do you want to go over the last part of it? >> i believe that is the purpose of the fee, for them to do the monitoring. >> we had a time where it was defined as whatever people want it to be, so the reason we have 18,000, which is the same number we had when we passed this law in they 1978, because we have the action, so without any disrespect to any city department, as a backup, it is important to have that. i think if you take the language from the residential conversion and demolition of ordinance,

that languages narrowed to be defined. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker please. >> we will wait and then ask the city attorney to advise us. >> my name is francisco. when i worked of the presidio common-law -- the presidio, in early 2002, we gave a lot of housing to university students. the gentleman before may has spoken about how the university has deprived the city of a lot of housing, and the planning inspection has been slow, but in some of our discussions with

planning, we have been able to ratify that. i have them to rally together. i am aware of those issues. i work with a few partners who do business not only in this nation, but abroad, and again and again, what has not been matching is that the banks are loaning money to institutions of learning, and this has not been mentioned. i heard the planning department say that something about the institutions planning housing for having a plan for student housing so the city could work

with them closely and in a better way, but as far as money is concerned, without money you cannot do much. the financial institutions today are embracing universities and institutions of learning to give them money. the other thing i want to point out is there are areas in our city where there hundreds of units that were there on the market, and some of them are brand new. people will not buy them. people will not rent them. if this legislation passes, in the interim, we could look at some of those buildings, and the

students come in, and they will give an input to the community. are you rooting to be our next mayor? >> no time soon. walter paulson. >> ♪ you never have to ask me why ♪ ♪ we will never say goodbye affordable housing ♪ ♪ affordable housing, affordable housing holds the city ♪ affordable housing ♪ ♪ affordable housing does it

could for you and me -- good for you and me ♪ ♪ affordable housing holds the city kee for you and me, and it should ♪ ♪ affordable housing does it did for you -- good for you and me ♪ >> anybody else? any further comments? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i wonder if one of our deputy chair scattered talk about the suggestion about private right of action. i have a sense this might require a referral. >> if we were to put a private

right of action, it seems something we could do, but it would require referral back to planning. >> i just wonder if it would be possible to send a committee letter and to ask if they can opine on creating this mechanism. i am just concerned that i would like to see this reached the board. >> it could be trailing legislation. we could look into that later. >> i will commit to sending a letter to major the inquiry is

fully considered. >> we do not know who is going to be here later, so to have a backup is important. >> we could send a letter of inquiry, and maybe both should be done. i think it would highlight the importance of taking a look at this. supervisor maxwell: colleagues, as amended, including the reporting amendment. without objection, the legislation is amended, and we will send a letter to our committee requesting that they look into having a private right

of action, and that means somebody else is overseeing our housing and making sure we are following the rules and regulations. thank you, supervisor dufty, and who thank everybody who is working on this. item seven will be continued on december 6, but if there is anybody here who would like to speak on it, you may. >> item #7 the committee benefits program. >> public comment on this item? >> i would like to say my understanding is that this is not to come before the public utilities commission until january. i served of the task force for

the expansion, and we work with the people. i wish that you would delay this until after the puc, but the figures i have requested for the southeast community benefit funds. thank you. >> any further comments? seeing none -- sorry. >> supervisors, regarding this, we had a task force, and there is a document with suggestions. she is just giving you some sense she is one of those from the task force monitoring community benefits. i have said it before and will say it again that at one point

when the bond measure was passed, it was part of the clean water and the waste water, but they chose to go ahead with a clean water, and it is still ongoing. we are going to go, and it is going to come before the board of supervisors, some $600 million bond measure, so the short and the tall of this is that in the bayview, you need to visit the communities. people need help, and people are desperate. the other thing some of you may understand is that we have an influx of latinos that have change the demographics, and they need help, sue. -- too.

that is the way you look at the picture. they are mandated to satisfy 5% of the total budget for work- force, community benefits, and so forth, so you are astute enough to know, and you will be there, because soon the new supervisors will come in, and they may not know this, so it is good to remind them that whatever we do, even though it caters to the whole city, the impacted area is going to be the southeast sector. that is where it will be reallocated. that is where tunnelling is going on right now.

tunnelling is going on, but with tunneling, it is specialized, so not too many people can be employed, but for the other thing, lots of jobs can be given, and for once, the impacted communities should be helped common -- be helped, but you cannot help them by waiting until the last moment. you need a plan to do it right now. thank you very much. >> any further public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. that is exactly why we want to have a hearing. we want to have a hearing to find out exactly where they are going with this and how much money does go to public benefits. right now there is no real clear idea, so that is why we have

these hearings. i look forward to seeing everybody here december 6. madam clerk, is there any further business? >> there are no further items. >> this meeting is adjourned.

>> bank youthank you. guab>> commissioner joe marshal. commissioner thomas mazzucco, commissioner dejesus.

