the structure of the contract allows a great deal more flexibility in implementing the program. it is being implemented in cooperation with caltrans and the federal highway administration. goals of 25% for small businesses and 5% for under- utilized or disadvantaged businesses. there are a number of activities that will be included in the work under face to. specifically what is considered the un-bundling of activities that can be broken apart, specifically identified for small and disadvantaged businesses with continuing assistance for certification, as well as assisting in doing technical analysis of the work and mentoring and managing their programs going forward. monthly contact is important to make sure that the goals are stipulated at the beginning of

the project are actually being met. the extension of the contract will allow for a number of activities, including promotion of phase one utilization for small and disadvantaged businesses. the phase two program is described briefly under the p3 questionnaire. we will be rolling out a technical assistance program that will assist in technical certification into a series of workshops in cooperation with the federal highway administration and cooperative services in continuing to track and report on utilization. the scope for the extension totals $275,000 with the by-task dollar amounts broken out in

this slide. that concludes the presentation. i would be happy to take any additional questions. supervisor mar: colleagues, any questions? let's open this up for public comment. >> i might mention that we have representatives from the consultant here. the lead, as well as a sub who has been very active in the out reach effort. i think gwen is here as well. thank you. supervisor mar: if anyone from the public would like to speak, please come forward. two minutes per person. >> good morning, supervisors. my name is yolanda jones. i come here as a bayview hunters

point local business owner and someone at who is proud of san francisco. i have been working with doyle drive by an order for my company to secure a contract on this important project. because of the team, i have had face-to-face meetings with some of the prime contractors. i attend all of reach meetings. they introduced me to other people that can benefit from the services that my firm provides. my firm provides a unique servants. i do construction -- unique service. i do construction administration. and i also provide construction highway equipment rental. these are tough times. it has never been more difficult to break into major projects because they want to be performed by primes themselves.

as i mentioned earlier, they may fall short because the crimes are not as willing to allow ubde to participate, but you need teams like this group working out on doyle drive, because they do a fantastic job providing out -- and opportunities throughout the city. -- out reach and opportunities throughout the city. they are professional and unrelenting in helping people such as myself break into the field. i am asking you to please extend their contracts. they go over and above to make he talked and make these prime contractors understand. -- they go over and above to talk to us and make these prime contractors understand.

please, renew their contracts. [tone] supervisor mar: thank you. next speaker? >> supervisors, my name is francisco dicostra. we have some complications. if you played -- if you paid attention to what he was saying, when the federal government is involved, there is money set aside for a certain type of training. in the last one year, we have been involved -- i mean the southeast sector community development corp., of which i am the executive director -- we

have been in existence since 2000 -- but we have been in the bayview coordinating council since the early 1980's. [reads names] so on and so forth. the reason that i come here is to explain to you that we need opportunities to train dbe's, lbe's, to understand what it means to get a contract. as a sub or whatever. even as a sub or a dbe, you can get a contract. but if you do not know how to manage payroll, on the blueprints, if you know nothing

about made it plans, it makes it difficult. we didabout -- about native plans, it makes it difficult. $600 million. there are no opportunities given to dbe's and lbe's such that they can participate in that type of work. [tone] what i am here to tell you is that people can come here and say that i have so much -- supervisor mar: your out of time. >> i will wrap up. it is useless. is not creating fde's that can move forward. supervisor mar: we have a question from maria cohen. >> do you have any suggestions?

>> we have created is kno a zonr contractors to have a space. you have to have an office space for six months. you provide every initiative that they need to know about the business. they need a chief financial officer that will work with small businesses to monitor them. what i am here to tell you is that you supervisors, people come here and say that this is what is happening on doyle drive. this is what is happening on some other project where the federal government and state government is involved. i am not talking as much about the city bids. we need to have separate entities that and trained dbe's, lbe's, giving them

opportunities. they are hard workers. i know. 660 buildings at the water treatment plant. the communications center. i know a lot about that. when i was saying that you work for the department of engineering, when the army was there, then the national park service came. now we have the presidio plus. doyle drive and the other opportunities, through the state and caltrans, raise unique difficulties. they come when small businesses do not get the orientation, do not get the support so that they can participate in those endeavors. supervisor cohen: thank you. supervisor mar: is there anyone

