Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    May 26, 2013 8:00pm-8:31pm PDT

8:00 pm
calendar. >> [inaudible] >> ms. marian. >> [inaudible] >> okay great. thank you. >> line item 3c. >> commission reports, decision, and commissioner reports. >> i just not as president i would like to report about an incredible incident i saw about two weeks ago. it would be two weeks from friday for members of the police department and also talked to the public about it, and it actually 19 years as a prosecutor it was an incident that really moved me. i was walking across third and market street at 1230 on a friday afternoon. thousands of people walking down the block and just before that i was walking toward the parking garage and waved to an officer and shock hands and he went on his way and i walked across the block i saw him and
8:01 pm
looked like he was doing with someone on the ground and i would head that way and saw the fire truck heading in the wrong way and was on the top of a homeless man trying to save his life. he was doing chest compressions and the firefighters took over and it was a gruesome scene and i have the report in front of me and a homeless resident and body gave out and bloody seen and unusual and blood out of his nose and mouth and yet the officer worked on him and do did the firefighters and the paramedics and these were veteran's officers and they called it off and died on the street on friday afternoon with hundreds if not thousands of people walking around videoing it and one of the officers said "did anyone
8:02 pm
dial 911?" and no one called. we're the liaison between the officers and the people and no one was called and i'm going to invite the person in two weeks and she flagged down the officers and said this man is throwing up blood. he needs help. it was just her and i have to tell you -- you know commissioner we never get used to this. it was a gruesome scene and had to have a hazmat team clean up everyday and our officers do things for people that nobody appreciate. they risk themselves to exposure of many different things and tried to save this homeless man's life while thousands of people walked about and afterwards talking pictures and it was interesting to them and i want to thank the officer and the public employee who flagged them down and thank
8:03 pm
the firefighters and the paramedics and i called the chief right afterwards because i was bothered by what i saw and the officers involved were sergeant rodriquez who was on the motorcycle, the dirt bikes, officer mc gold district and equaled -- and i want to thank the firefighters and vanessa from public works and had the courage to call the officers to the scene and they did a great job and i am very proud of them. next item. >> commissioner loftus. >> thank you for sharing that story. it's disappointing that no one reported it and it's terrible that the person died
8:04 pm
but it's good for us to recognize the hard work that our officers put in everyday and the risk they put themselves in, so commissioner kingsley and myself visited the safety hub and the official name and sixth between market and mission and we got treated to a tour from sergeant frank harold and i can see exactly why he was picked to do that and be a sergeant at that hub and we learned a lot from doing the visit. that hub is something that's very new with signage. i remember before the small business came and complained there wasn't signage and now there is clear sfpd signage which is great and the sergeant keeps the door open and people can go in and out and i saw that people going in and out freely and he explained why it's a hub and not a station and not a sfpd substation but a joint
8:05 pm
collaboration between the mayor's office and the district attorney's attorney office and the services in the city for the homeless and people that need services basically, and since they have been there they have a lot of meetings there, joint collaborations. i think the weekly meetings they have there which is great and i know that block well, sixth between market and deeper into soma because my office was a block away from there and that block had a lot of things going on, drugs, harassment of pedestrians and lots of drugs and crime and stolen phones and lap tops what happens on that block and since the hub opened a couple weeks ago, and it was much different and less people doing the illegal
8:06 pm
activities and we asked where they went and the sergeant said in the next few blocks from six to eighth have quieted down because of the presence there and because of the ambassadors that we saw out and about and protecting the young people for the art show and a concert and he said there is more work to be done and van ness and market onward is where some of the drug activity has moved and we need to raise resources to add another hub, supportive collaborative service, so we can address that end of market street but i was impresdzd and instead of strip clubs and i know well and you have a new bike shop and restaurants and condos and there is a lot going on in that area and i welcome the other commissioners to take a look at that hub when you get a chance. anything to add? >> commissioner king king.
