in our cdc renewal submitted in apply to any commission body, and i really just wanted to say the late fall, one of our proposals will aim to study pedestrian perceptions of that. violence. the goal is to establish a also, reflecting the diversity of our small business community, comprehensive database that whether it is a co-op, reflects all potential variables restaurant, business services. representing risk and protective factors. really want to thank everyone the candidate. i think this is an incredibly our aim is to construct a hard decision before us, but i database to keep san francisco think supervisor campos made a good point in that we did have policymakers informed of all aspects. two applicants come out with all three of us supporting them. this database which will be housed at the department of supervisor farrell, any public health will serve as the cornerstone of information additional words? necessary to create well- supervisor farrell: no, look, i informed policy. today, the voice of injured -- do believe monetta and mr. ortiz the injured pedestrian is reaching the absence. will do a great job. i just want to say i do not like our proposal will aim to address this piece by going to bedside this, but for henry and pete especially, whatever you guys and screening and interviewing need to do for the next go patients that are struck by round, the for commission, vehicles. we hope the analysis and whatever, you have my full recommendations will be provided support. i will work with my office to through the proposal for make sure that happens.

collective and individual this is not fun, but i agree behavior changed your education, that there are two folks that outrage, -- outrageach. all three of us mentioned, and i think that does make sense. i would look forward to meeting supervisor campos: if i may, i agree that i do not think anyone likes this. i think mr. west is an excellent a wide array of pedestrian safety advocates and choice as well, and i'm not stakeholders. happy, but i think we kind of go i tried to attend most of those meetings on the second tuesday of each month to get a feel of with where the consensus is. what is going on. supervisor kim: thank you so i would welcome the chance to work closely with the department much to all the applicants for of public health in this arena being here today. i also pledged to work with all and also mta. advocates for an increase in the the applicants today along with supervisor farrell's office to dess trace it -- pedestrian see how we can get your voice safety countermeasures. included. also most importantly, i would occasionally it happens where this really was an incredibly have the opportunity to share and -- committee findings with a difficult decision to make. again, super impressed by our applicants. pedestrian population. glad to see so that it -- so it is something i have been many of our small business passionate about. owners who want to be involved in the decisionmaking process. i have not been born and raised i know how little time you walk in san francisco, but i love out with families and this city. i wish i have. businesses. it is an incredible amount of we see a lot of individuals come work, so thank you for making

san francisco what it is and to that general -- is becoming hiring people and creating jobs. you have this motion, and we can an economic problem, it is a do that without opposition. congratulations. public safety issue and something that can be avoided with proper measures. >> thank you. i am a big fan of the injury unfortunately, our meeting has gone kind of long and we do have center and the immense amount of a schedule conflict. work to compile data, it is just supervisor farrell does neatly. striking. it is a huge budgetary cost for it is a cake, it we could move up items 6. madam clerk, can you please call the city in the state. item 6? the data of that was put out in >> item 6, ordinance amenities district 6 you have to dedicate and francisco administrative $13 million. code by adding chapter 79a to whatever we can do to prevent expand upon the minimum notice requirements prior to approval collisions returning -- occurring, we can say city of a city project that are mandated by the citizens' right dollars and that is important. to know act of 1998. i think the data also showing >> thank you, supervisor. this is a huge equity issue. this impacts our low-income in june of 1998, the voters residents and seniors passed the citizen's right to disproportionately over other know act of 1998. it is codified s chapter 79 in residents. it is important this is an issue

