but our company will continue to work on improving dispatch. one thing that we cannot do and that we do need you guys to work on is more taxicabs, and printed yearly, we need more at our company, not just more taxicabs in the city. our biggest problem is that we are routinely completely overwhelmed with the dispatch service orders to the point where we have every single taxicab and our fleet will have the mitterrand and 100 orders on the board. it is an absolutely hopeless situation. the answer is more taxicabs. we are cautiously optimistic that the board members are going to move in that direction, so if you can enjoy them on, please do. thank you. supervisor wiener: next speaker. mr. grueber.

>> thank you. i am with united taxicabs. there is one message and i would like to convey. it is that there must be improvements, not just in the quantity of taxicabs that are serving the public but in the efficiency of windows -- them serving. you can improve service by adding taxicab's of two. , and then you reach a point of diminishing returns because you are affecting the driver and, by doing that, and the more taxicab's you put on the street, more drivers have to struggle to make a living. it will impact the quality of service. it will impact the safety of services. a good steady goes back a few years now let shares there is an inverse ratio, an inverse proportion between the driver

in, and the number of accidents become a good study -- a good study goes back a few years and shows there is an inverse ratio. there is a technology that is here today. the problem is that it is now dispersed among several different applications that are now being used in san francisco, and numbers and numbers of them and are being developed across the country, and this needs to be consolidated into one system that every passenger and every cab driver and every cab in san francisco uses. this will be a tremendous help. centralized dispatch is an idea that goes back, i can trace it back to a previous the administration that had a task

force that recommended an least exploring a centralized dispatched. this goes back to to 1989 or 90. technologically, it is a snap of the thinker. taxicab companies can integrate their already computerized systems, and one company can send off to the others only those calls that they themselves cannot handle, and this will work for everybody, and the reasons we have been given, the reason why nobody is pursuing this is because nobody has pursued in the past. in other words, the power of the cap companies to block this is the very thing standing in the way of anybody taking it seriously right now. let me just say that the dispatch systems as they now currently exist unfortunately are terribly corrupt. that needs to change. no one is getting a handle on this.

and i also -- well, my time is up, so i will stop right there. bank. -- thank you. supervisor wiener: thank you. next speaker. >> it was my pleasure and honor to be a ramp cabdriver for over four years before i became a regular medallion holder. first, i want to thank christine hayashi. she has upset every single one of us, and that is a good thing, and she keeps moving forward. i cannot imagine this industry without what she has done in the past several years. i have seen many supervisors and many mayors come through here and try to sink their teeth into the taxicab industry and sort it all out. they typically have held a bunch of hearings, got overwhelmed by the minutia, the corruption, the

personalities in the industry, and then they have thrown up their hands. they have issued a whole bunch of new medallions and have then gone on to seek higher office and declared it a victory. i hope this does not happen with you folks. i hope if you seek higher office, you win, but that to fix some of the problems in the industry. none of those people who were here and have gone on ever addressed this issue of the dispatch. this idea of centralized dispatch has been years since i started in 1985, as i remember it. i have been working for two years with the only system i have worked with and have found it to be brilliant. it is now about 20% of my calls are coming from it. i have no financial interest in the company, but i get about 20 percent of my calls from it, and the customers, we looked at each other over the back seat and

say, "can you believe this?" is stand on the corner or houser they could beat talking to the cabdriver or believing in message. it is brilliant. it is the wave of the future. we need to in this direction. çhñyou can see the wonder of ths think for yourself. one other thing, charging cabdrivers' a percentage for cat -- credit-card fees is ridiculous. it sets up a situation of very customer get in and the customer gets -- we have never done that, and i hope that we never do, it

is as good as cash. we also need data. if you're going to put out more medallions, do not make it strictly a political decision like the other people before. >> bank -- supervisor mar: thank you very much. any further public comments? >> for a couple of years i worked in the hospitality industry. i saw firsthand how bad areas were with taxis. they were flabbergasted at how horrible the situation was. i am on the side for more taxis. supervisor mar: thank you very much. any further public comment? >> public comment is now closed. supervisor mar: thank you to the members of the public in the one gentleman -- i know that i'd

like to thank when i grab an issue, i do not let go until it is done. i know that mta staff is dedicated to these things as well. just a couple of issues that wanted to get a comment on one of them, and i mentioned this before, about credit cards. i noticed that there is less pushed back now than there were a few months ago. there were signs trying to discourage people, and i wondered if they were still there and if the agency was trying to transition more smoothly to the credit card system. >> in boston and new york there was initially a lot of resistance. but we have plans going forward as to the credit card issue.

