tv [untitled] November 13, 2013 9:00pm-9:31pm PST
9:00 pm
front is true east and the back is phasing 20 true west. >> yes. >> so the light and a air since it's coming from southeast that wouldn't be effected since your die north. >> yes. in fact, the proposed height is lower than than the appellants. >> mr. t. >> greg t for staff. just to first touch on pressure of this project was by the planning department department is went through the notification and that notification began on march fourth and a no discretionary review as filed on the project and it was subsequentially approved.
9:01 pm
regarding the design it was approved and somewhat unusually they had no requests for changes and no comments in the negative instead. they exempted that the residential destiny teem approves this editions to the pattern. regarding the actual destiny and the pattern there is a fairly clearly two pattern in the neighborhood when you have a clear pattern if you add an additional story we ask i set it back 15 feet so that's consistent with the guidelines. the rear horizon addition was only 7 photo and only 10 photo
9:02 pm
short of the required guidelines. so it meets all the guidelines and i'm available for any questions you may have >> pugh thank you. mr. duffey >> commissioners, i have little to say. i looked at the reputing from the building department point of view that was reviewed properly. one item on the excavation the project sponsor would notify the neighbors steno days prior to starting the excavation in the building code and as in the building code on your property and you've got a neighboring property you need to give them a
9:03 pm
10 day notice to review our drawings your from - this case i wouldn't anticipate any problems but that code section still needs to be addressed. >> have you seen a lot of permits taken out in pg&e in that area. >> i think pg&e wouldn't pull permits on all 7 but certainly i know the goods leaks are all over the area. they arrived in no time when i called them. but i think their referred to pg&e primarily >> actress any public comment. seeing none, wool have rebuttal
9:04 pm
starting with the appellant >> on roubl i want to ask dbi and what's the other one? planning >> how much do the know about the guideline. >> it's your time to - you want to know if you followed it you wouldn't have issued this permit. bringing it back to the rebuttal mr. william never respond to my phone calls did you write the letter before and after the gas leaks. regarding the wind tunnel effect our window feel off during the windy times. when they talk about they're putting a slope it's incorrect.
9:05 pm
i've shown it in my picture how it blocks everybody from the story pole all our windows are blocked. the light and a air we've been enjoying it for the last 25 years in that house. regarding the other things it pg&e literally i have had a difficult time. they're the one who found the leaks but they wouldn't come i contacted our supervisor lee and requested can you possibly come more often to check up. and pg&e called me yesterday they were going to send somebody over that's it they don't do it. they're waiting for san bruno to happen people liquor us don't
9:06 pm
happen. i'm going saying their don't build bus let's continuums. i'm working with the planning department and they said do you want any to ask them to compromise and they came back and said they don't want to compromise. so again, i wanted to tell you i'm not saying don't build if you look at the school superintendant he's sharing he doesn't want it to be built. we have children snavnt walking
9:07 pm
by and if somethings happens and the construction goes on for two years something could happen. so let's wait until pg&e fixes the pipe. you can't come in like a johnny come lately and a triumph one this >> my one of made a mistake which she said superintendent. >> i don't have anything else to offer i'll make modifying available. >> i have a question the 311 notification so did any neighbors show up. >> who neighbors showed up one
9:08 pm
is to the meal right and one other neighbor who is behind the property who is actually not a homeowner but a renter. and others commented on our design it was great. we wanted to put up story polls so we can show people the extent e stent of the building >> smart move. >> i want to say it's ironic our neighbors are building their homes. learn ours >> anything further and i have
9:09 pm
a question again, i think it's planning. if you could stand up. i want to ask you about the light and the light and air question that would be you >> it would be either. >> so the appellant is concerned about the light and air. i've heard it addressed based on the slope of the roof. could you give us a neutral position >> so the issue of light and a air is not addressed in the planning code expect are individual unit to make sure they have at least one window in their unit. >> okay. >> in terms of protection of neighbors light and air it was
9:10 pm
reviewed and the residential design team looked at this immense the design guidelines. dollars are d that stands for detached. so most of what the destiny guidelines gets to the impacts on light and air when you have projects of a higher decent. in this situation there massachusetts was not any significant issues >> views are not protected. >> private views are not protected. >> nicole are there any public view issues. >> it's protected but not
9:11 pm
private. >> okay. any comments? >> i think ultimately this comes to two views and as the acting da said the views are not protected. i'd make a motion to uphold >> deny the appeal. >> uphold the permit on the boos that the planning and code - >> i'm sorry what. >> don't error. >> thank you for correcting me. i'm sorry >> it's okay. >> we have a motion to uphold this permit on the basis it's code compliant.