we address. if you could talk more about the our administrative code establishes some minimum public empowerment center to increase notice requirements for certain social capital amongst the public projects that are being funded directly by the city or victims of violent injury. that was interesting and i want as mr. through use of state, to hear more about that. federal, or local funding sources. >> we visited supervisor campo'' what this legislation does is simply expanded minimum notice requirements for these projects. office. this is a group of individuals under the current notice provisions -- and i found this that go through our background program which is our violence out last year during a project prevention program that was in district two, which was a spearheaded by dr. decker. long project that ended up with a great outcome, but something she started this program we do not need to go through in the future -- a lot of neighborhood notice comes really too late in the process to seeing a lot of injury enable public input and having recidivism. meaningful input to city she ended up hiring three case administrators. this legislation requires notice managers who go to bed side and 30 days at a time instead of 15 help these individuals. days, and also requires each we tend to believe that -- state officer, department, or referred to anything we can, commission to post on its official website and maintain an whenever they need. updated list of all proposed it is substance abuse, metal projects coming forward. health. typically what we're trying to we worked on this legislation do now is instead of letting

with the mayor's office of housing. i want to thank them for working these guys and ladies go, we very hard on this. enrolled them back into the , especially due to the fact that this additional noticing empowerment center. legislation came out that the they can foster change within mayor's office of housing worked their communities. we hope giving them on in district two last year. opportunities to me with city's and joan mcnamara is here to supervisors, going to city speak with us briefly about the legislation. college, uc berkeley, a handful >> good afternoon, supervisors. of other events will help them thank you for this opportunity move in the right direction. to speak before you. yes, we are in support of the it has been successful so far. revisions that you have we're starting our next round in proposed. we have worked really well with you, and we welcome the the next month. opportunity to engage the supervisor kim: it is important for us to connect people that community in our projects, so thank you. have been victims of violent injury to give them that type of supervisor farrell: thanks very support they need. it is part of the healing process. much. i appreciated that. colleagues, and the questions? if there are no further supervisor kim: i do not see any questions will open up for questions or discussion. public comment. >> with a quick, and also to if there is public comment on clarify to our city attorney, is this item, please step up. here, just want to be clear seeing none, public comment is because we have had discussions and work, i know, that this

legislation does not impose any now closed. additional burdens on the clerk's office. supervisor campos: i make a >> it does not. motion to move this application the legislation speaks to the kinds of information that should forward with a recommendation. be made available to the board supervisor kim: thank you. by the department and does not i would like to support ms. impose obligations on the clerk in terms of tracking. evans as well. thank you for waiting and for >> a cake, thank you for comment work around pedestrian safety. i would like to support this on that. motion to move for the colleagues, i have a clarifying amendment that i understand will pedestrian safety advisory committee with recommendation to not be substantive to hold it the full board. up, but it is again a clarifying we can do that without opposition. language that the clerk of the board felt comfortable having to supervisor campos: thank you for make sure it does not affect your great work and we look forward to seeing you. their role in this legislation, supervisor kim: thank you. so i will be proposing that can you please call item 5. >> hearing to consider amendment, but i guess we will take public comment first. appointing one member to the supervisor kim: thank you. is there any public comment on public utilities revenue board oversight committee. this item? there is one seat and 3 applicants. >> calvin mulch from san supervisor kim: thank you. i believe that two of the three applicants are hopefully still francisco information clearing house and the human services here. we have jussive -- joseph sheehy clearing network. no difficulty with the addition of the 15 days, nor of the

and. electronic notification. serious difficulty with what we it is the same format as before. believe has been a dramatic increase in confusion about the if he could speak to your project. background in terms of how relates to this seat and maybe currently, section 79.2 states that approval of a project shall principles or values you would like to bring in. mean and action. >> i am a fourth generation san a decision to award a grant and franciscan. actions of a sponsoring officer. the new language being proposed, "i left my heart in san the amendment adds be francisco" was written by my cousin. i was educated at san francisco dramatically and unbelievably vague language of "a project state. shall mean any decision to i have a degree in chemistry and biochemistry and i am also a potentially fund." dentist. as to my qualifications, i have no idea what that means and served on two previous boards, on the board of golden gate i'm very happy to have sat yacht club that is during the america's cup now.

