budget to meet our mandates and requirements, as discussed. to maintain the legislative record current and historic and comply with open meeting requirements, to provide public access to the legislative record and the members, and to provide the administration and operation that is required to resource members of the board, in addition to the extra duties, such as the youth commission, that the board has opted to put into the budget. but mostly concludes my presentation. i am trying to shortcut and not go so deep into all the details. i thought it would be prudent to provide you with all of the information about our budget. i am available for any questions might have. chairperson chu: thank you, angela. just a few questions from me. the salary budget shows that we

have money for temporary salaries. those are overtime. can you explain what we spend our temporary dollars on, and whether we have been experiencing a lot of money in that area? >> there are three areas where we spend our time salary. the first is about $56,000 in the board of supervisors' budget for legislative aides when they go out on family leave. there was a motion passed by the board that the clerk fund back- fill positions. i have done that. the other used for temporary salaries is for when i have staff to go out on medical leave and we need to back-fill extra work to assist with our daily duties. and i have over the last two years had some prop s salaries which assisted us in the early days with trading our new

legislative deputy. now, we utilize the funds for specific historical questions that my legislative deputy and i encounter and cannot answer ourselves. chairperson chu: in terms of our usage of temporary reverses overtime -- versus overtime, do we have a past practice of only using a portion? >> i am happy to provide you with the current, proposed, and actual usage today. in terms of overtime budget, there are not that many dollars. we mostly use overtime when our courts have to clerk late meetings or its staff are preparing some documents on a timeframe and need to work a couple of hours overtime. chairperson chu: on the draft

non-celery budget side of things come up with professional services, you mentioned that was primarily to contracts. >> one is about $300,000 and the rose contract is about $2 million. there is a $50,000 contingency, which was also in their last year, which we never had to use. it went back to the general fund. chairperson chu: in the current year or last year? cracks in the current year, excuse me. in the budget year as well. chairperson chu: you mentioned a large portion of the expenses we would see for the i.t. licenses -- is that calculated in the expenses mind? >> is under both lines. i think what you are seeing is cost for our rico copiers for the newsletters, as the cost for the 20 computers is under purchases, if i remember correctly. chairperson chu: finally, a

question on the advertising line. i know that supervisor mirkarimi sponsored legislation that allows us to be more flexible in terms of our advertising. how does that affect this? >> currently, we are working with the city attorney's office to determine the effect of that legislation on this particular line item. we are asking for the full amount of the advertising dollars, just in case we do have to write public notices to the full extent we did previous to this legislation. chairperson chu: thank you. why don't we open this item up for public comment. any members of the public who wish to speak on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor mirkarimi: this is not an action item. i will continue to trust the

very thorough [laughter] information relayed by madam clerk. as he stipulated, this is the first phase -- as you stipulated, this is the first phase. we look forward to hearing the next one, especially as the other satellites of this department provide budget information as well. >> thank you. chairperson chu: thank you very much. i believe that is a motion to continue the item to the call of the chair until we have the next briefing. in terms of areas, i know you are good to be working with many members of the board to go around the budget and try to think about what other options we have, in terms of either submiting some cuts to our budget, or just thoughts around how to craft a. it would be helpful for me,

between now and the next time we have a hearing, to get a little bit more information about what you have put in the budget because the board has directed you to do certain things, such as the back-filling of positions that are leaving. it would be helpful to understand what part of the budget is changing because of that, as well as some of the areas with regards to newsletters, computers, and those things. i think that would be helpful for us, so that we can understand as we look at our budget we are asking you for. the other thing is an understanding about a little more information about how it is that we have pressures on our budget, maybe because of splitting up positions in the budget. i understand there will be an additional cost above and beyond what the cost-neutral positions would be previously because of health benefits. >> i will make sure a provide that to all of you in a memo. chairperson chu: i will ask you

to work with supervisor mirkarimi on lafco and other issues. we have a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair without objection. do we have any other items before us? thank you. we are adjourned.

