for section, but that thoughts t this time. >> other members? >> ok, i had a couple of things. i thought it would be a good idea to look at the possibility of moving two blocks north of district five of the cathedral hill neighborhood association. i continue to wonder about, again, being reinstated and one of the comments received this time around. it has to do with more uncommon district two.

i want to please ask you to really think about district 9. people in the community thought that the meeting that we had at the horsemen was the meeting that we were holding for the mission and as when they gave their input to bring the community together up to the freeway. i'm one of the people that said no and i continue to feel that it doesn't belong there. those people are divided by the freeway and don't want to be connected to the mission. i am really concerned about that. i am not going to give up on

that until the end. >> this is really helpful, but the way, to hear what is on everyone's mind. one thing that a sort of a new thought, and to some extent, maybe a little bit of a reversal of some work we did last week. i am the sinbad and our current working draft, the jimmy that is going -- i am noticing that in our current working draft, the chimney that is going is a slight overpopulation because we moved about during -- or the boundary, that is one thought.

in the general area, i believe we move a meeting we had a while ago to the southern border of district 5. if we reestablished that boundary, which could add more population. we could be potentially six blocks a still remain the full group.

if those blocks were moved into district 1, that is about 1300 people. it could be cascaded throughout one, too, and three. i appreciate that some of the members of the public sought some feedback from other community members. i share the concerns that it is a small block of geography -- the blocks that are in the northeast section of district 8, this is right across from the

freeway. the blocks that are sort of southwest of the 101, south of market, you can see a cut out into the area that is west of valencia street. ok, yes. i think that's the park. that area, i wonder if it could be moved into district 8. that is a possibility i am wondering about. in terms of district 6, limit a couple of adjustments, one of which was to move of boundary. i did not support that at the time. we don't want to upset the apple cart.

we have the mission bay area that we think is divided. and i think it would be worth it, i would like to examine that again. of course we of the portable question. i was interested in the supervisor's comments about the existing boundaries verses the boundaries and the draft back. we have reduced the population from 11 to 7.

we have added population. i think he is correct to point that out. we need to resolve that. >> there are areas for consideration. if we can look at how drilling down on district 11, i wanted to see the population if we were to bring it up, what that section. i don't have the actual borders.

>> 1886 people, and it would bring the deviation of district 11 to 7.04%. >> if i can point out, with respect to the district 7 population, if we move the northern boundary back up, it would offset the quite a bit, i believe. >> can we see between them? >> maybe you can overlay the current air to. >> the blue light is the current boundaries.

the red highlighted area is 2265 people. that will bring the deviation of district 7 to 1.01%. >> you were also reference in 17 rather than 15. >> wasn't moving? ahead of the current lines are all across. that is currently inside of what your highlighting. >> in the draft. >> kenya of highlight that for a second?

-- can you unhighlight that for a second? >> additional population inquiries? >> can look south of vase worth? if we were to take that section of northeast sunnyside, south of was worth that is now in? what does that do? >> that brings the deviation to district 7 to 0.29% a the deviation of district 8 t 10 -

1.1. -- district 8 to -1.14%. canw we look at the line? i think it's way too high, but -- >> and giggled. i'm getting old. an unhear>> is probably close e.

>> i want to make sure that we did this really closely. for population purposes, the population in the highlighted area is 1991 people, bringing the deviation to district 96.58%, and the deviation for district 1010 -0.67%. >> and somebody was right collecting input in the portal

at over 2000 people. i guess with the obvious trade- offs -- >> the thing is, if you put that in there and you put north of mission all the way to the freeway, then they have those people. >> i am thinking of district 10 that would be over populated. i just want to see the numbers. >> i would like to point out that if you want to try some of these things out, it is very quick to underlit again. don't be shy to ask us to draw one. >> are we shy? >> we are a number of things,

but shy? >> you want the entire perkin there? -- park in there? >> 23, 26 -- >> who obviously. obviously. >> 16,058 people. district nine, 18.08%.

>> cn wan we look at patrero asn alternative? and see -- it's not even enough to cover that, is my understanding. >> [inaudible]

>> would you like the entire hill area, or just the area currently in district 10? dr. helen be moved to 6, yes. >> 2008 hundred and 54 people. that would bring the deviation -- >> 2804 people.

