accounting corridor study and interesting san francisco state as that on yes, i do up $30,000 just to show how interested they were. when they think they're actually getting the transportation planning before their needing it they're interested in writing a check. this is not just one project by one project but all 3. >> i really do understand how for this will be for the velocities to have this demonstrate define ahead of time before they even break ground. could you just touch briefly what the benefit is to the people who don't see as much in the development as they're worried about accident effects

that that development is bringing and this is really helping us to get ahead thought possible congestion in that area. and it's not only going to speed up the process for developers but then speeds i think the help we offer to our pedestrians and your - bicycles. and if the classic way to do planning is wait until the 11th hour and have the department say oh, mta you're supposed look at it ahead of time and gives all

the detailed. let's go beyond san francisco and to do as much work as with the regional people and before the e i r and before you start sharping your pencils i will work with who've i need to so the e i r didn't propose more than they think they can. if the mitigates measure is something that works it is something through our tracking planning that helps us to build an implementation of transportation improvements but as development warrants.

>> if i could add first of all, those projects on their own are they as jennifer said their public - private developments. is it because the city sees tremendous values to the city and i'm sure if you were interested jennifer could speak for largely to the benefits of the project. as she mentioned those study areas that don't work today for the people who live in mission bay particularly in the south beach area people who are trying to use another way. this is making sure that the new demands won't bring negative

aspects to the community but it's vance new projects that are going to make the whole transportation syndrome the area work better. it's not just the - at any time to improve the whole transportation mode in this area to make it work in a faster way. so there's benefit that enables the promise to work well, it's a win win approach between peter and michael and jennifer and aaron and carly and all the folks behind this you can see from the presentation it's pretty complex stiff.

>> i want to say the light bulb moments that i got is one when i think about the sibling way providing underground link to peel street when you think about all the congestion that all the commuters are experiencing coming out of the city if you could get those folks out of streetcar muni and other modes and start training people to see that route as a quick route to california trance that's a quick win. this subway is sdoeltd open in 20018 and the arena project is

to open in late 2017. you may need to create something to develop that to get users to use that - and you're also reducing this traffic along that area when the new arena is present. another is we're talking about the other parking strategy we can now start talking to the giants around the bundling ticket sales with parking and the potential to sort of get people - if you're coming out of the north you come from the north if you come from the south you park to the south and you

take one the petty kabdz. there's also the giant are already working on bundling parking sales. we can partner with them and see if they work. >> that's all no more questions. >> thank you for the expensive presentation. i really appreciate the forethought that's going on this. i want to highlight i didn't side mentioned in your presentation yet was the - as part of the t d m strategies and i'm sure you've thought about that but make sure there was a streaming to incorporate car share and can you remember share pods. i'd like love to see a car share

pod on every block but for further opportunity i'm sure you've thought about that and you'll include that. the other thing i want to stress a to make sure your thinking about bicycle parking in the long-term. we've got the bicycle sharing i've thought of but i would suggest anywhere you've got that opportunity you've got to need for bicycle parking international. today, i rode my bible and had to park away over here and walkway over there. particularly with respect to the opportunity to leverage the private public partnerships that you've thought about.

great work >> again thank you very much. when you use the a team word you, your exactly right. i appreciate the creativity. >> there is one member of the public to comment here. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon directors. i am a member of the mta and i'm also the executive committee a member. i'm here speaking on my own. first of all, i want to tell you that the warriors have cite against the location.

there's american people inadequate transportation and it's not an appropriate use for march time space. every one of these 3 projects is in ground level for sea level wise. according to b cdc risk assessments must be based on on the best estimates of seawater rise and they rang from 10 to 69 inches currently provided the bets seawall protection for the west coast. and thus depending upon how quickly the greenland and ice kapdz metal. look at this i don't know if we

can see - if you can look you can see that ail these projects are going to be underwater thank you end of the century that's the prediction and then the warriors. this is the b cdc map that's maybe a little bit better. but i do encourage you to go to b cdc web site. those projects every one of them needs to be reassessed. >> good afternoon i'm a planning director. i first of all, want to commend peter for this really comprehensive look at the

waterfront. i really also want to commend the mta and peter and think brilliant execution of the pilot projects during the last year's pilot cups. standing up there for two hours helped me to see that the project was very worthwhile. we would encourage to you expand that upon the pilots this year. and as well as extending this facility all the way down to california trains. and it's exciting to think about the challenges that folks who are waking, biking and wheeling for folks who are facing this

challenge on the waterfront. we'll love to partner with you all on those projects and lately i know a lot of tension that's being reached around the green bay. and everyone who lives close to the waterfront should be able to reach all those water front area. >> anyone else care to address the board on this topic. >> he this is a very specific question thinking about far in advance by it may prompt some other ideas. when the central subway it completed there will be a new assess way to the ballpark.

and if they want to take muni service they can take 80 it down to the ballpark. but this isn't something that needs to be answered now but maybe in the next few months for blah is going to be the route for our special service for basketball and baseball games were are we going to use the existing loop for expanded service are we going to utilize both? a >> once to not once the subway

is running it won't go down to the - this area. >> we'll enhance both the m and the t we'll have both the services running. when we did the pilot of the eileen which was a time that we were pleased to find out that a lot of folks were using this e line service to get down to the park. we expect that a lot of the folks coming up here the walk is equivalent frays the bark station to the arena. the balance that would largely be picked up by the - as it is today by the ballpark.

those are exactly the kinds of things that the transportation assessment is working to develop >> anything else? >> item 12 is to conduct a closed session. >> move not to have one and any discussion on that? >> we're adjourned. test,

test, test, test, test, test >> san francisco's regular hearing for thursday march 7, 2013. please silence any mobile devises. do state your name for the record. like to take roll at this time.