projects. when i first approached peter last year to talk about the warriors arena i was really fkdz on the proposed multiply use facility. we were made aware very early on about the ongoing issues with commuter traffic. and peter and i have had the opportunity to work together on multiply phase plans in order to best think about the multiply use arena facility. we were thinking two narrowly. we were also working on two other projects. we weren't thinking about an overarching strategy to look at transportation along the waterfront and really trying to

understand the projects were connected from a people moving point of view. the proposed arena will be one of the most assessable projects in the nation. but as i in essence you listen to the neighborhood commuter today it doesn't work well. but half a mile away we're looking to develop a promise that compliments a new housing units. and more commercial space that can accommodate up to 5 thousand jobs and the rehabilitation

project. down the road there's another project that captures the dog patch park. and we have a proposed development that includes over 2.2 million office space for artist that could accumulate up to 12 thousand jobs. if he think about this there really going to be destinations for workers for visiters and we need the transportation to work now as the development and neighborhoods mutual that were it's boundaries go as far north as green street and about a half-mile in.

that captures these three projects but it will also look to try to anticipate the transportation needs thoughtful mission bay which includes another 3 thousand how's utilizes. and the smaller projects like 3 hundred and 50 condominium projects. this is really a model of what the mayor said we can produce. at any time a strategy inning iic look at what current conditions are and the proposed development seeks to be and what are the ways as these projects seek to include some of those projects. it is part of what the city

wants to proprieties. i think we need to look at this for something that maybe ways to facilitate those project of partnership. i'm ready to question any questions >> thank you very much and thank you jennifer so if we could have the laptop. i'll go through this overview and advise you we've had a lot of conversations with the communities. we'll be talking a lot about an extended conversation. as you saw in the chronicle today and as you walk up and

down market street what i'm interested in doing on the waterfront and we want to see the waterfront it is the classic commute. i'll get to the america's cup soon. i think that's an important part. but first transit first. clearly at mta we understand that to mean bicycle and pedestrian transportation. it pertains to the very constrained area within san francisco and the we don't have a lot of room to expand.

if i can take the liability it have that describe transit first that's our battle cry going into the water front planning. this is a quick little spin hopefully going upward. as congestion goes up on the market streets it impacks buses and streetcars that have to fight their way through traffic. people give up on the trains and the buses they stop walking because they don't feel safe we're back to the starting point. this is the trend of what doing nothing points to.

this assessment - this map is tilted so that the north is to the right. unfortunately, the color is not coming through but these are the projects. that was a former steelyard. actively there's a development but the effort cities is a much bigger part of pier 70. and there's the makers environment. that's just at pier 70 at 20th and third. the giants have big plans for this area including the housing, commercial recreational. and that's pretty sizeable. then to the far right it is lot

3:30. then the warriors arena. so those are 3 that are flagged. these projects is all going through the environmental review. each one makes some assumptions. each one shows how the transportation is shaping up. even before the environmental review is beginning are we really shaping the project and shaping the mitigation measures? we believe the answer is yes. we believe over the few years of the water front assessment.

we talk about the t pe and as a direct relationship on this area you can imagine it's right by the ballpark. we have parking initiatives underway. we've got bart going on and they're looking decreasing frequency. there will be the california tarantula expansion and on the terminal itself at any time smart a remember that there's a part of the waterfront transportation and its on expansion. we start this expansion last october is to learn from america's cup. a lot of the same aspects.

there's visitors and this may be the first time their in san francisco. especially october 6th and 7 when anything was happening in san francisco we planned ahead with the america's cup and before the environmental review the america's cup was underway we engaged all the partners the supervisors the transit providers. we looked at the regional services and got their ideas even great the environmental review. so when it concluded people planned document ended up being the documentations measures. to make sure we have convenience in the america's plan. we used this to take a look at the plan. we paid attention to the legacy.

