does receive a report after 30 days of the termination and to make sure that it is explicitly spelled out that it is not just the mta that is liable. and in terms of the city attorney was a recommendation, also in terms of accepting amendments no. 2 instead of the city requires prior approval, shall require. we can take those without objections. to the underlying guide and as amended, will that require a continuance? thank you. on the underlying item, can we prove that? without objection? item #7. >> resolution authorizing the issuance not to exceed

$8,100,000 for the purpose of providing finances for the acquisition of a unit, the family rental housing units. supervisor mirkarimi: this is for the 333 fell street apartments on the border of district 6. the target population is for families at 50% of the area median income. they have an average tenure of 11 years. the building population includes 28 children in the 62 seniors. average occupancy is 99%. the target population will not change as a result of the project. the current residents will remain during and after the rehabilitation project.

it will be green including the installation of photovoltaic and the replacement of aging building elements. it will prepare for the affordable housing. it is a good project and it meets all the standards that we would want to see. if you like to add anything, please. >> i am with of the mayor's office of housing. we also have kevin with bridge housing, the sponsor of this project. this is a project that requests that the city health issue bonds. it is one of the projects coming over from the redevelopment agency because they are not in a position to issue bonds. you'll be seeing a number of these projects over the next couple of months. we are really happy with this

project because bridge has managed to complete the rehab work without any additional city financing. the redevelopment agency gave the project $1.5 million about 19 years ago to build of the building. they have done a wonderful job of owning and operating this building over the last 19 years. the building is on the corner, and it used to have the psychic as a commercial tenant. we are really happy that they are managing to do all this work without any new city money. we are getting another 55 years of affordability. >> i am a project manager at the housing corporation. i think they have done an

excellent job of summarizing the project. at this time, i would just like to express my thanks to the board of supervisors for helping us attain the that allocation for the bonds and the tax credit reservation for the project. i am happy to answer any other questions that may come out and i want to express gratitude to the mayor's office of housing and redevelopment agency for their incredible support of the project. supervisor mirkarimi: for this part of the area, what the area looked like 10 years ago, especially before the demolition of the central freeway, it is completely enjoying a renaissance and like it has been seen before, where this area of housing exists, especially for high percentage of low-income housing. it is a pretty spectacular

project, one that i think should make us all very proud. >> we do not have a budget analyst recommendation or report because this is an item that does not have an impact on the city general fund. why don't we open this item up for public comment? many members of the public at which to speak? >> i have a lot to speak of this, but not enough time. how to put on your mind, without a doubt, we are talking about fairness. i am here applauding bridge, mercy housing, catholic charities. we had all the big giant developers at one time come to the west division. at one time, it was mandatory

that developments like this -- right now, we are at a state of emergency. i have come to let you know how serious i am speaking to you, whether you want to hear it on not. without a doubt, it is a prime example of a big project, with no input. i remember 10 years ago, they come to the western addition to getting approval, and it was a rubber-stamp committee. the right now we don't even have a rubber stamp committee. the only part of the city that doesn't have a community organization that the city and county recognizes. i have to come here and raise my voice. i have to come here wounded, homeless, jobless. but not information less. we are in a state of emergency.

all of these contracts you're proven goes without no input for the community. i don't need no clown backing me to ok what i'm doing. i have been coming here 20 years to see how this process has failed us. not only african-american people, low income people. you're going on and rubber stamping, walking all over our community. i am here to say that you are in total violation. i can't go to the city attorney's office. who do i go to? do i have to go outside the boundary of the city and county to analyze what is going on here? i am up here, my voice is

louder. i want to speak loud and clear in your ear that you are in total violation of the community. approve everything you want to do, but i wanted to show for the record that there is no voice for the western addition. with a c.a. with a c.b.d. i wanted to let you know i am here in your ear. supervisor chu: any other member of the public wish to speak? public comment is closed. and on the item? supervisor mirkarimi: motion to approve with recommendation, i want to underscore that this has no impact to the general fund. as with most affordable housing agreements that come before us, it is 80% of the area median income, and the retention of

those that live in the building, make sure it is 100% protected. this is one of those that should give a thumbs up across the way. supervisor chu: there is a motion to send the item forward and we can do that without objection. do we have any other items before us? we are adjourned.

