hold a recommendation only thing this item would be that structural changes not happen or they do happen at the citywide level and that's with the next item where we're supporting the institution of formula retail controls but the changes we're saying make those to all formula retailers. we would like to hear what you guys have to say thank you okay >> okay. thank you. >> yes, in some ways no matter the outcome of the study or what's happening what happens there we're not going to backpedal from proposition g. so i think the policy question

resolves around tweaking that and working within that framework; is that correct? >> yes, that's pretty well correct if you consider tweaking the framework. >> well, that's the debate that's going to happen next. in any case in the case studies are we considering the issues within the city

the city of san francisco sfgtv meeting of the neighborhood services and safety committee occurring on ⌝thursday july 25, 2013 will begin shortly.

>> good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the july 25, 2013 special meeting of the board of supervisors neighborhood services and safety committee, my name is david campos and i'm the chair of the committee, we're here with eric mar, we will be joined later by supervisor malia cohen bho is currently chairing the government of audits and oversight committee

and sthe will be filling in for supervisor norman yee, the clerk of the committee is mr. derek evans, we want to thank sfgtv staff for covering the meeting today, mr. clerk, do we have any announcements? >> thank you, mr. chair. please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices, completed speaker cards should be submitted to to the clerk, items acted upon will appear on the board of supervisor's agenda. >> before we move to our item, i would like to entertain a motion to excuse supervisor norman yee, so we have a motion by supervisor mar, if we can take that without objection. i know that there are a number of people here for item number 1, we have a very small item that's coming up on item 2, so i would like to take that out of order, so if you can call item number 2 and i know we'll try to make it quick so we can move to the main item of this

meeting. >> item number 2 is a hear toinger consider the premise to premise transfer of a type 21 off-sale general license from 810 mission street to 810 mission street, district 6, to sylvain montassier for tamer sf. >> and if i can call on the applicant. >> good afternoon, supervisor. >> if you can identify yourself, please. >> my name is sylvain montassier, i'm the cfo, it's a corporation that has the sf deli and wine in san francisco. >> i imagine you have already reached out o the district supervisor, this is in district 6. >> we have reached out to our supervisor and to the public.

>> why don't we now hear from the san francisco police department, either inspector fong or gordon. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors, i'm inspector fong, abc liaison region, he filed an application seeking a type 21 off-sale general license for 810 mission street. this permit is currently operating with an existing type 21 license and is seeking approval from the committee to extend the license to conduct the newly constructed entrance of the floor, police called for service from april, 2012 to april, 2013 is 0, there's no residents within 500 feet of this premises and a notice of the public was posted on may

22, 2013. this premises is located on plot number 222, it has 210 police reports reported for 2012, so the applicant's premises is located in a high criminal area. this is 176.01, the off-sale license authorizes by this tract is 7 and the active off-sale license is 9, so the applicant premises is located in an undue concentration area. there are no protests is recorded with the california department of alcoholic beverage control and letter of support is located with the california beverage control. there's no opposition from police station and alu recommendation is approval. >> thank you very much, inspector, colleagues, any questions for inspector fong? why don't we now open it up to public comment. is there any member of the public who would like to speak

on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. again, we heard from the applicant, we heard from the police department. there are no speakers. i know that the district supervisor in in support of this request, so if we can entertain a motion. >> i did want to say that though my office is working with supervisor kim and cohen on getting stores to display more healthy options in the front of their store, especially whole grains frush produce and non-fat milk, many types of items as opposed to junk food, alcohol and cigarettes, but i still see that this is supported by the district supervisor and i'll be supportive of this item. >> great, thank you, supervisor mar, so if we can have a motion. >> i'll move that we approve this permit. >> great, thank you, and if we can include that to support it

as the committee report so that it can be considered at the next board of supervisor's meeting, great, so if we can have that motion and we will take that without objection. thank you, the matter will be in regarded, congratulations. mr. clerk, if you can call item number 1. >> item number 1 is a hearing on how the department of public health is planning to implement the affordable care act with implications there are for healthy san francisco and the health care security ordinance and how the affordable care act's implementation will affect various communities in san francisco including undocumented san franciscans. >> the main objective here today is to hear from all the members of the pun lick and the community and the business community included who are here. let me say that i'm very grateful that because of the amazing work of president obama and our incredible and amazing leader congresswoman nancy pa

