tv [untitled] February 8, 2012 1:48pm-2:18pm PST
1:48 pm
real estate owned properties and what kind of bank lending are they doing for low income multifamily housing. we'll ask about their experience with lending in this city and their contracts and practices with businesses in san francisco. we're also going to ask them about consumer lending products and services as well as community investments. the goal of these questions is to learn more about what the banks do and how they support our local community here in san francisco. in answering these questions, we will allow a financial institution to receive extra credit points in the escort through the banking rfp. we must remember first and foremost, the goal of the banking and cash management services is to select the institution that is appropriate in the meat or surpasses the fiduciary requirements in handling the city of the money.
1:49 pm
we want to make sure we are doing the right thing for the city and county of san francisco. supervisor avalos: thank you for your presentation. i think it is really great, your consideration. another is a history as well with the fair lending working group. these questions that you have come from multiple sources and i know you have done a lot of homework on that. just on the response from the respondents, are they required to provide this information? you expect these questions will be complete? >> everything is open to decide what they are going to bid on, what pieces might be appropriate
1:50 pm
for them. this will be up to the financial institutions to decide what or how they will decide to respond. what we wanted to do was provide an incentive for the financial a institutions to answer these questions. the goal was to make sure that the extra credit point will be sufficient incentive to get them to share this information with us. many of the services the we will be asking for might be equivalent coming from one or more different financial institutions. the incentive we believe will exist, should two or more banks provide some of the services we are looking for. the extra credit. could help steer the business in their direction or part of the business in their direction. supervisor avalos: would you say that these banks, would they be
1:51 pm
required to keep financial information if they have a requirement? so on a yearly basis, we will expect to get reports? >> it is our plan to resell the said the same questionnaire from certainly the banks we contract with an essentially from as many banks we can get to work with us on an annual basis going forward. supervisor avalos: that as good here. we mentioned currently that the cash management services contract is actually going be bank of america, wells fargo, union bank. is there more than one bank? do we expect to have a greater pool of respondents? >> we're certainly hopeful that we will see a much broader pool of respondents. we are still crafting the r
1:52 pm
fp. for example, some of the things we are looking at are actually allowing financial institutions to not have the bid on all of the various types of services we require, but maybe they can bid on one or another if they have specialty or capabilities in one area as opposed to all the areas. our goal is to allow for a a a broad variety and a broad number of financial and institutions to be able to respond and ultimately to give the city more flexibility and hopefully more options to choose from and evaluate as we are thinking about where we're going to contract to receive these services. to answer your question, our hope is that we will receive a broader list of things and we are currently working with. supervisor avalos: are you giving any special focus for
1:53 pm
local banks at all? we're looking at no institutions, and the entirety of our transactions. is there a way to focus the process on a local bank that can have a piece of it? >> first and foremost will be making sure that whatever financial of institutions we work with and jews will be able to adequately service the needs we have. and we have a rather large magnitude of needs. at the same time, when we talked about the questions, we are asking exactly that type of information. what is the local presence, what is the headquarters, where are the employees based? things like that. supervisor avalos: when it comes to questions that we have to
1:54 pm
respond to about the makeup of their lending portfolio in san francisco, is there a way to craft is so that noncompliance will be penalized as well if they don't respond? is there some way we can level the playing field to guarantee that we are getting that information? it is pretty vital for the city being able the plan for how we can respond to our economic situation. >> we are still looking at that, supervisor, but like any of the other questions that we asked whether they are about the fiduciary handling, we don't penalize someone for what they don't do, we only give them credit for what they can do. i think that what is best for us to do is to handle this part the same as the others. if the bank thinks that they can excel by sharing misinformation
1:55 pm
and be forthcoming, the opportunity to gain extra credit points and we hope will provide a good incentive. i believe that it could be seen as a negative for that bank in terms of their possibility of winning summer or more of the business soliciting. supervisor avalos: great, i am hoping that we can get a good response based on future information that the banks can provide to us. if there is open is that we can guarantee, we can make further inquiries. it will be important to have. is that something you think can be built and? >> i imagine that we would certainly describe this questionnaire as something that would be a dynamic flexible document or inquiry that we
1:56 pm
would be able to adjust as time is able to have us accommodate. supervisor avalos: separate from the treasurer's office, there are other ways that they might be compelled to try the information at our disposal. that is where we might come in. you mentioned community investment, looking at making investments up to 200 to thousand dollars insured by the fdic to perhaps financial institutions are credit unions. can you tell us further about that? >> we are excited about the announcement of this program. as with any individual like ourselves, we also enjoy a fdic insurance on any deposits we make in local banks or credit
