san francisco - remind members of the public to please silence any mobile devises and i'd like to take roll at this time (calling names) both commissioners are expected to arrive late. commissioners first on your calendar is items like one

>> like to welcome to everyone to the san francisco planning commission this is a regular meeting for thursday september 19th. please understand that the commission does not allow any disruptions and please silence any mobile devices. i'd like to take roll at this time

(calling names) commissioners first on your calendar are consideration for items for continuance items a and b and x at the 270 brandon street for an observation recommendation until october 13th and case two a2 at 2499th street an appeal of a declaration is proposed for continuance until october 24, 2013, and under your consent calendar item 3 needs to be continued until the 26th. and under your regular calendar for 22 c at 331 there is a

request for appointment until october 12th >> any public comments on the items proposed for continuance. seeing none, commissioner >> i move to continue item a and b and on the continuous calendar plus item 3 on the consent calendar and item 4 on our agenda to the dates that acting secretary has noted. >> second. >> commissioners on that motion to continue as noted

(calling names) so moved commissioners that passes unanimously 6 to zero and as you're only item on the consent calendar has been moved booklets elites go to the calendared. >> i'd like to take a moment of personal privilege and ask the commission to adjourn in he memory of our son who died 11 years ago today. he had been accepted into the fire academy but he had an undiagnosed heart condition and we have formed a foundation that we have a memorial tournament and the chishts get the money but since it's the anniversary of his death i'll be adjourn in

his memory. and to talk about the secretary the scombe subcommittee had reached a recommendation and more about that in the future as that particular item is calendared but it was a very long and extensive process they to her and in various parts of the media and we had many applicants over a hundred and it was narrowed down to thirty and eventually 10 and we came up with a recommendation. i wanted to mention to the public how extensive this was and we felt we the good job and were happy to articulate. want to thank moore and borden who served on the commission >> thank you commissioner

moore. >> i'd like to ask the commission to consider the following. on september 17th the a i a held a major meeting designed presentations for institution this consisted of 3 design proposals and while this commission doesn't have any jurisdiction of the matter of the preyed do i think it's in the interest of how we look at the planning of the auditorium to have a bigger understanding of the design proposals. and this was the fish museum a number of years ago we all sat and without saying we had jurisdiction we had the right for comments. so i ask the commission s to ask we please have a presentation

and allow the members of the public who are not really visited by the a i a to hear this if the director considers this to be appropriate >> if the commission so desires we can certainly request they come forward for a hearing. we can if the the hearing time >> if you can accepted me more information. >> i can only forward that e-mail to you on september 1, '72 days ago and in the paper raised a number of sequestering questions and i believe it would be interesting to clear our own questions. >> okay. thank you. yeah. i agree with that, in fact, i wasn't able informing to the a i a presentation the other night but it would be of service

to have s a hearing where where everyone can get an idea >> xhirgs hill us. >> to the focus on the waterfront i think people get confused to who's jurisdiction is give where so i second that. >> as part of the presidio and trust. >> let's move on. >> thank you, commissioners i want to reiterate something that was in your director's report today about a couple forums that supervisor cowen is supervisor on october wednesday at the california college of the arts and the second saturday on october the 5th.

the purpose of those is to do a refresher course on eastern neighborhoods and to go do over the development process and how the public can get involved. with a number of projects that are coming on line particularly in the dog patch there's a lot of concern about the pace of the development. we want to go over the plan he it's reaching it's 5 year anniversary and about the purpose of that plan and the zoning perimeters that were set up that's october 2nd and fifth for those two hearings - public meetings i should say that concludes my report >> commissioners item 6 review of the past events of the

preservation commission. >> good afternoon. this week at the board of supervisors they heard the ordinance that would all the time the a u 0 zoning district to i am sorry that would allow the tourist of any size on the specific 0 zoning eurozone if it had a height designation over 5 feet. this was approved on first reading and you recommended approval. also the commission prosecuted this and if you would authorize an existing at two adjacent properties to establish a religion facility and supervisor

met with the two parties and negotiated the following conditions which were introduced by him at the board hearing on tuesday. the first new condition limit no more than 9 children and they could increase the enrollment up to 43. and they shall add one curbside monitor and one additional monitor. and also communicate to all parents dropping off children about how vehicles operate in the drop off zone they can't reserve in the zone and they shall move up if another space becomes available. and condition number 4 they must not block the driveways during

this time and condition 5 is the project sponsor should minimize unattended vehicles and item 6 if the mta were to approve the deposit off zone that is the number of vehicle codes vehicles would be limited during during the morning and afternoon pickup times and they shall deliver a pickup and drop off plan to each family. so at the tuesday hearing planning department staff expressed we would work for the compliance of the conditions. further as given to us they were

to provide evidence and staff noted without such evidence enforcement would be difficult. and they voted to reauthorize the c u plus those conditions as authorized by supervisor wiener and that concludes my report >> does not appear to be any. >> the board of appeals met and there was one item to be considered was an appeal of a - several building permits for 1050 val less than and hill and took the dr and heard on appeal of the deck and this was scheduled for an appeal late

last week an appeal was filed so it was continued to the call of the chair and it will be scheduled once the board of supervisors makes the determination on the board of appeal. >> commissioner moore. >> when those things happen there are additional fees left on this process correct? >> yeah. basically, we're doing those for fretting free so my time is not covered by any additional fees for the permit application we don't charge informing for those items when they're at the board of appeals. one thing as my understanding i need to get better detail we can't include those in our

normal appeal process. so the appeal process can only be covered as part of our normal fees >> it's a difficult situation as a director i must say. >> good afternoon tim department staff here to share with you the outcome of the preservation commission hearing. it was the first scheduled he meeting since august 1st so the calendar was full. the first resolution item on their calendared was a resolution honoring alice keri's contribution and work in preservation that was unanimously passed and will be for the to the state office. and as part of the package as

considering her for a governor's award. the first, he item was the landmark for moekz. supervisor breed came in support after the staff presented the finding of our report there was a great deal of overwhelming support. the commission also unanimously approved the landmark designation, however, during the public comment portion that really talked about the influence marcus book store has had on san francisco in general so we'll be updating that report and bringing that back in the

fall. the counter property owners were on hand and asked for a continuance of the matter until february to sort out some outstanding legal issues. we felt were a number of hearings in the pipeline that there would be plenty of opportunity to address those issues before the final approval or vote by board of supervisors. we had a new certify for the brandon street within the south landmark district and that will be before this committee in the next two weeks were the next two items on their agenda was the adoption of the japan town statement and the endorsement

and the complexity statement was drafted in 2009 and revised in 2011 so the commission asked us to amend those and it will be finalized in the upcoming months. and there was a couple of amendments they want to add two buildings and it's not an endorsement but to engage the community and property owner to see if the landmark is a viable thing the japanese language school and ymca and t