that were given out. but this is not, you know, enforced the ban is tough. maybe two park officers on patrol on one time, however, we'll do spot codes and we'll ask people inform comply that can range from dog use where dangerous are not supposed to be off leashes. we have limited sources. >> and i mentioned the children of housing authority. is there a better way i know that people are signing up on

lines and one of the biggest challenges that i know that many of the families in public housing has is the access for the ability to do that is once that enrollment is opened up i'm hoping it has been a little bit of an deterrent. i was wondering this is not necessarily a budget matter but could there a be better way to make sure that folks have access to the programs. >> sure just so the public is aware we do have online registration and we do all those at our rec centers and with

respect to the housing authority in particular i had the privilege of attending the wreaking parks i think two saturdays ago and our staff is more than willing to come to resident council meetings or any public housing authority site and help people with registration. we realize is outreach is particularly important in some communities to get some people enrolled in our programs. while resource constraints are certain >> also, if you have a breakdown of zip codes as to whether or not fees have been paid i'm not sure you have those

racial breaks down but i'd like to know whose parking lot in my district so that would be really helpful. now i wanted to ask the amount of money that you receive that annual from candle stick annual? in any particular year there's probably we're about 4, four and a half in expenses. so in a typical year there's probably a net revenue gain of somewhere between one and 2 million. there's rent credits at candle

stick but we have not gained imply revenue because we give it back if credits. there's extra attention in parking and revenue from concession at the stick. so our numbers have improved but sadly that revenue sources is short lived >> so when you talk about things over the course of i guess the past fiscal year there's $2 million that has potentially been cut from the budget that take into consideration the small increase in revenue from candle stick? >> no, the number i give us was from resources subsidies.

we have 3 prim sources we have our general fund revenue and earned revenues and we have offset our lower resources by a variety of sources >> so just better understanding that budget presentation would be helpful. and then the last question i have is regarding groups like the seahawks who expressed certain about their ability to assess kimble and hampton play grournd. i'm just wondering if some of the parks that one park has

partnered with city fields is a non-profit; right? . do they manage kimble? >> no kimble has become a importantly sports field. we're in close communications with the seahawks but in all of our fields part of the, you know, that's a mix of permanent play and open play. one of the issues we just want to show up we want our catcher to come and through a ball around. the seahawks would not be utilizess open field so the sea

headquarters wouldn't be charged to use - i'm sorry to use kimble >> or hampton? we have programs for which individuals kids could sign up and if their eligible for scholarships they come for free speech >> the sea hawk cheerleaders have been coming but now they don't feel their welcome anywhere there's new staff. a lot of the rec directors who are familiar with the community where no longer there. i'm just trying to understand are we basically pitting revenue

before the community? before those programs and i want to see in the budget how this works and how we're continuing

>> is really an important one and if other permitted events can look at that same principle. of leaving no trace or leaving the park less than you leave it. it's going to be difficult because it's so inform and an unplanned kind of event but i hope we look to find out who the main coordinators of those parks

are. so i said to appreciate our staff and your effort to make sure the park is brought back to a place that's used by everyone >> thank you supervisor. colleagues any questions. i would say as a former player of the seahawks it was a dump then >> i'd like to open it up to the public comment any comment on item 2? okay seeing none public comment is closed. >> mr. clerk can i please call item 3. >> hearing hear the updated

information on 2014 and 2015. >> okay. we have maria sue from d c y f. >> good afternoon i'm maria. joined now by my colleague. do you want to - >> actually mr. chair, i wanted to ask if he could do the d c y f presentations first? >> any issues with that? okay. let's precede >> i'm going to switch mike's.

so once again i'm maria. it's my pleasure to present our proposed budget for fiscal year 2013 >> excuse me. we'll hear them both together thank you. >> thank you just because we like to follow the folks with age we'll let them start.

okay good afternoon supervisors and directors. my name is a laura i'm the executive director of first 5. so i wanted to say that this is the 13 year that san francisco has been a city and part of the city and county of departments. this is my 7th year presenting in front of you. we made over a $120,000

contribution for the children and always april for all. i think we're an oddity in the city in that we our money comes from the state of california and also from a propose 8. so sometimes we are on the organize chart and sometimes we're at the table and sometimes we're not. but we take our role very seriously in supporting our children. so the main - all of our work centers around school success. we know the outcomes for

children we have 4 main areas we focus on all about perpetrating the school programs. we look at strengthening child health and we believe that we looked at the whole child not only the child but their families and communities and teachers. we believe in a continuum and making long term investments in our children and families. we have some key strategies that we have two platforms for our service deliveries and