for the pled of allegiance? >> i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> thank you. we will take the girl called

commissioners. president mazzucco, present. commissioner chan, present. commissioner slaughter, president. -- present. we have the chief of the police department. >> welcome to the october 12, 2011 police commission meeting. tonight's agenda has a few atoms of the front. we have a busy agenda on the closed session portion involving matters of discipline. we will move through this agenda rather quickly. would you please call item no. 1, general public comment. >> the public is welcome to address the commission regarding items that do not appear on tonight's agenda.

speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department or occ personnel. during public comment, neither police or personnel, nor commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public that may provide a brief response. individual commissioners and police and occ personnel should refrain from entering into any debates or discussion with public speakers. please limit your comments to three minutes. >> good evening. i am christine wagner, a resident taxpayer and law practitioner. i wish i was here to commend the san francisco police department. i am here to share with you abuses by officers in recent months and days that have personally and affected -- adversely affected me. you need to know about it and

things need to be done about it. as an officer of the court, i do not appreciate police witnessing -- witnessing police officers lying under oath, not once but twice in a court of law for 8 $220 traffic citation. this is egregious to me and it must be an embarrassment to the police department. i do not appreciate the taking of my busy time to appear on a citation that was issued to me without cause and under false pretense. to meet quotas of the san francisco police department, apparently. i do not appreciate the san francisco police department ignoring a court order for the production of documents. no documents were provided, and the reasoning for now documents

was provided. that is a contempt of court, quite problematic. i do not appreciate repairers by these public employees. on the street or in the courtroom or the courthouse as i experienced last week. i do not appreciate a police officer who is clearly on duty lying to me about it and refusing to identify herself by name or by badge number. i do not appreciate i am paying days bad apples for their salary and benefits. this is not a good use of police time and is an abuse. also i do not appreciate that report and made about stolen property that i reported almost two months ago has not been

responded to. and made repeated inquiries and that would be out of the mission district station. i have a letter to submit to the commission. i will be sending one to you, you are scc:'d on that. thank you. president mazzucco: thank you. next speaker. >> i have a couple of questions after last week's discussion on the jttf matter. i do understand that you currently are hoping to put it back on calendar for discussion at some undefined point. i am not clear on what that means. five weeks ago the commission committed to getting answers from the fbi reporting back on certain issues that would either refuse to or confirm or update information the aclu has provided about the fbi's claims

it will not abide by san francisco policies or allow officers to abide by them. we assume that would take place last week and was taken off calendar. we would like to know, will that happen? we have the time frame for wewhn that might happen? president mazzucco: we do not respond to questions. >> i will take that as non response. you have decided to leave the mou in place for now as is your prerogative. you have made statements to local policy saying that all policies will be abided by. you have an mou that is directly contradiction if -- of that. yousigned agreements make it untenable to abide by that. you wanted the bocc -- occ to

abide. officers are completely required if the occ is investigating to respond to requests for an jarret -- information. on the other hand, officers face consequences under the nondisclosure agreements on the federal side and there is no permission granted by the fbi that allows the process to go forward so we have a contradiction. i respectfully requesting since you are encouraging people to use the process, until you resolve this matter, advise the officers and the public what that means. as the fbi have been asked notwithstanding the mou, will the geffen's trances that they comply with the chief's order and the law in san francisco that there will not be subject to federal consequences.

if not, what fate should the public have in the process if they are not going to be assured the officers working with the fbi can the interviewed and giving them information. president mazzucco: thank you. >> 18 seconds. let me leave that with the question. if you're going to make these assurances and there is this contradiction that is not fair to the officers and public, i do not -- i hope you do not think it is not reasonable to ask how this will be handled given that direct contradiction. thank you. president mazzucco: thank you. neck speaker. >>-- next speaker. >> i was here march 16, 2011. if you believe in coincidences, my complaint is regarding my case, an assault case against my parents dated march 10, 2010.