1:57 pm
unions as guaranteed by the u.s. government. as i said, our goal is to keep the city's money safe. that means guaranteeing the full faith and credit of the u.s. federal government. it provides that same guarantee and therefore would meet our criteria for investing. right now, the federally insured deposit limit is $250,000 annually. we will make deposits of $240,000 because we need to allow room for the interest earnings as well. with that amount of money, we have announced -- we would be happy to receive their application and make the
1:58 pm
liquidity available to them. supervisor avalos: after receiving the budget analysts report, if the city just says that we have this investment will live like to do with you, i am not sure that these credit unions would respond, necessarily. if we work together on how we can target such an investment to a given neighborhood or a type of business, it might make a stronger -- if that is something you would like to do, i would like to work with your office to see what we can do with that fdic support for an institution. >> i would be happy to engage in that kind of conversation, i am not sure if there are any legal
1:59 pm
issues. we don't say, i would like to make sure that this goes towards auto loans or whatever. it might be something we can lead in trying to do. we want to make sure nothing hampers the insurance results as well. supervisor avalos: we can work on that and look into it. lastly, on the county pool of investment funds, those are accessed as we need them. they are drawn down by these financial institutions and they are put back into the investment pool funds on pretty much a nightly basis. how're they invested specifically? >> is kind of a savings account
2:00 pm
for the city of all of the city's money. as i said, most of the money comes from not the general fund, but a lot of it is bond proceeds. proceeds. the puc has a number of voters approved bonds that the issue to do things like finance the reconstruction of the hetch hetchy pipeline and other major projects they're doing. as the issue this bonds, received bond proceeds, that money needs to be invested somewhere while it waits for it to be spent on the construction costs. and so they put those into the county pool. we invest those bond funds. similarly, the airport has had an may currently have similar types of projects. city college and the unified school district and the city and county of san francisco. the majority of the money as the types of funds. as i said city and county general fund monies in there as well. those will invest as i described on to the criteria -- under the
2:01 pm
criteria set by state law. liquidity and yield. safety -- the safety goals dear's us toward the direction of having almost all of our investments be guaranteed by the u.s. federal government. that means typically investments in things like u.s. treasuries, u.s. government agencies, or other types of investments which come with the full faith and credit guarantee of the u.s. government. included in that list are even deposits in local banks or credit unions up to the fdic insured limit and that is what has promised to the announcement of this program. supervisor avalos: thank you. >> thank you, supervisor. supervisor kim: thank you for your leadership and questions. i have a question for the treasure. we talked about this upcoming
2:02 pm
rfp and this concept of extra credit points for answering questions that we're interested in. i am wondering in terms of the top three responsibilities, there is a balance. we want to see some of these social goals that can be achieved but at the same time i am interested in making sure the city has a sound partner that we're working with in terms of our transactions they provide the service we need in order to track our ins and outs and transactions we have to make sure our funding is secured, to make sure we are learning the best return we can in our savings accounts. how do you see this fitting in? first i would want to make sure the city had the strong financial footing in this endeavor. can you speak about how you perceive this extra credit to work? will we potentially see institutions that may not have been the most qualified win?
2:03 pm
>> believe me our number one responsibility and all the responsibilities we have in working with the city's money is to make sure that it is always 100% safe. with these billions of dollars of money that are moving through the accounts and these millions of transactions which will process your bank accounts, we absolutely require that every one of those millions of transactions occurs correctly. that is handled accurately. that it is reported on correctly and in a timely fashion. the city and county always house the absolute perfect information it needs to always be in charge of our money, our funds and that type of reformation. those are baseline criteria. in terms of what we're looking for in terms of partners for handling our business. the way i see this social responsible -- socially
2:04 pm
responsible questionnaire and points happening is the idea of extra credit while allowing banks to think to themselves, many of our services might be equivalent among large banks or even other types of services to and a variety of financial institutions. it is for them to know whether or not they're going to win the city's business because there might be one or two or more other banks that can provide similar high quality services of one type or another. our hope is that while the extra credit will not steers away from a qualified bake to an unqualified institution, it might help us to choose between more or less equivalent offerings that we might see in more than one area of what we are soliciting and i think that is the right way to approach this. supervisor kim: thank you.
