ygs it is important that we -- i think it is important that we focus voter attention on important items on the ballot and girn that we have been criticized for an alleged paragraph here which i don't necessarily agree with, i do think, though, that it is important that we give voters many reasons to support all of the things we are supporting on the ballots. for that reason, i believe it is a reason to support what i think is m.t.a. reform. i express my commitmentened n the long-term to work with all of you colleagues and the comprehensive m.t.a. reform so our muni riders finally get a muni that deserver. >> if i may simply just briefly respond to president choo and simply begin by thinking him for his efforts to try to bring

about immediate reform. i saw this document and i think there are many things here that are steps in the right direction. and i appreciate the fact that the mayor's office, working with your office, is willing to do these things but let me just briefly, without belaboring the point, explain why i believe the chatter amendment is something that makes sense and that goes beyond some of the things a are here. if you look at the issue of service cuts, i think it is great that along the lines that the board of supervisors and the county transportation authority has been saying for the last few weeks, that there has been a hearing recognition to restore all of the service cuts that have been made. but again, i don't think that immediate reform -- i actually

subscribe to the first section of this document that calls for an evaluation of the funding needed without any commitment explicitly as to when the money will be restored. i think that evaluation and creation of a plan, good idea as it is, is not something that points to an immediate restoration, which is i think what we would like to see.

work order with another accident something that this mayor can do today. and there is no reason why we should wait until september 30. and with respect to the enhanced

auditing function, i think there has been progress made in is this proposal. but i would respectedfully submit that the inspector general position that this charter amendment that we have introduced and provides is a lot more probust and envisioned here in this document that you the comp patroler and the m.t.a. board of directors convening a selection panel from our perspective, it was important that that individual report directly to the board of directors and that the board of directors have the ultimate say of who it is what happened the responsibilities are and along those lines, the responsibilities and the authority that is provided into the charter amendment is a lot more robust than the responsibility s that areoutlined hire. there is no funding mechanism

for that position nor does it provide for the allocation of additional resources. the last thing we wanted to avoid, is to create an independent auditor position, whatever you call the position and then have one person that doesn't have the personnel or the staff, doesn't have the resources need to do r to do the job. for those reasons, among others, i welcome some of the change s that areoutlined in this are outlined in this document. they do not go far enough to constitute reform. thank you.

the resourceses to restore the -- there is no commitment to that in the framework. just some -- you know, some vague plans that don't need to be implemented. therefore cannot be required -- to be implemented. we actually don't even really have it set whether or not they are implemented past, you know, up or down votes on the budget. the real kicker here, of course, is governance reform. the only way we can get governance reform at the m.t.a. is by amending the charter. what we have in front of us is a charter amendment to have

governance reform and that's what the mayor of san francisco would most opposed to. he did not want to cede any of his power and wanted to hold it will budget of san francisco hostage. so we think that a transportation governance task force is going to be any more influence than thank god it is friday task force getting the mayor of san francisco to agree to a governance change. i think the only thing to get him to agree to a governance change is if he is not the mayor of san francisco, which may happen next year. this section probably, we might as well -- from the agreement and call it what it is. maybe some restorations. maybe not. and then some stuff around work order and work order and auditing. in terms of the mayor holding the board of supervisors and our

budget hostage, i know i'm sometimes out there and i'm kind of, you know, a lone wolf or what have you on a 10-1 vote or calling people out for stuff they are doing behind the closed doors but as of this afternoon i'm not the only one and probably words stronger than i even use, the san francisco bay garden elltorializing underlines the mayor's horrible deal. vote trading for all local officials including new sh. mayor gaven newsome put the supervisors in a terrible position when he held $43 million of critical services hostage to pack commissions with little hacks. the deal he presented to the board was shameful and the supervisors should have rejected

it and now they should pass legislation to make this log rolling illegal. the mayor's ill leeling budget plan included -- illegal. they found a way to add back more than $40 million in funding for strick beds at san francisco general helicopter -- psychiatric beds at san francisco general hospital. unless board would agree to reject two proposed charter amendments to reform the transportation agency and the recreation and park commission. let's remember the -- have nothing to do with the budget. the board wanted to overall haul this department and give them some appointments because they are a mess. it is a rubber stamped agency that goes nearly 100% tune in anymority on every issue. unanimity on every issue.

