to seeing. >> yes. >> it wasn't expressed as a percentage it was just points so it just - >> so the points are a percentage based on the total amount. so typically if you're a a local business that certified with h mc is 10 percent. so if it's a hundred points you get 10 points in addition to our score. if you have a joint venture and you get 7.5 percent and so 7.5 of 1 hundred and that's how the points are calculated >> thank you that's sufficient it was new term and displayed in

a dive way. >> it took me a moment. >> well, you get a bonus for pointing out. and with that i'll move item 8 b and all in favor. any public comments. all right. there being none all significant by saying i. motion carries >> regular business. >> item the authorize the judgemental manager between the staff and sf puck. >> you're on mr. carr land. >> i don't know where that one

is. thank you michael deputy general manager. today, we have before you a understanding between the treasure island development authority and the puc. this is kind of nuclei will explain to you we've been operating without it for a long time. just to give you a little bit of history in 1997 the city of san francisco entered into an agreement with the navy. that was tight a. they provide the services. the board of supervisors has authored tight a but we've not had any authority we've been

doing it under a handshake. at this time a has the reporter for the water and storm water systems on treasure island. they have the agreement with the navy not us we're the contractor. we're the contractor under what we're been formalized under the agreement to do the services now we want a formal all the time to cover the costs and provide n some dichlts. and the contractor our in no way responsible for putting our money out it has to come from reimbursements through tight a

but we're reimbursed so we're made whole we're not spending our dollars on treasure eyed >> the development authority is a separate service. >> tight is a separate entity and there's the treasure island development. >> when i pass this resolution you'll get reimbursed. >> so tight is rate payers are the resident on treasure island. >> yes. as well as the u.s. coast guard. and so we have a colleague here >> so in this amendment as a contractor we would be paid for indirectly we'd be paid by rate

payers of tight a. >> that's correct and we're telling them that's the rates. >> are those rates comparable to someone living in san francisco. >> it depends upon. >> single-family residents? >> they set the rates. >> my understanding from commenced with puc staff is for every single-family residents the rates on treasure island are slightly higher about 15 percent than comparable rates in san francisco. >> that's the obvious transportation etc.. >> and, yes and the economics of scale. >> how is the water provided to treasure island.

it goes into the distribution system >> i was curious. >> and this is only for power; right? and a no, it's for gas and power and storm water services. >> and what about the liability issue. >> that's part of the mo u and we have some language in n there again treasure island belongs to the navy if we you think into certain issues it has to be taken care of by the navy but we have to provide some of the capital funds.

>> so if a sue anonymous comes and wipes out the facility we're not responsible and a that's correct. i want to be clear >> a sue anonymous or the - >> all the wildfires. >> that's right we that didn't stepdaughters what happens after the fire in terms of the erosion. >> all right. is there a motion and a moved and second. >> any public comments that is the motion carries. >> item number ten. >> public hearing on the 2013 inform the san francisco water system. >> good afternoon water quality description of director. we're here today to conduct the

hearing we have to do this ever 3 years. their ideal levels of drinking water that don't take into accountant the public health goals and that's because the technology is not there. could i have the slides please. our requirements are that we have to compare our results and we submit a report. we have to solicits the reports and we have to submit a letter to the state health department that we held this particular meeting. this chart is meant to give you a prospective where the system is operated. the red line at the top is the lc l the regulatory standard.

we've met outlining all the regulatory standards and we try to operate somewhere below that level. the very bottom is the public health goal and this is the public health goal. for the 90 containments there were 6 that we cleed and i'll go into that detail. for aluminum and architectures we had the surface source so our treatment worked for led there was nothing in the water that we provided but once you get into you tell household there's faucets with lead in it so the detection were in the homes. we had a hit of uranium and we

were not exactly sure where that happened. this monitor where we had the hits was in june 2011 and if you remember that was tucking she mean but the uranium is again, we have no idea. >> those occurred naturally as many chemicals do. >> that's the hard part was there something strange going on in the watershed so you can see we're right there we're not quite sure what it was but we feel sure certainly we're going to pay attention to that.

>> very often we have those waters that occur naturally. but when i wrote the clean water drinking issue many people were a alarmed about the chemicals in the water thinking someone had put them in there but they were naturally occurred >> so we're not sure we'll take up to look at the stuff so we have a long term of looking at the water but the nuke she mean we're going to have to pay attention to this containment. >> well, it didn't impact the olympics. >> we always see the chloroform but the 27 percent what the

michael month. if we look at the entire 3 years so maybe 3 hundred plus samples we get a positive. so discussion about the sources for aluminum arsenic and erosion is a natural thing and there's also in the chemicals you have lead and household plumbing we don't live in a stare relay world. we have operations that we minimize the sources and we have a watershed protection plan and we look at the chemicals to make sure they're not out of the speck. we worked a lot with the

department of health. we look at one of the optioned to replace all of our meters with compromise with the policies. we offer free tests for low income people and we have a phenomenal fee of $25 to drop off the bottles and we'll report the information back to them. and basically we'll make sure we send a letter to the regulatory agency so that's any report >> so one is to direct staff to do something. >> basically to send a letter. >> we don't direct it.

>> it's your meeting (laughter). >> is there a motion to move. >> so move forward. >> all in favor significant by saying i manufacture motion carries thank you. public comments on things to be discussed in closed session? all right. do you hear a motion >> i will move. >> attorney-client privilege and a those in favor? donna will read the items >> in closed items exciting legislation vs. the city and county of san francisco. item 14 existing litigation. and number 15 claims with

somalian and item 17 existing litigation for the city and county of san francisco vs. the panic gas and electric company. and item 19 consultation securing the water and power