a i wo imine er t choo wo er t ecretary a t coison in id th t rector is goi to e to igoff o te tion te rector of ery rt i t oiin officer, t i wo i t eard th ced m i i isreement of how it h beele it is not a tion i will to e i ed coison secretary to worwith you to e t od caide >> i would like to

e estion i t it is imrtt to e t worlo i t it wo be ot to er t coittee. in ee wit wt i out te ome initiol owlee, m ome otr coisoner c i est th cri whenen rved o this coison ro t oprtitto er othe otr ro u it o t ts comiorit w. od >>

incil coer e etty concern li a erior we do when the e. concerne etty m lin coer >> i tt your wies a esires to the omttee, i a e they will te o t pt of tir decisio >> we ot ed a motio do we >> i ju wt to me se wt liwa rein tt a

ri ositio would o quent to wh he or e wo to o >> i thin we aee it is iorta the tion i - t decided il the cret >> it tatwo or tee month to reallt oi >> it w ot to te fro tcoison i ju wteto e cle wit o where t thorit lies it w not to te one' thorit from >> ca le the chterer o th we re ot osed to

interpret it iwa th they would t rt we are not in t >> alo ai ere, i a in to e re you are not rewi ot oi thin e ot sto be in coisoner i aee wit when id, there is a job riioth nee to e crinized wit resct to t job of the cret rsos t mer od >> s ware cle s wa ivin t, thinto start you off wit th t comiowo t reonlities of crein job escription,

ca e the fort e te with or you c detract from it it is the of to desig t jow th ow it will e re otion i raftinth i wt to keein in wt waid ec i t it is into be iorta th t rson h to es ic record ositio in nee to come ck to the comio escily if they e in to t. ic recor nee to co ck we ee to at w we loo plic record eer ee e- il, ju a erythin if req i wo 85% of those e- ile

ot ilu cae ople belie them peoe the le to ople lete them we ed to etais res it nee to loo ain t nee to en tere re so ti ca est t ecretary nee to ta o tt i wa to te o fter i lea comior oore i would o of the thin t is interview our cret out wh it ea i thin it mig e ef to interview erof the lic w e ee aro the ocesfor lo time

t wt t ee tt we eed for o secretary it ct rt to e those coertion >> i move the esident' estion for the omttee >> to re i a clear, tt woe onini with migl alterte >> comiors i thinr rule t re the thorit to int coisoner >> tion witrawn >> c a if they wa the comttee aonini.

>> tre i o co ood>> all t i far? >> e. >> o th is the comttee i wo est ou selecte e of tt comttee - lecte of tt coittee there ould be ecir of this omttee >> i will let worthis o >> o of you g nee

to ci w ied cir >> t c work th o >> next ite >> e we cometed t ite >> es >> t scoittee will be in towith me to let e w when we e eeti >> next item ea >> coisoner we e w on item nr x coisoner ore: i a qestion for rator iit ose we ret or you rea to the coitio b whic we oved the for t ca of rt the reon i a in tre warkin lot t

int we tt e turned into g cae there wa rmison for p i tt ticular cot. these la two wee to sttle there, a are t aid or 10 ours i inctly reer tre w o rmison of rkinin t front rd of th ticular il i ot minit o t i wa you to loo it th is b u in fillre ied t ca for in >> 1787 lomrd t comiowa to en

contion e rition t to return tt ed to its forr ort-term u oocoitiol e thorizio waonly for t rear rtio there wa lain i will confirm t contion e i c et a tter rstain of wt concern re. they ct a iinof t >> there re es ithe fro trigre>> tre w a ise witloinin the front. >> rkin es od >> they are rkinin t lot >> t e rkin in >> tonly he thorizio for t rear rtioof t operty t fro portion of t rort i oned nc3 ot

require coitiol e. there e wa other i i will look io it coisoner to i wa oi to com i do reer they heari i do t reer t pt out oila i thinthere i alley ehin itif i at ista >> tt is correct coisoner el i a ot tr to et tin troue, t they he two illboardwith tir ele a i not ow if th i illel >> we will lso iestite