9:12 pm
9:13 pm
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ hello and welcome to this presentation. i'm san francisco purrs since that time we've helped people clean up their criminal records. we created this to help you understand how this worked. we'll plan or explain all the steps. after watching this program you'll know what to expect after completing the process. hi, there are i'm deputy and i'm part of the clean slate team. the first thing we will need to know whether your despicable to have our convictions dismissed
9:14 pm
can't be on parole or currently charged with a crime or serving a sentence and it must be from san francisco. while your colleagues will get to know your circumstances there are 3 steps. getting the clean slate process started it simple you can get them done in the same day. first fill out an application and they can be opinioned on sf defender.org. next you'll obtain a copy of your rap sheet that's a rap sheet going 80 the hall of justice at 850 bryant street on the fourth floor. the bureau is open monday
9:15 pm
through friday from 8 to 5. it's located one block away from the public defender's office you'll need to bring our photo id. finally, there's your our own your rap sheet to the front desk. you'll receive a letter from 2 to three weeks explaining the next steps. let's review the 3 steps if that fillist the police stations and on your police station and 3 deliver our rap sheet and application $0.40 to the defender. it can help with financial aid for colleagues. i want you to meet a client who did the clean slate program he refunds a nonprofit literary
9:16 pm
series. please meet joe. peep at the clean slate program worked with me today, i i am an author of 3 books a husband and a father would you recommend clean slight to another person >> i would definitely recommend that. so, now you have a better understanding of the gibt address benefits of the clean slate program as well as highway to get started. let's hear some common questions. keep in mind those are general questions you'll you may be seated with an attorney who be provide more information based on our circumstances >> just to be clear i don't have to tell my employers will my ejections.
9:17 pm
>> yes. as well as convictions that have been dismissed. if someone runs a criminal background they'll see the charges but it's dismissed. you will be able to legally tell your employers person never convicted >> i don't to tell anyone is there a way to rears them. >> there's some cases you can. maybe you're arrested because police thought you were someone else. wound our arrest record is sealed you can say you were never >> if i wanted to clear my record if i was convicted of a
9:18 pm
felon. >> it is also known as a one letter officer the clean stating hit. >> may be able to get it raersz but if i went to prisoner you may quality for a correspondent certified document saying you're a lay abating citizen are. you had should be aware for some state jobs state agencies are allotted to consider our criminal history. those jobs are private security jobs health care workers and other careers involving the children the i can sick or elder. it will benefit you human resources here's some of the things clean slate can't do it
9:19 pm
doesn't prevent an old conviction to there the sense of a new criminal action. the court might connotes more sentences even if it been submit you can't own or polgs possess a firearm. if it bars you from carrying an firearm eclipsing our record won't change that. submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection. if you're required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪
9:20 pm
9:21 pm
9:22 pm
secretary marie this this was one of the first when we went through the translation of that to use the arresting are a fund it was such an enlightening positive effort in the tenderloin to use the federal program that president obama gave us. i'm here to welcome you to san francisco and thank you for being here for the home matters for health symposium. it is the right place to be because t n d c has been a powerful change and i'm glad their championinging the center between health. no one else can do that because
9:23 pm
you've got it it right here in the community. today's symposium is part of a commitment that our city is making. i wanted to let you know all the things we're going to continue the housing for everybody. last week, we you wanted up the helen rogers and my good friend reverend hall was under its a public-private partnership that's now to just conclusions in the wonderful home for more than one hundred of our cities protecting and homeless seniors. 25 of those units are set aside for the seniors. and last month we broke ground
9:24 pm
to house youth that was formerly in foster he care we were in chinatown breaking ground for homeless families and protecting residents. all of those housing developments have supported services on site to make sure our residents live healthy lives. it won't stop there. let me repeat it will not stop as a matter of fact, 25 percent of all the housing that's being built in san francisco 25 percent of them are affordable that continues a strong commitment from our city. last september of this year we annuity more resources to stop unlawfully evictions for our citizens and because of our cities careful planning we have to plan for the future and to
9:25 pm
understand the problems now not just to react to them our city it tripling the amounts of funds the human services provides which is nearly $8 million for the defense services for those who need it the most. some of those funds are coming from something we did last year the housing trust fund it was a measure overwhelming passed and to the tune of $1.5 billion in the next thirty years. we are also in the midst of revigil our cities public housing and no more than do we want to be involved in poverty housing that is for isolated
9:26 pm
context. i've been working with deputy and hud here in washington to get off the treadmill and repair bag logs including elevators and i've asked our city administrator also the director of housing to partner with hud and to rebiological and expand on the model that's the whole sf model. i'll proud of the process towards ending hopefullyness for our veterans. i want to thank you secretary john's and our local hud office veterans administration and for our partnership. since 2011 we've decreased homelessness among conveniences by thirty percent by opening the
9:27 pm
permanent housing for 75 conveniences with on site services and our two other successful homes for heroes. with the partnership from hud and the vouchers rapidy housing and the cities refunding of housing. all told over the last 9 years we have some 10 thousand san franciscans have left the shelters for permanent housing including 3 had thousand units for affordable housing and housing first is my priority we'll continue to support emergency services particularly those with for those in needs. we're expanding our shelter for
9:28 pm
81 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on