i don't host america's cup without trying to make the city better. so without the statement this is to all the 3 phases. phase one is to develop the project with the transportation providers. namely bart the ferry operators and the golden gate and presidio. they actually have a role connecting people and then to engage the projects sponsor. maybe the giants the warriors and for the city they are also people who can help us come up with solutions. they're looking to us to make sure that their project works well, as far as transportation. they're willing to work with us

in plain storming and leverageing. and there's - we've had workshops we've built networks that are current and proposed for transit for bicycles for pedestrians per we've had that break out sessions where people broke you tell and let us know what was working. those airport meant to be read but the graphic on the he left is two columns. we knew all those projects were happening over a period of time. they're the big 3 projects we talked about. their everything in the pipeline and it has a degree of

certainty. in right on the blue are the transportation promotions. one of the challenges we find is this alone has been a good exercise. this year art plans and other plans that have goals and objects - we want people to know about transit and parking but not 80 just to look at san francisco but the transportation authority or look at caltrans we formed all these projects into one. so out of that before we go into

the i railroad. by also existed are the new ideas. we we set up those new ideas not just for the warriors e i r but for the pier e i railroad. we also include how long it takes to get those projects in plays and what those costs are. that's a checkpoint to make the difference between a checkpoint and a reality. just to share. this is a very regional area the buses area. bart's already working on 25 trains to go up to 27 trains.

it's a timing of it being measured by the developers. we've all followed with the planning around the market. we know your big pictures. but what are short term projects that can expand improvement. also on deck is california train improvements but there are some increased frequencies and we're tracking that as well. and, of course, the big downtown extinction to the downtown terminal. with gotten gates bus running

they're not supposed to pick up people in san francisco and drop them off in san francisco. they're supposed to drop people in the afternoon on the other side of the bridge. maybe those buses are going down the waterfront could be used for local trips. they're basically confidential buses that are on the street. this could be a great augment to our transportation. and by the way, i want to acknowledge a few people fordif.

more people feel confident on bike and that actively goes to the mode tests and it shows more chips on alternative. we have a bike facility i

understand that some ports like pier 40 with the implements of that so those developments are actually jump starting the project. we know that bicycle sharing is coming out this summer. we look at the sponsorship opportunity. and effectively we could expand the bicycle sharing here. parking. this is not the easiest thing to talk about. if our strategy in the city was to use the existing park we might actually reduce parking demand.

lot of potential. and then mta is interested in operating the garages as opposed to mission rake so with our parking managers to see in that m mtas facility could be used for the whole area rather than one particular use. and there's much more there's the program.

transportation and manage. aaron miller raise your hand, please. we have the transportation demand expert. do not let them have any more children soon. this is about programs and helping people understand that the managers on site can help visit take advantage of all those facilities their building. promoting sustainable choice giving on site on site broker who helps he horns get part of the package on living on development. these are strategy that work

well, for like treasure island. we want that same kind of program manager entity so that we make the best use of all all the investment in the area. and we don't forget about the cabs. we make sure that the efficient operations of these are not interfere with other modes of transportation. so we're working closely with the muni services and i'll be at the taxi meeting next week. so fast two, that was just a very timely review. there is so much more going on. so, now we have all these

projects going on desk. we approached california trains and others. we want to find out for example, is this plan working if no, it doesn't work then we stop working on that. it's like a lot of projects ended up on the cutting room floor. that's not just one project but 3. i figure it will get smarter. we come up with what it takes to pit those elements in plays. by one project may have great

value they may want to partner in ifth the eileen group. so would we structure a fair share allocation to a fraction of the cost. and you can see in this valley and the executive park not one of the people paying one hundred percent but their fair share. with that we need to document those all the times. it's not just from the e i railroad we're supposed to build those things were we want to know what people's responsibilities are. we could get more grants if we

make ourselves so much more efficient peewee have to follow those projects have a lifespan of 20 years. so don't read this but it shows that who's in the lead of which transportation litigation measure, who's responsible for it. when he get to a certain level we'll know 3 years as we monitor the system we'll tell a procurement grow up that we need it streetcar in about 3 years. so we watch the process from beginning to end.

so this is the assessment we're well ahead of the rife. i think it's here we're going looking to have this wrapped up in may or june and to really test how things are supposed to work is much smart. i'll be happy to answer any questions >> thank you for your presentation very good. >> i'll start. that's a thank you. this is incredible interesting. it feels to three and four like this is something pretty new the city taking an entire area and really documenting out all the changes that are planned up to thirty years out and really addressing it bit by bit.

this is the first time we've done something like that isn't it? >> i'd like to point to a study that looked san francisco state and looked potential for what is the shopping center. what's interested about that the san francisco master plan we're tracking them and taking the 19 accounting corridor study and interesting san francisco state as that on yes, i do up $30,000 just to show how interested they were. when they think they're actually getting the transportation planning before their needing it th