fine. you know, so what? people need to get away from that urban rush and noise and this is a perfect place to do it. feedback is always amazement. they don't believe that it's in san francisco. we have visitors who will say, i never knew this was here and i'm a native san franciscoan. they wonder how long it's been here. when i tell them next year we'll get to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the park, >> good morning, everyone and welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors budget and finance subcommittee meeting for wednesday, may 22, 2013, my name is supervisor mark farrell and i will be chairing this committee joined by eric mar as well as john avalos. i would like to thank the clerk

of the board, the clerk of the committee, mr. young and as well as the members of stgtv covering this meeting. >> mr. clerk, do we have any announcements? >> yes, please silence all cell phones and electronic devices complete your speaker cards and any documents to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk, items will be on the june 13th, agenda unless otherwise stated. >> could you call number one. >> resolution authoritying the office of the district attorney to contract for accept and expend up to $256,974, allocated from the california victim compensation and government claims board for the project entitled the criminal restitution compact. >> all right, we have jackie ortiz from the district attorney office. >> thank you for having me here today. i am here to explain to you a little bit about the restitution specialists. i wanted to let you know that

she is a liaison between the victims, the state, and the district attorney's office in assisting prosecutors with imposing fines, fees, and orders for court, when appropriate. this grant has been awarded to us in the past on an annual basis and it is my understanding that this time it is going to be for three years. and i'm also here to answer any questions that you might have. >> appreciate it. >> colleagues, any questions >> okay, seeing none, much appreciated. we don't have a report, if anyone in the public that would like to comment step forward, public comment is closed. would i have the motion to move it forward. >> so moved >> do that without opposition >> could you call number two, >> resolution approving amendment number one to the professional services agreement, and airport contract number 8994, manage and staff the suber side management

program between fsp, ppm management llc and the city and county of san francisco at an amount not-to-exceed $15 million. >> all right. we have cathy back here from the san francisco airport. >> good morning, whether avalos was the supervisor he threatened to charge me rent. the airport is before you today to seek your approval to the first amendment to the existing curb side management contract. to exercise the first option here through june of 2014. the airport has used a variety of services since 1999, in order to manage and monitor the airport's ground transportation services as well as to increase the use of various modes of transportation through better customer service through the passengers. the existing contract is the result of a request for

proposal process which was approved by the board in 2010, the amendment before you extends the term of the contract for another year and increases the total contract amount by $14 million. for a scope of work that includes management and monitoring of the airport shared ride van zones, limousine and taxi operations. the cost of the contract is funded with collected revenue from ground transportation trip fees from the companies who access the airport's curbs, roadways and passengers. the airport does agree with the budget analyst recommendations to reduce the contract costs by approximately $430,000. this is achieved through reductions in proposed fridge benefits as well as remaining money from the original not-to-exceed the amount that was not sent. for a new total not-to-exceed the amount of $14,636,814, for

this new contract year. the clerk of the board office does mention that our original resolution neglected to include a whereas clause, referencing the original boards of apropal contract and so the resolution has been amended to include that reference to the november, 2010 board approval and other than that, i would be happy to answer any questions. >> just real quick, to our city attorney we will do two amendments, whereas the clause is one potentially to accept the budget analyst recommendation? >> the attorney, yeah. >> thank you. >> colleagues any questions for the airport? >> okay. thank you very much. and to the budget analyst report. to the chairman and members of the committee, on page 6 of our report we have table two which shows the budget for this agreement for fiscal year, 2013, 14, in a amount of 4

million 617,000 dollars. and on page 9 of our report, in table five that shows a summary of the budget and legislative analyst recommended reductions that totals 430,186 and it was based on a straight budget an list and we recommend that you reduce the curb side management program agreements not-to-exceed $431, 086 from 16 million to $14 million and recommend that you approve it as amended. >> okay. >> thank you mr, rose. >> colleagues any question for our budget analyst? >> thank you very much. we will open up number two public comment, anybody in the public wish to comment? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, do we have item number two before us, we have potential amendments to the

