Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    March 22, 2011 11:00pm-11:30pm PDT

11:00 pm
>> [speaking foreign language] supervisor jane kim. [speaking foreign language] mr. president. [speaking foreign language]
11:01 pm
ladies and gentlemen, as you know, my name is -- i would like to give special thanks to our district six supervisor, janer -- jane kim. née people like to be around her to see if she can help our district -- many people like to be around her. there are many who try to run for mayor. you are one of them. not to you or anyone else. the would like to see each and every one of you what agenda you
11:02 pm
have and what will do when we give you our vote. we have tried to support you. if you run for sheriff, i would like to see your muscle. crime in this city korea i wish you good luck. and guess what? we are going to support and they're going to vote for the person who has a plan for san francisco. think he for accepting our invitation. it is not to come to visit me or
11:03 pm
my neighbor. you will visit with another family. thank you. president chiu: think you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. stop the rape of the public library. every now and then, we must face the abuse of the race to resources and the trail of public-service on the public library in its historical perspective. what we have to realize is that it is in the newspapers. the scandal at the library -- the claims were always lies in the problems were -- promises were always broken, one after another. there was the card catalog scandal. another scandal. the post occupancy evaluation scandal. the lower accreditation scandal. the staff whistleblower scandal.
11:04 pm
the library fee-for-service scandal. the firm and fund scandal. a thousand public records sunshine. when the san francisco zoo was privatized, the elephants died. the public library was no different. private money was so important, but it destroys accountability, instead. the sow from philanthropists call themselves the friends of the public library korea they would not answer questions about their finances from your committee it on the board of supervisors. they are not required to justify philanthropy because the reason for the philanthropy is to maintain the privileges of class and barriers to democracy
11:05 pm
itself. they advertise the money, but the money on the benefits themselves. private fund-raising is intent on destroying. the lie costs more than the moneyh. -- money president chiu: thank you. next speaker. >> supervisors, ♪ if you are feeling sad and lonely, just remember send out just a few and then you will not have to haul so many we will not have to haul so many phone books all around town and just remember that this year you render, then you will not have to halt it around
11:06 pm
it will come to you, and you will look to the phone book then you will have the information in your hand just a few around, and you will not have to haul so many of around town and just remember, just a few to render, and then there will not be as big a mound of around town -- all around town ♪ and ♪ good golly, miss molly when you are rocking and rolling with public comment at city hall good golly, miss molly, this
11:07 pm
city sure is a ball when you are a walking in a rolling at city hall -- rocking and a rolling at city hall good golly, miss molly at city hall ♪ [bell] president chiu: feints you. next speaker. >> my name is eugene jr. the government initiates' capital currency. accumulated wealth and capital currency is involved in government with controls, the conditioning of we, the people, to educate.
11:08 pm
it is no different than a seed planted in the earth for production. their only difference is that their motive is in reproduction. it is currency and consciences. an already divided people, a sharing, giving. it is equal for its own motives profits. the public leisure performance contest, market speculation, consumer advertising, public participation, and a victory from what is bought in sold. it takes so much effort to convince.
11:09 pm
a political-economic dictatorship, and exchange for union labor. clerk calvillo: thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello, my name is dal;e -- dale. i have to tell you, these meetings are born without crests -- are boring without chris daly. these drug buys, 30 or 40 kids on the corner selling drugs. i guess they feel on friday,
11:10 pm
they're going to get a paycheck whether they get out of the car or not. you are working with the police department with an over $1 million substation to catch people selling -- stealing $15 things out of the mall. we have got an epidemic. we have got a drug epidemic 600 feet away, and you have the gall to put in a substation? how dare you? how dare you? i cannot even go down there. they sip their lattes and drive through. do they need some intelligence as to who is doing this? i will help them out. i have been in the travel agency for many years korea i have
11:11 pm
never seen anything like this when the police do not get out of the car. -- for many years. i have never seen something like this. they have been on the street for 30 years, and they are professional ie -- ignorers. [bell] president chiu: thank you. next speaker. >> my name is -- i want to thank you for the work that you do. with regards to the pg&e smart meter, i asked why are corporations such as them entitled to have more decision making power than the public? they ripped off the ratepayer, cause harm to our health, and
11:12 pm
how can our public officials stand back and let this happen? an emergency ordinance will set in place in san francisco -- we need your help now. pg&e is rolling of those smart meters, and now, they are hitting my neighborhood. at this point, the public is going to be left on their own. it will be left to performing civil disobedience. i am hoping that you will put out an emergency ordinance against these installations, which have never had an environmental health study done, along with other studies.
11:13 pm
may i leave with you, from professor glen chase, -- thank you very much. president chiu: next speaker. >> i have been could you on the streets since the 1970's, before many of you were born. i started down at pier -- and sometimes, i creek on other subjects. we are coming up to the one-year anniversary of the murder of a senator in georgia. last tuesday, in the city of san as it -- he is lying, and he
11:14 pm
knows he is blind, because it has to deal with the city of san jose and in every state korea it is not just what happened about the senator from georgia, nancy -- in every state. it brought attention to the cause to destroy the child protective services, because the child protective services is filled with pedophiles. to get rid of the child protective services because they have molesters that they have hired, and they are taking kids out, playing with them, ok, and making pornographic movies out of them and selling them. that is a fact. there is a local police officer that works with the child protective services. the child is kidnapped, abducted.
11:15 pm
i am telling you, i wish i was elijah. i would pop some people some lightning bolts. you say, "what is the proof that these allegations about nancy were right?" her character. president chiu: thank you. next speaker. >> i just wanted to drop by and say hi to everyone. the congressman stands ready to assist with any project, so please contact our office if you're interested. keep up the great work. president chiu: thank you.
