actually jump starting the project. we know that bicycle sharing is coming out this summer. we look at the sponsorship opportunity. and effectively we could expand the bicycle sharing here. parking. this is not the easiest thing to talk about. if our strategy in the city was to use the existing park we might actually reduce parking demand.

lot of potential. and then mta is interested in operating the garages as opposed to mission rake so with our parking managers to see in that m mtas facility could be used for the whole area rather than one particular use. and there's much more there's the program. transportation and manage. aaron miller raise your hand,

please. we have the transportation demand expert. do not let them have any more children soon. this is about programs and helping people understand that the managers on site can help visit take advantage of all those facilities their building. promoting sustainable choice giving on site on site broker who helps he horns get part of the package on living on development. these are strategy that work well, for like treasure island. we want that same kind of program manager entity so that we make the best use of all all

the investment in the area. and we don't forget about the cabs. we make sure that the efficient operations of these are not interfere with other modes of transportation. so we're working closely with the muni services and i'll be at the taxi meeting next week. so fast two, that was just a very timely review. there is so much more going on. so, now we have all these projects going on desk. we approached california trains and others.

we want to find out for example, is this plan working if no, it doesn't work then we stop working on that. it's like a lot of projects ended up on the cutting room floor. that's not just one project but 3. i figure it will get smarter. we come up with what it takes to pit those elements in plays. by one project may have great value they may want to partner in ifth the eileen group. so would we structure a fair

share allocation to a fraction of the cost. and you can see in this valley and the executive park not one of the people paying one hundred percent but their fair share. with that we need to document those all the times. it's not just from the e i railroad we're supposed to build those things were we want to know what people's responsibilities are. we could get more grants if we make ourselves so much more

efficient peewee have to follow those projects have a lifespan of 20 years. so don't read this but it shows that who's in the lead of which transportation litigation measure, who's responsible for it. when he get to a certain level we'll know 3 years as we monitor the system we'll tell a procurement grow up that we need it streetcar in about 3 years. so we watch the process from beginning to end. so this is the assessment we're well ahead of the rife. i think it's here we're going

looking to have this wrapped up in may or june and to really test how things are supposed to work is much smart. i'll be happy to answer any questions >> thank you for your presentation very good. >> i'll start. that's a thank you. this is incredible interesting. it feels to three and four like this is something pretty new the city taking an entire area and really documenting out all the changes that are planned up to thirty years out and really addressing it bit by bit. this is the first time we've done something like that isn't it? >> i'd like to point to a study

that looked san francisco state and looked potential for what is the shopping center. what's interested about that the san francisco master plan we're tracking them and taking the 19 accounting corridor study and interesting san francisco state as that on yes, i do up $30,000 just to show how interested they were. when they think they're actually getting the transportation planning before their needing it they're interested in writing a check. this is not just one project by one project but all 3. >> i really do understand how

for this will be for the velocities to have this demonstrate define ahead of time before they even break ground. could you just touch briefly what the benefit is to the people who don't see as much in the development as they're worried about accident effects that that development is bringing and this is really helping us to get ahead thought possible congestion in that area. and it's not only going to speed up the process for developers but then speeds i think the help we offer to our pedestrians and your - bicycles.

and if the classic way to do planning is wait until the 11th hour and have the department say oh, mta you're supposed look at it ahead of time and gives all the detailed. let's go beyond san francisco and to do as much work as with the regional people and before the e i r and before you start sharping your pencils i will work with who've i need to so the e i r didn't propose more than they think they can.

if the mitigates measure is something that works it is something through our tracking planning that helps us to build an implementation of transportation improvements but as development warrants. >> if i could add first of all, those projects on their own are they as jennifer said their public - private developments. is it because the city sees tremendous values to the city and i'm sure if you were interested jennifer could speak for largely to the benefits of the project. as she mentioned those study areas that don't work today for

the people who live in mission bay particularly in the south beach area people who are trying to use another way. this is making sure that the new demands won't bring negative aspects to the community but it's vance new projects that are going to make the whole transportation syndrome the area work better. it's not just the - at any time to improve the whole transportation mode in this area to make it work in a faster way. so there's benefit that enables