i want to make a statement that i am not perfect and i have been arrested twice since that time, not because i did anything wrong, it is because my parents call the police on me. the cat -- complaint -- i am really tired of a cover-ups of the pricing. i was a person who was followed all around sunset. i ran up the stairs to the precinct two years ago. at 3:30 a.m. and there was no one in that precinct. it is a bold faced lie. chief 00 h-- the chief says he has an open door policy. we have kept in contact.

the only to people i've received any help from was george gascone. here is my complaint. two calls, never returned my call. redella tenet returned by call and said he would get back to me, he is on vacation now. rich dalton calls me today and said the statute has passed. how can they pass it when they never followed up? it was for did -- forwarded to the precinct. what you call cold case? i have evidence to show i did not make certain statements added to my statement that is found in computer records and i want something done about it because i am still being harassed. in any event, when i left here last march, i am not going to tell you how it is done, i

heard him said i will make much a man 102 a good thing. i stated i want it that removed off the curriculum. i want that put back on. i asked you please assign an investigator to check into the evidence i have against that pricing. president mazzucco: thank you. next speaker. ok. any further public comment? seeing none, comment is closed. >> #2. reports and announcements. a review of recent activities and a status update of behavioral science recommendations from the meeting of september 14, 2011. >> the evening.

-- good evening. i have six items that we reviewed and i propose we come back with some information for the regarding the officer involved shooting check-in proposal, that we would like to do three mandated sessions with our clinician. at this point, the final map draft has to be submitted for review and approval by the city attorney, in november. the second was -- >> do you want to take questions at the end? >> what is the draft? >> the final draft that we can include the specific language before it comes to the city attorney. >> i do not know what you mean by draft. is it a bureau order or bulletin, what is it? >> it is a proposal. we had included, we had changed some of the language to include

the three chickens. we had talked about to before. -- two before. the officers can get full support and more of an oversight. it is not clear about the form. what is it? i know the content. i do not know what it is. president mazzucco: the proposal as discussed was that there was going to be an immediate required debriefing and a debrief within 30 days. >> i understand the content. i am wondering what form is it taking? >> it could be dv, or to get the language appropriate to put it anyplace, i usually goes to city attorney review. >> we do not know the form yet, we're getting the content.

>> it does not have a title but we will work on that. >> ok. we ewere looking at increasing the requirement for the officers and sergeants from two hours to three hours. it would be a three hour block implemented in the new cpt cycle. that has been discussed and confirmed with the academy. and a four hour academy block was discussed. three outside vendors have been found. regarding department general order 1111, the update to include additional issues to mandate intervention, the car -- current policy includes alcohol

abuse. it needs to be expanded to include substance abuse and other behavioral management issues. it is not that much of a change, just a few words to include for their resources. -- further resources. it is going to written directors and he has been notified it is in process. president mazzucco: that was the list we gave you. >> there is to more. -- two more. regarding a billable services, we will be doing a presentation -- available services, we will be doing a presentation. we are augmenting staffing with the critical and -- critical incident response treading. we're having ongoing training for our members so that we can add additional support for the

department. of formal request may be made after a process of identifying it. a certain individual with a certain skill set. we're looking at a possible additional staff member with specific skills. >> could you also going to the presentation that is coming up? >> i am not sure of the specific dates. which day? it will be at 28 hour block two eight-hour block. president mazzucco: thank you. the issue is what form this document comes in. we are putting together a document for review. we will send it again for more review. before we go on to questions. we have a speaker.

who was invited? all the officers invited? how are we going to work this? >> we are i and the process of deciding. we would like to include the sheriff's department and espouses. the officers and members of the department. and the police commission. i'm not sure who else. bart pd. we are trying to get as many jurisdictions to attend. as long as they can sit at the center. president mazzucco: it is an excellent book. i have read it and it is the most poignant on. book i have seen since i have been on the commission and since being part of this police family. >> of the chief has ordered several boxes of the book. we're trying to figure out where we will distribute them. two new recruits or family members. we have gone several books distributed to the