process and that was made available online. there's a much more detailed document that goes over the decision process in detail. when we released all the award we put that on our website. so to start with every proposal was read and there were hundreds of scores that had to be recruited for this process. after the reviewers submitted their information we went through the process. this is a procedure we used in the last rfp and it was reviewed through the audit of the process by the controllers. we also create what's called a

neighborhood score. and again on our website we provided details on how the neighborhood needs scores. and i know i acknowledge that zip codes sometimes over generalize but at this point it's one the best processes. there are other ways we go look at needs. any proposal that receives minimum reviewer score of '75 or a combination of a proposal score of 65 and had a high neighborhood need score got to the selection process. the selection process is when folks from d c wifi and our partners sit together and we go through all the proposals that got through to the selection process. some of the things we're looking

at is to extent that the program is a priority and the program requirements. we looked at the strength and weaknesses of the program design. we were very specific about the design of the programs. and for clear grantees we looked at past performances and new ones we visited their programs. every program that gets through to this selection process their program name is written down on a sticky. so everyone gets consideration. sometimes those sticky are grouped by neighborhood and target population because we're trying to reach a pa particular population we want to make sure the

money.

so here's many of the numbers in the end. this doesn't include the funding. excuse me. but 4 hundred and 98 proposals were received and some neighborhoods and some funding strategies have a a lot more strategies so the competition may have been very high. for example, if you were doing arts you had more competition. so at the end 2 hundred and 85 proposals of the 2 hundred 90 those advanced to the selection process that i described and in the end 2 hundred and 89 were

awarded funding. we were asked to provide some data this is hot off the press so i haven't had a full opportunity to review this but we're certainly open to meeting with your staff. this is by the strategies and the actual proposals submitted and awarded. what we're looking at is our funding by district. how it appeared in 2013 and it compares in 2014. we're going to do the match of the district and we know it isn't representative of all district but we know what district were picking you up

from. we have the data that a lot of the kids are coming out of district 5. i want to point out the citywide fund at the bottom is over looked at but that citywide funding is cruel when it comes to target some of the places in the city. the workforce plan for example, we may have a program like one in the mission but their serving kids from across the city and reaching into the other departments like juvenile. so the citywide services some days with not recognized as reaching the kids in our district but they are.

other example is my interim went to the bay area and she came to our office everyday to work that would have been citywide funding. okay. so this the the projection of kids to be served. at any time compared to again consensus 21 data. and here again, it's american people imperfect matching but this is what we have. even when we

district. this is the last question. can i turn it over to you? >> so the last question was around the summer and how do we

decide. so in this slide you can see that this is similar to the last rfp in which we partnered with the school district. we wanted to simplify the application. so really it was in the spirit of trying to simplify the process so they didn't have to submit duplicate applications. and in the last slide in that it describes how the guiding principles we used. once again similar to the last partnership we wanted to leverage the state funding. and this year we were able to

allocate more funding for summer programs so we were able to match some of the summer excel there's so we can do some summer programs we're really excited about. and with that that concludes our presentation. so i'm more than happy to answer questions >> thank you, ms. sue. supervisor mar or breed >> yeah. i want to thank the department. i know it's going to take time to look at this. i appreciate the neighborhood with the most need the clear process you go through and the huge amount of proposals. i'm very supportive of the

effort and it gives some capacity building as supervisor breed said really produce strong results but may not be the best is the drafting the proposals and know how to get our proposal through the process. some neighborhoods are getting the short end of the stick and i do feel that equity means not looking at blanket zip codes but looking at the pockets of poverty that exists. district 1 if you look at 94118 it has poverty and rich folks. some are living in the units

crammed behind garages. sometimes, the affluent part of the zip code might hide the poverty in the district. i see that 6, 5 and a 1 are the ones that decrease. district 6 for example, the poorest people live in the tenderloin and market area but it's heighten by the more affluent people who have moved to the parts of the city. so i think we should look at the different pockets. there are tremendous needs 90 in district one. but hopefully, we're having a conversation about that >> supervisor breed. >> i'll just say we can have a

more detailed look at the information but in the interest of public comment i don't time to go down the road and repeat what's been said. thanks >> okay. thank you colleagues and ms. sue. we'll continue this into next week. so at this time we're going to open it up for pickup comment. there's a lot of people here and again, i would ask we give preferences to elderly and disabled as well as children but if the first people will start lining up against the wall. come up to the microphone but if you want to point in the direction of lynn people up against the wall let's get the show started.

