union job. it is really a lie to our students a d or better. if we have students that graduate only d's or better that is not giving them more opportunity. that is actually not coming through with our promise to these students. so just to let folks knowing that we're doing d or better now, but why we need the numbers for c or better is because we need know what we need to do to get those students ready to graduate c or better. it is our intention, i think, to deliver on our promise to our students, that will give them great opportunity and that greater opportunity is a c or better. i especially want to thank the youth commissioner for coming out in support of this funding for credit recovery for the students and actually asking really, really thoughtful questions. i appreciate their support and also their greater interest in

this. because they realize and know students who are struggling to meet these high requirements. thank you. >> thank you, commissioner. one thing that i would like to discuss at some point and i don't know that today is necessarily the day to do this, but as we're looking at the objective of giving every student the opportunity to go to college by allowing them to meet these requirements. the focus isn't necessarily on what the school district is doing, but i would like to say more and have more of a discussion about what else the city can do to help the school district reach that objective? and i know that there is additional supportal funding that supervisor kim has introduced. and a number of us are supportive of that.

but i would like to have an even greater discussion that goes beyond the specific amount of money. but what else is it that we can do to collectively reach that objective? because to the extent that resources are a big problem here, is there -- are there additional things that the city can do with the resources that we do have to help in this effort? and to me, that discussion will also involve a discussion about what different city agencies, what role they can play in this effort? you know, what is it -- what kind of support system is needed to help a student achieve academic success? and academic success doesn't just happen in the classroom. it's something that requires an

entire community school district has the responsibility to make it happen. so i would like to figure out how we as a city and county can be even more helpful? because i think that we're all in it together. president chiu. >> thank you, mr. chair. i was going to make a similar point and certainly in the context of november 6th and we don't know what is going to happen at the state level and what is going to happen with funding, but we're all the wayed with baited breath to see what would happen in the beginning of november and to ask if school district officials can help us think through. we need to think on the city and what we can do to be the

type of partner that the city and county ought to be with vis-a-vis the san francisco unified school district. so i'm very interested in this conversation as well. i want to make a moment and thank all of you for being part of this conversation, particularly the young folks who are here. because your voices, a-g for a lot of folks, people can intellectualize it, but it is helpful to hear how it impacts the lives of students and your future. so thank you for being here. x thank you very much. and again, i think it's important for us to continue this conversation. i don't know that we have to do it within the context of this item and i think there are different ways of structuring the discussion. so i would ask that we file this item, if we could have a motion by

commissioner fewer. seconded by commissioner mendoza. if we can do that without objection. i will certainly bring this issue back and i think it makes sense for us to do so after -- sometime after the november election when we have a better sense of where things are. but i think that even if the measures pass, i think there is a lot more that the city has to do. and, by the way, one of the things that i am interested in doing and will be doing in the next couple of weeks is introducing a motion to expand the make-up of this committee or least to consider including city college. because i don't think we can have a full picture of how we're educating young people in the city without having city college at the table. so i look forward to that conversation. the last point that i will make is that i do want to acknowledge mr. hoover lydell, who is in the audience and the

reason i want to acknowledge him because he has been an institution in the school district for many, many years. when i started as a lawyer working on the consent decree, hoover served as an expert in the court and i'm glad that the school district continues to use his efforts. he has benefited thousands and thousands of young people over the years. so i'm glad to see that. so mr. clerk, is there any other business before the committee? >> that completes the agenda. >> that completes the agenda and the meeting is adjourned and two words go giants!

>> good morning and welcome to the san francisco county transportation authority meeting of tuesday october 23rd order, 2012. my name is david campos and i am the chair of the authority. madam secretary, if we can roll >> commissioner >> present. >> commissioner chu >> carmen chuy. commissioner cohen >> commissioner elsbernd >> present. >> commissioner >> commissioner >> present. >> vice chair wiener. we have quorum. >> please call item two. approval of the minutes. >> before we take action to this item. is there a member of the public

that would like to speak on item two? seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues, you have the minutes of the meeting before you. if we can take a motion to approve the minutes. motion by commissioner avalos. seconded by commissioner farrell. we will take that without objection. >> on item two. roll call. campos, >> roll call taken. item passes. >> if you can please call item number three. >> report, this is an information item.