th >> they are m >> rthose ople i lee. >> twere t thin othe roof originly tese were coverin ive ctio of t ldin they are t loon loon tey are e rectale with tir dog ele >> if there e other coison ters, rector rert >> i would like to t of aeals a notes there w o of relateto evio ecisio for 3 even

edit t wa il coitio ral a t aeal wawith eer i ju wte to let t coison kw out th lt ig esident rcia aoued his reio fro t board on [ da dsq) da hhj)n&4$ ö e mih ä&4aaóa0 p4m e+k mek j k] d' 2b p

h i c %zbá e1 d wá; rá } } 8c president chiu: good afternoon. welcome to the board of supervisors meeting. please call the roll. supervisor avalos: present. supervisor campos: present.

president chiu: present. supervisor chu: present. supervisor cohen: present. supervisor elsbernd: present. supervisor farrell: present. supervisor kim: here. supervisor mar: present. supervisor olague: here. supervisor weiner: present. >> all members are present. president chiu: ladies and gentlemen, could you please join me in the pledge of allegiance? colleagues, can i have a motion to approve the board meeting minutes? without objection, those meeting minutes are approved. >> there and a communications.

item number 1 is a motion adopting findings and approving a conditional use authorization on property located at 1111 california st., subject to conditions imposed by the board of supervisors on april 3, 2012. president chiu: roll-call vote. mayor lee: ah -- supervisor cohen: aye. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor olague: aye. supervisor weiner: aye. supervisor avalos: aye. supervisor campos: aye. president chiu: aye. supervisor chu: aye. >> there are 11 eyes. -- ayes. item two amends the code for adjustment in writing of a proposal or bid of a california corporation for a competitively-

bid city contract. president chiu: same house, same call? >> item 3 urges the mayor to launch a summer jobs campaign to increase the employment opportunities for san francisco's disconnected young people. president chiu: same house, same call? >> item 4 authorizes the department of emergency management to accept and expand eight grant in the amount of $35.50 million, amending the annual salary ordinance reflecting the addition of zero any -- of one of grant-funded position in the police department. president chiu: this ordinance is passed on first reading. >> item 5 appropriating salaries and fringe benefits in the fire department budget and reallocating it to overtime to meet projected increases. president chiu: same house, same

call. >> item 6 re-appropriating funds in the police department for overtime to support projected increases. president chiu: same house, same call. >> item 7 is an ordinance appropriating $320,000 in salaries for overtime in the public utilities commission. president chiu: same house, same call. >> item 8 appropriating surplus revenues and expenditures and general fund reserve to support shortfalls in the department of public health for the fiscal year. president chiu: same house, same call. next item. >> and 9, resolution authorizing the department of public works to execute an amendment to the executive structural engineering and consulting services by increasing the not-too-exceed

amount -- not-to-exceed amount for the seismic improvements project. president chiu: without objection. >> item 10 ordinance changing the official sidewalk width of portions of golden gate avenue polk street, and redwood alley. president chiu: same house, same call. >> item 11, a resolution approving for six months designation of six temporary selling spaces for street artists certified by the arts commission exempting said spaces for regulations of the police code pertaining to the display size. president chiu: this resolution is adopted. why don't we go to will callbacks >> supervisor -- roll call? supervisor farrell: today, i am

introducing legislation to extend our san francisco film rebate program through 2014. since the program was created in 2006, approximately 1135 san francisco residents have been employed in productions using the program, bringing over $12.50 million in wages to san francisco. last year production spent an estimated 56 colors million in labor supplies and other items. this body recently passed legislation i sponsored to bolster our phone rebate program by adding documentary's and programming, and to lower permit fees. the film and television industry is one we cannot afford to lose. many are great union-wage jobs. it diversifies our economic

base. it reinforces civic pride when we see our city on the big scene. i found this astonishing. my office had our budget and legislative analyst do is study on the film rebate program. it is a net profit generator for our general fund. we take in more sales tax, hotel tax, and permit fees from these productions than we give back in the rebate program. it is a net money generator for our city and general fund. the margins are slim in that regard. it is not a lot of money. as our budget and legislative analyst suggested, other states and countries throughout the u.s. and internationally have very aggressive film rebate programs we compete with, ranging from zeroing out there permiting fees to regrading all police officer fees.

