in parking. the east, west streets are at the trial difficult straights partial will i because they carry heavy traffic. we see the elimination of the curb parking i think some mechanism needs to be devised by which the parking lot accommodates are area.

the parking area has other effects of food traffic and people coming and going throughout the night. i ask our consideration to support the neighborhood parking where you come at night and a go home but not make it a garage for other activities at night. i'm not interested in a public night time garage. >> commissioner. >> i'm so much - so much has been said. i want to commit about the buildings are much better and i think that was frail critical apparently i think it really does respond a lot better and the massive building forms is a

much superior improvement. i confine the community and team. in terms of the transportation i guess i have a couple of questions about i know that - i'm glad to we got a report open the phasing. will we be at a point where it will have to be shut down? i was wondering what that looks like >> i'm with the planning staff. i want to acknowledge point fte staff has gone home but which we looked at the cooperation and

there would be a overlap and there would be a lot more coordination as well. and the closure the pedestrian tunnel will be at night >> there will be poirgsz of the van ness. >> there can be an overlap but it requires much better coordinations. some of the studies and the opening payment and the focus open loadship is the right strategy. and that's a great approach. in terms of the development agreement i agree with adding an additional notice. i think maybe in looking at the

section 8.2.2. maybe when you have a report realized the third party review and the ad and public notice we add in the major group and other parties that would give them thirty days to have the report before the hearings that would happen. i do know this requires them to have an advisory - the part of the agreement process is the hospital has for each of their individual gnaws they have to interhave a board >> the advisory boards are appointed by certainty criteria

in the agreement but their required to have and consult about the activities on the gnaws. maybe >> maybe we can add those so they can also convene about that. i imagine along the way different project sites there's going to be different issues. when the hospitals are functioning there will be issues when the people in the immediate community will have and we could ask c mc to consider including some of the coalition members among the board members. but if you could think about incorporating that this could be

an center degree of certainty. i had looked at and talked to anothers about the cpc services their administering benefits and their determining where the benefits go. i think because of the third party monitor and the process we can deal with that if there's issues where there's non-agreement we can deal with that by adding the additional notice. that makes a lot of sense. i also agree with making sure we put in the agreement the 40 periods of time. i guess the final issue i recognize there's not much to be

done in the situations but the city can continue to work with the challenge of what's going on in the city of what's in the psychiatrist bed. last night some person was yelling at the top of his lupgz and obviously i don't know where he should be but we need to work on this. i don't expect the c pmc should shoulder the whole problem but maybe at a later date i know we have to have a hearing from the

health department and i don't know the status of that. i think there's an eir going on; right? >> hi. commissioners we are doing mitigated desk and we're both about to send out a notice for the health care services master plan >> so when we have a hearing we can talk about that and how the change would health care helps provided or doesn't froird more sports. >> to bring back our part about the eir process the culminate structure impact and with the c p m promise and we had a measure that said it would help produce

some facts as you unrelated and this is kind of different is there some kind of public works? are we going to make sure we're doing everything at that time like the department of public works. so if there's any need to tear up venice >> to know what we were doing the impact analysis we looked at the two variances but to do something in the future that's being proposed beyond we wouldn't have saw i think you're talking about future reasons to tear up the street. the city has a better

understanding of what needs to be torn up >> and when we do the environmental review to look at what's being proposed and to coordinate. i want to make sure we coordinate. they said have to go to the fire and police. as well as they benefit from the california trance facility and they have permits >> so the question is after this is approved and it's going through it's being considered it would go through the process again?

>> yes when they get closer to construction yes. >> i'll go ahead and make a motion we'll move to approve - should i just involve that move all the items. >> i have a list of what i think you want to do. what i have on my list is the basic changes to 8.2.2 the augmentation to the notice number 2 the changes around the delay payments and number 3 the common the document of 40 percent of the jobs for 10 years and number 4 what you want to say about the parking lot for number 5 i think that's all the things the commission wants to do

>> and we want to call out the advisory boards of the individual hospitals to receive notice - i'll move items 8 a through in connection with those amendments. >> i don't know if it's clear you want to say about the parking lot. >> i think we wanted to - what? >> this is an susan certain - >> you guys want to the flexibility in having the parking available to the neighbors after 78 p.m. >> i mean tommy's customers i would strike the fact that the parking is limited to just cbc

employees after 7. >> yeah. strict that portion. >> i i would second that motion. >> commissioner. i am in agreement with all that's been said and also in agreement it the architect has been better. and on the notification i'm fine with that. the hospital has received a notification of patient with records of cal pacific. we know that 40 percent of your patients are not how old are and the whole process our taking care of on your own.