thank you very much. colleagues i have a very brief report today. we had two significant transportation events. on october 11th, we hosted the u.s. secretary of transportation, ray lahood as well as our house minority leader, nancy pelosi at at ceremony to mark the approval of the federal government grant for the central subway. this is a commitment of almost a billion dollars to a project that has been on i books for a very long time. we want to take this opportunity to congratulate the sfmta on reaching that important mile stone and thank everyone involved in making that funding possible. of course, including the members of the board that have been supportive for this and advocated for this project and our star that have been working on this. secondly, on october 12th, we marked a major milestone.

we have the ground breaking of the presidio park way. we were honored to have minority leader pelosi as well as the highway administrator, victor mendez and malcolm dougherty. we want to thank speaker pelosi and the project has received significant amount of money be it stimulus money to open it. the first phase opened in april. this second phase is important because it would be delivered through a public-private partnership it will rely on a concession to deliver the project on time and fixed price and operate and maintain to specific standards for the next 30 years. so we're very pleased with this

development. i think in all, we have a good month for public transportation here in the city and countiy of san francisco. we want to remind the prop k local sales tax is being used to improve the delivery of services to our residents. we're very proud of that, and i look forward to continuing the work with all of you on the commission. and again, we want to thank our staff for their tremendous work. with that, that closes my remarks. is there any member of the public that would like to speak on this? if so, please come forward. >> mr. chair, i have a few comments on what you said. on the two projects that you tried to give a little spin so

that our representatives in congress as you say, have delivered this huge sums of money. but let me remind everybody that it's taxpayers money. let me talk about the central subway. all of y'all should know that phase one of that was the third street light rail where we expanded over 700 million. that has to be tweaked. as much as we have people talking about rosy terms, that system really doesn't work. so now we have phase two, which is 1.5 miles and expanding over a billion dollars. to be expect, over $1.6 billion.

if you folks think that's something honorable, then i think we need a line item on this project. and y'all will be held accountable in the seniors, the physically challenged in this sub-- central subway project have to walk for long distances. i watched nancy pelosi used to stand for the buses. here they come, here they go. if she wants to say what's over ground and not working is going to go under ground and going to be working, you representatives have to listen to the people and there are a lot of people that really don't agree with that. but that's on you. i worked at the presidio of san francisco and i am glad you have

a witness in mr. [inaudible] who did a wonderful job on the drive. there are many phases to the drive as you understand that's federal property, but now we have a private governmental state type of collaboration to complete that project. at least there, there are bench marks and at least there you can watch the standards. on the central subway, you representatives just don't go with the flow. it's taxpayers' money, even though the representatives may think that they were involved in getting it and that the subject of transportation mr. hood really loves san francisco. it's taxpayers' money. >> thank you very much. >> thank you sir, any other member of the public that would like to speak on item three? seeing none, public comment is done.

>> if you can go back to item one. commissioner carmen chu is away today. she's on way on her honeymoon. seconded by commissioner farrell. can we take that without objection. i also want to thank mark bunch and jessie larson from sfgtv. >> executive directors report, item four >> thank you. commissioners, executive director, my report is on your desk. i have just a couple items i want to highlight. to follow on to the chair's comment about the presidio park way. we have an interesting

opportunity for the first phase, opened to traffic at the end of april and it's essentially the southbound lanes. and the northbound half of project, which is almost a mirror image of what has been built is what is delivered now as a public-private partnership. it gives us a textbook example or opportunity to do an analysis side by side, a comparison of how long it took and how much it cost and the challenges of the first half traditionally versus the second half in an innovative way. we're looking at the possibility of bringing this as a potential study with a collaboration most likely of a higher learning, one of the universities that has a strong infrastructure program so

that we can not just do the comparison, but use this to shed light on the entire state infrastructure program. the state is at a cross roads in terms of funding for transportation, the nation is looking for models that might work. that's what minority leader, pelosi said at the time of the ground breaking and this is the time to provide that information. an opportunity that will not present itself in such a clean way because in most cases, you're transferring the lessons of one project to another project and this is an opportunity to do a comparison side by side. i give you a recommendation on this in early in the next year. in terms of other studies and issues that we're dealing with, there's been a considerable amount of progress on the 19th avenue transit study. you may recall that's a study to

try to move the light rail service from the center of the street to the west side integrate it more with land use changing happening there. they were a set of key meetings that happened with the folks that managed the stone sound galleria and san francisco state. there continues to be progress on that. i am very, very interested in the study. there's going to be a seminole effort to reshape that part of town and really increase the potential for transit ridership and bicycle-pedestrian safety in that part of town. we will complete that in the summer of 2013. for the interested members of public. we have quite a bit of member on

