want to - they didn't look at the kind of positions generally? that you next time maybe you, let us know and help make the case seriously of their rationale. >> sure. >> in regards to the polk street bike incident we'll get an update? it seems to me in the past it comes to us for approval processes but i'll be be able to understand the selection of certain streets. they need to have a place where bikes are not two steep but at

the same time, they prefer the bibles to be on two-way streets. part of larkin is one way >> i'll be happy to give you an update. >> yes. his - i absolutely don't understand the rationale behind the bike lanes on polk street it's narrow and a commercial street. there are people parking there additional opening their doors. if anyone spent any time there the idea of bicycle riding is ridiculous. i'd like to understand the rationale >> i'm happy to pass that on to the mta.

>> i agree. >> commissioners item 5 the board of appeals and the boards of commission. >> i'm happy to present this they heard the ordinance zone of upper market. the first components would be to rezone second to change the height and bolt composition and third to address some food issues to allow a food providers to operate in a non-residential establishment. and at the first time you heard

it you recommended approval. first, you wanted the upper market to be mrerl integrated. but the last parcel is within the commissioners if you feet from his house but the department will be getting rid of the you were market you can expect that ordinance next month. in addition please know with supervisor weaning reduced the proposed height for the parcel from 65 b to 62 b and this is the agreement to the stakeholders. during the hearing the speakers

were there to support the draft and everyone agreed to let's the food provider continue. this was considered. the full board of supervisors this week they heard the taco controls and they passed it on first reader. you recommended the revisions and it would reflect not all you recommended removing the paraphernalia on taco. you time to regular the alcohol district most of what was - the ban on new bars and liquor store was not incorporated so there

will be the ban on those. those recommendations were included in the 49 liquor license has been incorporated and your request that the ordinance be moved for the banning period was also incorporated. your last request was to add a provision and that's been added so the ordinance for the alcohol restricted use will take place in 5 years. also the full board were the items related to the california medical center their before the board for disapproval.

those new ordinances have been schedule to be before this commission on may 23rd. and if the board approves those remaining ordinances. the final ordinances that were adopted it would establish the city's reservation fund and to cross funds across two districts. that concludes my report. i heard there was no board of appeals report for his item. thank you >> good morning. i'm here to give you a brief summary. the agricultural review committee met yesterday. at the committee they nominated

andrew wolf from his chair and a continued a proposed san francisco ferry terminal expansion. this is 3 expansions a public plaza and he that's between the two ferrys. during the commissioner comments in question the proposed revision doesn't include any parking area. the committees comments were concerned were largely around the canopy structures and they will be address at a future hearing date. i also want to point out that

due to the preservation conference in may a number of staff will be at the conference. at the full historic he prejsz hearing the commission nominated and elected bob attorney a landmark historian as their representative to the fund committee. the commission only had one entitlement on their calendar which was the major permits for 135 powell street to replace a damage area for a flagship store to open later in may. and finally president haas and i gave a condition on the project

myself and other members of the committee examined the building on the project and the contractor is going to provide a list of the priorities and this is for the rehabilitation of the building and the san francisco agricultural heritage does have some plans and i'll give you the results of report. that concludes any presentation. yes, thank you. >> my understanding was the parking lot was a separate issue and i'm very pleased mr. attorney is appointed to the fund committee he's a wonderful

member of the planning board. >> first in regards to the ferry building i know there's a historical aspect of it and there's also this parking issue. i'd like to hear more about the specific reference to the parking end of it if it goes before you or other agencies. i know it's a contentious issue and they need the parking you need to be able to park close to the building >> we'd be happy to report back to you on the development. >> thank you. >> commissioners it will place you under general public. members of the public may address the issues expect agenda

items. with respect to agenda items your comments will be affordable and you'll be up to 3 minutes >> one speaker card. >> one speaker card john. if we could silence all the mobile devises please and when we >> for the central corridor study grant we thought the term corridor was 92 just a jargon. we're not a corridor they're in personal places that don't have

real neighborhoods. there are 10 thousand people living in our so-called central corridor. and about a year ago when the first public meeting as held and the staff person speaking first and i quote let's face this is really about expanding downtown. we immediately after the meeting pointed out that no $0.31 it's about building the south neighborhood of the future it's responsible for that's success for a visitor industry and tech industry. we were told okay. they get it. so we spent the last year bay trying to hammer this point home. so we looked at the planning at

the there isn't any. there's nothing in it about building the neighborhood specifically not a chapter. nothing about a youth and family zone. so we thought let's see if they talk about our age groups. it's not there. there's no place in the plan they tell you you how many people live in the district. i've never seen a plan it that didn't take the trouble to say who we are. there's 10 thousand of us and they'll probably be 20 thousand in years from now. now the best we can do to give

you the information about who we are. we looked in the plan to see that about affordable housing. nothing. it's not there. i really can't believe this document. we need a major course correction on this so-called corridor plan process that makes neighborhood buildings equal. thank you >> any additional general public comment? okay seeing none. public comment is clolsz >> commissioners it will police vehicle place you under the regular calendar the development plan informational presentation. >> commissioners i want to introduce lourey who is the