else from the public? >seeing no one, public comment is closed. thank you for your great work. this is really helpful to look at. but i do think that we have to do better in meeting the goals for disadvantaged businesses. but i know that you are already looking at strategies. is there a motion? without objection, thank you, everyone. please call the next item. >> item #4. recommend amending the adopted fiscal year 2010/11 budget to increase revenues by $16,509,843, decrease expenditures by $49,268,862 and decrease other financing sources by $152,787,500 for a total net decrease in fund balance of $87,008,795.

this is an action item. supervisor mar: it is on page 18. we have the deputy director for finance administration. cynthia? >> what i have before you, every year are around this time we take stock of our revenue trends. we are recognizing new plants and taking a look at the unforeseen expenditures from the budget that we put together last year. this is on page 19 of your package. on page 23 we have a cable, what we are proposing to increase and decrease, and we would like to see the proposed amendment budget be after rate change item. i can walk you through the changes we have for the budget

amendments. first, a new grant for a city car share. increasing revenues by 285,000 by november -- revenues by november for the presidio parkway project. as you recall, this came before the committee last march. we also have the central subway project, where we are increasing revenue to be collected. we anticipate it being used in the last fiscal year. mta was able to find other funding sources for the central subway project. we also have the street lamps, decreasing 2.6 million. caltrans has been working on much larger projects in the area.

you will see this on the next item. prop aa, as you all know, we were citizen approved for regional vehicle registration fees. we are anticipating $684,000 in revenue to be collected. we also have a $23.5 million in revenue to add to this budget. this is an obligation from the power authority, who happened to receive an award of funds for the transit. funding our cash flow, i will allocate that again in -- at a future date when needed. we are increasing programs and initiatives by $30 million mainly due to projects and radio

replacement. you can see that there is also the presidio parkway project. the swap that we made with central subway last march. you have $75,000 for the fta program. you can see vehicle registration fees year, $332,000. removing the $340 million debt issue as anticipated last year, with the increase of $16.5 million in revenue this year, there will be no need to issue the debt for this fiscal year, 2011. with it that, we are seeking a fiscal amendment.

supervisor elsbernd: in terms of decreased expenditures, what is that affecting? he mentioned a swap. is there a decrease in a project going forward? >> last year we spend more time. -- spent more time. last year we were still working with estimated numbers. after taking invoices into account, we are increasing our voices right now. it is more like a timing difference. supervisor elsbernd: thank you. supervisor mar: any other questions? let's open this for public comment. is there any member of the public that would like to speak? public comment is closed. move forward without objection. thank you. please call the next item. >> item #5,preliminary fiscal year 2011/12 annual budget and

work program. this is an information item. supervisor mar: i think that we have missed phong again. >> yes. i have a short power point slide for you, i can walk you through the different components. and you will get a second look at the budget next month. we will have the opportunity to review the budget with a full month's meeting, seeing this committee in may. the board will also have the opportunity. so, if with the start on the power point.

-- so, we will start on the power point. the annual budget includes projection of sales tax revenue, federal, state, and regional graph revenues, investment income, administration costs, and financing dead purposes. the budget package includes four components. page 32 starts the fiscal year 2011-2012 annual program. here you have the five functional levels of the authority. the parking program, capital project planning, finance, and administration. page 41, you have line-item

details. a much more detailed version of attachment a. page 43, you have a detailed line item description of each of the defense items for the annual budget. we have a pie chart for you here. pegging down the different sources of revenue. you can see that the lightest source is our sales tax revenue. we expect to collect $72 million in the next fiscal year. the second largest is the revenue for bridge tolls of the presidio parkway project. the next largest fees of revenue is the federal funding grant for the ybi improvement project for

the san francisco transportation plan and electrification project. the next source, we have interest earnings of 1.2%, representing $1.2 million in revenue for the fiscal year. the next chart that we have, very historical, showing you the history of sales tax revenue. starting in 2004 we collected 68 million revenues. we had an all-time high in 2007, collecting again in 2008-2009, but collecting plastic in revenues.