i do not know to what extent i should talk about them today. but we definitely want to reduce the percentage down to something more comparable to what other merchants would pay. 5% was selected because that is what was typical in other cities. in new york is 5 percent, in boston is actually 6%. that looked normal at the time of policy, but since the franc dog act had been passed, there have been a lot of learning experiences from the ground. we will be drafting additional legislation pretty quickly here, to revise that policy.

supervisor mar: i know that the mta has given a lot of thought to structures and permits like that. personally, i am not a fan of the traditional medallion system. i think that it injects a lot of inefficiency into the system and in forces -- and present their lot of enforcement issues. putting in the middle man that can charge and make a lot of money. i am wondering what the thinking is around different structures. >> absolutely. the single operator permit was a different kind. in many ways companies have asked us to give a number of temporary permits to the company's. said they could operate the

vehicles without a medallion holder involved. yes, we are thinking about different ways for these permits, as they do not meet the traditional medallion mobled. putting medallions on the street or taxi driver in, and that kind of thing. supervisor mar: in terms of the complaint system and how it is processed, different groups will be good or bad, and i know it is something that i have dealt with regularly, people who have had bad experiences with a cab, they report it to 311 and they never hear anything. that is not unique to the cab industry. we are gradually making a lot of

those 311 issues, not really responding, they do a good job of passing along complaints someone saying that a cab driver made an inappropriate remark, or whenever, how would this process go to the mta and how would the process go? >> i would encourage everyone to use that system. we have 7000 individuals out there and it is hard for us to bring them all to a certain level of quality all at once. if we find particular issues with a vehicle or driver, we want to get that into our data. the issue of calling someone back out after a complaint is

something, as we have come in and created a new process, we have found that sometimes we would call people back and they were upset that we had called them back. saying that they had already called in -- what are you bothering me for? i already left the details. these other ones that seem the most sensitive. we are still finding our way as far as the right procedures and whether to call someone back. what does happen and, and it happens based on the number of staff and the nature of the complaint, if something is safety related, we will prioritize that.

for every complaint, we will call the driver and ask their side of the story. if there is an issue that can be resolved by the impact of the compact -- of the camera, depending on what our taxi driver tells us, we may either feel that there was something indicated. we will counsel them on their individual issue. and -- anger management, customer service, maybe you should not use that word in the front of your customers, or something like that. or we will have them come back in for a day of retraining. we want to use that to identify the problems that we can -- fix on a case by case basis. supervisor mar: i know that when

they call, they ask if we want someone to keep in touch. >> i will double check on that. we only have one person who is currently dedicated to those processes. supervisor cohen: i hope is that it would involve the big companies to small companies, but one asset covering the whole cities -- the whole city. >> it would be in for the purpose of getting into. off industry involved. -- getting the entire industry

involved. we think that it would be in the public interest of centralized dispatched, if you could find any available taxi in san francisco. supervisor cohen: pretty amazing, how it is in real time. it would be good if we could get reports of how close we are as it is developed and local government helps to develop it. supervisor cohen: i have a couple of questions. about the development of an application, are you partnered with dks, have you put it out to bid, and what exactly is the policy process will have laid out to develop this application? >> until a few weeks ago, i had

anticipated issuing an rflp. in part of the california college of arts at the end of february. supervisor cohen: there are good things that come out of them. i know that i just downloaded -- i am a taxicab user, and part of last year, i lamented the whole process of actually getting a cab. i have learned that it does not matter where you are. the west part, the east part of town, it is generally difficult to get a cab. >> the taxi drivers also want

the customers to be reliable. if they know that the customer will be there when they get there, you will find increased reliability. that is what this kind of platform offers. the customer does not go with another taxi driver and the taxi driver does not go with another customer. supervisor cohen: 1 more thing that i have experienced, almost literally being thrown out of a cab, because i tried to use my debit card by had cash, ended down very ugly, very quickly. >> use -- and it went down very ugly, very quickly. >> use 311. supervisor mar: without objection, continue to the call of the chair. is there any other business before us? >> we have no further items. supervisor mar: thank you,

everyone. we are adjourned. >> the question when i started 11 years ago when i started doing resolution work is can anything be presented on a really low resolution device where it is potentially a digital image? can anything be presented that way? or will it feel cold and electronic?

