supervisors that we're looking for that high-level of affordability. we're looking at a first time home buyer is not necessarily someone who has a home. we want to make sure that the first time homeowner gets. i also feel their are other parts i want to look like. we want to make sure we're not giving a subsidy but we are talking not 2 hundred percent from h m i for a family of 4 is

$230,000 but i think it's like a home that's superfluous luxurious i'm not sure the rules are codified. but i think there should be some public discussion about what we're planning for. also wondering if we have

>> brian chu mayor's office community development. in terms of whose included in the first responder program it's true that the first responder so we included the fire and sheriff's department and police officers to find out if they have a city definition. as first responders they gave us a list of what they felt were the d hr responder

classifications. that does include the emts so that's why some other folks you may have thought of like nurses they're not technically within the city definition of what a first responder is. so is the d h.r. definition consulted after it was craft >> my understanding so it was done with d h.r. at the time it was put into the ordinance. >> if i may this is something ii may have taken a lead on when we put in the first responder program it was designed to be something very different. we work with our management

department and the department of human resources we need to put limitations on it. i can't avoid the fact that i grew up with first responder but when we have the next one hit we need more folks more first responders living 90 in our neighborhoods. i think there are limited funds especially in year one. so what the program became let's do the sheriff's and firefighters in the first run. and that includes the 9-1-1 folks but to come it with the core folks now.

as i mentioned this is year one in the thirty year program before let's angela get a core program on first and then moving forward we can potentially expand it if the fund are there >> i could see a core program but really bringing down the income level is really important. i think it's important in the passage of the property c before and the idea of second homes not being a part of the qualification. it doesn't make sense if you have a second home. but also living in overall with the purpose price that would qualify for the down payment.

if you're trying to find a luxury home i should be living within the means i think it was originally designed for. those are my thoughts i have other parts of housing tries fund. i know there's been some flexibility around the housing funds. supervisor moore >> i want to say i'm in agreement to blow 2 hundred percent to qualify for this. if you can't limit this to people who don't currently own a home they've sold their home adds to the calculation of why they needed the assistance. and i'm in agreement with a

community of organizations that defines the first responders. so what you can do to broaden the definition to include others besides firefighters and police and sheriff's it would be helpful >> thanks for those suggestions. as the lady suggested. we're going to be going into ongoing discussions. as you mentioned it's going to be a pilot program. we're able to make a program and tweak it. so thanks >> consideration of time i'll keep going here. the other thing we're doing with the trust fund hearing we're spending down as well as leveraging other state and local

funds. this is important where the federal and state requirement limit the using uses like maybe owner occupied. we want to use the local dollars to expand the programs for homeowner thought accident city. and in terms of our affordable housing pipeline projects that are funded through our housing funds there's 14 million allocated in the first year. that's barely enough to complete one housing project. we prioritized those promotions that have been in the cuing for several years like a state grant or a hud grant. or other reasons where they have to be funded this year.

i can talk about that more. i wanted to - >> supervisor avalos. sorry >> just a couple of questions. i was under the awe assumption >> in the first two years there's no attempt to bopped. number one we have considerable fund balances over at the redevelopment agency we need to spend down. many of that debt service once it is retired there will be lessen an impact on the general fund. additionally we are getting a lot of other sources and funds right now. i mentioned earlier in our

development impact fees have been low. my first year in 2345089 we had $220 million in refunds. we're anticipating those projects to come online giving us a source of inclusionary and linkage fees. additionally any funds from the tick legislation are another affordable pipeline. in year one and two it's not necessary to bond. but we're seeing is another type of issue not so much a funding issue. >> we were told that the upper generated that maybe in the first crush for the first year. >> i understand there are

acquisition costs. i i've only, you know, what's solid if the plan one year one. but opportunities change based on project deadlines and so as and said those projects that have been if the x are going in the next two years supervisor we're not to say we don't want to continue to work with our office to get that project going >> okay. thank you. >> i want to get clarity on something you said as getting available funds once the debt is paid downor the housing trust fund were envisioned. right now this is a general set aside but as debt fees get paid down they'll be a source of -

it's not additional funds flowing down - >> so we're not at risk of those dollars being taken by the state. >> we're fortunate because we're the biggest tax entities being that the state denies let's say the projects for the redevelopment agency or doesn't fund them at the level we require immediately those funds flowback to the general fund and can be a priority for this border, however. >> can we rely on the possibility of those funds? >> i think around the major approved projects especially the shipyard where we have final and

inclusive fined we will be able to fund our housing obligations. we have mission bay and the shipyard additionally we continue to ask for dofs approval. and that would be uses citywide for a lot of projects >> just judge want to be clear. we've been told different things. there was a statement by olsen year it wasn't going to be in year one and there was another gentleman who said there could be a freeze. i realize there's a lot of that need support

>> i could be more clear. i'm talking about terms of our pipeline next year we have inclusionary housing fees we're anticipating coming on line we can used for a variety of sites. we need to see what that funding level is. i think before we build a affirm commitment for next year >> okay. thank you. this is an overview the housing trust budget. as you can see the 20 million is here and there's 21 million that includes the first responders we're spending another 2 had the 6 million for loan repayments. so we're looking at about 4.6 or