the promise to work well, it's a win win approach between peter and michael and jennifer and aaron and carly and all the folks behind this you can see from the presentation it's pretty complex stiff. >> i want to say the light bulb moments that i got is one when i think about the sibling way providing underground link to peel street when you think about all the congestion that all the commuters are experiencing coming out of the city if you

could get those folks out of streetcar muni and other modes and start training people to see that route as a quick route to california trance that's a quick win. this subway is sdoeltd open in 20018 and the arena project is to open in late 2017. you may need to create something to develop that to get users to use that - and you're also reducing this traffic along that area when the new arena is present. another is we're talking about the other parking strategy we

can now start talking to the giants around the bundling ticket sales with parking and the potential to sort of get people - if you're coming out of the north you come from the north if you come from the south you park to the south and you take one the petty kabdz. there's also the giant are already working on bundling parking sales. we can partner with them and see if they work. >> that's all no more questions. >> thank you for the expensive presentation. i really appreciate the forethought that's going on this. i want to highlight i didn't

side mentioned in your presentation yet was the - as part of the t d m strategies and i'm sure you've thought about that but make sure there was a streaming to incorporate car share and can you remember share pods. i'd like love to see a car share pod on every block but for further opportunity i'm sure you've thought about that and you'll include that. the other thing i want to stress a to make sure your thinking about bicycle parking in the long-term. we've got the bicycle sharing i've thought of but i would suggest anywhere you've got that opportunity you've got to need for bicycle parking

international. today, i rode my bible and had to park away over here and walkway over there. particularly with respect to the opportunity to leverage the private public partnerships that you've thought about. great work >> again thank you very much. when you use the a team word you, your exactly right. i appreciate the creativity. >> there is one member of the public to comment here. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon directors. i am a member of the mta and i'm

also the executive committee a member. i'm here speaking on my own. first of all, i want to tell you that the warriors have cite against the location. there's american people inadequate transportation and it's not an appropriate use for march time space. every one of these 3 projects is in ground level for sea level wise. according to b cdc risk assessments must be based on on the best estimates of seawater rise and they rang from 10 to 69

inches currently provided the bets seawall protection for the west coast. and thus depending upon how quickly the greenland and ice kapdz metal. look at this i don't know if we can see - if you can look you can see that ail these projects are going to be underwater thank you end of the century that's the prediction and then the warriors. this is the b cdc map that's maybe a little bit better. but i do encourage you to go to b cdc web site. those projects every one of them needs to be reassessed.

>> good afternoon i'm a planning director. i first of all, want to commend peter for this really comprehensive look at the waterfront. i really also want to commend the mta and peter and think brilliant execution of the pilot projects during the last year's pilot cups. standing up there for two hours helped me to see that the project was very worthwhile. we would encourage to you expand that upon the pilots this year.

and as well as extending this facility all the way down to california trains. and it's exciting to think about the challenges that folks who are waking, biking and wheeling for folks who are facing this challenge on the waterfront. we'll love to partner with you all on those projects and lately i know a lot of tension that's being reached around the green bay. and everyone who lives close to the waterfront should be able to reach all those water front area.

>> anyone else care to address the board on this topic. >> he this is a very specific question thinking about far in advance by it may prompt some other ideas. when the central subway it completed there will be a new assess way to the ballpark. and if they want to take muni service they can take 80 it down to the ballpark. but this isn't something that needs to be answered now but maybe in the next few months for blah is going to be the route for our special service for basketball and baseball games were are we going to use the existing loop for expanded

service are we going to utilize both? a >> once to not once the subway is running it won't go down to the - this area. >> we'll enhance both the m and the t we'll have both the services running. when we did the pilot of the eileen which was a time that we were pleased to find out that a lot of folks were using this e line service to get down to the

park. we expect that a lot of the folks coming up here the walk is equivalent frays the bark station to the arena. the balance that would largely be picked up by the - as it is today by the ballpark. those are exactly the kinds of things that the transportation assessment is working to develop >> anything else? >> item 12 is to conduct a closed session. >> move not to have one and any discussion on that? >> we're adjourned.