with the keption of 8f. 8a through e, can i have a motion. >> so moved. >> moved and seconds e. >> all in favor. >> aye: >> the motion carries. >> i have a quick question, back to the exhibits. there's somebody here, specifically, exhibit c. would you be kind enough to give my some background on how we put that together and with whom we had conversations? >> susanna ruffle, real estate services. i did not negotiateiate this, but, juliette, ellis, city real estate if this, and i'm lady

to take this questions under advisement and respond to at the next meeting. >> exhibit c deals with scope work. triggers an inquiry. although i'm not an expert of that jurisdiction of work, but, the private sector, seiu, that's local 80 7, olga maroneda. i have not received a telephone call, but, i want today alert all-or-nothing. i see no reason taking under advisement to not move forward. thank you. >> thank you. >> and your wish would then be to kontsz it to the next meeting. i've i i don't think

so. if it's being recommended to us, i'll make the motion. life i secondsled. >> seconded. >> any discussion, any public comment. all in favor, >> ayes. >> the item carries. >> i testimony 9. (reading): >> item 9, (reading from agenda.). >> this is the came item that you heard or july 24, at that point, you asked us to to back and seek further input from the over site bond committee and [?] we have their input as well as the input from commissioner

[inaudible]. there are 3 slides of summarized of key changes. if i pay go through those on the slide projector. the sit zbensz advisory committee was very placeed with the commissions actions in elevating key policy items in addition to all of the procedures and best practices that we do. but, to look at some of the over arching issues. we should be smart how we employ our technology. our one device policy, should help minimize costs for technology, with computer, laptop, or other wise. we've caution abilities security components. we've incorporateed that. they've

appreciateed the over archling budget and capital. they encouraged us to redouble our efforts to look at systematic hierms. and look at recycling. do not limitment scope.. at that meeting, we also received one public comment, that encouraged this khition to look at expanding it focus to fiber band. the next bond discussed. their input included they wanted to make sure the noteed the expanse of how we look at technology. they ask that we include something. the processes and procedure us. the

tangible and intangible procedures. so, we've included that in the proposed edits before you : clients cost is consistent with our total cost approach. that's what we do, where we can, according to jenny accepted accounting principle, from the july 20 4 meeting, they were to tighten up the policy and make it consistent with the community benefits policy, and environmental justice policy, look to optimize sustainability. threw commissioner vietor, and adaptation to climate change. all those changes having made in the red line copy that you see before you.

>> thank you commissioners. >> i'd like to moveed policy. >> okay. moved. life i seconded. >> and seconded . i do have a question, first of all, a comment, i think the changes made during the review process improveded policy, and i appreciate the people taking the time and effort to focus on that, i did have one question. in the red line for the environmental principles and criteria, the first bullet point talked about seeks technology to optimize sustainability, what was eliminated. in the treatment of utility service. i was wondering what the thought was behind that deletion. >> the thought was not to limit it to our direct you till

taoeg provision, but, to the degree we had work foertionz dwoement programs, so, not to be limiting, but, it can either stay in or go out. >> okay. i guess i'd like to hear some discussion of that. one of the things that i want today make sure is that, where we are pumping the envelope on technology, that there be a real utility link. so, that job is still the job and we can use green technology. so, i like the linkage to the utility service. when i read t i read it could limit, like the intellectual property, that's not my intent. that's value

added to it. my question is, is there really an incompatibility. was the intent to explore technology that has nothing to do with our utility mission? or not? >> no, it's central to our utility mission. one example could be the new video law, 525 golden gate it's incredible for outreach and education. does it help us in the treatment of waste wa*etion. not directly, but, indirectly, that was one of the ideas where technology that we've adopted to achieve multiple objectives. >> okay, i can accept that language. the thing i want to be clear about, and i've used the analogy before. i believe

in affordable and accessible child care. i believe very strongly in that. i am delighted that our office building has that kind of facile tie for the employees. i am not interested in the puc taking on providing child care for the city as a whole. that's the distinction. i want to make sure we keep our focus on what is our job. do it sfwel regently. so, with na understanding, i appreciate your clarification. i have no objection to the language that's tl.s >> thank you. >> thank you. any other comment, commissioners. mr. ppillpal. >> david pilpal. this is not the public you till taoegs and child commission. that's okay.

