tv [untitled] June 6, 2011 1:30pm-2:00pm PDT
1:30 pm
development, residential mix and low density as figured under the district based on the lot area. i believe that it is one or 800. supervisor mirkarimi: considering the capacity of this density under consideration, what about the design philosophy? something similar that the supervisor was inferring. that a design philosophy over a 55 foot building to accommodate this level of philosophy? >> even if they did a project within the existing height limit, it could produce something that is code compliance but loftier.
1:31 pm
-- but box here. it may have a more awkward impact to jason neighbors. supervisor mar: and it may cost more out of the mayor's house and budget to subsidize and make financials work for that. >> that was not really taken into consideration. supervisor mirkarimi: let's hear from the mayor's office and housing. >> north is actually along this street here. i just wanted to correct the
1:32 pm
orientation. supervisor mar: someone from the audience was gesturing there. could we hear from the mayor's office in housing? >> good afternoon. i am the project manager 4800 presidio. i will briefly review of our financing of the proposed development. first of all, i wanted to let you know that the mayor's office of housing participated in the task force in 2007, convening the planning committee. the plan had the goal of creating 400 units by 2015 using various housing models.
1:33 pm
in 2009 we issued a notice for funding availability to initiate new projects. 800 is one of the three projects selected to create an additional 88 units. in july of 2010, the city wide affordable housing loan committee included pre- development funds for the proposed five story building. as you know, this would be a mixed population with 24 units for long-term singles and two manager units adjacent to the new booker t. washington community center. as a local finance agency, we typically provide feasibility work and make-up financing requests, the bulk of the local contribution.
1:34 pm
already providing the initial predestined element loan the estimate is that it will be approximately $7 million for housing. is believed that echolocation with it the community center will be a huge asset. our office was in discussions for a 49 union. looking at the feasibility, primarily because of the operations and the cash flow would go back to your one. however, with capitalized operating reserve, that project could be feasible.
1:35 pm
making that proposal, we realize we could potentially provide an additional financing. however, more units of affordable housing and i am happy to answer any questions. an analysis of smaller projects would require the city do put in what? another $1 million? >> these numbers are preliminary. but we estimate, based on current budget, $500,000 and more. supervisor mirkarimi: if
1:36 pm
additional funds are needed to fund a reduced development because the reduction in during this development to save we have provided capitalize reserve that the sponsor would have been and over 20 years we would draw down to make it every year to makeup reducing it to 41, tapping the nine units elsewhere. >> i do not think that we've looked at the direct link we
1:37 pm
would need in general just to find that information in another budget. supervisor mirkarimi: so, you would have to transfer this to another project? >> is in the sound? keeping you have a higher units or reducing the >> and a value that and we hope to report the latest, but challenges might occur in so we understand that.
1:38 pm
1:39 pm
1:40 pm
1:41 pm
1:42 pm
building for poker to washington. -- booker t. washington. as we look at the larger block, there are more they are coming up in -- at the other side -- the bus yard. down further, we have jaycee see and the fire station without their residents 0 block here. as you can see her on film, this diagram described as the historic pattern of san francisco from street with to
1:43 pm
building height ratio. typically you will see one: one. so, our ratio from the point of booker t. washington, coming up from 45 to 59. presidio we have an 8 foot wide thoroughfare. as we look upon the building, you can see that we are just trying to accentuate the top dog of the of the site and pushed the massing towards the larger revenue. you can see that from presidio ave. looking from the back, we have a 13 foot 6 inch and again, 136
1:44 pm
1:45 pm
something that reflects more light. and with that of the design -- supervisor mirkarimi: the reason i am asking is because there are people that feel it is not in the fitting with the neighborhood. make your case. >> not all live in neighborhood with parts to the rear of the building. the impact is on a transitional streak that represents a historic district in the city. as we break down the building, we use a traditional race- middle-tops back from the
1:46 pm
1:47 pm
1:48 pm
intact is what i am trying to understand a bit more clearly. >> on the other side, presidio comes at an angle. you have the bus yards. i am not saying to the web, a year of war in all quarters of that in this section will close of four of the archetype, we need to discuss it. >> i would like to discuss any changes made and they're just
1:49 pm
1:50 pm
supervisor mirkarimi: you know that parking will be a concern to favor of voice their potential neighborhood distress at the lack of parking. >> i would say this -- i have been working with first place youth for fun. i got to know so -- some of the kids. >> they are really just trying to year through the day. and there is a bus that runs for
1:51 pm
one california to get a couple of blocks away. supervisor mirkarimi: gary, vety, also on scope for the next few years. very good. mr. shcherbakov i believe that we should go to public comment. and everything in the washington community center involved picking a number and speaking as well. supervisor mirkarimi: if they want to send representatives from that group, they should do so. but not everyone, i think. supervisor mar: let's open this for public comment. supervisor wiener: my
1:52 pm
understanding is that just because we have an impending certification and the conditional use appeal, that we are not permitted to forward this with a recommendation. is that correct? it just said that folks in the public understand that we are required as a matter of due process and, assuming this is forwarded, assuming a his for bid, it should not be too much of a concern to anyone expressing negative opinion. supervisor mirkarimi: we are trying to be somewhat reserved in asking the questions that we
1:53 pm
are. we will ask people to navigate as best we can. let's begin. i have cards that have been handed to me. >> [inaudible] supervisor mirkarimi: i do not think you are on microphone. there you go? >> can you hear me now? fantastic. they have a history of multi as generational and the senator's efforts that historic plea responded to segregation, discrimination, and the uprooting of black families through urban renewal.
1:54 pm
in recent years we have served a diverse population. always a potential component of our support oand nurturing environment. the majority of youths often return at 18 with no system only fractured family ties. once they do, there is no help for them. we are determined to at a component of housing. booker t. washington center offers the support of a community with education and recreation programs. use radio, the winner of the
1:55 pm
peabody award broadcasting this year will have the bureau in the studio. some of our neighbors have suggested a reduction of the arts element. i can tell you that that is not financially feasible. not without being able to access those nine units. making up that deficit would be at the expense of other programs. that is why the planning commission is recommending this. we urge you to support the development of the increased density. thank you. supervisor mirkarimi: [reads
1:56 pm
names] if the people want to line up so that there is less transition time? >> thank you, supervisors. and it was this morning -- we are supportive of this housing. and it would be something with a 55 foot height limit, this is it. you would have more projects with more people and the money involved.
1:57 pm
1:58 pm
1:59 pm
today we heard words like massing. the building would be mom illicit -- monolithic. we heard about 110 units and other compromises down the 50. we think that is wrong. we think that the compromise should be at 37 units or 40 units. that is what the planning code calls for. the proposal being presented here so egregiously violates the building and planning code in this city that it requires a special district in a project that has virtually no parking. in the parking that is provided is tandem parking. it is not separate parking. that means everybody has to move their cars. we are encouraged from the east
139 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on