through the first part of this i also served on the board of committee meeting to provide legal support for civic action. i think what we're doing here is the olympic club. creating a full employment i am very passionate about water program for attorneys. issues. i have no idea what any decision i spent my youth backpacking and to potentially fund directly camping in the area around the means. does that mean accepting federal hetch hetchy, around cherry lake money? does that mean accepting federal and i know this area very well. money that the community -- i know the system -- i will not that will mean the community development block grant? any decision to potentially fund say i am an expert. is a dramatic, it seems to me, i know the system from studying it just for fun. i used to know all the flows and expansion from the existing 79.2, and i would urge that the politics and i could get language to be dropped. caught up with that as time goes does not deal with the findings. i do not know what it is on. supposed to mean, but it is if elected to this position, i would be -- bring out passion to extraordinarily confusing and this. i believe in water systems. bay. thank you. i believe in what is going on with the city of san francisco, >> good afternoon. what they're doing with their

san francisco human services water system. is magnificent. it was developed over 100 years network. i want to echo the remarks ago. regarding the vague language in it still works fine and need some earthquake -- needs some this proposed ordinance. earthquake refit. when i hear that, i think of a it is gregory driven. phrase that my father used to it does not cost a nickel a electricity. use with very young people where he would say cassette and i knew -- it is gravity driven. you when you were just a gleam thank you. in your father's side -- "i knew supervisor kim: i was curious where your son teaches math. when you were just a gleam in your fathers eye." >> my son finished his master's degree at usf in digital learning. if someone did not get required he taught at universal studies notice, could they sue and it definitely hold up a project well into its approval process? i also need to mention, around academy. he took off six months -- he was not able to get this certificate the original legislation as well as this that we do see this as and a master's and everything down when he was working hard. an attack on projects that he took some time off and he benefit people are or arepoor -- will be back at unified school district to do that. supervisor kim: i appreciate his who are poor and who are service. >> my son -- other son is a

disabled. if we want to open a child care policy director for the facility that is privately funded, but is only for child congresswoman on capitol hill. supervisor kim: thank you. care facilities that our city next, karen donovan. budget, and that is true of many projects that are going to come under this ordinance, and we are deeply concerned that the city she did let our office know that would be setting up a special process directed towards the we would -- she would be here. we have a third applicant who could not be here today. projects that serve vulnerable people in sanford cisco, and we hope you will take that into again, he was called to jury consideration as well. duty. thank you. i do know that supervisor farrell wants to hear the >> good afternoon. applicants as well. i hear the other comments in being that we have one of three, i'm not sure if we could continue this to the call of the public comment. i'm not sure that the language chair. we will not ask you to come back is vague, but i suppose it is again because you were able to potentially vague, and that is important. come today. i would feel more comfortable hearing all the applicants i supported this original ballot before making a decision. measure that former supervisor at this time will open up for public comment. yee had proposed and passed. >> i came to speak in support of i support in concept the legislation.

i think it clarifies some of the karen donovan cornell a little requirements that now exist. bit served for two years on the public utilities commission i think that this needs some additional work to amend the citizens advisory committee where i was appointed to serve. language at a minimum. she also has experience as a for example, on 79a.5, the deputy city attorney on the public utility team and is an website notice, line 17, shot at eternity -- an attorney at east a proposed project at the bay mud. earliest time when the she has a range of experience following events may occur -- i think those are triggering events, but the language should say "shall within 48 hours that is appropriate. i did not know mr. sheehy. we should find some way to quarter may or three working days or something so that it is find -- involve him in the puc. more clear what the requirement is. the more people who are paying attention to the big important work at puc, the better. i wanted to see those comments. i have no problem with continuing this item. supervisor kim: thank you. in 79a.7, the actual notice is there any other public comment? seeing none, public comment is