include the warehouse clause as well as accept the recommendations. >> i will move both amendments. >> as amended and we can do those and then the underlying the resolution as amended. >> so moved, support for the res lieuing. >> we can do that without opposition. >> all right, to mr. clerk, could you call item number three. >> item three, ordinance authorizing the public utilities commission and the city attorney's office to approve settlements of claims or litigation arising out of the february 27, 2013 accidental break of the sfpuc's water transmission pipeline and 15th avenue between west power tal avenue and wawo na avenue in san francisco for amounts exceeding $25,000 per claim not-to-exceed, $4 million. >> we have steve richie from rupc here. >> thank you, this is the

general manager for the water of the puc. it was mentioned already that unfortunately we had a water main break on february 27th of this year that affected 23 homes. since the initial clean up we have been working diligently to repair the infrastructure of the neighborhood water and suer mains and are getting close to the completing of that work. you have been provided a confidential memo describing the activity to date and the out look going forward and we request the approval of the proposed ordinance aloeg it to move forward to sell the claims to the effected neighborhood. and i would like to express the puc's appreciation for the support provided by mayor lee and supervisor ye e and all of the other city departments, particularly the city departments they have been work to great with. >> colleagues ne questions for mr. richie? >> thank you very much. >> to our budget analyst report, mr. rose?

>> mr. chairman, members of the committee on page 12 of our report, we note that as of the writing of this report the puc could not estimate the total cost that would be encured from the subject claims, and that resulted from the february 26, 2013 water break. also, the estimated cost to repair aside from the claims to repair the broken and adjacent water mains is about $1 million and that will be paid for from existing previously appropriated funds from the board of supervisors in the 2013 budget. we consider this to be a policy decision for the board of supervisors because you would be waving your authority to approve each individual claim in excess of 25,000 in the future. >> if it becomes over four million they will be back in front of us. >> and you would have to

appropriate. and the board must appropriate the board of funds if it is in excess of $4 million. >> the puc and do you have any. and updated current estimation of what these claims are going to be? i will speak for myself. i support, you know, restitution here, and inside of the district from what happened for sure, but i am curious from a budget perspective. >> we do not have an estimated dollar amount yet. we are getting to the point of starting to work on evaluation of the homes for restoration purposes. this neighborhood has had settlement problems in the past so it is going to be a little bit avenue challenge of the process to work through what was caused to us that was naturally occurring there, but we are dedicated to that starting in the next month to get going. >> okay. >> thank you very much. >> colleagues any further questions? >> okay, seeing none, we will open up three, to comment, anyone who wishes to publicly comment on this item? >> seeing none, public comment is closed.

we have a motion to support item number three? >> are there technical amendments? >> i don't believe so. >> i think that is the item before us. motion to move this forward and we can do so without objection. >> mr. clerk, could you call item four? >> resolution authorizing the five year renewal of and amendment of a lease approximately 27,826 square feet of space at 1390 market street with brcerebral palsy 1390 market llc for use by the department of public health at a monthly cost of $83,000. >> okay. mr. updike, welcome back to our budget committee, thanks for being here. >> thank you, chair farrell. john up dike. >> this is a lease for the

department of environmental health action at fox plaza. and it is an expansion as well as a give back of some premises which is a net increase in space, but a fairly modest one taking us from.25,937 to 27,726 this is to accommodate the growth in the weights and measures areas that have occurred over the years. the suites to be leased are on the second, fourth, and 8th and ninth floors as well as storage spaces. the lease rate as negotiated here before you is just under 36 dollars per square foot per year, it is fixed for the five year term. so we find this to be advantageous rate for the city and locked in until november 30th of 2018. the lease also contains one five-year option for renewal, which could take us out to 2023, that is subject to

negotiations at 95 percent of the fair market rent and that needs to return to the board of supervisors for approval. and so the only issue now is the five-year lease. as noted in the budget analyst report, there were two typographical errors and so i want to note those to you. they are on page one of the resolution nine 6. the date of november, 30th, should have been december 1, 2013. and on page 2, line 18, the number 27,846 square feet should have been 27,826 square feet and we concur with those changes and happy to answer any questions that you might have and i am also joined by dph if you have any program questions. >> colleagues any questions? >> okay, we will move to our budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> thanks.