if we want to compete in san francisco, we cannot just rely on our city's good looks. we have to do something about it. i want to thank those who worked on this legislation with me especially our film commission. i want to thank my staff and members for the controller's office. we spent a lot of time putting together a solid economic forecast. finally, while this legislation extends the existing film rebate program in its current form for another two years and adds another $2 million to draw from we have spent a lot of time in my office speaking with different members of the film industry -- from companies, producers. suzanne robinson has been evangelizing san francisco in los angeles recently. how can we make the film program

better to attract the next generation of films and television shows in our city? i am interested in making this more attractive down the road. my only requirement was that we do it in a cost-effective and responsible manner. those discussions are continuing. although today we are introducing a continuation of our existing program my hope is in the not so distant future we can amend the legislation to make this even better into the future, and take our film industry to the next step here in san francisco. the rest, i submit. >> supervisor kim? supervisor weiner? president chiu: colleagues today i am introducing in legislation that would establish an urban agriculture program to oversee and coordinate all of our urban agriculture activities and to

adopt goals for the city related to urban agriculture. we right now are in the middle of a new movement in cities around the country to reflect a new interest in healthy and sustainable living through urban agriculture. since 2008, over two dozen urban gardens have been created in san francisco. with many, there are significant weight lists of residents who want to garden in many cases over two years long. this would allow for the production and sale of things that are grown to urban agriculture. at this time, we need to take the next step. i want to take a moment to think -- thank spur which looked recently in two ways to expand public and private land for agriculture in san francisco. the highlighted the fact that we have seven different agencies that run different aspects of urban agriculture, 11 different

agencies that manage land. yet we do not have coordination among these agencies. at this time, in recent years the budget spent in total for urban agriculture programs is less than was spent in the 1990's. we also do not have a full staff to look at the city wide system. this legislation would introduce a city-wide centralized urban agriculture program. it would propose that this program focuses on creating a one-stop shop for information and programs related to urban agriculture. it would also move forward the creation of urban resource gardens, into partnerships with community organizations, looked into incentives for how we convert private lands, as well as streamlining the application process. i want to thank spur and the agriculture community, who have been working hard to think about how san francisco will move forward our agenda around urban

agriculture. i look forward to this conversation with all of you. supervisor campos: submit. supervisor mar: colleagues, today i am introducing with mayor mayor lee legislation that will help our parents and parent-teacher organizations support their local schools by exempting parking lot fundraisers from being taxed by the city. i want to think co-sponsors supervisor kim olague avalos chu, and farrell for joining me. i want to thank our treasurer and jason elliott from the mayor's office. this important legislation is the product of about three months of work in conjunction with michelle parker. and parents from the middle schools.

we have all crafted legislation that we think will allow such parking lot fund-raiser events to flourish and to protect the meager dollars raised by parents in these schools and schools throughout the city from being taxed. it helps parents in the school fund-raising. we are looking at other schools to be working with them for event fundraisers like parking lots. parent teacher organizations hold special parking events on local school parking lots to raise supplemental revenues for their school. currently san francisco business and tax regulations code requires these events be taxed at 25%. this creates an unfair burden on the volunteer organizers of these events parents staging them for the sole goal of enriching their schools.

this will help allow more of these events at schools. it also allows volunteer parent organizers to reap the full benefit of their efforts. the school of san francisco should do everything possible to help our families and children remain in the city. this legislation is helpful to parents going above and beyond to ensure their schools are adequately meeting their children's needs. i'm not to think the treasurer for joining me in this important legislation. i am introducing a resolution today that along with the department of the environment, 6 approval for associate membership in the home mortgage finance authority. it will help homeowners seeking energy efficiency improvements in their homes in the richmond and throughout the city. it allows san francisco residents by joining the authority at no