dolores street will be eight foot. that will lower the traveling to one lane only for the stretch of the bulb out. south of that bulb out there will be two lanes all the way down. and the same with the northbound travel lanes. two lane and that merges to one lane next to the bulb out. i wanted to make that clear. for that road design and the planning department has done traffic analysis to see the impact on traffic. and i want to have great reason to go into more details of the results of that analysis. and then i am will come back to continue my presentation. >> good afternoon, commissioners, greg reason, planning staff, and as my

colleague mentioned we did a traffic analysis for the bulb out and the whole foods and the traffic generated by that. our analysis showed the intersection of market and dolores and the bulb out. the level at that intersection will go from b to b +. adding one second overall. pretty negligible and that was all the traffic study for the project. and we shared this with the community and some skepticism or disbelief that you could do this road diet and such a small impact. and for that reason we did a more thorough traffic analysis than we usually do. let me cue up this video.

so i am about to show you a traffic simulation model. market street at the top. with the bulb out. and the development is not shown. but you see that white car driving and the blue, those cars are exiting the 2001 market driveway. the development is there on the west side. so as my colleagues have mentioned, the only actual road diet is for the northbound approach from dolores from two lanes to one. the southbound direction is no road diet. there is only one lane accessing which will be continued. when you watch the simulation you want to look at northbound traffic that is cued at the red light. you want to watch to see if

those cars can get through on a green light. i will let you watch. there they go -- still going. this is the same signal phasing that exists today. simple two-faced signal. and there they go. and now the cross-traffic on market street goes. that's it. conclusion is there will be no traffic impact. traffic will move very smoothly. and one thing we should mention there is a concern of cuing as cars enter the parking lot and they will cue out on the street. that occurs in other markets in the city. and for that reason, we have put approval in this project. they have to obey the cues and if the planning department observes cues, they have to take correctionive action to fix it.

but it's up to them to fix it. >> quick question, what time of day was that? >> that was in the peak hour. our typical analysis. and we did a saturday peak hour, that we normally don't do, but did because of whole foods. and that scenario was slightly better. i showed you the worse case. >> thank you. >> okay. so now i will continue talking about why we think these improvements are a good use of the market-octavia impact fees. as adam talked about the context these improvements are consistent with the policies of the market-octavia area plan and the upper market street scape

plan of safety and public improvements. also these improvements, these street scape improvements are identified in our inneragency plan, the apec reports, the annual reports we have. they are identified in there. and as we mentioned this is a high entry intersection. so these improvements will help mitigate those issues there. and lastly, i want to highlight that the city would benefit from the cost efficiencies that will come with having the construction team of 2001 market already being there and building those improvements. in terms of the cost of the project. and then about the outreach, the planning department went through the design proposal with eastern

neighborhood cec over several iterations. and we have input from the cac and we asked the project sponsor to revise their proposal in 2011 cac passed legislation supporting these improvements up to $35,000. and the increase cost of the resolution is mainly because of the stronger emphasis on the public plaza and the landscaping on the public plaza. and increase of construction costs since 2011. the cost estimates for these improvements have been reviewed and verified by the department of public works. they have verified those cost estimates. and quickly about the maintenance of these improvements. the maintenance we as well discussed with dpw about the

improvements and portions of these improvements that are adjacent to the property owner of 2001 market will be maintained by them. and the rest are going to be maintained by dpw. and in combined with adjacent property owners. so there is the maintenance plan in works but figured out for the most part. so just to conclude the proposed improvements are projected to cost $510,000, and what is before today is to improve the impact waiver to the project sponsor. and planning staff on analysis that we did approves that waiver. thank you. >> okay. >> i think we have the project sponsor here who wanted to speak

to this. >> project sponsor. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am don bragg with the project group and i represent the sponsor. we are happy to have this forward today from all what you heard from the various groups. as indicated towards the end of our entitlement before this body approved our project. and thank you again for that. we were asked if we would be willing to contribute part of our community impact fee and our construction crews to implement these changes for the overall neighborhood. the project sponsor agreed to voluntarily do that. and to be the sponsor to bring this forward. the one thing i wanted to

emphasize beyond what you heard today. that just happens i came here from the topping off ceremony of 2001. that project is moving along at a good clip. as we look across the street at the brian spheres project that's well above ground. and down the street the mcfarlane project is closed in. what is excited about that, those things that have been out there for so long are coming to pass. is this fully expected to be a wel well-enjoyed area by the community and the city. and this is a great complement to all that is coming. and we hope to have your support today and april, our landscaper