i preshlt, that in the 6 weeks, it has gotten better. the policy initiatives. the rate policy next, seek input from others on that, i'm also hoping that this small and growing collection of policies will be on the web so that we can point to that and say this commission takes rate pair issues seriously, we have' set of policies and evaluate against those policies, doing business well and properly. and one small suggestion, in the fourth suggestion on transparency, fourth and 6 bullets refer to the enenterprise easy. i suggested to add and bureaus, so, it's not limited to the

enter prizes aztecnology prevaeds finance and it, but, throughout the other bureaus as well, if you can make that small change. thank you again for seeking input from others. >> thank you for that comment and suggestion. >> i appreciate that suggestion to add bureaus. >> would you like to move an amendment. >> yet, and add baou roys in bullets 4 and 6, after each enterprise, and baou roys. life i okay, we have a motion. could i have a second. >> second. >> any discussion? any public comment, on the motion to amend, all those in favor. >> ayes. >> motion carries. tall in

favor, opposed? the motion carries. thank you. madam secretary, item 10. >> (reading i temg 10 from the agenda). ... with a duration of 5 years to brao vied comprehensive management, of cherry reservoir water shape as well as security of .... >> steve richie. general manager for water. this is 2 agreements. one for comprehensive management for which arey water shed and the other -- parallel to the hetch hetchy. we do care about the water quality of cherry reservoir, so, we want to make

sure we're protecting the quality of that reservoir similar to how we fro tengt the hetch hetchy. to provide armed personnel, to maintain security of our facilities on the cherry side. i'm happy to answer questions on she's. >> commissioners? no questions. do i have i motion. >> second. >> any public comment, seeing none, all in favor? life i ayes. >> opposed. >> item carries. item 11. >> (reading item11 from agenda.

>>barbara hale, verify to our customers the electricity, we are required under state law too make this disclosure and you need to attest to the voracity. we also have been working under the state law with the california energy commission and provided the same information to them, with that, i ask for your support, happy to take any questions. >> any questions? >> i have a question, just because i've lost the thread in it. helpy has been grandfathersed? >> yes. our helpy power, we have' separate stream for helpy power. our content label lists our use of traditionally

eligible and large hydro, and disclosing to the customers where the power comes from. that's not going to change as that are faz as we know. this is no expiration stated in the law as pfs passed. >> is there any credit if we replace some of that. there's also talk if you start to replace some. large stale that's grandfathered in, that there could be credit: >> i don't believe the law it covers that. at the time the law was under consideration. there are aspects to the extends that we imrao*uf them, there's an increment of an additional capacity because of those improvementings. that

increment could be eligible undered traditional rules. >> right. okay, thank you. >> any other questions. can i have a motion. >> move id. >> seconded. >> any public comment. >> all in favor. >> ayes. >> opposed? >> the motion carrys. we'll be going to closed session sortly, any public comment on matters to be considered during closed session? >> i testimony [inaudible]. >> what about that item? >> what we come out of closed session, we'll consider item 6a and hopefully dispose of it at that time. >> is that why it's not in the

top 3? [laughter]. okay. >it's probably to have a motion whether to assert the attorney client privilege during closed session. >> moved. i've i second. >> public comment. all in favor.

