>> good morning everyone. welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors, budget and finance sub-committee for june 5, 2013. i'm joined by avalos and erik mark. i would like to thank the members of sf gks tv covering this meeting and victor young. mr. clerk do we have any announcements. >> yes, please turn off electronic devices. items act the upon state will be on july 5, 2013. >> mr. clark can you call item number one. >> rez collusion approving the execution of a lease amendment for a portion of property

commonlyknown as block no. 0817, lot no. 30 (parcel k), by and between the city and county of san francisco and proxydevelopment, llc, for an extended term through january 31, 2021, and a revised monthly base rent of $7,200 effective june 1, 2015.. >> okay. thank you this is sponsored by supervisor breed and we have breed's office to speak first. >> good morning supervisors. i'll be brief, but to give context for this context. it is in haze's item and this is by the freeway. they sold it which is dissolved so the property is in the hands of the mayor's office of housing which plans to develop it in development housing. in theen trum, the city entered into a lease with a city called approximaty development which has a use of this space. it's a nationally recognized urban

design and honestly we were say tg could have gone to the land use city. what was previously a parking lot is a model for development. it's a true haze valley. this is supported by the neighborhood association. proxy done a great job with working with job training companies. and the rent that the city receives is actually tied to what it would receive if the property was used as a parking lot and supervisor brief thinks this is better than a parking lot and happy to see the lease continued and ask for your support. thank you. >> thank you mr. johnson. >> we have john from our department of real-estate. >> john, director of real-estate. very briefly. this is an 11,430 parcel

originally leased by the city in 2004 for parking purposes that in 2010 the board approved this lease with proxy development and we're here to extend that agreement. as part of the dissolution process, the property was transferred to jurisdiction as mentioned so today this is a straight lease agreement. we're asking authorization for an extension to 1312021 which coincided with the reed property. it has a new base rate to the city and increases to $5,300 per month and that would carry with an adjustment and in june the new basin creases to modestly by $7,200 a month, reflective of our taking a look at the month

and the increases therefore at 2>> good morning with work force development. bare with me while i bring up my power point. >> so i'd like to follow john's comments with context on the proxy project. in 2000 the city received 2 thousand parcels. and they're named a-v and the redevelopment purchased seven of the parcel, a, c, g, k, and q and with the purpose of developing these parcels for affordable housing. it presents the redevelopment interest. to date four of these housing projects have been completed on the

boulevard. parcel a is the park view terrace which is senior housing and parcel c is the senior community center which provides 100 units for low income and homeless seniors and the richards apartments for homeless individuals and parcel q has the octavia court for those with disabilities. and the mayor's house says that parcel o project will start in 2014 which will add another 100 rental housing, parcel u has been programmed for h use. parcel k is on -- it's one of the 7 former freeway on octavia build and is affordable housing. it's programmed for

20 to 25 units and the units are affordable with ad to 100, the mayor house has housing for will not develop parcel k until 2021. in response to concerns to activate the space while waiting for development, they issued a question for temporary use if 2009. and the proxy was selected by parcel k and l. the project used shipping containers and small retail service and food services and businesses located on parcel a is smiten ice cream and coffee and basic training and city car share, parcel k hosts multiple food trucks, parcel l is part of the proxy project and home to the beer garden while part

of the project, l is not currently in front of the sub-committee and asked for consideration. in addition to activating parcel k, it has furthered economic development in the neighborhood since opening in april 2013, the tenants have created 109 jobs which are filled with san francisco resident. proxy done outreach to the surrounding neighborhoods including partnering with the mobile food program and offering discounting rates on site and priority and scheduling when they can be on the site and they have a working relationship place vendors on the site and working to have spaces for non prove i can and events. i like to introduce douglas to go over the design

of the proxy project. i'm the principal and ark trek tral -- architectural design and i like to give a brief over view by power point. and i thank you for considering the lease extension on this site. as timson noted, parcel k is located at the corner of haze and octavia and bound by lynndon street. and these projects are along patricia stream and the idea of the project is to activate vacant lots on these sites. so we started with vacant lots. lot l was vacant and lot k had day

rate parking, $10 a day, no in and out. we then added -- we realize that we need to phase this project because we're slightly under funded developer and we started with smiten and ritual which is phase one and add the beer garden which is phase two. we're basically just starting phases three and four, phase three is an art galore which will face lynndon street on lot l and phase four as the full implementation of the project on lot k. including more retail containers and more food vendors. this is rendering the project at a full build out. and it includes event space on the inside. this is last summer which shows the art

installation on the corner of ocavia. >> is that from the music development. >> no, that will not be permanent. that's the back of an outdoor movie theater so the idea is there will be a walk in movie theater that would be occasion nal events tied to a film series. so our vendors as timson went over with is smiten ice cream and coffee. this is ritual. the beer garden on lot l, either a parrel store on lot k, and you can see basic training which is a fitness boot camp that uses our site for training sessions. just a few recent press that we've