>> the imagery will change. there will be four different sets. it is a two dimensional image. it is stretched out into three dimensions. the device is part of the experience. you cannot experience the image without the device as being part of what you are seeing. whereas with the tv you end up ignoring it. i make gallery work more self and budget and public art work where i have to drop this of indulgence and think about how people will respond. and one of the things i was interested in the work and also a little fearful of, it is not

until you get to the first and second floor were the work is recognizable as an image. it is an exploration and perception is what it is. what are you seeing when you look at this image? one of the things that happens with really low resolution images like this one is you never get the details, so it is always kind of pulling you in kind of thing. you can keep watching it. i think this work is kind of experience in a more analytical way. in other words, we look at an image and there is an alice going on. -- and there is an analysis

going on. >> call to order of the san francisco county transportation authority. i am scott wiener, the vice chair. power chair is out sick today. -- our chair is out sick today.

>> we have a quorum. >> thank you. >> item two, reprogram 4.8 million in the congestion management agency block grant funds from the department of public works at the st. streetscape project to the cesar chavez streetscape project. this is an action item. >> at our last meeting, this item did come before us. there was some questions and further discussions that needed to happen, so we continue the item and scheduled this to consider this item. i will ask the director if they would like to make any introductory remarks.

>> first of all, i want to thank my colleagues for this special meeting. i think that we often spend our lives sitting in meeting spent -- sitting in meetings. this was put on the emergency calendar and it did not go through budget or the appropriate committee as most of our items usually do. i know that i took up quite a bit of time with some comments and questions about a loss of funding. i do appreciate that. the mta has sat down and gone over the communication breakdowns that occurred over the past year and a half around the process, unmannearound the outreach.

i appreciate the memo that is come to us. i know that we have a few members of the public that are here today to speak on this issue. >> thank you very much. >> good morning. i am the executive director. the item that is before you is essentially the same memorandum that you saw last tuesday and i appreciate the remarks i do have a memo written by the department's head. the recommendation does not change. we did benefit up from the

discussion of a purely. we are working with the sfmta on an application for funding so that they can proceed with the level of planning in and out reach for this project that is clearly needed. they will have the additional allocation. this will not be preventing

them. what we should have it is a very welcome scope of work with a very reliable process to this project and with a solid amount of community support. to make sure the public park position province is also would not have another surprise. i really do not have any doubts that we will be able at the end of the process to find the appropriate amount of funding for the project on second street, theáúa with the community. i am concerned, at this point, the estimate of the potential cost of the project is in a wide

range, included in the memo, from 4.5 million to $8 million. i know we will evolve from that to a much more organized and reliable estimate. that is my main focus today, that we get to that point so that when the items come back to you for an action on an allocation of funding for construction, you will have a reliable no. and you will know what trade-offs you are making between the money for that project and other priorities, both in commissioner kim's district and the rest of the city. that is the appropriate process. we will do everything we can to get to that point quickly. we know from the department heads, that process is likely to take one year. we will be working with them to see if we can make that shorter. we are cognizant of the challenge of working with the community there.

with that, and this item is the only action item we have on the agenda today. i know there are representatives from the dpw and mta available to answer questions. commisioner wiener: thank you, director. colleagues, any comments or questions relating to item 2? seeing none, do dpw or mta wish to comment? commissioner kim: i would like them to prison briefly on the memo. please go over the projected time on from here on out for the corridor and the funds committed. those were the two requests i made at last week's meeting. i understand the need to reprogram these funds because otherwise we will lose the $4.8 million but one of my requests was to get a firm time line now, go