>> mr. chairman, and members of the committee on the bottom of page 17, we report that the base monthly rent of 82,818 is $2.98 a square foot a month and that is for the feet and that will be an increase of $12,756 from the existing base rent and if you look on page 18 of our report for the first year cost, that would include rent utilities and one-time cost needed and, it would total, 1 million, $136,686 and as he stated we have two technical amendments on page 18 to delete the november 30th date and insert december 1, 2013 and also delete the 27,846, and insert 27,826 and recommend that you approve the resolution

as amended. >> okay, thank you, mr. raoes, any questions for mr. rose? >> thank you very much. we will open up item four to public comment? >> anybody went to comment? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. we have a lot of public comment today. >> make those amendments? >> we can do that without objection and the motion to approve the underlying lease? and we can do that without objection. >> mr. clerk, could you call item five? >> resolution authorizing the municipal transportation agency to execute a retail lease agreement with the sega food groups and ramin vahabi for approximately 1127 square feet of retail spaoes at 133 ofarrellstreet, for ten year term and an initial base rent of $180,000 with annual increases. >> good morning, chair farrell and supervisor mar and avalos,

i am from mta and we seek the approval to authorize the director of transportation to execute a lease for a tenant space at the garage, the garage provides 950 parking spaces and three tenant retail spaces, four of which are occupied. under the lease done, and the time to repay, $15,000 a month in rent which is about $160 per square feet per year, the tenant will pay for all tenant implements and any broken commissions. the initial lease is ten years with two, five year options to extend. on may 7, 2013, the mta board approved the lease for 2 million in additional revenues for the first ten years, we request your approval and i am happy to answer any questions that you may have. thank you. >> okay. thank you very much. colleagues any questions for the mta? >> all right. seeing none we will move to the

budget analyst report, mr. rose? >> mr. chairman, and members of the committee, it is shown on table two, and table three, both of those tables are on page 24 of the report and the proposed rent of 13 dollars and 31 cents per month exceed the rent and per square foot per month for the other two leased retail spaces for the garage, and we recommend that you approve this resolution. >> okay, thank you very much. >> any questions for mr. rose. >> thank you very much and we will open it up to public comment, my guess is that there is no one here for that, seeing none, public comment is closed. >> and where is walter? >> and colleagues, we have this lease to approve and could i have a motion to approve? >> so moved. >> we can do that without objection. >> mr. clerk, could you call item six? >> resolution authorizing the department of public works to retroactively accept and expend a federal grant in the amount

of $3.5 million from the federal highway administration for the islais creek bridge rehab project. >> we have ray here from the department of public works to speak on item six. >> good morning, mr. chairman and members of the committee, i am ray leu and i am the inspection repair manager and this resolution would authorize the department of public works to accept and expend $3,451,487 for the federal highway bridge for the rehabilitation program. this project will make significant repairs and up grades to the bridge on third street, crossing over islais channel, this is important to bay view hunter's point and it carries the traffic as well as pedestrian traffic. the repairs will enhance the bridge and basic access and safety issues. the bridge includes work to the bridge mechanicals equipment and the steel deck as well as

corrosion, and additional structural up grades, these improvements will reduce ongoing maintenance cost for the bridge, this grant amount is for the preliminary phase of the project, they are expected for the construction phase of this project, i will be happy to answer any questions. >> a question for you, given the con construction and when is it anticipated that it will be completed. >> fiscal year, 1314. >> thank you. >> colleagues any questions? >> much appreciated, thanks for being here, we do not have a budget analyst report and so open it up to public comment, seeing no one in the chambers i am going to close public comments. >> colleagues? >> we have a motion to approve the resolution and we can do that without opposition. >> mr. clerk do you have any other items? >> that will complete the morning agenda, we are adjourned and we will see you at 1:00 test,

test, test, test, test, test test >> good afternoon, everyone and welcome to the san francisco budget and finance meeting for wednesday. i'm mark farrell. i'll be joined by othsupervisor.