sfc sf sfcc -- sfcta.org. this is work that will extend through the fall. the other thing that is a good piece of progress. we have completed the members for the ballpark stationary study. i am thankful to the board for that to validate the progress of the study. the study does also have a website, sfcta.org/balboa. the cac will meet regularly now that it's fully constituted. there's progress on the bay view

hunter's point study. we convened the second of six monthly meetings of the mobility study working group. during the month of october, during the october meeting, the working group prioritized the mobility gaps in that area and also potential solution categories, and next month, the study team will present a set of initial strategies and a business plan for that area. the third meeting the take place at 1601 lane street november 13th at 10:00 a.m.. we invite the public to attend that. we have an active call for projects on the, one bay area grant. the o-bag grant, $35 million of grants that will be spread over projects for the next four years

and this includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements. local streets and roads. safety to school and transportation for communities type projects. the o-bag applications are due at our offices on october 26th. the end of this week essentially. we have developed a two-part call for projects with first park consisting of the prioritization of staff and selection of a pool of potential projects. those then that will happen by december, of course with your blessing and after that, we will work with the sponsoring of the projects which will still be essentially a rough semifinalists list and hone in on the aspects of the list and further detail them to put them

through a final evaluation and from that, select a final group of recommended projects that will come to the board for discussion and hopefully approval. so the following several months will be the opportunity to get that done. and we will apply the screening and prioritization criteria to have that list in shape by may-june of next year. that of course, will be as the whole obag process is a new paradigm and experiment in how to distribute funding from the region to the counties with ultimately, a blessing at mtc by june 30th of next year. the san francisco transportation plan has also reached some major milestones. you saw a presentation of the planned process last meeting

here. after that, we launched a major outreach effort. there is now a new experiment involving people in the process where we propose that they create their own transportation budget and essentially using the 3-1/2 or so billion dollars in discretionary funds for the life of the plan to decide how to prioritize it if they were san francisco's transportation king for a day. the tool is an online budget tool, people who are interested should go to sfcta.org/my budget and play with it and come up with their own priorities. we had a great deal of interest in this. more than 300 people have submitted their ideas through the tool and it's still going on. we expect that we will be able to bring back the initial recommendations to you at the

november 20th meeting. and the next meeting of the county-san francisco plan advisory committee is november 28th at 6:00 p.m. at our offices. people are of course invited to attend that as well. the last is our progress report on our commercial paper. you approved a change in the letter of credit that we have supporting the commercial paper program away from the lbbw bank, the german bank to wells fargo. that already showing major benefits. the cost of that letter of credit has essentially been reduced in half. still a far cry to have money in a bond and have the flexibility

of the commercial paper. that was, i think, a very good outcome for us at this point, and i want to thank cynthia fong, our deputy for finance and administration for helping us shepherd through that process to have a smaller cost of doing business. that concludes my report. i will be happy to answer questions. >> thank you, colleagues any questions for our executive director? seeing none, we will open up to the public. anyone that would like to speak on the executive director's report please come forward. >> this item is item just for information. so it gives me an opportunity to give some information on some points. as far as the balboa station is

concerned, i see the representative present here. i think you should push for the balboa station somehow connecting with the third street light rail. now it begins at fourth and king and ends at the middle of visitation nowhere. the san francisco county transportation authority did play a role in it and think that's fine. you spent $700 million. starts at fourth and king and ends in the middle of visitation valley in no man's land. it's high time that whenever balboa station is mentioned, you are really a transit-first city, we connect balboa train station

with visitation valley. the second point i want to make is on this so-so called mobility study. new right, the transportation system especially any of the buses that go up to hunter's point is very precarious. and this has been going on for many, many years. over 15 years. but in the last three years, it's despicable. you do not know who are the focus groups gathering to talk about some mobility program, but as far as the really plight of the people, something has to be done. and that's one of the ways where [inaudible] is fostered.

the sfcta, loves to talk the talk, but cannot walk the walk. finally, i saw this thing in the bus that you be a czar for a day and now to the year 12-2040, you can spend $64 billion. we are not dealing with monopoly and those type of gimmicks. it's a shame our streets are pathetic. our transportation has to be tweaked and we have to be serious about our roads and transportation system. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. is there anybody member of the public that would like to speak on the executive director report, please come forward. >> good afternoon, supervisors.

government transportation. what has it done for this city? in the last 10 years. as it really made any citizen's life better? san francisco was renowned for its public transportation for years which had traffic calming, which had character and culture. the public transportation system in this city is to die for. i was hit by a muni bus, rear ended coming back from a yoga class. now my arms are paralyzed. do you think the city and county of san francisco compensated me for that accid