the motion common and i am not sure i want to lock myself into a particular date, because things could change. if there is some persuasive thing, i am open to it. i am not sure if there is going to be something huge and persuasive, but there may be a need to make a final tweaks somewhere. if we could really advance the report, i am very comfortable with that, but i am not sure the setting an earlier date right now helps. >> i think i am on the position that the fifth is possibly -- i

think we should be ready to draft an ad nauseam to the point where we feel comfortable about where we are, and i think we will not decide on the ninth we are moving to the 10th. i think the fed is probably the right statedate, and i think we should leave the last day. >> i will amend my motion to allow a final drive that addresses the larger issues of leave open to polishing and tweaking after that.

after the fifth. >> if we can to roll call. >> are we accepting that amendment without objection? >> without objection, they will be excepted without the amendment. >> on the motion as amended -- [calling votes] there are six ayes and one no. the motion pass those -- the motion passes.

i think maybe we need to restate the motion for the public debt on april 9 the task force will provide a preliminary draft -- i am sorry. on the fifth. a preliminary final map which will allow for changes to be made at a later date, and it is april 5. >> correct. >> of his time, i am going to conclude the work plan agenda item. we will move on to task force's budget. i do not have any new updates, but overall we are so well in in thin as a task force overall expenses.

>> i have a point of clarification, but on item 4 regarding mali's suggestions for inclusion, i did not know whether or not we have arrived on fact. maybe i just miss that. we can taket it offline if that is easier. >> if we can take it off line, that would be great. >> i do not care when, but sometime in the next 15 and a half days, could we have some kind of budget reconciliation in writing that shows where we are in various expenses? i would like to feel comfortable but we did our task within the budget as amended.

>> thank you. >> public comment for task force and budget? task force member reports? >> nothing. >> nothing. >> i had to add we are receiving a few media inquiries, but i wanted to be able to alert you about that, and i anticipate we will continue to get more requests as we get closer to our final states. >> are responding -- are we responding to those requests? >> that those requests go

directly to the clerk as well as to our share, and share macdonell will decide whether he wants to delete it goes to individual taskforce members. -- if he wants to delegate to individual task force members. >> we will move on to public comment for any items that were discussed this evening. >> regarding the blocks south, i recently learned our new supervisor reside in that area, specifically near baker and fulton, so i suggest you find out where she actually live

cents so you can see which blocks might be affected. >> i did not finish what i wanted to say about out reach. i said good things, but it now predominantly turned out bad. there was insufficient software, insufficient training, insufficient everything, and although several people were at that meeting, not a single mouth came out of that, and that is a function of the budget. the budget was insufficient. the first thing that goes is advocacy, and things get really bad. let me close by putting on my predict perhaps -- predicter hat.

i am going to predict a couple things. portrero is going to turn of the way it did 10 years ago. it is going to be put back north of market. there are a couple of differences. we are not in the brown administration, and it is interesting to see the appointments not be giving in lockstep. a representative from chinatown was claudine, and she was completely unresponsive to the requirement, and my question to you now is where is she now. >> as a matter of record, i want to stay faste that as far as i ,

if you umbrella organizations were contacted, and no input was taken for the community unity map, and so i do not know which community they were united, but it was the neighborhoods. just because you have drawn blinds does not mean they cannot be changed. i would encourage you to take a look. redrawsf.org and is really good. it is a lot of fun. it does not take long, but you can actually see where you aren' and the racial makeup of y

group in the area, which is what i did on the map you have, so draft the lines yourself at home. it has been easy. thanks. >> do we took the words out of my mouth. i do not know how many of you have actually gone to san francisco and drafted your own map, but if you are proficient with it, and it took me about a month before i got proficient with it, but i could probably move to 40,000 people in rotation in about 30-, and it can be done.