2:05 pm
2:06 pm
so well financially and has an incredibly efficient banking system that has worked well on cash management. i am very concerned about the number of people who are losing their homes in the city and the toll it is taking on families where my neighbor has to tilly give up her job. she has given it up for two years simply to deal with the banks. simply to try and get a modification of her loan. her mother is cooking for the family. the sun is taking care of the younger daughter and the husband is working. the effort to simply get the banks to respond is humongous. my biggest concern right now is that there be some public input
2:07 pm
on these rfp's then there is verification by the bank of america, by wells fargo, and by union bank that what they're saying israel. and is accurate. i would love to have public input. some verification that the banks are doing what they say they're doing. supervisor kim: thank you. nicks speaker, please. >> good afternoon. my name is gary brown and i am a long-term residents. i am one of the residents that went into foreclosure. i would like to see the city system in contracts -- sustain contracts with banks -- bank of america bought out countrywide.
2:08 pm
i would like to see this city look over the contract before they signed to make sure that all the finance institutions are willing to fit the criteria there that will help the people, homeowners, small business people. and before there would give bankamerica one, i would like to see them make sure they consider or offers. thank you. >> last week the city council voted to find a more socially minded institution to hold over $300 million in city assets. the council members said they hoped the decision would send a message to the banks responsible for the housing crisis and the economic disaster that followed.
2:09 pm
one of the things i think they considered is that wells fargo has been such a significant player in the crisis and has never paid for some of the actions. what is telling to us as it is so many of our members in our union are facing foreclosures. i am told over eight of them are wells fargo. i think the city should be applauded for its decision to take action against the banks, many of which have yet to face anything for what they have done in terms of negligence and illegal actions on their part. i think they should be lauded and i hope the city of san francisco would also be willing to say not only is it important to have safe, sound, business
2:10 pm
practices but it is important to invest in the city. i do not mean just sending a check to the nonprofit, taking care of the citizens in their homes and jobs and helping to stimulate the economy in san francisco. thank you. >> good afternoon. i am the political action chair for sau local 1021. rarely do we get the opportunity to overview process that has such a gigantic relationship to the rest of our economy. we have been paying for the economy. when we lose our services and as workers when we have to give up to protect some services. there is a little we can do here at the county level to address the economic crash.
2:11 pm
we have to do what we can to mitigate the damages to homeowners, small-business lenders, to investment, the next thing is investments reflect our values and the lease we can ask is for these banks to report about their behavior, about their practices. certainly many of us are being affected by the practices and it is only right that our democratic process has some oversight or has some kind of leverage to do right and to choose the kind of banks that will reflect mostly our values and will do the best by our city. thank you. >> hello, supervisors. i am a resident of the excelsior district. i wanted to first and foremost start off by saying i am incredibly thankful to be a san
2:12 pm
francisco resident and i am thankful for the opportunity to speak with you today. briefly, my own situation is such that i purchased my first home in 2008 in the excelsior. a 532 square foot home which i purchased for $352,000. my payment was $2,700 a month. i modified that payment down to $2,400 payment a year after buying my home. in 2010 i lost my job. i was told by wells fargo they would work with me in order to retain my home. in january 2011 i was informed of was going into the foreclosure process but there would continue to work with me. in june 2011 i was offered a forbearance agreement which reduced my payment to $600 a month. i was told i needed to make a payment immediately on that
2:13 pm
agreement in order for it to be accepted by both parties which i did that very day. and the following day my home was sold at auction. i've gone to wells fargo, they have treated me with this respect and all of us -- aloofness. i spent $5,000 to fight this in court and day was thrown out on a technicality. i am here because i want to lend and voice my support for a municipal bank of san francisco. i believe it to be the best choice for the city. also this is the best direction for us to take our funds and to utilize them in fostering of san francisco residents. supervisor kim: thank you.
2:14 pm
2:15 pm
>> she has tried many times and many years to work with will -- wells fargo to reduce their payments. her husband was on disability from his job and they tried to work with wells fargo, to no avail. at this point they're trying to report their salary and income and wells fargo has not been responsive to their requests for a lower reasonable payment. >> [speaking spanish]
2:16 pm
2:17 pm
fargo is not. >> [speaking spanish] >> since wells fargo has not been helping her family or other families, she is asking the city's support in not banking with them. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i work with a housing immigrants' rights organization in san francisco and in oakland. i am here to speak in support of their being in municipal bank in san francisco and specifically due to the fact that wells fargo especially as the nation's largest servicer and has been responsible for foreclosing on millions of homes throughout the nation. bringing it back to san francisco, two things ther
164 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on