again, if anyone is disabilities or has small children let one of the sheriff's know and we'll make every endeavor to get you up. okay come onyouth.

i hold a belief that most people want to feel valuable in our society. we want to benefit from the life-sustaining support we offer. i'd like to turn the microphone over to the committee. we are here for all. i want to commend all. this is for all the items we've called today so, please came forward

>> go ahead. >> my name is ryan and i'm a client at the larkin street youth services. it has a great education higher-up we're next door to drop in. they're very he helpful they help us get our ged or high school diploma. i became a member and the second day i wanted to enroll back into school and the staff helped to enroll in march in may i graduated and got my high school diploma. they're very helpful to get our education.

and i'm working on getting to san francisco city college. so i'd like to give my huge thanks for them helping me to get to this point. yeah, it's a good program. thank you >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please come on up and if there are members of the public who are elderly or have small children speak to one of the volunteers. >> i'm bernard. since we're addressing all budget items i want to focus our attendance on the central subway budget we believe should be placed in awe obedience until there's a friends audit. particularly regard the false

and legality uncertain california environmental act and accessibility of the handicap walk between union square and market street replacing is by benches does not meet the standards. secondly, the subway will be 80 feet above market street subjecting it to earthquake and no litigation has been presented. i recall horrifically to the thousands that died in berlin. put that in your memory. it is important that we subject the analysis

>> their - i wanted to speak about homeless seniors. we've been working in the tenderloin six months trying to get some beds designated for seniors. i think we were almost there and everything seems to have blogged down. i think it would be helpful if the board of supervisors would inspect some funds for. i find that i have worked with ken and others. and they would have seniors at

curry who come in 12 a month of they're new clients are likely to be homeless. they can come from anywhere in the city just because you're not in that neighborhood become desperate for a place to stay. they need - you don't put them too far away from the bathroom or on the top bunk and you try to help them you don't throw them out at 6 o'clock in the morning. those are things that francisco be done within the framework. but the funds that designate that might be helpful >> once the have is a chance to

commit please leave the chambers. if you want to stay in city hall we have overflow rooms to wit this on tv >> morning i'm jennifer. i'm a connector for the community living campaign. being connected through technology. in my lifetime technology has bridged the gap between not employed. i meet a resident who has

connected to people all over the world and wanted others to have this experience so he started a computer club. i've seen the confidence go up. the club is set up so residents become trainers. everyone passed the skills forward. air royal they're part of the community and findings value in their talent. i urge you to employ seniors and people with disabilities in computer labs around san francisco. you have a golden opportunity to be a leader to show the rest of the in addition, the capped resources of people and seniors with disabilities. when you were looking at the

budget keep in mind how technology has connected the community. there were none before. thank you for the opportunity to be heard >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> why don't we keep doing. >> i'm jessica. >> hold on one second let's get the microphone on. we need the microphone victor >> now i can here myself. i'm confused of the programs.

the seniors have ensured lots of cuts. this year is a time to make sure we're support the parts of our community. i want to ask to support the enhancement request this is for homeless folks and he shelter. we are in a housing crisis this is a modest amount. i want you to pay attention to the housing collaborative. we're asking one million dollars and this is again combaej folks and improving housing conditions. we think it's critical that tenants are involved in the short term and long-term. this is do tenants have a voice.

i'd like to urge you to pass an increase for the non profit staff. our rent is going up and 4 percent doesn't begin to cover the actual costs so we hope you'll make that happen. and thank you for funding detox >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> hi. i like commuter it's the internet. thank you okay. thank you very

much >> thank you. next speaker, please >> good morning committee messengers i'm a client at the larkin shuttle. i'm here to show support like i i would for the larkin shelter. when my life at home became for me, the larkin center opened up for me. the opportunities that were priority to me has been crucial to my development they allowed me to find a job and save money. this fall i'm going to start college

>> and we're not quite sure when this funding comes to an end. i want to turn this over to one of our students to talk about disabilities >> i'm here to talk about the program. it's been assigned to - unable to as i've said our disabilities and for the kids who are never