>> good afternoon. this iso8yc the land use and economic development committee board of supervisors. it's monday, september 10. it's beautiful outside by the wayr our clerk isd$"i: alisa miller. >> the clerk: please make sure all submitted to the clerk. items will appear!inhg the board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated tngeddle thankm you. we have six items on the agenda. i should introduce our cityd6! attorney, john givner who is with us today. ç4p&c"x authorizing acceptance of a grant from the san park alliance for play area at lafayette park.

sponsored by supervisor mark farrell. i believe we havex$r] from> good afternoon, s. thank you for having me hear today. i workf/ç4u on the san francisco recreation and park department's partnership team. -w often work with the park alliance with various friends group. the friends ofsuf3o lafayette pk playground have worked incredibly hard to raise additional'' play area at lafayette park. by bond money, as well as the private money, andp pay for special bolders that are part of the design, construction documents, and cash gift, to pay theh

contractor to complete0j enhancements of the playground. >> chair mar: thank3ísg if there are no questions, colleagues, let's open this up for public comment. is there4÷m that would like to speak? closed. colleagues, can we move this forward with a positive recommendation? withoutmçmk ms. miller, please call item 2. >> alisa miller: item 2, resolutiong+w,ñ authorizing a retroactive acceptance of a grant from san francisco park alliance for windmill project phase 3. >> chair mar: thank you. grant that i'm the sponsor of. and we have dan mauer?ç÷;j frome recreation and parks department. this is windmills, one of two, that are park. mr. mauer. >> good afternoon, board members,&rj department. the yft is an accept and expend

$513,000, 375 come from[?kcñ the gordon moorelñ foundation. these funds will be]o< coupled with open space funds tj complete the phase of three phase project. it is open.a.0p and operational. these funds will be used to and other interpretivepe educational exhibits which will complete"f i know there is tremendous support from the dutch -- whenst the huge crane came and putw

well. colleagues, if there are no questions, let's open this up for public comment. is there anyone from the÷c that would like to speak in seeing none, public comment is8f closed. colleagues, can we similarly move this forward with a positive recommendation without thank you. ms. miller, we're movingß-a alo. item?l 3. >> alisa miller: item 3 ordinance amending the planning codewl policies and goals. >> supervisor mar: this one is sponsoredfp christina ol!$ david campos and myself. we're hoping to have someone from?u?.u supervisor olague's oé let's see. so, yeah, i do see this. i see -- okay. well, on this item, i would like september 24th.

>> the clerk: mr. chair, we have to open#l1÷jv it up for puc comment. >> chair mar: thank you. so let's open this up for publiv comment. oh, supervisor olague is here. okay. so we just introducede no. 3, the housing preservation and production item, thejv dashboard -- >> supervisor olague: be item because we need to talk to some of the organizations1sj'$ t have been working with us closely, and also with the reach more consensus among some of those items that are still a littleíh controversia >> chair mar: okay. thank you, supervisor. >> supervisor olague: uh-huh. >> chair mar:p[cpz let's open ts up for public comment. is there anyone from the public comment that would lieb torgm speak? public comment is closed. colleagues, without objection. we're moving this to september thank you. thank you, supervisorx3?cx ola, c @&c"x

please call item 4. >> alisa miller: ordinance amending planning code to permit existing gasoline stations cx on 19th avenue to provide a mechanical car wash >> chair mar: so, it looks like supervisor olague has left. so we have to present,mu planning department,> aaron staffer from the on july 12, 2012 the planning commission votedj-ws 6-0 to recommend approval of the ordinance with modifications. the 86k;+red ordinance would allow existingc service stations of a certain size located on 19th avenue from lincoln avenuerr& boulevard to provide mechanical, with conditional use authorization. >> supervisor mar: we have i was going to ask if she has

any introductoryd(:,>p)ks. >> i'm sure you will cover a lot of what i will mention but i'll it is appropriate to allow the intensification of useqm-yá certain sites, that are of a certain square footage, and already serve this legislation wouldn't allow new stations to pop up, but% instead works within the confines of existing stations on and proposes very specific metrics that the projects must no, and waste mitigation. conditions that require the stations to demonstrate that they have ! considerations of the impacts on the envirqs$? including limiting it to stations on lots of at least 12,000 square> performance of a traffic study, a no