the money was there but he wouldn't. he would allow desperately old people to be turned away for lack of a bed if the board didn't stand by its own reforms. providing a critical vote for the mayor's agenda, the board went along with the deal. the mayor didn't give up his. the newsome measure would prevent lebtsed officials from servings on the democratic committee is still on the ballot. several deserve credit for refusing to refuse to accept a bad and embarrassing deal. the mayor played tough. if the supervisor traded one piece of legislation for another, it would violate state law. the board should immediately pass legislation for all local elected officials including the

chief executive. >> thank you. >> i wanted to just add to the day log by thanking president choo for working with the supervisor and myself and coalition of a novepl transit organizations and including my staff. i also wanted to applaud the president's effort to work with the mayor to come up with a municipal transportation agency reform framework. i think it is an important step forward and i'm appreciative of that but like my colleagues, i don't think it is enough and as one of the co-authors of this measure, i'm going forward and supporting it for the november ballot but again, i will -- for

his efforts of progressive of the muni system. thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you, chair. i will be supporting the m.t.a. charter amendment that does not have the -- and i would really like to set the record straight on the budget and the deal that was made. you know, i didn't really talk about this publicly. i will talk about it publicly now. we got to about $36 million and in restorations and revenue for those restorations and the budget committee and felt that the budget committee should have stopped right there. that was where we should have ended our budget and for those who wanted to get more out of --

which i also you know, like the services. like the restorations that we have made. it neant since the mayor was putting that -- meant that since the mayor was putting that before us, to go through some ballot measures, it meant cutting a deal and to say that you want more of this restoration and not want a deal i don't think is quite -- is quite honest about what we were doing. i -- i pushed to have a restoration list that was equal to what we were able to achieve with revenue that came in that was unexpected and the work of the committee and to have these revenues, these charter members stored this there meant that we had to choose between living with our means or asking for more. asking for more meant somewhat cutting a deal. for me, i, you know, well, i feel we had some success in

making restorations. i have mixed feelings about it. but i do want to support this measure. i want to vote on these measures based on my conscious, based on what i feel is the right public policy approach to take as well as be supporting the version over the charter. >> number 56. >> thank you. i just want to respond to a couple of things that we're raising. first of all, i do want to thanks sponsors of this measure and all of the transit advocates that i and my staff are worked close with in recent months and we will continue to work to reform muni. i think it is better to have a bird in the hand than to not have anything at all. that is in part why i am very supportive of moving forward with this budget reform. to the supervisor's point, i have to agree with him that we were faced with very difficult

choices and i think colleagues, we all knew what we were all doing and so suggest that we didn't, i think is a little bit disingenuous but i get it. we are where we are. i also want to address the suggestion that this m.t.a. reform framework does not include an immediate commitment to restore the 5% service hours and in other words, there is not an immediate commitment on money to roll back these cuts. we don't have consensus on how we are going to get there. in fact, if there were five votes for my set aside idea so we could set aside money to do that, i might be thinking that we should have six. but we don't, colleagues and everyone thoughs that weand eve. we do not have a consensus within this body, with the mca, the mayor on how we're going to

find the money to restore the service cuts, and from my perspective, what i think is important is we now have a commitment on the part of the mta outlining a plan to restore that, and if they do not, i will be as upset as anyone, but we need to move forward and do this. from my perspective, i think the best way to insure that the other services are going to be funded is to make sure that the ballot in november is as lean as possible, and i think that we know the reality. it would allow people to campaign against the board of supervisors. that is the reality of how this campaign would be framed, from my perspective as president of the board of supervisors. i want to be sure that we are able to list the status of this body so that voters can understand to cooperate and move

rc forward with measures, that we do that, and that is why i am voting. supervisor mirkarimi: supervisor maxwell? supervisor maxwell: i still agree with supervisor avalos. people wanted more, and we had to pay for that. i did not support the measure, and i do not support it now. -- i did not support the muni measure vot. it did not go far enough in some cases, and in some cases, it went too far. i want to thank him for his honesty. president chiu: supervisor mirkarimi? supervisor mirkarimi: .thank

you, rich oester president, supervisors, wrote -- thank you, mr. president. thank you, colleagues, and those who contributed to this charter amendment. i believe that we are long overdue in returning back to the ballot with mta reform. i am not a fan of the portion that has been set aside, as others have mentioned, as well. to achieve that kind of reform, it starts with the government. granted, there have been other charter amendments that were once put forward for consideration. another one, like red and park, that did not make the cut. if there is any particular measure we could rally around,

it would be this measure because of the way that it affects so many daily lives, and we do not see what is in store in the near future that we can rely on. i very much appreciate any of the inroads that have been made between mayor newsom and president buschiu, but these and not institutionalized to where i think i can rely on them. these particular inroads could not be undone. i trust what we would be able to achieve at the ballot. i think the voters of san francisco should be allowed. muni, there is an appetite for change, and i think we should help deliver that. item number 56.