gotten. this is ferna mcferson who is a graduate of the food program and she's vending at proxy. we've been covered in the chronicle quite extensively and also in this past weeks new york times sunday edition, michael work about used proxy as a prime example of that and i'd be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> i think my question about the music was answered and i appreciate that. >> would you like it to be permanent? >> no, it's a good movie but you might want to switch out for different audiences that might want to come through. >> i've been to most of the sites there and been impressed

with the use of space and the quality of the food and its openness to bring in people into the space. it as been pretty exceptional to see. >> thank you. >> any other comments or presentations. we'll open this up to public comments. and we don't have much for item number one. anyone who wishes to speak, please step forward. >> i'm the neighbor association and the transportation and planning committee. we've been engaged with this project and everything basically about it as turned out better than we thought. the proxy group has been the best partner you can ask for in working constructively with the community and this is the perfect example of why temporary uses engaging spaces are the ideal thing so they're ready to be built on, so we

very, very strongly support the continued use of this proxy development in k and l, even though l is not up for consideration today. and look for your support on it. thank you. >> thank you very much. anybody else want to publicly comment on this item. public comment is closed. mr. johnson and i want to thank camton coming. this is a super cool project and thank you proxy for doing what you're doing. move this item forward and we can do so without objection. thank you very much. mr. clerk can you call three, four, five together.

>> item three, approving the persons with aid s rez collusion of approving the housing opportunities for persons with aids program and authorizing the mayor on behalf of the city and county of firefighter to apply for, accept and ex pend the city's program entitlement from us department of housing urban development in the amount of 9, 244, 988 and the ex pend

program income and reprogrammed funds in the amount of 2, 546, 160 for the period of july 1, 2013 through june 20, 2018. mayorresolution approving the emergency solutions grants program and authorizing the mayor, on behalf of the city and county of san francisco, to apply for, accept, and expend the city's fy2013-2014 emergency solutions grants program entitlement in the amount of $1,528,852 from the u.s. department of housing and urban development for an unspecified period starting july 1, 2013.mayorresolution approving the fy2013-2014 home investment partnership (home) program and authorizing the mayor, on behalf of the city and county of san francisco, to apply for, accept, and expend the city's fy2013-2014 home program entitlement from the u.s. department of housing and urban development in the amount of $3,763,707 and to expend program income in the amount of $30,000 for the period of july 1, 2013, through june 30, 2018. >> thank you mr. clerk. >> good morning. director of committee development for the mayor's office and community development now. i'm here to present these four items, we usually present our had you had funded programs to you earlier in the year, this year because of some lateness in congress's decision making, we're here

just at the he tail end of the year to present these expenditures schedules. we presented to you in the schedule when this item was introduced and provided you today with some slightly amended expenditure our program saw a block and it's a 6 percent increase from last year to this year. unfortunately our emergency solutions plants program which funds many of our homeless programs, a significant decrease, a 27 percent decrease, unexpected, our understanding is congress took from the emergency grant program to fund, to back a deficit in the care funding

from the mackenny program from hud. and we saw a slight increase of 3 percent and our hopkn support for aid's housing and we saw a decrease of 11 percent. that's unfortunate. what that means for our cities and grantees, let me tell you, we're in the middle of a three year funding cycle and we're going to go into our second year, so the grantees will see no change from last year's schedule to this year's schedule. we were able to cover the decrease in our emergency solutions grants program by allocating some of our increase in community block funds, all of our esg programs are eligible for sbg funding so on the community development side, virtually all the dollars had to be used to back fill the

significant decrease in our homeless service budget. on the homeless side -- >> i'm sorry. we will go back to that entirely. >> we were able to cover all those costs. the decrease on the sdbg side means our discretionary dollars we have for capital funding for facilities that's where we took the hit because we wanted to maintain the service side. on the hopkins side we were able to maintain our fund for the operations of our long operation care facility. the hoplica is significant in many ways and creates a structural problem for our city. we have relied on, hopple service. to maintain our service, we will no longer have any dollars available for capital rehab for

our, had opple facility. putting that into per speck tefb we used to be able to set aside half a million for our funds, when i first got to the city, we had $3 million available on the cd bg side for capital community facilities funding. so we move from $3 million on the cdbg side and only $800,000 for the city for capital rehab for our community facilities. i think we've done that for a good reason because we wanted to maintain the service level but it creates some structural issues in how do we work with our community facility to manage their capital needs. in addition, we saw a decrease in our fund to go the partners in san marine county. this used to be in

under the san francisco redevelopment so people may not have been familiar with those programs, but as i said the grants program really is similar. the program that you saw last year because we're in the middle of multiple air funding and i'm happy to answer any questions that you may have before the program. >> we have a bunch of amendments. >> can you walk-through those. >> the amendments on the resolution are entirely on the amounts for each of the four resolutions. so on the committee development block grant, resolution 130492, the previous amount of 16 $16,204,000 is amended to 17

million 1 hundred ,155,000 # hundred $81. and the program income amount on page 2 is amended from 6 million 9 hundred $6,963,291. those are the only amendments on that resolution. on the emergency solutions grant, resolution which is number 130490, the original amount of 1 million $1,528,852 has been amended to 1 million 1 hundred $1,182,146. that is the only amendment on that resolution. on the home resolution which is 130489 the original amount of 3 million 7