>> welcome to the hour meeting -- to our meeting. we will be handling a disciplinary matter this will be in closed session. tonight, this will be a brief public session but we will be busy late into the evening dealing with disciplinary matters. please call item one. >> item 1 is adoption of the commission's minutes before the regular meetings held on june 2nd, 2010, and october 20th, 2010. >> you have a copy of the minutes in your packet. are there any changes or deletions and need to be made? >> moved and seconded.

>> please call item number two. item number two is general public comment. you may address the commission for a time. determined by the chair, not to exceed three minutes, on items that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission but to not appear on the agenda. >> thank you. is anyone that wishes to address the commission? >> october 22nd, 2010, i met -- at the basement of city hall. we proceeded to go to the police commission and as usual, an indian-looking man showed up again. peter confronted him and asked him for his identification. he claims to be homeless. the very first time that i met

him was after a phone conversation with james ramsay. he followed me to a police commission meeting and he also followed me several blocks. he told me that i was on his list to be raped. i knew that he is trying to intimidate me and was lying about his status. he called me several times until i asked officer james ramsey to have him stop calling me. on october 22nd, he had 10 officers, sheriff's deputies around him. i asked the sheriff's department to have him stop stocking me and harassing me. can you please have that man leave me alone. he gave me his e-mail and he never responded the.

he seems to appear at every police commission meeting that i am at. my vital organs were burned and you do not understand that because this has not happened to you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good evening. i in a private investigator of crimes against children covered up by law enforcement and down -- enforcement. i have asked for meetings with you said that we can discuss the crimes being covered up by your department here in san

francisco. i was the one he did a citizen's arrest against that individual two weeks ago. we turned in our reports to the sheriff's department. what was shocking is that we had talked to police officers to intercept him. we divided into three groups and he said, you know me, you know me, to the deputy sheriffs. why is the stalking my friend here? who is this piece of scum? i want to ask you to investigate this man and have him arrested before in this room. she was told that he would never stop her again by the sheriff's

department. you have police here and i'm asking for someone to arrest this man. we believe that he is working for the san francisco police department and that is why he is being protected. my point is that because we have come here now for two years this month asking the police commission, i realize that most of your new and -- you are new. we have asked the chief of police, we have asked for investigations and now you have a new police chief, nothing is happening on the torture of children. we are sick and tired of it. i urge everyone to listen to my show from 6:00 until 7:00 tonight. then we will be on another show.

we will ask and call for a boycott of all businesses in san francisco between now and the first of the year because since we can't get anything from you, the sheriff's department, the police department, we will go on the offensive. you need to help us. you have volunteered to be in these positions to help victims. how about doing your job? >> bling to, any further public comment. >> good evening. -- thank-you, any further comment? >> i would like to say hello to some of the new commissioners.

in the remember some of the difficult things that happened at that particular meeting where there was a situation for us? my own people tried to stop me from doing my thing. i'm here to explain and expound. in my opinion, this is participation whether we want to or not. we have police officers who have been there for one to three years. we have some who are called by our community.

people that are trying to stymie -- trying to stop me. [singing] police are coming after me check your history, you're coming after me because i am a- c-t. [normal voice] you're calling me a terrorist. that is why i'm fighting you and the chief and commissioner marshall because i am part of a fabric that cannot be stopped by this agenda. i am being interfered with by the police department and by some of these so-called leaders.

i am here on the mission and i will be continuing. there are rickey's said don't know anything about the history saying that you cannot use your bullhorn. i need you to come out and telling it like it is. we are working on this to get there. we have a situation on golden gate and fillmore with mcdonald's. i got two orders from the police department on the same day. they're not lawyers. we don't need to their interpretation of what the lot is. >> he did call you. >> i am begging and hoping that we have some control.

>> time is up, mr. washington. >> i don't think that i can talk about 1. i will talk about an experience that i brought with me when i was living in key west. i was part of a board or an international organization called crime stoppers. i was curious as to why there was not a crime stopper branch in san francisco. this is an international

organization for crime stopping. the organization basically pays for tips that lead to convictions and crimes. with the economy in the situation then it is in, i am surprised that there is not already an organization that has been set up in the community. i downloaded the applications but because i've only been here a couple of years, i don't have connections to the leaders and individuals that would be supportive of the ideas of forming a board. i do come with experience. so, if anyone in those anyone who would be interested in joining with me to form a crime stopper branch in san francisco, i would be happy to offer some time and experience.

>> the chief of south side in dealing with another issue, maybe you can challenge him on this. >> is there any further public comment? >> first of all, i get an e- mail from chief william. he sent me an e-mail and i will not get into the private details that he said the best choice i ever made was my number 2. that is quite an honor. let's move past that. i grew up in boston, let's talk about the great officers we have right now and the great people today. we had an officer who was dragged, an officer-related

shooting. we have some great officers. yes, we make mistakes. i talked to terry this morning. dark and marshall, you know the date you better than nine. the cost of a view -- corp. bayview better than i. >> i would like to ask you about

law. this is a simple question. they did not obey the law. they are the ones accusing us. any policeman is provided with a car. they don't obey any law whatsoever. then they have a hard time. what do you think about that? that is a simple question