mr. clerk any announcements? >> completed speaker cards and part of the project should be submitt submitted. >> okay. can we call item number one. >> item number one hearing an is budget up dates from the mayor and including balance and shortfalls and additional revenue. >> thank you, mr. clerk i think we're going to be a talking about our update. >> good afternoon. supervisors ben controller thank you for having us as loopholes.

>> two weeks ago our office put together a quarterly report for the board of supervisors and public. i'll briefly walk through the report. at the highest level the report is a highest balance of $210 million. of that $210 million a one hundred and fourteen millions has been appropriated. we have a surplus of $96 million above and beyond previous appropriations which is a significant improvement in our last projection.

this is a high level run down of the component of the ending balance and further detailed on our website. but you can see at the top of the page we ended with $220 million in balance in the general fund of which the mayor preoccupied 1 hundred and four millions in the with budget for $16 million balance. we have prominently where the economy has continued to beat our exceptions and that means better revenue. it is from baseline contributions and leaving $118 million of current year mixture expenses to the

positive. the ears policies put in place do contribute an additional quarter of a million to the revenues. then you can see as i've indicated on the slide at the bottom of the page in approving the budget last year you have appropriated one-hundred hundred and $4 million to support the next year budget. the revenue in the current years supplementals will need to be replenished. so real quick just one way to think about it >> so we have a $15 million uptick where we were originally given a $220 million deficit

it's 29 million years one and two so we can basically is a we're basically at the 94 level. >> looking at the current year news yeah. there is ongoing complications. we're talking about we'll approve budget as well and pay role is coming in and that's ongoing in nature and will improve next year's budget. so your market is correct in dividing it by 2 and bring the deficit down but this quest outlook is further improved because this revenue pictures as ongoing complications as well.

the mayor's office is going to provide interpretation next week's >> i think we're far closer than $890 million. >> is there a range that we can think of in terms of of the proposed deficit for next year new. >> i realized it will be balanced in 9 days. >> but i think i can confirm what the controller said we've continue the policy of the $59 million applied across the

next year's so you, think about the projected short that fall. i think the mayor is working diligently with our office to make sure we have a proposed budget for june 1st >> i know the mayor's office was going to provide an update but there's been a circumstance involved. >> the projected deficit is and that's when we have the 9 month report and the 6 month report but it's a moving target i realize because you're in the middle of balancing the budget but the range. >> maybe i'm not understanding your question. the projected deficit we're working toward those revenue updates are part of the solution

i mean, the 5 year financial plan includes a package of how to deal with the shortfall each year so the increased revenue is one of the balanced approaches to clay close the total deficit number. are you looking for a new number? >> i typically around this time of the year there's a number. the joint report there's a projected figure for the next fiscal and we're looking at 5 years ahead in terms of the >> if i can briefly the supervisor alvarez is dwindle trying to get to our question

but i don't know if the information is at the fingertips but i know she was working to get the figures today. absent having her availability today, she, provided it updates at the next work weeks weeks meeting. the big picture is you had a budget deficit of approximately $130 million. we have $58 million of ending balance from the last year and that's approximately $30 million in the budget year off the 1 and thirty. and when he look at the revenue mix of this $130 million we would expect that $30 million of this is go ongoing in nature.

at a minnesota minimum this is going to bring that deficit down further so it's $30 million or less i know you're looking for a more high-level >> so that's my question. thank you >> okay. but as we're talking about on the revenue side you can see we've got good news for the local taxes we've seen growth in the local economy that has exceeded our exceptions unemployment has come down and the real estate market is good we're