hundred $3,763,707 is amended to 4 million. and the program income -- the total amount of 3 million 4 hundred $3,493,707 is amended to 4 million 1 hundred $4,113,100 and that's the only amendment on that rez collusion and the final resolution item 130491 and the total is amended from $9,000,400 to 8 million 6 hundred $8,633,125 and the total amount including the program fund is amended from 11

million $11,071,158. that's the only resolution. the reason for these multiple amendments, prior to receiving it, hud advised us to have a 5 percent decrease with all programs and it was not 5 percent, some where higher, some where lower. all the expenditure schedules and the environmental review and it has been realigned with the actual hud allocation amounts. >> okay. thank you. any questions. >> okay. >> i do have a question actually. on hopple. interest was restoration that the mayor made in the budget from federal cuts but since the mayor presented his budget it seems there could be $3 million i've been hearing from the service advocates and i'm wondering if hopple funds are included in

that amount of money if you would know. >> to my knowledge, the mayor's budget didn't reflect these cuts. it wasn't anticipated and it was 11 percent and we thought it was 5 percent. we were able to retain our service dollars and all of the mayor's was reserved at services. we have to have a discussion to support the housing opportunities because to this point, hopple is the only one for non service facilities so now is the time to have this discussion. >> how much was the cut that was made to hopple. >> it was an 11 percent deduction, so the entire dollar amount for the area including marine county was a little over $1 million reduction from $9.5

million to $8.6 million. we did set aside some funding for a one time planning processing to have an aid housing plan. it went from 2007 to 2012 and it's time for that plan in view of the changes and epidemic. >> thank you. >> thank you. we'll open up to public comment. if anybody want to comment on, 2,3, 4, 5, please step forward. >> motion to accept the amendments on all of these resolutions and to move forward with recommendation. >> we can accept a motion to accept the amendments and do so without opposition and approve the underlining items and we

can do without opposition. mr. clerk can you call item number 6. kimresolution authorizing the department of the environment to retroactively accept and expend a gift in the amount of $20,000 from ch2mhill to build out the department of the environment's ecocenter at 1455 market street for an unspecified period starting february 1, 2013. >> and we have rodriguez in the department of environment here. >> good morning supervisors, rodriguez. department of environment. this is part of the gift's efforts in our move from 11th grove street to our current location and the dollars were to support maintaining and expanding our eco center, if folks were familiar with our street, it was our commercial store front facility and this -- this gift was an ability to maintain that ecosystem in the new space and part of our larger efforts so happy to answer any questions that folks may have.

>> colleagues any questions. >> okay. thank you for being here. we don't have a budget in this report for this item. so we'll move to public comment. anybody wish for public comment for item six. public county is closed. recommendation, we can do so without opposition. mr. clerk can you call item number 7. mayorresolution authorizing the department of public library to retroactively accept and expend a grant in the amount of up to $750,000 of in-kind gifts, services, and cash monies from the friends of the san francisco public library for direct support for a variety of public programs and services for the period of july 1, 2012, through june 30, 2013. >> thanks we have maureen singleton. >> good morning supervisors, the proposed before you will allow the library to expand $5,000 of cash money from the san francisco public library for direct support of a variety

of programs, such as sf summer read, staff development and recognition. one city, one book and san francisco in the 60, robotic program for youth, e learning support and the annual puppet program for children, library production and many programs. with the support the plans, the library have more than 2,000 in fiscal. we ask for your support on this resolution and i'm here to answer any questions you may have. thank you. >> thank you, comments, any questions. all right. much appreciated. we don't have any report for this item so we'll open it up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item number 7? >> ramiski and i'm a member of the board of the san francisco library and i want to thank you

for your support in advance for this resolution, the acceptance of these funds. the summer reading program is just starting and i'd love to have each of you to check out of the 26 branchs and get involved in the summer reading program. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. anybody else like to speak. if there's any members that like to speak, please line up over the far wall and we can take you. >> i'm the executive director for the friends of the public library. we're delighted to make this grant of $650,000 and we've raised a half million dollar for the branch improvement which we helped open up the baby branch and beginning our fundraising for the north branch. thank you. >> thank you very much. anybody else want to comment on this item. okay. public

comment is closed. calling a motion to -- >> i'm in support for that grant. >> we have a motion by supervisor mark to move it forward and i'm going to do so without opposition. thank you very much. mr. clerk can you call item number 8. yeeresolution approving funding increase for an emergency public work contract under administrative code, section 6.60, to repair a kitchen cart wash leak and related mold abatement at laguna honda hospital in an amount not to exceed $595,3: >> okay. we have john thomas from our department of public works to speak on this item. >> good morning chair, john thomas from public works, the item before you request to exceed the $250,000 opposition to abate elite and mold from a car wash facility at the lagoon in a hospital and the rehabilitation center. the leak was identified in september of 2011 and was