supervisor mar: that is including the creep upwar? >> the next slide that we have is the fiscal year 2011-2012 expenditures. 90% is for capital projects and expenditures. the past pay projects, they are sf -- pedestrian, bicycle programs. the debt service expenditures represents the fine surface of the other personnel

expenditures, which are equivalent to the 42nd authority. $2.3 million. it says that $1.4 million is needed for operating expenses when office supplies, a contract, printing, anything that you need to print off is included. what program includes overseeing the prop k sales tax measure program? we also served in that function for san francisco, acting as the local manager for the tsa funds program. this year the administrator florida new cop program. in case you apply for strategic plan, the past vehicle license

for vehicle registration fees ,tfea programs, monitoring regional funding revenue coming through. moving on to the capital projects program, our main project will be led by the interchange improvement project. we are taking the lead in san francisco on the california high-speed rail project. the second project is a market street project working under transportation plans and various other projects within san francisco. the technology services division is our section that provides modeling support. it provides modeling services

for other agencies and private sector uses. working on the demand model, they provide a i.t. development. unless we have the finance administration section, budget development, obviously we take care of the budget development every fiscal year. taking care of the billing, accounting, lbe program, the human resources function, and the paper program management. with that, let me remind you that this is an information item. we are here to seek any items from you for the budget. you will be seeing this budget for a final look at next month's meeting. supervisor mar: thank you, colleagues. are there any questions? thank you for such great detail

in each of the five areas. really well done. if there are no other questions, is there anyone from the public that would like to speak? seeing no one, public comment is close. thank you for the informational items. please call the next item. >> federal legislature, action item. supervisor mar: taking the long walk? >> i apologize, usually i said in the front row. we are in the middle of legislation considering bills these days. your matrix has been updated with a significant number of new bills. out of them a but like to draw your attention to four -- out of them, i would like to draw your attention to four. the first is 8076 in the second

is sb72, capping the expenditure on high-speed rail 18 bonds, essentially bringing the program to a halt. we have suggested a post- position employment fact. the first was heard yesterday and killed. i think that we can see the prognosis for the bill, sb22. i have three bills that we are recommending support for, the first is ab133, and i am sorry that i neglected to tell you which page these are on. ab133 is on page 3 of your matrix. it is a technical bill that opens the door for the high- speed rail authority to use federal funds that are allocated to the high speed rail

authority for project purposes. there was a bill last year that did that, as well as a few other things, that were not successful. this year is to streamline high- speed authorization for access to federal funds received. we recommend support for that. in addition, this one deals with high-speed rail authority, in encouraging them to consider the impact on california jobs as they move forward on contracts. it does not prescribe a process. it will have force of law as a statutory section. they will be mandated to consider and develop the process to look for ways to enhance job development in the process they are embarking on. finally, ab 1041.

this would allow the city of san francisco to continue to use video enforcement of traffic by a land -- in the lanes for transit use. so, that would continue and existing programs sponsored by the city and county. we felt that our support would assist books city representatives. supervisor mar: what was the number on that one? >> ab1041, page 11. sorry. supervisor mar: there was another, ab485, where you are recommending a watch on the local planning village transit development business.

>> in essence it will allow transit village lot to have access to infrastructure development statute authority. it would open the requirements under the infrastructure development authority acts for a majority of the people to tender the feed. lending that authority to the transit village act. and i thought that i would complete with a bit of an update on 8057. barry rafik, a great outpouring of support -- very rough, but a great outpouring of support from your delegation. they walked into the room and sat down to testify. the opposition witness testified against the bill in strong terms. he was joined by the assembly

member. it became a very vigorous discussion. ultimately, the bill passed out. that committee had been -- they had a number of members that resided entirely within santa clara county. going in, we have a feel for how that might turn out. the recommendation to the management here, and the city and county representatives, is that as this bill continues through the assembly and goes through appropriations, we need to jump ahead and start working the senate transportation committee, so they do not wait for that activity. that committee is not welcoming for northern california and has very few representatives, but does have knowledgeable chairman.