8:07 pm
>> commissioner chan you did a great summary. i would like too to thank sergeant harold and gave a good tour and a walking tour. we spent a couple of hours with him and really walked the street scpis can say from the many years ago that i would walk in that area going to law school and since then there is a tremendous transformation just in the last several months. it's very different. all the debris that used to be flying in the air is gone. there is a different scent to the street literally and the sergeant explained how dpw comes through with sanitizers and scents and the vibrance of the area, that beginning vibrance of new commercial endeavors is very apparent. it feels safer. there were tourists on the street as we walked down this
8:08 pm
corridor and all of the departments in the city that have contributed to this really observe a big pat on the back. so far it seems to be working well, their efforts. >> sergeant herald explains the people in the sro units in the area are appreciative and feel safe to go outside and before they couldn't leave the unit and they thanked the department for being there. >> great. commissioner loftus. >> yes. i wanted to update my colleagues. we had a presentation from the crime lab on the issue of untested and sexual assault kits and the success of the other program that started in 2010 to expedite stranger rape kits from being tested. we heard about the significant investment the department heard in increasing
8:09 pm
the number of criminalists and trained and the work is right. i wanted to get back to folks there are a couple of follow ups happening within the department. there is a audit that is being done of the property room to ensure there aren't any untested kits which we know is common in labs and medical examiner's offices and they're making sure of that. in addition to that they're doing a review of the untested kits which they have identified and determining whether the reason it was untested whether a criminal case wasn't filed, whether consent was the issue in the case and the da wouldn't be dispositive in the case so i think we will hear more from the department as they continue to improve. i think there is consensus and we certainly heard from the department that the policy is to test all kits and i think that is certainly the right approach from a law enforcement perspective from prosecutors and
8:10 pm
victims and the community that if we collect that evidence we need to test it. i think resources are always an issue and i look forward hearing from the department on the plans to test any kits that aren't yet tested and make sure we're supporting the efforts to continue to support the crime lab as new technologies come afoot, but certainly and i don't know if technologies come afoot, but sounded good at the time, but as new technologies come online -- that's how you're supposed to say it. that we're availing of these tools and help us prosecute cases and exonerate the innocent and i wanted to update you on that and the second issue was we're going to set up a trip for us, a chance to visit the crime lab and learn more about some of the technology so i will true inspector monroe invite the commissioners to go out there and understand more about this,
8:11 pm
so appreciate the support of captain perae out at the crime lab and good to learn about the issues when we are dealing with them. >> thank you for taking the lead on that. >> and the chief has made the commitment to test all of the kits. >> thank you for the work and follow up they know you're doing and i am interested in going on that trip. >> please call item 3d, commission announcements. >> commission announcements and will asking of items identified for consideration at future commission meetings. >> any commission announcements inspector monroe? >> one. we have a community meeting on the 29 and that will be held at balboa high school in the green room and it's may 29 at 6:00 p.m. and that is to hear comments from the public and ingleside captain concerning issues of protection in the area.
8:12 pm
>> great thank you. so you're not doing the 40 minute slide show tonight? >> what is the address again? >> [inaudible] >> thank you. >> you're welcome. >> inspector when do we have calendared the program on pedestrian safety? >> june 5. >> june 5, so two weeks. >> right. >> thank you. >> commissioners anything you would like to add to our agenda as we move forward? hearing none. great. public comment on line items 3a, b, c and d? >> commissioners good evening once again. i only have a quick comment. i could appreciate thomas maswriewko's experience in watching somebody drop dead. i have taken first responders courses, also emergency
8:13 pm
technician courses. although i didn't take the exam they teach you that first responders should carry basic isolation gloves. most police officers that have taken the courses they should also have mouth gauzes and three basic isolation for cpr which is a funnel and tube. they should have kitos them all all times. they're this big. every police officer that went through the training should have that kit for that type of emergency because blood can communicate -- or contaminate anybody around it and a police officer hopefully didn't get contaminated by some disease. two, is they're also taught as you start cpr you're supposed to pick somebody out in the audience that is watching. tell them to call 911 and get back to me immediately. that also has to take place. i
8:14 pm
think maybe some of the police officers should be retrained or brought to their attention when these incidents happen there is certain protocol that should take place. i don't know about the man that died and we don't know what happened and maybe bleeding internally but i think every police officer in san francisco has that basic training. they should have the kit on them at all times and view -- or annual basis the protocol should be given to them in terms of the procedure are when something like that happens in front of them. that's all i really have to say on the matter. i thank you for your time on the issue. >> thank you. any further public comment? seeing none public comment is closed. please call item four. >> item four election of
8:15 pm
commission officers. action. >> commission this item is election for officers this evening and we're supposed to have it completed by may 30 by charter so i will turn -- we're here for nominations. dr. marshall do you have anything to say? >> i want wanted -- before we -- i read this whole packet but for some reant didn't see item four. i think we should have a full complement of commissioners. we are missing one right now so we could have that vote and i know our faithful president has worked hard the last couple of years already started a little later last time so it's not too off to delay this by a few weeks. is that possible? >> ms. porter. >> the deadline is set in the rules of order so if you want to pick an alternate deadline that is within the jurisdiction of the commission to decide to do. >> okay.