$4.5 million program. housing stabilization this is an initially view it's in the mayors proposed budget. based on subsequent conditions you're seeing about 10 million in the housing trust fund we're proposing reallocating some of the housing line items. since the mayor did provided other housing resources. to really fully fund and jump start those that would be an additional 2.8 instead of 1.8. we have a design program for the

infrastructure. for the first year it's program outreach gairg up to a grant program with a million dollar - i'm sorry supervisor >> you'll probably appreciate that. we had discussions in my office was they're going to be enough money there. i guess my question is have we program designed where that million dollars is going to be used and if not, i want to work with you - >> that would be excellent we want to work with interested parties in really creating the types of programs that would be stable and keep tenant in their home. >> that's great because the housing fund i pushed for to be

part of the prop c that increase my district we have a lot of single-family homeowners that are facing did he fatality and eviction or foreclosure. i wanted to make sure we have is the resources that would help prevent that from happening. we have a part of san francisco mostly where single-family homes we wanted to make sure that the prop c would be a help >> we appreciate your leadership in that area. additionally i didn't call it out specifically but i'll get it that. is the small site acquisition and project program it appraise money to get the program going back those are smaller properties up to 25 units. i think it's really going to be

effective in countering higher rents and higher districts that have not seen housing pranl projects in the next year. looking forward to starting that program. and then he have 1.15 growing to about 1.2 million looked for project delivery. this is about 3 had the and 50 thousand to provide funding for exist staff. >> terms of fte we have 15 on and off positions. 7 of those are new requests. those positions are project management staff to implement.

those are housing trust programs and additional asset positions. we're asking that the interim expectations to the budget the mayor put that forward to the board so those positions can start july 1st. we can start on the remunerate and hiring and get those programs going. there are 3 positions transferring that were converted to city positions and those will be funded at the mayor's office of housing. just briefly as i spoke with you earlier this morning about our loss program it's growing by 3 million. those are funds provided by d h a and their net 1 hundred and 92

new units. we're close to identifying the new units to end chronic homelessness. there are 2 hundred and 25 housing units and 1 hundred and 68 are transferring from the plaza project north of marketing. and it's to the mayor's office housing project and there are 1 hundred and 28 additional units for the homeless for 2015. briefly our community development program budget as many of you know is supported by federal funds. there are grant funds in our budget that includes $650,000

increase. and then annualizing add backs for cooperation to rebuild public sites. our hunter fee program is finishing up phase one with 1 hundred and 70 families he moving in. supervisor avalos >> i just wanted to put in a good word for the community development part of the mayors community housing development. they've done great work in our district. and it's really changed a lot of things how people are actually

participating in the neighborhood and a collaborating together on neighborhood promises. it's the community action programs we have in our district. thankful been getting people to make improvements in the relationships or the public infrastructure in the neighborhood. small grants that are bringing people together. it's a great strong model. and i just want to thank our office for their work >> we have planning over reciprocating n that in other places in the neighborhoods. i hear there is great work in the sunset too >> and lastly i know part of our mission is to diminish our

work requirements. our analysis is impediments and a lot of the questions were applicable to mo h cd. broadly he speaking we continue to have on site staff to provide information about your programs in a variety of languages that many of the folks in san francisco people speak. our loan applications we started to make sure those loans are translated in as many languages as possible. we work closely with our

community development partners so where we don't have the internal partnership what is your making sure we have multiple lingual organization. and so i can take other questions or turn it over to other staff >> supervisor mar. >> yeah. i quick one. i know we had talked earlier about the transition of housing use. you mentioned there are at least some programs that g s a will be covering for drinkingal youth. do you know how much that is going to be covering for programs in the community for that vulnerable population? >> i'm less family familiar

with the at a time programs but, you know, i'm looking to kate or brian to see if anyone. >> supervisor kate howard. there's a new k building that is include in the mayors proposed budget. >> ms. howard is that 375 fifth street? >> yes, it is. that building my understanding is there are remains some additional needs for that specific population. that the human services would like to be able to provide and it's agent >> yes, that's correct. >> thank you. my other questions colleagues. okay thank you i want to move to

our budget analyst report >> on page 81 our recommended instructions is 63505 and 15 thousand ongoing and 401 are our one the time savings. it's still $24.4 million. it's still allows the return to the general fund. and those recommendations in fourteen and fourteen our general fund would total and still allow an increase of 3.1 million. we have a policy recommendation on page 83 of our report.

and this pertains to the affordable housing terrorist fund. i'll briefly read this for. we have a table that shows the daily of that $18.20 million. it's notes discretionary and there are for the first 5 years 15 million for the assistance loan programs down payment assistant programs up to 15

million for the housing stabilization program and a maximum of a program infrastructure program. however, the specific allocation to individual programs is discretionary in 13, fourteen. so that they're considered by your office to be a policy decision by our office. and then in 15 and 15 totaling $.43 million they're part of mayor's office housing program. while the total housing program is not discretionary there are specific you housing levels the specific allocation of funding

individual programs is discretionary in 2014 such that they're a policy decision for the board of supervisors >> thank you, very much. colleagues any questions for mr. radios? so to confirm the mayor's office is in agreement >> yes, i will i want to thank deborah newman. >> colleagues any questions? >> motion to accept those amendments? >> okay. we, do so without opposition. all right. >> that excludes the recommendation? >> that's correct.

>> next up we have