>> it's not just it, to david's point, the population depth is between 280 and district 9 line. that is what you're talking about moving. no, even that -- i encourage -- i think that we should think about it because we have split opinion. for others that are really considered, it would be important to see a plan for what that looks like. >> i wanted to make a comment. this is not to advocate one way or the other, but if you wanted to put it in 10, you effectively have to do our rotation. these are all rotation jobs.

you end up with most of the hill and greater mission bay in 6. naughton and the killing more to the north mission, but it also has the effect of really cutting into soma. wouldn't be 16th, 14th, the freeway or 11th. it ends up in a very strange place in the western -- and the western soma folks would have issues. haute there is a balance to be had. >> i think we have some targeted areas for next week cosy discussion. similar to raising that i think the task force should be

prepared and will have some link the mapping sessions, a solar want to encourage members to be ready for the endurance that will be required. next week, we will have the task force present. at this time, if there are no additional inquiries, we will move on to the agenda item, community outreach. >> thank you. i forwarded to -- or i asked madam clerk to forward to task members the ads that came out for community outreach. we have five.

and there were two, one in english and one in japanese. we have reporters that came out with a half page and i think they were supposed to come out today or two days ago, a full- page ad. i don't know if you want me to pass this around -- >> those are the same onees. s. >> not all of them, i think there were only three that provided -- these are the actual ones. i just want to point out that these went out in the last two weeks. they have the codes to hopefully

reach to the young people. there were questions about newsletters and a neighborhood of publications. i don't know how to track the results of that, but the project got rich will be completed. >> we appreciate it. this is reaching the various media outlets. public comment for community

outreach at this time? >> judy berkowitz, are these examlpeples of outreach? are they going to be literally or c virtualut and pasted -- or virtually cut and pasted into the file? i want to make sure they are going into the official file. >> don't make the tenderloin part of the knobb hill coalition. when they brought the mapping in to the tenderloin neighborhood, five people showed up. this gentleman with me today it was the last known german.

the sort of people that really are needed to bring the tenderloin back together are starting to come to these meetings, they operate on a shoestring budget, we're pretty much used to not getting our way. that doesn't bother us. if you would really like to make my life miserable, you would actually agree with us. the responsibility, i have to come through. just a thought.

we will move to agenda item number four, the task force work plan. last week's meeting, we had initial discussions around the final report. one of the major markers of the completion of our work, not only in addition to the mass and the redrawing of the district line by the deadline april 14, but the documentation about the process and how we arrive at the final maps. the draft outline that was afforded, i want to open up for discussions around landing on some benchmarks in some enter and deadlines. i know that the house member have also raised, in addition to the final report, how we

developer process where both the report would be compiling the report that doesn't have the necessary wait until the final maps are drawn that we can do those simultaneously. i did get an update from mr. schreiber that he is charged with the topics of the first three topics, and production, criteria, and a process that he would have a draft to the process by the middle of next week. it would give us an initial market by april 4 that we would have the first three sections forwarded to the coeditors. i believe that you have put together an initial recommendation? >> can i take a moment on that?

>> does anyone have a copy of the draft from last -- >> [inaudible] so what i said that the -- what i said i would do at the last meeting is to identify those chunks that i thought were other areas where we have moved or that we have talked about it decided to keep where they were. this was not perfect. i was attempting to look at those, and i could think of the

filipino community as a cross- district area. i would invite others to do some more work. we could come up with some examples or elsewhere for the type of narrative that i thought would be useful. is sentenced to a paragraph depending on complexity would be warranted. i would like to reflect what we got into public comment growth and the meetings and in writing and any other data sources, so that was kind of what i was thinking. and i spent a little time on three paragraphs with lessons learned and recommendations. others are little more assertive.

i would encourage people to think about that. i am hoping that this will be useful and if this is -- i am not sure it is too much, if more is warranted, i can add to its and those hoping that we can grow this report and put pieces to it in the next couple of weeks. a that we will not wait until the end. >> we talked about writing these paragraphs, it is our responsibility doing this that we do it by next week. i thought that we could do it by the end of next week because, actually, i've got a high you feel, but it only gives us another week for us to edit

everything. i am not willing to stay up until the middle of the night. i have students that i have to correct papers for. i would like to suggest that the very latest, april 5 would be that we get all of the draft for everyone who is responsible for doing the draft. it gives us a few days to actually give them back or get clarity, and otherwise we will run up to the last-minute, and whatever we decide it is going to read like, is going to be. we'd have some reflection -- or we need to have some reflection. >> going with the same sentiment, i was going to suggest that we look at using thursday