8:16 pm
>> [inaudible] >> do we have a sense of when we will receive our seventh commissioner back? >> commission if i can i called the board of supervisors -- excuse me, and they told me that the next maybe available -- maybe hearing would be some time in june but they didn't give me a date. can i call them tomorrow and see if there is an update on that. >> >> okay. and just a suggestion that we delay until that time so we is have our seven commissioners decide this. our president already is doing a great job. i am in rush to switch presidents right now. >> the only comment i agree. i think president mazzucco is doing a fabulous job. in terms of the commission's work and staying on its agenda and so on i am wondering if bringing somebody in and having an election the first night they're here or even the second night might be asking a lot of a new
8:17 pm
commissioner that is not really familiar with the folks that they're serving with yet, and so then the question would be -- because i think something similar happened when i came on board, and you were there at least a couple more months, so i don't know if it's going to serve the commission well by deferring it. i understand the fairness issue, but the point may then be well do we postpone it a couple months. >> yeah, my suggestion is we set it for another date so it's on the calendar and once that date rolls around and we need extra time we can take a few extra weeks. i think it happened to all of us and when we were new commissioners and i don't think it's a big deal and i think it's fair to have everyone here. >> well, we're assuming it's the old commissioner who will be --
8:18 pm
i think that's the thrust of the reasoning is that once again commissioner dejesus -- i'm not telling people what to do so the issue of a new commissioner -- the only thing i suggest is we've done these -- the only issue if nobody shows up that day and we don't have a full complement of commissioners and that could happen also. it's fine with me. we can do it tonight or when patrick gets back. i am assuming that is the scenario we will work out. [inaudible] >> commissioner dejesus has reapplied. there san expectation that she might be returning. >> as far as i know she has reapplied. as far as i know -- >> well, the ref lance -- >> she's the one that said to me the rules committee doesn't
8:19 pm
meet -- and she is waiting. she is in limbo right now. >> she is a commissioner and familiar with everybody here. >> we are running up against that. i am prepared to go forward forward tonight but i'm also prepared to wait until we have a full complement, so a couple other people want to weigh in and then we can decide. commissioner truman. >>i am fine with proceeding tonight but the commissioners decide we will share the leadership appointed by the mayor and those appoint the by the board of supervisors you're prepared? >> i am prepared to proceed tonight as long as the commissioners decide we share the responsibility for the commission between commissioners appointed by the mayor and the commissioners appointed by the board of supervisors. >> let me ask a further question. does that mean you
8:20 pm
would be prepared to move forward? can we postpone it under those same conditions i guess is what i am asking? if we don't do it tonight and do a month from now i am asking if you say the same thing? >> a month from now i would ask that we continue to share responds. >> okay. there is really no difference then. >> i think it's helpful to have everyone here. >> no, just what he said i wanted to make sure it applies to both dates. >> commissioner. >> i am with the commissioner and i think scheduling is something with the board of supervisors schedule and the uncertainty of any given person on any given night. i am comfortable with going forward tonight and dom plying with our rules. >> [inaudible] >> i would hope that we wait for the seventh commissioner. i'm not sure what is going on here
8:21 pm
but i hope that we have a seventh commissioner and have a conversation and appreciate our president's work and i'm not sure what is happening tonight but i hope that we wait. >> i am just saying we might get to that date and only have six people. >>i get that but we don't have a commissioner serving their term so they're not here and if we have commissioners sworn in and don't show up and it's scheduled that's a different matter. >> well, in keeping with the theme we're find with the president's leadership i nominate president mazzucco to continue as president for another term. >> you want to accept or a second or what? >> i can't second but -- >> accept. >> accepted it. >> i do. >> commissioner moved and
8:22 pm
properly -- i will second it. >> carol seconded it. >> once again being the commissioner -- [inaudible] you're good. fine. >> [inaudible] >> public comment. >> any public comment regarding that? >> [inaudible] >> i forgot about that. >> good evening commission. with respect to this matter i concur with commissioner chan. i am very much interested in the input of petra dejesus, commissioner dejesus in this matter and as was established just a moment ago it appears that the commission would not be in violation by making that decision so i think it would be both prudent and important in the sense of full consultation
8:23 pm
