do the word press.com. eastern neighborhoods united fronts which the sfenuf.org. and then also sf info which is sfpar .info. thank you. miss jackie. we are going to ask if you would limit your comment to 2 minutes because we still have a lot of stuff on the agenda if

that's okay please. we are still on public comment item 7. >> thank you. i'm allergic to labs and i was thinking being in the bathroom was far enough away that i wouldn't leave in an ambulance. that's how sensitive i am. going from there to the blue placard thing. very quick placard story. i live at the apartment between folsom and howard street. i heard a loud commotion, loud music one day

and i see two latino males who are discussing one having a flat tire and need to get a ride to have the flat tire repaired. one of them had a blue placard and his friend said, where did you get that from? he said never mine, i want to use it. he said you can't use that. he threw it in the gutter. i ran across the street with my walker and reclaimed it and had it since this day. i'm the mac member who spoke about the street fares. the problem being that blue zones are displaced and disabled people who happen to live in the neighborhood have been invaded have no place to park. there needs to be a different formula for coming up with how many disabled places

to put around the neighborhood so that disabled people can park there and so the merchants don't park there and the bicycle people don't latch their bicycles to the meters. i have a complaint with the mayers office with disability, sharon is due to get a response to me. i don't think she's going to make her deadline. >> thank you very much. >> christina? >> i just want to address a few of the things. i thought all the public comments were helpful. that's what we are here for especially with

respect to payment and time limits tlchlts a couple things i want to reiterate. i think the person with the presentation covered. one thing that i'm not sure was covered is the idea that people with disabilities need more time getting in and out of their vehicles with the exception about time. the time it takes to get out of your vehicle does not count against the meter time. we want to educate the public on that. with that it shouldn't take extra time to get out of your vehicle. it's definitely a topic of conversation. on the payment issue it's something that was really heavily discussed in the committee meeting. it was very difficult. we looked at so much statistics and data that

indicated that payment at meters did not have a negative on folks with others in the community and other demographics in our city. we are going to roll this out with a huge package of things that is really intended to provide access for people with disabilities. not to cutoff access. i hope that people can see this is a package of solutions and that we are being really thoughtful as we role these out and we want to continue to hear your very important feedback. thank you. >> thank you very much. >> it's a surprise. i have a big question about this. what

will happen if somebody use, not using the handicap spot or using the blue thing, what happens if somebody steals it from your car. that's what i'm wondering. if they do that, what if they get the california id card use it for the bus and the drivers know don't use the id card and more people using it. me question again, will you

please answer this question, what will happen if somebody sell your car or abuse it or what happens to that person? >> thank you. >> you're welcome jerry. next is mike. good afternoon. i'm a student at city college. as we try to remember the year when we met john scott around 2002 in a different position. i was sitting in a mayor's city council and it was up to be

appointed and left the city hall politics field the reason i'm here today just to echo, i would like to not just present some information to all of us here but to people maybe watching on the t v. the policy could be dominated by the state. so we are not expecting to know how much the city and county can do with this kind of legislation to be able to be legal or adopted by the supervisor or the mayor. i think that's two things i would like to echo. check and balance which is monetary and supply and demand. the reason we are doing with not ard legal or not

many people have done that job. i don't need to do that. it's downtown area. it's from the top of my head, the green zone area and also maybe when it came to the yellow zone commercial on the weekend so we can allow people to use it for two hours, for hours limited. and also if you want to go further after the part is set up even after a four year period we can check whether we use it on yellow and black for the truck for the weekend and downtown area. they are vacate a lot of times. last but not least, the meter paying or not is not focused on this item. maybe 4, 5, things from now on

we can use from regular smart phone and they say pay my bill for meter. that's the future. thank you. >> thank you. is there anymore public comment? anymore comment from the committee? from staff? okay. seeing there is no more public comment. thank you presenters. thank you. okay. guys, we are going onto item 8 and it's a report from the disability disaster preparedness committee presented by council member chip.

>> thank you mad chair. the disabilities committee member, representative from various community agencies and organizations attended. the meeting discussed about who would obtain the volunteers for the goals, it was decided that mayor's office and disability and san francisco independent living resource center would split that responsibility. councilmember denise would also participate. only two observers would be allowed. from the san francisco ilrc. it was

discussed there would be a brief discussion about those who participated and observers in order to get a sense of how the exercise went for them. this review will be gone over at the next ddpc meeting. the functional assessment service team or fast work group of the d d pc met on friday april 5th, 2013. fast teams are trained to be deployed at shelters during a major disaster. team members are specifically to address the needs at the disabled shelter residence and to maintain and live independently in a shelter. team members attend a two day training and certified by the state. a report was given by councilmember chip and

a lengthy discussion was heard and highlights were guarded. no municipal and county support structure. it was estimated that fast trainers in the county of san francisco, fast teams need to be formed locally with certain specific specialties present in each team. the team will be independent of the red cross or the government so that they can make evaluations and decisions quickly without interference. it was the consensus that fast teams needed locally. the next fast work group meets on friday june 7, 2013, and 130 at city

hall. this concludes the ddpc report for may. the ddpc meets on every other friday. the next one is july 5, 2013 in room 421 in city hall. please join us. >> thank you, chip. i'm sorry. i apologize. i will get it right. chip. i better think of them chips i want in a few minutes. >> next we have item no. 9. public comment. within the jurisdiction of the mdc. each speaker is limited to we give you three minutes. and we have miss jackie. i was