let's hope that we are able through both of the efforts, offline and online note, to achieve reform that we can all be proud of. think you again. president chiu: supervisor campos? supervisor campos: i think this has improved upon what was in the charter amendment, but i think as a whole, it does not include a set aside. i think that is, from a public policy standpoint, a better approach. finally, with respect to some of the comments that have been made about the budget, i appreciate all of the work that has been done, and i appreciate the work done by supervisor avalos and

others, and i will simply say -- in terms of how the mayor's office approaches this process in this budget, from my perspective, the fact that at the end of the day, a larger add-back list was finalized and approved demonstrates the fact that there was more money there, and i think that the fact that the mayor's office was able to find that additional money is proof of that, and i think that with something like that, it is needed. i appreciate the work that was done, and i also, again, want to thank president chiu for his efforts to address some immediate changes.

i do not believe, respectfully, that they rise to the level to warrant a no vote on the amendment. thank you. president chiu: thank you, colleagues. anymore comment? with that, why do we not take a roll-call vote proved madam clerk -- roll call vote? madam clerk: [reading roll] there is one aye and 10 noes. president chiu: this item will not be submitted. next item. madam clerk: [reading roll]

there are five ayes, and six noes. president chiu: this item will not be submitted. why do we not go to the next one? supervisor maxwell: thank you. an update from planning staff, a representative from the academy arts university as to their efforts for the master plan. the environmental review. assurances that it will complete the required studies, but we

have not seen progress. instead, we know that it continues to operate in violation and even does continue to acquire property throughout the city. it may be time.to discuss this. this would address for-profit educational institutions. thank you. madam clerk: thank you, supervisor maxwell. supervisor alioto-pier? supervisor alioto-pier: with the reship change of ownership, this might be different. -- with the recent change of ownership, this might be

different. potential buyers started asking about the possibility of building a state of the art arena in san francisco. the chairman of manville and entertainment and his partner were successful in there have been to become the co-owners of the golden state warriors. there was a long passion for the nba and especially for the warriors. developing science and technology companies, as chairman of the entertainment, they have produced movies including "rudy," "rainman," "batman," to name a few, and he has also owned minor league teams. they will bring a new level of enthusiasm to the warriors franchise. this dates back to 1946, when it was first established as the

philadelphia warriors. they won the championship in the inaugural season of the basketball championship of america, what would become the national basketball association. in 1962, the team was relocated to san francisco and became known as the san francisco warriors until 1971, when the name was changed to the current golden state warriors. the team has played all of their home games in the oracle a korea from 1966 with the exception of a one-year hiatus -- oracle arena. they have won two others, tying for sixth in the nba and the number of championships. in 2004, they started their campaign which was infectious, spreading hope to their fans and gating thousands more as each

game continue to inspire hope for the so-called underdogs. -- gaining thousands more. here in the city and county of san francisco. i am introducing a resolution today along with supervisors dufty and elsbernd to let people know that we welcome the opportunity to work with the franchise and explore the opportunity to build an arena to house a much beloved bay area basketball team and bring them back home to san francisco. along with supervisors mirkarimi and maxwell. and we do want them to defect. my second is that in more korea -- in memorium today.

she died after a long battle of congestive heart disease. that will conclude my remarks. madam clerk: thank you, supervisor alioto-pier. supervisor chu? supervisor chu: i have one item. improving the seismic safety standards for some of our most vulnerable. right now, we have a current program that is available for and reinforced buildings that, and this helps the arlington residents, which is currently an affordable housing project with in the tenderloin that would deal with our existing programs.

this pertains to chapters 14-b in chapter 21 of the administrative code. this encourages participation of small business. and i am happy to be cosponsoring this. finally, i want to request that we adjourn today's meeting in honor of a judge. mary pastoring last week at the age of 102. she was born -- mary passed away last week. she passed the bar in 1932. she was the first woman attorney hired by the california railroad commission. she served at the cpuc and was the first woman ever to hold that position. as chief counsel, she argued many cases before the california supreme court,