11:16 pm
next speaker. >> good afternoon, my name is jamie whitaker. i live in the ring con hill neighborhood -- the rincon hill neighborhood. we want to get you to stop having mta prioritized vehicles going through. we had a neighbor died on friday, and i think we really need to start taking some action to slow cars down. just painting can strides in the cross rocks may be a star. the paint is a cheap part. -- can make strides in the course rock -- crwss -- crosswalk may be a start.
11:17 pm
some streets are treated like glorified freeway ramps. 30,000 more people have moved in in the last 20 years. we need to start improving pedestrian safety now. thank you. >> can i get this on the flashboard there for a second? yes? ladies and gentlemen, i was the way down here, when it hit me. i am a person who has tunnel vision. u. of r. have not said anything.
11:18 pm
-- you have not said anything. ♪ blacks are leaving this town now ♪ when will the board of supervisors stand up and ask for a public hearing? the issue of blacks leaving. ♪ blacks are leaving san francisco ♪ i am not going to bore you with my song. there are a love of you. -- 11 of you. right here is where the urban
11:19 pm
renewal started 50 years ago. ♪ but i want to know who is in control right here in san francisco ♪ ♪ because my name is ace, and i am on this case it is no mystery, check your history ♪ president chiu: think you. are there any other members of the public who wish to speak during general public -- general public comment? police stepped up. -- stepped -- pleasae -- please stip -- step up.
11:20 pm
>> i normally talk about the shelter systems, -- a fair and impartial manner. five letters from different community organizations to speak out, and the rules committee, they just did not even interviewed them. the coalition on homeless, but when you look at homelessness and their history, they had one person who actually hates homeless people, and then they picked another person who did not understand procedure, and i
11:21 pm
need another person, they did not show up to the meetings. they did not do their inspections. so a coalition of homelessness. you are pretty much going to find a derelict group of people that they choose. i am just saying i have a dream and a vision where we can help the people in the shelter system, but i am looking for somebody to do something, it and this is excessively failing the citizens. when i mentioned about the drug dealing in the shelter system and how they did nothing about it, she just laughed.
11:22 pm
president chiu: thank you. are there any other matters for public comment? seeing none, next item. clerk calvillo: meeting in closed session. president chiu: colleagues, can i have a motion to go into closed session? i have a motion from supervisor mirkarimi, seconded by supervisor mr. public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. cognos, unless there is something, we will go into closed session. ladies and gentlemen, we will get a briefing from the city get a briefing from the city attorney, so we will ask the
11:23 pm
supervisor chiu: colleagues, we are now about a closed session. could i have a motion to not discuss what was discussed in closed session? without objection, the motion passes to not disclose the information. colleagues, could we go to our adoption without committee reference calendar? >> items 19 through 23 are being considered for immediate and unanimous adoption view of the committee reference during these items will be acted upon by a single roll call vote unless a member requests discussion. is to be considered as a separate matter. them up one of order, mr. president -- could we formally container -- continue our closed
11:24 pm
session item for two weeks? supervisor chiu: colleagues, any objection to continuing this item? without objection, that should be the case. now to the adoption of that committee reference calendar. would anybody like to sever any of these items? supervisor elsbernd: 23. supervisor chiu: if we could take a roll call vote on all the items except 23. >> cohen aye. elsbernd aye. farrell aye. kim absent. mar aye. mirkarimi aye. wiener aye. campos aye. chiu aye.
11:25 pm
aye. kim aye. there are 10 ayes. supervisor chiu: resolutions are adopted. item 23. >> item 23 is a resolution authorizing proponents and opponents ballot arguments and rebuttals ballot arguments for some middle to the voters at the june 7, 2011, consolidated special election. supervisor elsbernd: it is easier is just one supervisors listed under these things, and i would make a motion on page one line 17 supervisor kim be listed as the primary proponent for the charter amendment, the supervisor chu be the lone proponent for the ordinance for a former mayor, the eye on page 10 be the lone proponent to the charter of the board of
11:26 pm
education, and since no one to my knowledge is opposing the ordinance that we strike lines 12 through 15 on page two. supervisor chiu: colleagues, any discussion? without objection, the motion on that passes. on the underlying motion as amended, can we do same house, same call? without objection, the motion is approved as amended. now, if we could go to our 4:00 p.m. special order. >> the next item is the special order at 4:00. it is on 14 through 17. 14 is a hearing of persons interested in the decision of the planning department dated june 8, 2009, the project located at 795 foerster street is exempt from -- a category --
11:27 pm
under categorical extension class is one and three. 16 reverse the decision by the planning department and commission that the project is exempt, and 17 is a motion directing the preparation of findings reversing the exemption. supervisor chiu: line understanding is that supervisor elsbernd needs to be reduced? supervisor elsbernd: yes, to be clear, the city determination on the underlying approvals for this project may very well create a precedent that could impact property directly behind my house, and while those underlying approvals are not necessarily in front of us today with the ceqa appeal, i believe because of the right line black- and-white issues in regard to economic conflict of interest, i do recused myself on the subdivision of you back in october on this property, and i request that i'd be recused from
11:28 pm
>> assumed the -- supermarketer mirkarimi has been a motion to recuse. we have in front of us determination by the planning commission that 213 los palmas drive is categorically exempt from environmental review. this project is tattered correctly exempt from environmental review. he will have 10 mets to describe the public review. each speaker will have up to 2 minutes to describe this. we will then hear from the planning. following planning, we will hear from the real party interest. we will hear from members of the
11:29 pm
public that wish to speak on this. each speaker having two minutes to present. the appellants will have three minutes for rebuttal. any objections to proceeding in this way? mr. williams, the floor is yours for up to 10 minutes. [inaudible] >> i am wondering if the microphone at the podium is on. >> testing. >> i am representing the ael