is here. >> opening up for public comment. tamika moss. there are a number of speakers, if you want to line up on your right side of the room, that will be helpful. >> good afternoon, commissioners, tamika moss with spur. i wanted to speak on behalf of this project and ask for your support for the in-kind agreement. we reviewed this project in 2010. and i have a letter for you, we endorse this project and we believe it will be a part of revitalization and improvements of the upper market area. and as staff has communicated to you all for many reasons. when you do a plan and you actually have impact fees, you want to see them come to

fruition. and this is what this agreement is actually doing. bringing it to life. and you are seeing the market-octavia plan that so many of us worked on over the years. materialize into pedestrian safety and street scape improvements. and given the environment of our public resources, it's a really great opportunity that the project sponsor is going to be able to provide some of these improvements for the entire city in the neighborhood. so we ask that you support this today. thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, i am maury starky, a member of the neighborhood association. i would first like to submit our petition against narrowing the dolores street at the sttop.

we are not against all improvements of this in-kind. but we simply believe that a bulb out of eight feet would be adequate for pedestrians to get across. we want all the other improvements that the in-kind proposal is adding to our neighborhood. we think that the planning department's exclaclaim that thb outs will have view on the traffic and we view this as a political proposal and we believe that scott weiner is the one pushing it. it's social engineering in our neighborhood. it will back-up traffic. whether or not they have a lovely graph on how it will not affect us. but if you live in this neighborhood and you see other

places with major groceries stores. you will see the back-ups. even with the mitigation they want you to believe this will not cause problems in our neighborhood. we do not believe that. i was also on the cac's board during the supposed endorsement of this project. now we had -- the planning department gave us a proposal of the eight-foot bulb out. the commission liked that. only until scott weiner stepped in with a letter to the cac did two of the members abstain on the next vote. so literally it came down to 3-2 approval on this as far as the 14-foot bulb out. again, we want all the improvements. we just believe this will cause traffic problems in our

neighborhood. so we would like you to consider going back to the september plan that the planning department proposed. so i want to make sure you understood that the cac did not endorse this 100% basically. [bell] here are the -- petitions against -- and by the way this was done in two hours worth of work, i got 250 people against narrowing dolores street to one lane. >> next speaker, please. if you are ready.

and go ahead start speaking. >> i would like to pass this out to all commissioners. i am gidian kramer, vice president of the neighborhood association. and following up on what the last speaker said, we completely support this project with one exception. that's the 14-foot bulb outs. and if you can pass this out and look at this. this summarizes our objection o. the idea of reducing dolores down to one lane will have only a negligible effect on traffic flow. regardless of this supposed simulation is ridiculous. there is no way you can have the same amount of traffic going through a single lane. where before you had two lanes.

and think that will not have an impact. you have a huge amount of traffic coming off from freeway 101 from work, and come up to boss street and make a left on market street. and now they make a left turn into a dedicated-left turn lane to dolores street to go home or whole foods store. and they will be shuttled through a single lane. it's not rocket science to imagine if you have x amount of traffic to two lanes, and now restrict to one lane. even if it's only that single choke point and opens to two lanes after that. that won't have any effect on traffic flow is ridiculous. just -- and another block down. all you have to do is go on a sunday and see that people are parked on both sides of the intermedian on dolores street.

and traffic is reduce to practically a stand-still. that's what is going to happen here. cars will back up to bose street. and the dedicated left-turn lane holds six to seven cars. the simulation that we saw there were no cars in the left-turn lane. it's completely unrealistic. and that's the way today, with the new developments and the new units to imagine it's not the way it is today. it will be far worse. i would urge you to adopt the original plan, which i will project now. this is the original plan, it's not easy to see. but basically it's 8-foot bulb outs from the corner of dolores and all way down. and two legitimate lanes in both

directions. that's a far more reasonable plan that still preserves pedestrian safety. no worse than the other plan, the single-lane plan. and to me this is a no-brainer. i hope you reject the latest plan in full of two full lanes. >> thank you, your time is up. >> thank you very much. >> next speaker, please. >> yes, i am william spell. and i am a resident at 11 dolores, right at the gateway, of the intersection we are talking about. i am concerned though i am grateful for all of these improvements. that it will be too constrictive. and we have we have 233 new residential units. with the whole foods property.

also the 25 dolores new construction. there is going to be 32 new units. with 24 new garage spaces there. and then across the street at buchanan and market, there is 120 new residential new units in that construction going up. i believe that this great amount of the (inaudible) boulevard, dolores, is going to be a center of gravity. but i don't want it to sink with the congestion of traffic. with 233 new residential units. right here surrounding this gateway that we are talking about. and 124 new garage spaces. that are going to be taking shape in the coming year. thank you.