>> there has been an acknowledgement of the special places around san francisco bay. well, there is something sort of innate in human beings, i think, that tend to recognize a good spot when you see it, a spot that takes your breath away. this is one of them. >> an icon of the new deal. >> we stood here a week ago and we heard all of these dignitaries talk about the symbol that coit tower is for san francisco. it's interesting for those of us in the pioneer park project is trying to make the point that not only the tower, not only this man-built edifice here is a symbol of the city but also the green space on which it sits and the hill to

which is rests. to understand them, you have to understand the topography of san francisco. early days of the city, the city grows up in what is the financial district on the edge of chinatown. everything they rely on for existence is the golden gate. it's of massive importance to the people what comes in and out of san francisco bay. they can't see it where they are. they get the idea to build a giant wooden structure. the years that it was up here, it gave the name telegraph hill. it survived although the structure is long gone. come to the 1870's and the city has growed up remarkably. it's fueled with money from the nevada silver mines and the gold rush. it's trying to be the paris of the west. now the beach is the suburbs, the we will their people lived on the bottom and the poorest people lived on the top because it was very hard getting to the top of telegraph hill.

it was mostly lean-to sharks and bits of pieces of houses up here in the beginning. and a group of 20 businessmen decided that it would be better if the top of the hill remained for the public. so they put their money down and they bought four lots at the top of the hill and they gave them to the city. lily hitchcock coit died without leaving a specific use for her bequest. she left a third of her estate for the beautify indication of the city. arthur brown, noted architect in the city, wanted for a while to build a tower. he had become very interested in persian towers. it was the 1930's. it was all about machinery and sort of this amazing architecture, very powerful architecture. he convinced the rec park commission that building a tower in her memory would be the thing to do with her money. >> it was going to be a

wonderful observation place because it was one of the highest hills in the city anywhere and that that was the whole reason why it was built that high and had the elevator access immediately from the beginning as part of its features. >> my fear's studio was just down the street steps. we were in a very small apartment and that was our backyard. when they were preparing the site for the coit tower, there was always a lot of harping and griping about how awful progress was and why they would choose this beautiful pristine area to do them in was a big question. as soon as the coit tower was getting finished and someone put in the idea that it should be used for art, then, all of a sudden, he was excited about the coit tower.

it became almost like a daily destination for him to enjoy the atmosphere no matter what the politics, that wasn't the point. as long as they fit in and did their work and did their own creative expression, that was all that was required. they turned in their drawings. the drawings were accepted. if they snuck something in, well, there weren't going to be any stoolies around. they made such careful little diagrams of every possible little thing about it as though that was just so important and that they were just the big frog. and, actually, no one ever felt that way about them and they weren't considered something like that. in later life when people would approach me and say, well, what

did you know about it? we were with him almost every day and his children, we grew up together and we didn't think of him as a commie and also the same with the other. he was just a family man doing normal things. no one thought anything of what he was doing. some of them were much more highly trained. it shows, in my estimation, in the murals. this was one of the masterpieces. families at home was a lot more close to the life that i can remember that we lived. murals on the upper floors like the children playing on the swings and i think the little deer in the forest where you could come and see them in the

woods and the sports that were always available, i think it did express the best part of our lives. things that weren't costing money to do, you would go to a picnic on the beach or you would do something in the woods. my favorite of all is in the staircase. it's almost a miracle masterpiece how he could manage to not only fit everyone, of course, a lot of them i recognized from my childhood -- it's how he juxtaposed and managed to kind of climb up that stairway on either side very much like you are walking down a street. it was incredible to do that and to me, that is what depicted the life of the times in san francisco. i even like the ones that show the industrial areas, the once with the workers showing them

in the cannery and i can remember going in there and seeing these women with the caps, with the nets shuffling these cans through. my parents had a ranch in santa rosa and we went there all summer. i could see these people leaning over and checking. it looked exactly like the beautiful things about the ranch. i think he was pretty much in the never look back philosophy about the coit. i don't think he ever went to visit again after we moved from telegraph hill, which was only five or six years later. i don't think he ever had to see it when the initials are scratched into everything and people had literally destroyed the lower half of everything. >> well, in my view, the tower had been pretty much neglected

from the 1930's up until the 1980's. it wasn't until then that really enough people began to be alarmed about the condition of the murals, the tower was leaking. some of the murals suffered wear damage. we really began to organize getting funding through the arts commission and various other sources to restore the murals. they don't have that connection or thread or maintain that connection to your history and your past, what do you have? that's one of the major elements of what makes quality of life in san francisco so incredible. when people ask me, and they ask me all the time, how do you get to coit tower, i say you walk. that's the best way to experience the gradual elevation coming up above the hustle and bustle of the city and finding this sort of oasis,

if you will, at the top of the hill. when i walk through this park, i look at these brick walls and this lawn, i look at the railings around the murals. i look at the restoration and i think, yeah, i had something to do with that. learning the lessons, thank you, landmarks meet landmarks. the current situation at pioneer park and coit tower is really based in public and private partnership. it was the citizens who came together to buy the land to keep it from being developed. it was lily hitchcock coit to give money to the city to beautify the city she loved of the park project worked to develop this south side and still that's the basis of our future project to address the north side.