the city moving it over to the city doesn't have the structure to run the apprenticeship programs. they've got a lot of curriculum and there's certainty types of evaluations that are being documented, you know, so i would caution you moving it back over there to accomplishing all the credits and coccyx >> why don't we act on others issues then. that's correct it is a fiscal year >> so supervisor bred any other discussion can i have a motion?

>> we can do that without opposition. >> thank you very much. appreciate i being here >> at this time we'll move into the board of supervisors agenda. >> good afternoon members of the budget and finance committee the clerk of the board. deborah is loading the presentation. i am here today with hardworking staff to present the board of supervisors budget for 2014 and 15. those abilities reflect the board of supervisors budgets with just a haven of changes. the most meaningful way to address that is through the

legislation that is passed by the board of supervisors. this is why we have a core mission. we continual strive to update and improve the information available to the public. all our minutes are on and on online. each agenda includes accent and interpretation services. and additionally we publish in the local newspapers in the city. the budgets before you allow us to continue those mandates. so the major departmental initiative both of which reside in the appeal board. with the treasurer and the tax collector for people to receive

the taxes. we'll host meetings in the fall to assist the bagging backlog of appeals. the mayor has added one position to clerk those evenings and one for the appeal board. we have a assessment board tracking assessment system. we recently hired a new person and she is on targeted to allow the updating of the system and by winter we should have a system that will allow residents to pay for their applications on and on online. the departments excuse me.

the department itself has felon transitions. most recently we welcome new legislatures and new staff and a records manager mr. wilson. your staffing change that we bracket before you in february is to fund the youth commission that had previously been held vacant during the economic downturn. the director of the youth commission is here to brief the committee on the benefits to the committee. >> good afternoon. i'm with the youth empathies. our long term goal is to collect experience with this position

we've been able to strengthen our position and support the commissioners. we believe this is the way the commission s can bring the recommendations to the board of supervisors. since our staff has increased we can expand our relationship with san francisco's many youthful organizations. as you can see we've reached 26 unique activities since the position was filled. committee meetings include provider networks and resource fairs and both of our research has gone to workshops at city hall. this accounts for argue youth who are gaemg on admission

priorities. they're working to address the goals. our goal is to strengthen our ability to help people speak up about issues effecting them. and to insure that the youth commission has insight for local issues. thank you for your time. >> as the board knows we have filled the position on a temporary basis, however, the position is included in the budget proposal that is before you. and to the next slide it's the departments budget has been relatively flat dues to the cost saving measures. the most significant savings was

the new legislative position. the largest driver of notable revenue changes in our budget has been due to the assessment appeal board. as you know the number of assessment appeals has tripled. the puc agreeing gas station project. we incurred miles per hour and the revenue fund off-site committee. the revenue bond oversight. quickly we have two more slides. the proposed abilities 12.9 million respectively. this is a $500,000 expenditure

due from labor cost. it will continue to go up in 2013 and $10 million in 2015. the financial report and the work orders and materials and supplies and the backlog project. the next slide reviews the budget in february. the differences you see in this budget have 4 changes additional wages and the civil service changes in the spring. the controllers fringe benefit projection plaintiff's and from risk management and the sftv.

other than that the two bulges in 2014 and 15 remain the same. i would like to give a quick thank you to deborah and let the committee know we're in agreement with the budget recommendations. include in your packet are 2014 and 15 and the division type of which i'm pleased to answer any questions you have. ms. deborah and i are here thank you thank you for being here today. any comments or questions? >> okay. mr. rose do you want to go to your report. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee open page 73 for 13 and fourteen the reductions

are ongoing savings. it would allow on a increase of 3.8 percent in the 13 and fourteen budget. all of which are ongoing savings and allowing at about increase of 2.57 percent in 2014 and 15 budget >> thank you, mr. rose we have an agreement. colleagues any questions? >> okay - what's that. >> can we have a motion to approve the motion. thank you for being here >> all right. >> as with all departments that are no, we have no dispute with you have no need to come back next week. we'll move along to the mayor's

office. please do. >> item number 12 remove certainty observations of the hotel tax and remove obsolete items. and this is regarding the quantifies of charities. >> good afternoon supervisors. kate howard. i'm here with the deputy demeanor of the mayor's office with housing and community development. and brian two from the community development and mo h cd. as you know the mayor's office representatives the city and county of san francisco and

insures are this is a place where people can thrive. i want to address the specific changes in the mayors administrative offers and turn the presentation over to my colleague to discuss more significant changes in the mayor's office. >> i want to show you this overview of the mayors budget. approximately tow percent of the mayors budget is in affordable housing. and then approximately fourteen percent in the mayors administrative offices. like public policy and finance. the second chart shows you a breakdown of how we spend the

money in the mayors budget 40 percent in the housing loans and smaller amounts in other categories. i'm note for you salaries compromise about 13 percent of our budget. overall the mayors budget increased by $25.5 million from one fiscal year to a total of $51.5 million. 87 percent of that is for housing and community investment. and most of the gross that you see here is relative to the housing trust fund. specifically the mayor's office has grown by $286,000 that's for salaries. however, the mayor's office of neighborhood services is adding

a partial position due to a partnership with people with developmental disabilities. the mayor has talked about this. your overall priority the financial - this includes our work on behalf of the state budget and among other things. and then policy priorities i know that many of euphoric on violent prelims and the housing trust fund. our hope initiative to transform the task force related to transportation. our work with cite and open data and focus on employee wellness and trying to get our own