i would encourage on the parking lot striking but for who depend upon customers. those are thing you can work as your moving forward with the agreement >> commissioner. >> yeah. i'd like to make an amendment to the motion. i'd like the motion that c pmc is to maintain their current psych beds whatever gnaws campus >> that's fine. >> it's actually not on their campused but --

>> i'm not prepared to agree to that at that moment. >> that's my amendment and the board can vote think it as a recommendation to the board. >> commissioner. >> can i ask the representative from d h formulation you're ready to commit on that? >> we acknowledged the -- and we know from our own experience is maintaining the constricting psych beds is a difficult thing to do but i'm not prepared to make a position on that that. >> well difficulty doesn't have

anything to do in the there a need for it? i understand the need we had a meeting we couldn't get into the police sections of the mental facility but there was a lot of discussion about the great need for more community based services but at the same time the emergency room is over flowing so nights not just community stuff. there's a real need for something to take place in the hospital situation. that's all i'll saying >> i can give you a little bit of experience i know the c pmc could give you the experience.

you're correct that our psych beds are full. however, their full not only with patients that require psych care but patients who are waiting for an appropriate place to go in the community. they're not appropriate for the inpatient facility. so at any given time approximately half of our patients in the unit are eligible to go to other plays for care. so the relationship we had for door street would put a staff member to divert those patient to that lower level of care >> but - how can the situation

that we're currently talking resolve the issue of 50 percent of your patients in those beds currently doesn't have access to the community; right? and you're trying to is to me now that the arrangement will result in the 50 periods of time to be able to have the community based resources? >> i'm in agreement we need more community based mental health services to awe - >> i can't accept that because people spent all this time negotiating but i will accept

the motion that we ask the board of supervisors to maintain the psych beds or net get community services provided for. we're not going to negotiate tonight >> somebody comes to us and we want to see you, we don't go oh, maybe a. >> this is for whatever reason even with the community it's not perfect but for whatever reason psych beds were left out of this agreement. >> i feel the same way i won't want to change the agreement at this point. >> i think we have the power to do that or why are we sitting

here? >> commissioners there's another motion and a second if you could forward me those comments. as a clarification. did the rest of the board accept you're not condition but recommendation that the board take a look at this issue or not? >> that's part of the moths. >> that we're just seeing - >> we want to request of the board of maintaining 18 beds or finding more beds in the community. >> all right. >> okay. so on the motion commissioner

(calling names) so move commissioner that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. commissioners that will place you on item 71 e at 11 will have california street public hearing on the draft and environmental impact report please know that the public comments will be september on june 13th. can i ask the public to leave quietly so we can continue on the last item. i would appreciate it

>> we're going not - we're not done yet.

>> all right. >> you guys ready? >> i'm not sure if is this

yours. >> good afternoon president fong. >> wait have you called the item? >> because i live within 5 hundred feet. >> it there a motion to review. >> no, he can't leave. >> on the recuse of the commissioner (calling names) that motion passes 6 to 1 with the commissioner voting against so (laughter) >> good evening president fong and members i'm with the environmental planning division this is a hearing to receive the environmental impact report for

case 201171 e-11 california street which is the may center project. it is the grandfather and california room ex-pay attention haul and kitchen. the maximum number of events would increase from 2 hundred and thirty to over 3 hundred events. we would have the chairs removed to allow more attendees. this comments should be daenthd to the accuracy. staff is not here to have committals and the comments and responses documented. this document will respond to all verbal and written comments

and will include revisions to the eir as appropriate. commenters should state their name and address and speak slowly for the court reporter. after hearing comments in the general public we'll also take the comments in the eir drafting. the comments will extend july june 12, 2013, >> opening it up for - is there a project sponsor? >> opening it up to public comment. >> linda chapman i have two

cards. linda chapman k h ap m a n larkin. i'm to mention i'm sprite i didn't get notice of the scoping. you know, i tried for a long time to get the coping and skag asking what's happened with the application. and i was still trying to find out in february where people tried to find out what was happening with that. of course, the scoping nose went out last october. i had a 13 page appeal on the desk that went into the motion and most of the address should be in the eir.

and then the document for that appeals for the board of supervisors and it included some relevant things. and we had a lot of difficult getting the documents i sent somebody over there to get them. you know, i want to mention this is just it's an impossible location to have this venue in terms of the accessibility and not being a lot of residents around that. i was in the 70s when we weren't talking about alcohol the whole place would block up with traffic and all the award way

down to van ness. and there was no alcohol involved to speak of. and there was a great deal of information turned in previously last year about the number of historically feed back like 8 with live entertainment in 94 or 11 a big contrast or - you submitted to the commission last year the muni passport strauz do let showing you how many people can get on the buses and there's 52 lines one runs every half hour. people coming to pomp street i