there was a lot of testimony from people supporting the community saying, you cannot change it. it is going to be too difficult to change it. nonsense. the fact is you only need five rotations going in a counterclockwise direction, and 5% will beat weeks you can do in the next two weeks. protrero hill into district 6. the theater district, the islands into district 3, 3700 people interdistrict two 3300 people into district 5, and you have accomplished in 95% of what you need to accomplish, and it

does not take a rocket scientist to do it, and it does not take more than one hour to do that. >> my name is benjamin gonzales, and i am a filipino american born in san francisco. i have been to a couple of meetings. i thank you for being able to stick to the process. i heard in the last meeting only have showed of -- only half showed up, so i am glad you guys as a committee are able to hear what the public wanted. in february i sat in with a group of filipinos, and we asked who we are and what we wanted. i came to the meetings and saw

these different groups defending their areas, and the lines you create are going to build those communities the filipino community have not had an actual larry get it was designed as theirs. i heard a long time ago there was a question about japan town becoming little manilla. i am asking and requesting that you recognize there is a filipino community in san francisco, and i hope they stay together in one consolidated area. thank you. >> thank you. at this time and we will take -- >> i did spend many hours 10

years ago of these task force meetings, and i do recall changes were still made on that day, but i do see the value of having something before the last day in place. obviously a little tweaking if need be. i do feel we are very late in the game to do something as big as taking potrero hill out of district land. i feel as people felt strongly about it it should have been discussed more seriously early on, so i urge you refrain from doing that. i do appreciate the fact you have been sensitive about traditional communities as in restoring japantown in district 5, along with other important cultural components of district 5. i hope you can keep it or bring back the west side community

into district 5, where it really belongs. thank you. >> i will take future agenda items. i heard earlier this evening and we wanted to keep pretty similar to the agenda items we had this evening. are there any admissions -- additions? >> i would like to request that i would like to get some numbers, demographic information for the latino population in district 9 based on how it looks now compared to moving the boundary north to the freeway. >> if there are no other adaptations, we will adjourn,

and our next scheduled meeting is for wednesday. public comments for future agenda items? we will adjourn, and our next meeting is wednesday, april 4, 6:00 in city hall in room 406. >> the public wants to access particular information about

your house or neighborhood we point them to gis. gis is a combination of maps and data. not a graphic you see on a screen. you get the traffic for the streets the number of crimes for a police district in a period of time. if the idea of combining the different layerce of information and stacking them on top of each other to present to the public. >> other types of gis are web based mapping systems. like google earth, yahoo maps. microsoft. those are examples of on line mapping systems that can be used to find businesses or get driving directions or check on traffic conditions. all digital maps. >> gis is used in the city of san francisco to better support

what departments do. >> you imagine all the various elements of a city including parcels and the critical infrastructure where the storm drains are. the city access like the traffic lights and fire hydrants. anything you is represent in a geo graphic space with be stored for retrieval and analysis. >> the department of public works they maintain what goes on in the right-of-way, looking to dig up the streets to put in a pipe. with the permit. with mapping you click on the map, click on the street and up will come up the nchgz that will help them make a decision. currently available is sf parcel

the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map of san francisco you can search by address and get information about any place in san francisco. you can search by address and find incidents of crime in san francisco in the last 90 days. we have [inaudible] which allows you to click on a map and get nchldz like your supervisor or who your supervisor is. the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's office of neighborhood services. you can drill down in the neighborhood and get where the newest hospital or police or fire station. >> we are positive about gis

not only people access it in the office but from home because we use the internet. what we used to do was carry the large maps and it took a long time to find the information. >> it saves the city time and money. you are not taking up the time of a particular employee at the assessor's office. you might be doing things more efficient. >> they have it ready to go and say, this is what i want. >> they are finding the same things happening on the phone where people call in and ask, how do i find this information? we say, go to this website and they go and get the information easily. >> a picture tells a thousand stories. some say a map