>> come on up, ma'am. let me call more names. tim colon and ted olson. peter henke. cruit singa. robin levet. >> good afternoon, commissioners. lechu, i am an architect and a member of the board of dolores association. and i second my fellow members comments. i am here to convey my concern about the proposal. i don't believe this design will really achieve what we understand to be the city's goals, which are -- i think to increase pedestrian safety, to encourage the use of public transportation and bicycles, and

to discourage the use of cars. as to public safety, there are practical difficulties necking down dolores to one lane will increase congestion. you heard this. i didn't repeat but this doesn't show merging, no cars in the lanes where they merged from one lane to two. that didn't seem realistic. and the narrowing of dolores -- oh, i did mention the bicycles. the lack of a bicycle lane in that one lane will force the cyclists to share the single lane or ride on the sidewalks along with the pedestrians. that will cause a public safety hazard for both bicycles and pedestrians. . and narrowing dolores to one lane will back up the traffic on

market street and cause delays on the surface transit. the third policy which i infer to discourage the use of cars by causing congestion. i want to point out that congestion at this intersection will be amply provided by six factors and policies not related to the number of lanes. first, policy of allowing parking on sundays in the lane along dolores makes it functionally one lane on sundays. second, the policy of quadlupling the residence on market and the parking in the area provides a two-fold increase in local cars. not counting the people that don't have garage space. and fourth, the need for deliveries of whole foods will require several large trucks a

day. and the traffic on dolores, and on sunday dolores will be no lanes going south because will be completely impeded. the remedies for the artificially congestion will not be enforceable. because they are caused by a city of self-inflicted wound. i suggest you simulate all of this before you build in concrete. okay? thank you for listening. >> good afternoon, commissioners, we endorsed this project back when, loved it. and it's rare that i come to speak on a project with approval and in construction. it's a gorgeous project and i am excited about what it does.

and the reason i am here after the approvals is perhaps to correct a misconception that the housing action coalition focuses on the housing units. on behalf of my members, what we want to convey. what we are thinking about when we review a project, how does a specific project make a better neighborhood. is -- this is a terrific example of that, the proposed improvements of a grocery store like that. wide sidewalks i expect it will be thronged with people. and the idea is to attract people. let them enjoy the space. put in bike parking and trees and amenities. as supervisor weiner said this is huge for the community. and as we watched market-octavia evolve this is what it should

look like. i understand the fear about change in this area. anywhere. but to fear or to oppose this because it might cause congestion, it's really putting the cart before the horse. this is the tail wagging the dog. we should doing this and making it an attractive place to be. i think that chances like this come along too rarely, you shouldn't turn it down. this is a great project to approve. thank you. >> come on up. >> hi, i am peter henke from the neighborhood hill association. i want to speak because dolores is an access point for us. and like the other speakers like

the imp-- improvements and we oppose the choke point in areas where there is not good public transportation options. most people do use their cars to get to those places. from a traffic flow design perspective, it doesn't make sense it make a bottle neck here. anyone who drives that road, and know that it's congested. and to make a simulated video game and it's not credible to believe that you will improve a bad situation by narrowing the traffic flow. i don't think that the city's traffic analysis has been spot-on in the past and it's wrong here. the bottom line this will create a congestion. it just -- dolores street is two

lanes the entire way. why create a restriction at this point. and push traffic to other streets that is crowded. and why create for pedestrians and bicyclers alike. that doesn't make sense. i can tell the real point is to make life more difficult for drivers. that's something that supervise weiner has advocated. and let's make this street work for everyone. make it work for pedestrians and drivers and everybody. streets should be designed in a sensible way. to be clear we support improving the cross-walk here. having the pedestrians in the middle makes a lot of sense. and the cross-walk makes sense.

and you can't have turns on red. the other thing that market street is the predominant street there. the signals are long. it may be a long stretch but it's something that pedestrians can easily get across because there is plenty of time to get across. i think if you supported the proposal that the mission dolores neighborhood has shown. you can still have a cross-walk that is very safe. finally these are community improvement funds. the design should be something that the community supports. not something that is dictated by the planning department without input from the community. thank you. >> come on up. magnes chancy. >> good afternoon, i am the vice chair of the market-octavia cac

and a long member of the area. i am here to speak in support of the in-kind agreement and the pedestrian improvement to the area recommended by the planning staff. the improvements will increase safety for pedestrians at what is now a long and dangerous intersection. and also be a guide to prioritize pedestrian improvements as a part of future developments in the city's overall transit goals. i know that it has been brought up, the key concern is the car cuing for the whole foods parking. but i think that the treatment proposed will mitigate the cuing and make the store and the area much more pedestrian safety. and the bulb outs and the pedestrian