loes si, in march of 2010, president obama signed the comprehensive health reform that we probably have heard a lot in the last couple of years. it is the patient protection and affordable care act which many people referred to as the aca or obama care which is something that we have affectionately appropriated because the term was use ined a derogatory way, we think it's a positive way, this law does many things but perhaps most importantly, it makes preventive care more accessible and more affordable for so many americans and i'm excited to be here to begin a series of hearings that we will be holding on the affordable care act so that we have in san francisco a smooth as transition and implementation as possible. today's hearing will focus on how the aca and our local health care security ordinance work in tandem to make health

care and health insurance truly accessible to as many san franciscans as possible. you know, the thing about the health care security ordinance, it was really an example of how san franciscans can come together, you had labor, community activist and is the business community coming forward and passing an ordinance that set an example for how you can have universal health care for the rest of the country. in september of this year, i plan to hold a hearing on how to enroll for health insurance in california's exchange which is called the covered california. right now, i know that san franciscans are getting ready for enrolling in the aca which the enrollment begins on october 1 of this year for coverage that would then begin january 1, 2014. later on this year, and we're thinking around october, we plan to have a hearing that

will focus on women's health and how women's health will be impacted by the implementation of the affordable care act. in the coming months, i look forward to a lot of lively discussion about the exciting moment in history in the history of this country where quality health care will become more accessible to so many americans. i wanted to start off the series of hearings on the aca with a discussion about the importance of maintaining our landmark health care security order and as you remember, this law was authored by my predecessor, former district 9 supervised sore now assembly member tom am yan noe, this serveesed as a model for the country for how to do health care reform and we know that we have heard from many moses if washington dc before the aca was passed that they were looking to san francisco as a model. my driving concern is that during this period of transition, here in san

francisco, that we continue to be that model for the rest of the country, and that the health care dollars that san francisco workers have been receiving from their employers for the last 7 years, that those dollars are not taken away during this transition. the health care security ordinance contains two components, both of which will be crucial to maintaining -- to ensuring full access once the aca is implemented, the first component is the healthy san francisco program which is a program that provides health care access to uninsured san francisco residents and which will continue to be crucial for those residents who are left out of the affordable care act, namely undocumented residents here in san francisco and other parts of the country. the second component of the health care security ordinance is the [inaudible] it was included by assembly member am

ya*n know that worked on this landmark piece of legislation. on the belief that employers should contribute equitably to the health care needs of their employees and employee provided health care is not only reserved for the high paid workers here in san francisco, the employers spending requirement was never really meant to be a primary funding mechanism for healthy san francisco, for the healthy san francisco program, although we recognize a small portion of this money does help the program solvent. the employer's spending requirement was meant to encourage employers to provide and to continue to provide health insurance to their employees or in the absence of health insurance, to provide economic assistance so that they have as much access as possible to quality health care. many of us believe that the employer spending requirement is needed neve

because under the aca, individuals are required to meet an individual mandate and purchase health insurance, while cal foreign's health exchange, the cover california that i referred to before will make health insurance more affordable to many individuals in high cost cities like ours, like san francisco where according to recent reports during the most recent quarter, a one bedroom apartment in san francisco will cost you an average of 779, in these high cost, lower wage employers will find health insurance unaffordable, because of the health care security ordinance and the spending requirement in that ordinance, we hope the workers we're talking about will be able to use this money to meet their individual mandate and if workers can use the employer contribution to purchase health insurance, we believe the aca will be an

enormous success in san francisco and we believe that san francisco will be the model for the rest of the country on how to maximize its success of the aca because of the health care security ordinance. there's a last point that i want to highlight here before asking the department of public health to come and present, in 2015, the aca will include a requirement that employers provide insurance or pay a penalty if they do not provide health insurance to employees that work over 30 hours a week. what's going to happen as a result of this unfortunately, in many parts of the country to the extend that the threshold is at 30 hours a week, there's an anticipation that many employers will be lowering the number of numbers that employees work to 29 or under and because of the health care security ordinance, we know here in san francisco, an ordinance that goes beyond the coverage that the current l