campus planning for ucf. we'll hear about the plan in want informational hearing the commission doesn't have formal jurisdiction but we've been meeting with them and recently that fairly frequently so laurie is here to present that. >> before you start the work that the karen company did was associated with this l rb example p d correct? >> yes. >> because i did should i recuse myself. >> you don't have to recuse

yourself but don't practice any discussion. good afternoon members of the commission and members of the public. i'm laurie i'm grateful for this opportunity to share with you about our thinking on long-range plans and get your feedback. i am joined by several of my usc colleagues. my office is responsible for all capital planning and we're responsible for updating our long-range master plan. so today, i want to talk about our long-range development plan

process and our schedule as well as some of the key proposals for our key sites. so let me start to reacquaint you with us. we're one of the 10 campuses and we have a research and patient care. we're focused on health science and we have 0 small student population. we do have a large employee population of 22 thousand for one time staff which makes us second to the city of san francisco. we have a medical center that is a world leader in health care. our land holding, properties

holdings include 61 acres of open space reserve and altogether we come up about 8 million secret around san francisco. we've enjoyed long stoond relationships with san francisco medical center. and we have generated an impact of about $6.2 billion for the regional economy. so our long-range development plan is the universities equivalent to other institutions what they prepare. we have over a period of 15 to

20 years the current plan you'll hear about references of how we have changed. the next plan is expected to have a planning horizon of 2035 anticipate that plan with counsel a report which will be certified and adopted. our l ap is driven by our strategy academic plan. this is a that shows our campus. the pink cycles note the major owned sites and the number of

cycles represent the amount of is that a we have at the sites. our largest sites are at mission bay and we also have a multiple building site at mount sdooen. our other sites will be the mission building and san francisco general. this table shows you our primary activities and major sites i described. you can see our in patient and outpatient care as well as our regional research plans and housing. at mission bay we have a

significant research presence and we have some outpatient clinics that will grow in 20015. at mt. sdooen we have in patient and outpatient programs, however, the in patient programs will be closing when we move the beds to mission bay. at the central heights we have a small amount of lapses. this will provide the patient care under a affirmation agreement with the city. and we'll teach students and trainees. so this is a general overview of

what drives our growth. you may or may not know we are very robust research institution. we received over $530 million in research grant funding which doubled since 1997. we receive more i h funding in the country. so that's a major driver of our growth. in addition our clinic programs are a major driver of our growth. so since 1997 our outpatient has almost doubled that were we have enjoyed relationships with donors and benefactors who have

dmoontd to our construction growth and that continues to be a driver of our growth. in the next - in the last l lp we grew significantly by 60 percent especially with the development of the mission bay campus. we anticipate a slower growth rate and i'll see that in th my subsequent slides. we want to touch on our plans for our medical center. we're opening a new hospital in 2015 which will house our woman's and children's services.

at mission bay - i'm sorry at mounting sdooen we're going to close it out patient program and reperspire mount sdooen with other treatment activity. we are going to continue our in patient and a outpatient activities in the hospital. one of the two major hospitals by 20 thirty and repurposing the moving it hospital. the next themes are 5 fold. one is to address our seismic challenges and to open misses our space and 3 is to accumulate growth and have the opportunity

to grow as you opportunities arises. to express a strategy for leased and remote locations and finally to respond to our goals. this diagram is difficult to read i apologize. notes your overall process so at the top the erroneously bars are intended to show the major phases of our process and the blue bars show our plan and the green bars show the steps we're talking to prepare the d i r. the erroneously bars we started this process back in 2011 so we're going two years ago into the process. we've completed our background

collection and we're in the is process of our prepare our analysis. and we're going to perp our draft plan in the coming months. right now we're expecting to publish the draft plan in april of 2014 and take it to the regions in late calendar fourteen. ucf is committed to a process and engaging in the last 20 years we have inched i initialed a series of meetings with the community. we've held workshops and mission center and will do so how old more workshops to present our

plans as options as well as near the public for their input. we have a committee advisors group that we will continue to meet with throughout the process and we will hold community it possible meetings once we finish the draft plan. this just shows the milestones i indicated earlier this notes our eir scoping meeting in april and final adoption in november. so let me most to our sites. so i think you're familiar with our campus which is our largest flagship campus. we're limited in our boundarys

and is that a we're not permitted to acquire property so we haven't gotten any property we lease commercial property in the near surrounding areas of our campus. so the main issues that we are trying to address in our plan are to address our seismic clajd buildings that are 4 two are small and two are large. to replace our moving even though space and to manage our population growth and address traffic and other impacts resulting from our growth. so this shows you a map which is

this difficult to read i'll note that the erroneously fingerprints are the buildings we're proposed to change in someway. so in particular let me start with the u c hall that building which is the oldest building on the campus we're going to retrofit and a retain. we plan to demolish several buildings. 374 proctor m r-4 and lab biological we are going to