>> i was at the meeting. since my horse is not dead, i can serve as a drum. i'm going to the fact that we have had an ada compliant accommodation april 30, 2010 and i would like to give the mayor's office an at some opportunity the

proposals that we included in this ordinance. carla was not the director at the time, the other person was. who is no longer with us. i have my reasons. so carla now it's going to be on you to get the money and get to the media and let's get out there, the bicycle coalition, every time i turn around, when i'm not playing dodge by the. when they say it was ride your bike to workday. it was right your bike on the sidewalk to workday. wow. you know, i didn't even have a cane. well this segways into something i found, i found my original july 27, 2009 fax to the civil rights squad and it had to do with the port a

potties being placed on the sidewalk at the folsom street fares. there is to be a 4 foot wide clear path. 24/7, 365. i filed my complaint and heather is working on this and she is to be giving me a written thing and tick-tock tick-tock. her 30 days are almost up. i would like to suggest if you can manage it. someone from the mayor's office on disability attend these meetings. they are the 2nd and 4th thursday of the month. i have volunteered myself to attend the mac there because these are the guys that close the streets. it's multi-departmental you have the

police and fire and department of public works and you have people who i don't know and they get to vote. so the disabled people can participate in regular life things. thank you. >> is there anymore public comment, seeing there is no more public, it's the bridge line? is there anybody on the bridge line who would like to speak? no.. >> i apologize to the bridge line. i forget sometimes. you guys got to remind me. sorry about that. i am very new to this council and it is my first time serving, ma'am. thank you. >> okay. you guys. we are going to move on to team 10,

information team. correspond ens. >> do we have any? >> we do not have any corresponds. i'm going to turn it over to our deputy director. we have no new corresponds. >> thank you very much. team 11 discussion team, council member, comments or announcements? any council members, do you have any announcements? don't forget the next month we have mental health month. june 1st, the walk for mental health and we have mental health hope day, june 8 at the library. i will be "the master" of ceremony. please come out and join us. that is june 8 at 11-1 at the

main library. it is called mental health hope day. we are going to have a ball. >> okay. seeing that there is no more comments or anything, you guys this meeting is adjourned. thank you very much. test,

test, test, test, test, test, test, test >> good morning today t is wednesday may 15, 2013 this is a meeting of the abatement appeal board. the first item on the agenda is roll call (calling names) we have a quorum and the next item is b 0. please people given testimony today stand raise our right hand. item c approval of minutes.

discussion and possible action to adopt the minutes on april 2013 is there a motion to approve >> motion to approve the minutes. >> there's a motion and a second. my public comments? any opposes. so the minutes are passed. so for the next item we have a request to have an item heard out of order on the agenda. so we requested that thought president and he granted the permission to hear item number 3. first is case no. 6776.

757 north point street. of the department let the department speak. >> good morning members of the board chief housing inspector. it particular item was continued from last month are direction by the board to the property owner with some requests to the adjacent property owner the appellant and i don't have anything new to add only a couple of things. first to provide you with up dated information we requested the adjacent property owner to

give us access to the property for the purpose of taking photos to show you the populate. unfortunately, the owner was not willing to facilitate that action. also you had certain requests of the property owner i believe a etch of the adjacent property own has asked you guess for a copy of the krarths certification that was given to me that i made some comments about and it was for the purposes of answering questions by the this body that item was discussed and those questions were swrnd. i gave that document back to the property owners representative. we now have after asking for

that information they gave us copies to the certification. we just got that and have given the copy to the adjacent property owner. we could not produce it earlier because it has not been entered into our record. but we didn't have it in our record. i didn't have the opportunity to make a copy but those are the new items and the other item is the property owner has repeatedly asked us about the process of remediation. any contractor doing the work with the notice of violation

must comply with state and epa regulations. elbows if they're dealing are over 6 thousand feet they may need remediation contract. but we've been tempted to clarify that and i'm clarifying it again through this process. i don't have anything else to add i think you need to hear in the appellant and the adjacent property owner. >> i just want to remind everybody that the department has 7 minutes and the appellant has 7 minutes and then

rebuttals. >> good morning, ladies and gentlemen. david may appearing on behalf of the property owner who's subject to the notice of violation. the department is a little bit behind the curb here. what happened after the last hearing the contractor that the doctor wanted to use went out and spent 20 minutes to a half hour speaking with the lady to mitigate her concerns. he was unsuccessful so we decided to use the contractor that the neighborhood wanted to use.

he contacted them and received something that was called an estimate but it wasn't simply a statement which was not sufficient. i called the agency there mr. bush who would send out on estimate for the job. and specifically i don't want to get catch up her in words but the notice of violations. without using that language in a technical sense with respect to lead inc. so we're still waiting for an estimate from the reconstruction. i can show you if you want

documentation backing up what i'm telling you. i have - we talked about the lead base paint that's undertaking from her property. he did not stated they tried to get on the property but weren't allowed to and we have photographs. i can show you those now but i don't know if that's productive. if we can put t this over to the next hearing we can get the contractor who wants to do the work i don't think there's any problem with that. she feels that contractor has all the appropriate certifications and we're simply going to accommodate her and use

the person she wants to do the work provided the estimate is a reasonable estimate. but if it's a reasonable estimate we'll use that. i would request we expedite this hearing and i request we expedite this hearing i have to be in court at 9:30. thank you >> thank you does the did not have anything else to say.