closed. posted and the list of those thank you for being here. persons that were interested in i was really impressed by what the project should be forwarded you had written in your to the board of supervisors. application. it seems like you do know about when there is consideration of a the water system and it is not project that you actually have something our average denizen an interested persons list knows that much about. generated out of this, and i i appreciate your interest and think there are some other for your experience. also great to have a fourth comments we just heard. i would encourage you to generation san franciscan applied. that would make supervisor continue this. i would be happy to help with farrell quite happy. that. i think that there is some work being that we could not hear to be done. from the other applicants, i would feel comfortable continuing trade or on the record and we have heard you speak. supervisor kim: thank you. -- comfortable continuing. is there any other public you're on the record and we have comment on this item? heard you speak. seeing none, public comment is closed. i know you have some amendments to it is, supervisor farrell -- supervisor kim: i understand the desire to hear the other applicants. to introduce, supervisor i am happy to make a motion farrell. supervisor farrell: thank you. i appreciate all the public comment, but i have not spoken with any members of the public to spoke to my office before today, so i'm surprised that that, but i read it to everyone,

as i always have, at my door is open to people what to think about changes possibly to this legislation. the one comment i will say to what mr. walsh was talking about, section four, that is something we put in. it is not something i am wedded to if there is strong feeling among community members. i'm happy to take thatit is somh in different departments. we want to make sure that it captured and work through different apartments and whether it captured all things. -- that this was behind. this is not meant to be a cog in the will but to bring neighborhoods and neighborhood members into the planning process and to get their voice to be heard. even if you end up disagree with neighbors or members, to give them a voice early on it means a

lot. it is something we should try to include here. if there is comments on that, that is fine. otherwise i would ask you have a motion here to accept these amendments. >supervisor kim: there is a measure to accept this. we can do this without opposition. supervisor campos: i appreciate supervisor farrell's thoughts. i wonder if there's a specific change to that language that anyone has in mind that could clarify some of the concerns. i do not know if it is appropriate to ask mr. welch. >> i would urge it to be stricken. that phrase.

79-2 defines -- or approval, showing an action of a city officer, or department, sponsoring a city project, approval should not include decision to undertake a preliminary study or one or more potential sites. approval shall refer to the actions of the sponsoring officer, department, board, or commission. that seems sufficient to me. i have no idea why we're adding language to that that says in addition, any decision to potentially fund directly or the project shall constitute a proposed project. supervisor campos: i get the point. >> this is language we worked with a number of different departments. there was no objection we talked through it. i express because the real intent here is not section 4. if that is something that is

meaningful to people, i am saying i am willing to take it out. i had to reiterate mr. welch. i would have loved to have heard from you before hand tried to have my phone number and we could have done this before today. if that is something members want to do, no problem. supervisor campos: i would make a motion to strike that. one motion would be this can go to the board. if there is a need to add different language. and maybe that is an opportunity to do that. i would make a motion to strike that. supervisor kim: we do have a motion to strike. supervisor campos: it would have -- it would be to strike the definition of proposed product -- project. to strike that. supervisor kim: we do have a motion to amend. i believe we can do that without opposition. are there any further discussions? supervisor campos: to move

forward. supervisor kim: we can do that without opposition. thank you. madam clerk, can you please call item 4? >> appointing one member, term ending to the pedestrian safety advisory committee. supervisor kim: i believe that abigail evans is here today. thank you for patients. we appreciate your application. pedestrian safety is one of the top priorities for my office. as you know, so many of the collisions between vehicles and pedestrians happened in district 6. i did appreciate your application and background and expertise. you can speak to your interest on serving on the pedestrian

safety advisory committee. >> thank you for having me. i am currently a research associate at san francisco general hospital. we are one of 13 injury centers funded by the cdc. currently i managed and direct a handful of projects aimed at reducing the incidence or recurrence of injuries among people of all ages in san francisco. many experience this -- experiences says that this leads to a sustainable results. we executed an economic analysis as a cost of auto verses pedestrian industries. -- entry. the cost is $80 million each year. we found 74% of those involved in a collision were san francisco residents and 75% of the cost was charged to public funds. that is medicare or mettetal.

in 2010, 36% of art, patients were struck by cars, including people on bikes.