and full disclosure that commissioner dejesus be part of this conversation and i strongly encourage the vote on this matter to be postponed. >> any further public comment? hearing none -- >> i have a comment. >> yes. >> it is neither appropriate nor fair to commissioner dejesus or others that apply assuming that commissioner dejesus is the person sitting here to vote on this matter. our rules allow us to vote tonight. certainly we can amend them and i have certainly heard statements from everyone -- no one objects to president mazzucco, so i'm fine with nomination that i made. however, if others feel that we need to revisit it i'm fine with that too, but the statements i have heard there is no problem
8:24 pm
with the current presidency, so i don't understand why we can't move forward with that. >> public comment is closed. next -- [inaudible] >> [inaudible] >> there is a nomination on the floor by commissioner truman to nominate commissioner mazzucco as the president. it was seconded by commissioner king king. call for a vote. vice president marshall. >> aye. >> commissioner chan. >> so i'm going on s have to vote no and not because i don't absolutely love president mazzucco and you know i do but i'm disappointed we're moving forward without a seventh commissioner in place and i wish we would wait for that person to be in place and i am taken
8:25 pm
aback with this. normally on the previous three years on the commission we waited for that person and much longer than i'm asking with this time and with a lot of respect and gratitude for your hard work i am voting no at this time. >> commissioner loftus. >> aye. >> commissioner kingsley. >> before i vote i would like to ask a question of commissioner truman. is your idea that we vote for -- you have nominated a presidential nominee and stop at this point and do the vice president on another date? is that where we're going with this? >> there is no vice president currently nominated. >> that would be next. >> and i don't plan on -- i will tell you i'm going to nominate commissioner loftus but yeah.
8:26 pm
>> and so then the other question would be in terms of had requested that there be -- i don't want to paraphrase you incorrectly, but a balance between a mayoral board input influence and representation and so on. are you comfortable with that -- with you -- the board being one person short with that objective you have? >> i put that forward and i have no comment or anything about it. we moved right passed it so i thought it was only important to me. this commission is not running solely on one commissioner's beliefs and thoughts, so that was one thing i thought was important but no one else seemed to think it was. it certainly was important last year. no one else commented on it so maybe it's not important and i am comfortable with
8:27 pm
commissioner loftus being vice president. >> let's get the presidential -- >> thank you for your response. we're going forward with the elections in total. aye as to president mazzucco. >> commissioner truman. >> aye. >> commissioner mazzucco. >> aye. >> motion passes. it passes 5-1. >> thank you very much and at this time i really took what commissioner truman said to heart and i think several of us talked about it. i'm not breaking any rules though and i would like to nominate -- because i have talked to dr. marshall about his busy schedule and the great work he has done but i would like to nominate commissioner truman for vice president. >> second if he accepts. >> i do not accept but thank you for the invitation. and with
8:28 pm
that i nominate commissioner loftus. >> well, this is very interesting. i would just like to urge commissioner truman to accept the nomination. i think it is important i think we talked about it last year having representation in the leadership from someone appointed by the board of supervisors. my experience working with commissioner truman through the tazer process and community process and watching him lead that process, listen, seek input from the community, work with the department, achieve shared goals, i have tremendous respect for his skill on this commission, and would like to urge him to reconsider, and serve in leadership on this body. >> dr. marshall. >> commissioner truman you will
8:29 pm
not accept? is that what i am hearing? >> i will accept the nomination. >> you did. then i second it. who made the nomination? >> i did. >> and i could. >> and i second too. >> there you go. >> there can only be one second. >> so you have three seconds. >> the chair is not bad over here sir. >> i accepted [inaudible] >> call for public comment. >> any public comment regarding the nomination of commissioner truman to be vice president? seeing none public comment is closed. jeremy. >> i have one comment. >> sure. >> i think you should wait until the next commissioner is here, so we don't have a problem down the road with whether this is
8:30 pm
legitimate or illegitimate even though it's proper protocol. it's not ethical. if certain members of this commission feel that petra dejesus should be here and based on that i think you should wait for a proper time. this isn't something that needs to happen today anyway to have proper protocol and record on board you should have mr. dejesus her for her one opinion, her one opinion on this nomination whether she's for it, against it or for someone else and i think that is proper. no one can have any doubts afterwards that we had a horse and pony show here that anything was rigged like a kangaroo court there would be no court. that's all i have to say as a citizen and