future. we're going to have imply campus housing as well as the 92 burn building which was two dormitories before. we plan to demolish the institution building and put a hospital building there. we're proposing to make certain improvements in cooperation with the city. and also take steps to manage our impact especially the neighborhood experiences. so we'll continue to consult with our neighbors. i mentioned a subject earlier that has been a controversial

matter as a result of a plan we put forth to address some of the hazards and health of the forest there. this lp will not specifically address that plan because we have already produced the plan and so i'm not prepared to discuss in detail what you're actions are going to be expected what we publicly stated already. so let me move on to mission bay. that's where most of our growth has taken place. so therefore we've created a

critical mass of programs there along with our new construction of the hospital. because we've been very efficient in the use of our footprints there we have more land than our development capacity so we want to match that and expand our development program within the existing land. we're not asking for more land you, however, i wish to note that we are in the process of identifying opportunities in the near term for 3 hundred thousand secret of new space we would lease from a private owner. and that would be off the universities site.

so in any case; right we are to acquire more land we would engage the community in those plans with community members. so this shows you a site plan of our mission bay site which includes a fourteen a acre north of 16 street it was acquired in the late 90s. we're proposing to build on the black outlined footprints with reach destruction and office space in blue and housing in yellow. we plan to also reduce your

overall parking supply there and our parking ratio. we're trying to create more activities and we're trying to improve the public spaces there with a full-size sports field. south of 16th street is already planned for clinic development our medical center and so we have no plans to change what's already approved for that site. now moving on to mount sdooen. it's on post streets as i indicated earlier we're going to

make that into an outpatient. in order to accommodate that we're going to demolish 3 buildings on the hospital bloke i'll show you in the next slide. so this shows the major building there on scott street. the red believes are the buildings we're going to retain on that building and those are the buildings we're going to demolish. we've still doing a captain height on that site but you intent is to develop f it as well as possibly accommodating

leases and providing parking we're in dpier need of. mission center is a smaller site we own at the 15th and folsom. we have no plans to change the use of that building, however, we're looking for other options and again, we're doing a captain analysis of that development. laurel heights is located to the california street near presidio and has been the right site of media coverage. we've initiated a process that would turn the site over to a developer to develop it. and the reason why we're looking

at this stream is to reduce our operating costs by consolidated sites. that developer will be responsible for the sequa process with the city. so that developer would come to this body to request approval for any development of that site. thankful not been able to rely on the universities zoning. we've been in the process with the developer. san francisco general we don't own as you know. we have a significant presence

both in terms of our clinic staff anticipate teach students and trainees. many of our studies are in compromiseable buildings. but those brick building do not comply with the building sowed. so we're going to look at vacating those brick buildings and constructing a new building on the parking lot adjacent to the current hospital that will accommodate your offices from the other brick buildings. as well as some off campus leases. we have gone discussions with our staff and as well as the

department of public health. we're industrial trying to figure out how at all the building is going to be. we need to come up with a solution with the parking that will be displaced as well as a mechanism foresight control. so this is the bigger picture of facts. so we are - we currently have 8 million square feet. we will grow by 10 and a half percent excluding parking. this does not include our mission bay campus.

we have the capability to build there. and speaking of clinic capability so this shows how many inpatient bed and how this will change over time so by 20035 we expect an lovingly percent increase in our bed frame and an increase in the exclaim rooms for outpatients. in our housing so like other institutions we are in great need of housing but we propose to meet our needs with existing

lands. this to those conversion of existing space as well as some limited new construction. and mission bay we have designated a block for new housing development on the campus north of 16th street. our transportation program is a very be robust one. 69 percent of our students and employees commute to and from the sites other than driving alone and we use a number of different modes ways of promoting transportation among management throw our shuttle program and community and clipper card sales and ride

share and as well as i bicycle racks. we've had this in process we've been able to limit our parking expansion, however, our patients do drive and we need parking for our patients. we realize that our shuttle program is very voiblg and we'll continue to monitor them. and be fvn we're proposing to look at new t d m measurements to minimum the vehicle trips coming two and fro our sites. so as the director mentioned we have engaged in and will continue to cooperate with the

city including our staff the office of infrastructure the redevelopment agency staff, the mta and real estate and the city attorney's office and the san francisco general. so we have convened a working group and we will be convening a working group to coordinate this activity. the eir will not coming to this program. this concludes my presentation i'll be happy to answer any questions >> why don't we take public comment first? seeing none public comment is closed >> thank you for your report i

have a few questions. first is regarding the open space. but i know you put in a building not too long agree i think it was an accelerator >> no, it's a stem cell reach building. >> that was within other lands my question was could you utilize any of that? >> we're prohibited from developing that resource. >> my second question i notice there's some buildings that are going to be demolished. >> yes, it's the original mt.

s synbuilding. >> it would be having to be retrofitted i would like to see happen. long is fine? that you yes long is fine with the seismic. >> moving - >> we don't know we have no plans to close our beds. we don't have a large psychiatric beds.

where we will relocate we don't know right now. >> you know there's another psychiatric bed case good morning with another hospital right now. >> then there was the expansion of admission bay. one the things you mentioned is retail and you need retail not just ucf s but the housing it's difficult working there to go to the cleaners and get a hair cut so hopeful that will be a high priority. laurel heights i assume will be responsible for the development

plan. whether it will be single-family homes or whatever that will be in the future >>right. >> and on historic buildings in general hospital i might menace they're very attractive buildings. it's unfortunate hopefully there's a way they will be preserved and made into something else. but it's sort of the trademark of the hospital the appearance of those buildings >> yes, we - our plans currently called for vacating those buildings and returning them for the city for retrofitting. we don't have plans to retrofit those buildings and come occupy.

and there is a building that is seismic okay. but the including the current building it will be the city's prerogative what to do with those buildings >> i'm sure they've be responsible. in terms of our housing needs it sounds like you're able to meet the housing needs of students and other faculty within our sites? >> correct. >> >> not having to have students housing out far away.

you're able to lease buildings to be able to accommodate everyone >> thank you very much. >> thank you for this presentation it covered a lot of land and i really appreciate the clarity around the brick buildings. it does certain me if you're not going to fix the buildings i don't know where the city is going to get the resources to fix them. can you talk about the health care obamacare is actually effecting the hospital. we had this discussion a couple

of weeks ago >> i can speak in jeopardy we have 5 hundred plus beds we'll be growing our bed frame by 2 hundred beds at mission bay. we have the capacity to build other 2 hundred and 61 beds by as i said earlier we don't plan it construct those beds within the 20035 timeframe. now as far as what the obamacare act is doing to our facilities it presents certain financial concerns, however, our medical center s has no plan on retrenching. we have been working with the

center in oakland so as opposed to our footprint we hope to maintain our patient care programs. and at mounting sdooen we'll expand our footprint there and that will help in terms of our clinic revenues. so at this point in time we - our major clinic sites will remain at mission bay and at mt. sdooen and the awe - >> great and i talked about transportation and i just wonder if you, you, you know, you gave

us a lot of information and their commuting habits to the hospital do i have that similar data for patients? i'm curious how much that is >> yes, we have gathered data open our patient and visitors traffic. however, it's a bit outdated and we're in the process of updating that information but in general our patients tend to drive more. given their impaired health. however, our patients do use the shuttles. and so our parking strategy has

been focused on trying to accommodate argue patient needs first and then our employee and students need >> we're going looking at the increase in outpatient how we look at transportation service in th corridor. to the extent you do collect data there's an issue going on looking at transportation in the future and these are the kind of things we need to take into consideration. i'm glad you, you talked about the beds. i'd love to hear our thoughts l about - there was a conversation about there's more focus on putting them into the community

and if there's a philosophy on that >> we haven't made any decisions about the offense beds. >> i like your conversation about the heights and scale and i think that's something not specific to your projects but this commission has struggled with. to the extent that your staff could be collaborate around those issues. san francisco general are not necessarily those distinct we could do something to enhance

the neighborhood around mission bay to give it more character. and in terms of laurel heights you said that you've put out requests for developers i want to know whereer >> we issued qualifications in december and we are following up that review those proposals and are following up that our r f q to a short us of developer teams and we'll be receiving those proposals later this - later in the spring. and then by the summer we'll make some sort of decision. and when you issued that request was it pretty generic? just

curious about the kind of projects you - >> we didn't specify what kinds of used for the site. i would note to the current zoning is r m-1. it is a residential zoned property. so the question is would a developer submit a plan that conforms to that zoning or would it require rezoning? we're obviously trying to optimize any revenue we might receive from that property but we know it's a a sensitive neighborhood >> your state and we're look like obviously it's different. obviously revenue is a driving

factor in our decision. but with staff and others kind of the types of things the city is looking for it will make it a smoother process >> my colleague melissa white is the director of the relations and she's working hand in hand with your staff as well as with the neighbors. >> great well, thank you and a thank you. >> thank you for the presentation i had some questions on laurel heights too. it's interesting your selecting

a developer when you haven't found out what the preferences is of the city. are they coming to you now with the program you recognize it's an r m-1 zone area. when we get those larger lands of developments we recognize bigger block size buildings. you know, he tend to get the mission bay solution which is a block size development of housing which i don't know would be appropriate for this site. i'm concerned as i go through that process the development doesn't get too far ahead of the development and a please be assured we will not let the process get ahead.

we totally understand that in order for anybody to be successful we need a win-win. win for the city, the university and the community. >> i would imagine all the developers are looking at the housing. >> i'm not in the position to describe by i'd like that housing is a logic thing for the site. i don't know what the specifics are at this point >> right and a there's ail kinds of opportunities to developing that site and we're open to discussing with developers. >> i would like to see the city get involved no