wellness of our employees better mlgd and addressing federal health care reform. finally this is a program by program change you can see the first column shows you the proposed budget. the second climate shows you the changed in year to year. i can draw our attention to 2 had the 20th century $1 million for housing. this is due to the housing trust fund and in addition those are homeless resources. happy to answer any question you might have about the mayors budget otherwise i'll turn this over to my colleague >> ms. howard i want to ask

about the mayor's office criminal justice i think it was called. there was a time they were responsible for over seeing federal and in some instances state grants for the city for criminal justice initiatives. i notice within the pass two years the city didn't submit an explanation for by fully fit the criteria and would have fit the program like the academy on treasure island. the question i have is with the loss of this particular department whose managing this annoy for the city? >> thank you for that question you may remember several years

ago the mayor's office transferred reporter for violence prevention to the families apparently after some successful work with the juvenile probation department to better coordinate the violation - violence protection. >> there has been a loss of several grants if from the department justice. something is clearly in my prospective you know from not being actively engaged inside of what is happening there might be

a change that's not in the best interest of capturing the dollars >> i'm happy to look into this question with you. thank you >> thanks. if there are no further questions i'm turn the presentation over to my colleagues. thank you to deborah newman and harvey rose we're in agreement with the budget analyst and a good afternoon mr. chairman and members of the committee. i'm the deputy director of the mayors housing office. and director lee is over at the c mc hearing so i'm doing the presentation today. i'm going to focus mostly open

the housing trust fund for this shows you the general budget which is growing significantly because of the prop c in november that was approved by the voter. there's a $20 million allocation. additionally there are additional affordable you funds that the mayor priority on a one-time basis. and as are allocated to a freeway parcel adjacent to a market facility. parcel o. the negative number you see here is due to the $5 million hotel tax that used to be allocated directly to the housing affordable project. additionally it was quite a year for the mayor's office of housing in terms of the passage of the property c dealing with

the successor agency upon the dissolution of the mayors agency. the mayor take on all the equity programs and assets and about 11 hundred units and affordable housing assets not only monitor but preserved to marry we don't lose my units of housing. as the director mentioned today 1884 passed and the funds that were about $185 million went back to a separate entity that this office createed. we're partnering with the c ii to implement the affordable housing implementations which

include the on site and inclusionary affordable unit and a transfer mission bay and a shipyard and the replacement housing implementation that could be fund citywide. so those funds are recovering to implementing those critical projects. and the last line is that fund created by state law to fund the continuation of those redevelopment assets that were allowed to retain the revenue to preserve the assets as well as fund additional programs or rehab programs according to redevelopment laws. and this was approved by the

voter to establish a fund to preserve affordable housing. it's approximately $1.5 billion of investment. over the next thirty years. in year one there's a $20 million allocation and it gross by $8 million annually. afterward the allocation is adjusted based on the revenue growth or decreases. the housing trust fund putsz specific allocation requirement including the first 5 years that the $15 million be used for allocation requirements. there was a cry out for up to $15 could be allocated.

it's the position that we allocate that 15 total in 5 years. then we have a infrastructure program for parks and childcare centers or streetscapes. four principles were carved out as policy priorities with the housing trust fund. the main sources i mentioned was creating the long-term to preserve thousands of rental units and home ownership houses. we have another program we see an uptick in market rate

development so that's something else our office is managing. the neighborhood improvement program to stimulate all workforce housing by creating predictable sets of rules and regulations for developers. i want to emphasis this is year one of a thirty year allocation. we've been trying to ramp up about 58 ftes p with some vacancies and we're asking for more. we wanted to do in the first year getting the funds out the door quickly and expanding the infrastructure of our program such as our stabilization

programs. we're spending the next 12 months evaluating programs we've heard from stakeholder and members of the public to make sure this is a vibrant citywide initiative. so some of those things in the first year are a first time responders down payment this year's for the fire department and sheriff's department and as defined in our h.r.'s department. they're not exactly the same as our exist assistance program.

we're starting >> sorry supervisor avalos and just some questions on the deadliest program. i have heard that the a m i say income that was required is at 2 hundred and 50 percent and i think that for my point of view might be a little bit high and maybe i'm a little bit jealous because the rules were different for me. i think it's kind of high. i looked at the language for the chapter amendment and it talked about the first responder program being inclusive of the firefighters and police officers

which means there's other responder that are not included. i totally want to understand that our first responders are a majority of them are firefighters and police officers i think it's about a third, that are living inside the city for your first responders. and it seems like we're not encouraging folks to come back to san francisco. it's the academy classes that are perhaps we're providing for. but that medium income could very well be for a family of 4, you know, people who are earning $250,000 a year a that's not what i necessarily believed is

what the voters voted for. nor it's thought of how we're moving through the board of supervisors that we're looking for that high-level of affordability. we're looking at a first time home buyer is not necessarily someone who has a home. we want to make sure that the first time homeowner gets. i also feel their are other parts i want to look like. we want to make sure we're not giving a subsidy but we are talking not 2 hundred percent

from h m i for a family of 4 is $230,000 but i think it's like a home that's superfluous luxurious i'm not sure the rules are codified. but i think there should be some public discussion about what we're planning for. also wondering if we have

>> brian chu mayor's office community development. in terms of whose included in the first responder program it's true that the first responder so we included the fire and sheriff's department and police officers to find out if they have a city definition. as first responders