everything we do is focused on those platforms one is preschool and family research centers. and within those platforms we probated in our work around health and mental health and family support. we also make strong investments in t, a's and training and coaching. we also put money into direct services and those are really targeted to the children and the families at their highest need. and we believe in order to have a bigger impact we need to align our investment and we've done that. and lastly we believe

children's signature program. it it it is tarthsz our neighbors >> can i ask a quick question? so the tax goes down because people are smoking less? then the propose h money from the public education enrichment fund has been going up but it need to be reauthorize in 2014 is that right >> it has to be reauthorized correct. we also have in propose 10 we've been award a grant from the

federal government down to the california department of ed down to us which is part of the president obama's race to the top grant. we have about $50,000 that are for the cares plus and that's helping providers rise their quality. we also have a planned reserve for $8 million next year and a question. thank you for being here. t the letters reverse so overall did you have that somewhere? thank you. one other question related to supervisor mar said.

we've seen a downward trend in revenues >> i think the highest we've got is 11 million i'm sorry. it's been about 9 million and our projections from the treasurer is t will continue to go down. i'll show you our projections. this is a little bit about our expenditures. i'm going to tell you a little bit more detail. last year on propose h. we spent the money 92 percent. the administration costs hoefrz r around this figure.

well, i'll tell you for propose 10 it's about 15 percent forgive administration and 76 percent for programs and some for infrastructure and the rest for evaluation. so this is a slide that shows our key core investments. again those are in our result areas so for child investment and this is enhancement and reimbursements for families that have children that are 4 years old. we also invest in i'll tell you how we're going to backfill our cuts and our strategies. so for our workforce and capacity building with propo 10

we're investing in workers' compensation this is the wages and give our providers a boost in their salaries and benefits. we also put some money into family support around our children who are part of the preschool for all and also curriculum in science and art and math. we invest along with the program that we continue to keep that investment fairly high we have over 50 mental health

consultants. there are in a our family resources centers. with our inclusion for children with special needs we have a new stream we're funding several strategies will inclusion we want to have preschool for off-site that have - including children with special needs in their programs so we're doing a lot of on site coaching and on site services like speech. we have 3 demonstration sites. it will take a couple of years to develop but we're paralleling

that work with the work of the school district that are developing 8 sites. we'll have 11 preschool sites. also to help families we've got a center and this is san francisco general and appraise comprehensive assessments with the . along with d c y f we cover all the birthday of 5 years old. and then our major investment is with family resource centers we

have 25 around the city. we've proud of them. a lot of other departments are interested in joining us and others are joining us like the mayor's office. and we're also taking our family resource centers on a pathway to quality. you he can see this is about $610,000. any questions? i know that supervisor farrell wants to us talk about our budget thirty signed work orders this is involving the mayor's

office of housing we give programs for our joint strategies and other departments give us money to support our strategies. this mostly centers around the family centers. so this is about child development. just a little bit more about our race to the top challenge money. that is a federal award we were given a grant for 3 had the $3 million. we are target our sites for children. we also are working in calibration with 5 other bay area that have received race to the top money. it's for efficiency and also

that our families move around the bay area we want all the families to when they move they'll believable to assess the child development programs. we're also collecting a lot of data altogether and sharing assessors and the evaluation data and that's pretty exciting. harvey dunkin' is coming next week because we're the race to the top site is exciting. we're trying to promote school readiness this money is given us to so we can do qualify

improvement services. they wanted us to build this high quality setting in the neighborhood where we have the lowest schools. but all our schools about benefit from the funding there. so here now john walked out - but here's our sustainability. we do have a sustainability plan. our beginning balance this year was $16.6 million. the reason we have this plan is because we've used prop $10 because we spent it we did accumulate a fund balance. we're spending out that fund balance so we'll zero identity

in june neo 15. and i'll tell you how we're using that reserve. are the 3 and 4 years old if live in 70 we're filling the back cuts and that restores the kits that the state made for all the 3 and 4 beyond a reasonable doubt and this includes head start and other large community programs and this covers about 4 thousand children. we also developed a strategy called 3 year plus and we've got about 3.2 million annual. this is to provide all day

scholarship for children that don't have access to a quality environment. we're phil children and giving them full quality scholarships. and this will serve about 2 hundred children. and the other thing we're trying to do is voucher children lose those because they lose their jobs. so we want to make sure that those children stay in preschool at least until their kindergarten age >> i saw the slide