>> hello. the welcome to the creditor meeting of the budget and finance committee. my name is carmen chu, the super -- the chair person of the committee. i'm joined by supervisor avalos. mr. young, do you have any announcements for us today? >> please silence all electronic devices. items after deposit they will appear on april 3rd, 2012 on the board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated chairperson chu: would you call item no. 1? >> item number 1, the acceptance of a state grant in the amount of $3,883.76 from the california department of food and agriculture to participate in a

program for a quality control program. chairperson chu: thank you. >> good morning. i'm here today to respond to any questions you may have regarding this contract. chairperson chu: for the purposes of information to the public, which you just explain what the grant would do? >> it funds the inspection of the number of just about two hundred agricultural inspection lot. we do wholesale distributors and we have about 116 of those inspections to conduct. we also at 82 retail inspections that we conduct city-wide at the small stores and the large stores. what we do is we go out and we have a device, a tool that we use that is called an egg

handler. it projects a really strong light. it places the egg up against the can lurk and can see -- against the candler and we can see inside if it is good. we reject the broken ones if they are not good. we can see inside it is good. we dispose of the not good eggs on site or return them to the plant where they were produced. chairperson chu: this is not requesting any new positions, correct? >> know. chairperson chu: why don't we open this up court comment -- open this up for comment from the public. are there any members of the public who wish to speak? come on up. >> thank you. good morning.

my name is fredrik. i have lived in san francisco for 60 years. i would like to speak out in favor of this resolution. i've always thought a partner public health group used every -- could use every dollar it could get its hands on. even though it is only four thousand dollars, i guess that is better than nothing. in my opinion, the department of public health probably wastes more than $4,000 a day, so maybe this is a step in the right direction. since we're talking about quality control programs, i would like to take this opportunity to assess -- maybe we can get state funding for the overall quality control program for the department public health, especially for the general hospital. thank you. chairperson chu: thank you. >> ♪ one more

♪ item to answer ♪ one more and to find ♪ one more item ♪ to make it all better ♪ and make it better ♪ and we will be happy ♪ we will have a programs ♪ to make it better ♪ and we will make it safe to eat ♪ ♪ and we will be there ♪ and we will answer the budget called ♪ ♪ today thank you. chairperson chu: are there other members of the public who wish to speak on item number one? seeing none, public comment is closed. do we have a motion? we have a motion and a second. item number two. >> item number two, up resolution authorizing reentry

on behalf of the council to retroactively accept money from the institute of local government as a recipient of an award of the california reentry council network. >> jessica went off here with the department of reentry division. thank you for considering the resolution to accept and expend this grant of about $40,615. it is a small amount of money to continue some of the work that we started last year. the roosevelt foundation institute for local government originally founded as when the reentry staff went to the public defender's office to lodge a statewide reentry council. there are about 12 bodies braintree around the state --

for reentry around the state. the rosenberg institute reached out to local government for this project. since that time we have developed monthly conference calls, one statewide convening various side presents, and the website. this has been valuable book for san francisco, as well as to further good practices in other communities. i'm happy to answer any questions that you have. chairperson chu: this is also an item that would not require additional positions, correct? >> correct. chairperson chu: why don't we open it up for public comment? >> ♪ coming to the subcommittee was not what i had planned ♪ ♪ and i wish you good luck with reentry plans ♪ ♪ i want you to be all free ♪ and now you're looking at me ♪

♪ and that is what i want for you ♪ ♪ is reentry chairperson chu: thank you. are there other members of the public that wish to speak on item number two? seeing none, the item is closed. we have a motion and a second. we will do that without objection. item number 3. >> the resolution of the parks department to expand and urban grant for the boat bekker part funded by the safe drinking water, water quality and supply river protection act of 2006. chairperson chu: we have take a bill pressed from the department of recreation and parks -- we have jakob from the department of recreation and parks.

>> i would like to reiterate the importance of the park. that was opened in 1985, i believe. there was one of our newest parks in san francisco. in years -- there is a lot of need for renovation. we need to update the park so we can open it to members of the public. open space is very important to the neighborhood because we have one of the least open spaces of any neighborhood in san francisco, but also a high- density of seniors and families and adults who like to use recreational open space in order to build the neighborhood for a healthy model long term. chairperson chu: thank you. jacob? >> thank you. this is a culmination of a five- year planning process of the community. i'm happy to answer any questions about the grant. chairperson chu: