date to an urban agriculture program coordinator to be housed within rec and park, to take the work that's been done to date, to continue working with an inter agency working group, and to formulate a work plan with actionable metrics for success. and to move forward with that. so, just briefly -- i'm sorry, i was under the impression the city admin office was going to speak in more detail about this plan from the fall. i'll go over briefly the streaming recommendations that came from the city administrator's office were that the rec and park department, the puc, public health, and the department of the environment continue their leadership roles on urban agriculture. one of the other substantial components of the strategic plan in the fall was the mayor's budget office worked with all of the agencies that were working on -- all of the city departments and agencies working on urban agriculture to do an accounting of the funding and the staff time that's

allocated to urban agriculture. so, that identified that these departments were playing a leadership role. the second recommendation, the one that i'm here to speak a little bit more on key tail on, is that the rec and park department should be the lead agency for the urban ag program. and finally, that san francisco's public spending on urban ag is significant and should be used to leverage new private investment. we're really excited to have someone on board who can help us look for private funding to leverage this position and i also want to emphasize that we're hoping that this addition would be a permanent part of the city budget so that rather than it be a temporary thing obviously based on the success of the position, that this role would continue for the foreseeable future. so, just briefly, in the process during the strategic planning process during the fall, the rec and park department was asked to put together sort of presentation for substantiating why would the department want to take on this program. we have strong support from our

department leadership including general manager phil ginsberg and capital planning division manager don [speaker not understood] who is here today. we have extensive experience managing community gardens program that includes 35 sites on rec and park primarily on rec and park properties but also on dpw and puc properties. we have close working relationships with other city departments that were strengthened through the strategic planning process, specifically for urban agriculture, but also, of course, on many of the renovation and capital projects that we do in operations we partner with other agencies as well as nonprofits. we have successfully -- we have a successful shift riff of recruiting volunteers and managing them. we have a comprehensive community process for running meetings and workshops. and we also have a partnerships division specifically meant to be the front door to working with folks in a collaborative manner. again, sorry for the poor resolution.

this map just shows the red, yellow -- red and yellow dots are our existing community gardens showing, of course, the new urban ag coordinator will come on and look at what's our distribution across the city and how can we work to build that. this is to show we're currently managing 25 park sites, 90 [speaker not understood], and what dpw and puc jurisdictions. i have been working in my capacity of community gardens program to support the department in developing our community gardens program website as more of a resource. the plan is for us to hire an urban agriculture program coordinator who will build on this website and have a portal that's specific to urban agriculture program. the i am p/e test largely for the urban agriculture resolution and program is to have sort of the front door for urban ag. so, we are not planning to take over other urban agriculture activities that are going on from other departments or other

cities, but rather to be a front door so a member of the public can know if i'm interested in working on this land or i want to know what's going on here, that there's a clear contact person that they can come to who can then point them in the right direction. so, our plan is to develop a process calendar to outline year one which i'll show you in just a moment, to hire a full-time urban agriculture program coordinator to build on the work we did in the fall. and also to develop the urban agriculture program alongside or in conjunction with our community gardens program. so, the rec and park -- so, i will continue in my role as community gardens program manager and that the urban agriculture program will be looking at how to improve the community gardens program, but also looking at other initiatives that are going on both on rec and park properties and of course not on rec and park property. so, once this resolution is passed, we will consider the urban ag coordinator position official tali transferred to rec and park.

we have a high priority on transparency moving forward, letting folks know what's going on and being inclusive. to that end, we are planning to identify commissioner wuedthctionv members who would participate in our hiring process in an advisory capacity. we'd like to have that person identified by the end of this month or early next month. we are going through the process of filling out the required human resources paperwork and we hope to host a recruitment in august and have someone on board as early as september. we also will develop and implement a year one work plan with the inter agency working group and community stakeholders incorporating mechanisms for reporting and evaluation along the way so we can take all the great work that's done and make sure we have metrics for success and we have benchmarks to evaluate. this is a brief calendar showing the next -- the second half of 2013 as well as 2014 moving forward. our plan is in august to reconvene the working group

that met last fall to check in with folks from city departments and also from the public to find out if they'd like to continue in that capacity and to open it up to others to join that working group if they so choose. and i guess we'd like to convene a meeting to look at the goals that have been developed to date and hone in on goal set fog r year one. obviously we're looking at one year. we have a lot of folks involved, and there's a lot of work that could be done to make urban agriculture even smoother and fantastic in the city. we want to really focus on having approximately three achievable goals that we can go for success and we can accomplish tangible things in the first year. so, september we hope to have someone on board. we reconvene the working group and start to set up that one-stop shop of contact information. at that point we would work to finalize the work plan. we think it's important that the person -- the employee be hired and on board before we finalize the web plans so they can also be in the know and

take ownership of how that looks. in november we've been asked by spur and sfuaa to make quarterly presentations to the rec and park commission. we're happy to do that. and it's also been suggested that we return to the mayor and the board of supervisors before the end of this year to sort of report back on what's been done with urban ag to date. we're happy to do that. and we will consider our year one in rec and park as from the time the person is hired, which hopefully will be again september, early october latest. and, so, we have in april 2014 a year one midterm evaluation with the working group and stakeholders. and then in october, a year one evaluation. we'd like to meet with the working group at least bi-monthly if not monthly, and it's not on the calendar but the urban agriculture coordinator would be working to implement the goals at every month. i would put [speaker not understood] working closely

with in supervisor david chiu's office as a contact member -- as a contact -- excuse me -- person between now and when the resolution goes to the full board and, of course, if you have additional questions you can reach me or general manager ginsberg and don. thank you. i'm happy to take any questions. >> thank you. i want to thank ms. stock man. i also recognize don from the senior staff of rec and park for the work you've done on this and your leadership on this. and unless there are questions -- supervisor kim, do you have a question of rec and park? >> i do. although this may have been appropriate for the city administrator's office. i was reading through the report last night and i -- there was a survey done for all the city-owned property and buildings [speaker not understood]. the city is considering affordable housing sites we actually grant funding to. so, we have a series of affordable housing that we support with financing or we do

master lease with granting for. and, so, i think it would also be great for us to survey those sites as well since we have many residents in them that may also want to [speaker not understood] in urban agriculture [speaker not understood]. specifically because i think we have sites in neighborhoods that are [speaker not understood]. [multiple voices] >> that certainly was done by the city administrator's office. i don't think it was done by rec and park. >> it was. >> [speaker not understood]. >> we expect bill lawrence from the city administrator's office. i'm not sure if he's going to be coming down. i hope he is, but certainly rooftop gardens was one aspect of the will thetion asian we were looking to explore with the city, part of the city administrator's study was to do an audit. and i would certainly be supportive of that possibility. i don't think the city just looked at city-owned buildings, but affordable housing developments the city has significantly invested in, that's a great idea. >> or public housing.

>> or public housing. rec and park, if you could pass that along to the city administrator and add that to your mix? i know we have a couple representatives from the puc. i'm not sure who would like to speak to represent the department, but thank you for being here. >> good afternoon and thank you. chair wiener, president chiu, supervisor kim, and a special thanks to president chiu for introducing this inspiring legislation that brings us here today. my name is yolanda manzoni and i'm the [speaker not understood] for the san francisco public utilities commission. i'm here today on behalf of sfpuc to show our support for the recommendations of the city administrator regarding the establishment of the urban agriculture program and supporting the recommendation that the recreation and parks department serve as the location for the new urban ag program. because of the many established benefits that urban agriculture brings to our city, to our

communities, and our environment, the sfpuc is proud to be a long-time supporter of many various types of urban agriculture activities ranging from programs that relly focus on environmental cadu to those that focus more on economic and work force development opportunities through urban agriculture. specifically, the san francisco puc commission passed a secondary land use policy that seeks to proactively promote urban agriculture as a secondary use on sfpuc land. and that is a policy that is actually quite unique nationally and with that policy and in context of this overarching city-wide urban ag program, we are really looking forward to continuing our leadership role particularly over the next few years as we roll out the development of three new sites on puc land for urban agriculture within the city. now, as manager of those urban ag projects, i've also had the pleasure of participating on

behalf of the puc and the working group convened by the city administrator's office for the strategic planning process. and i would like to say that the int agency collaborati and experienced while particing because working together, collaboratively as sister agencies slag in close collaboration with community and stakeholder groups such as the urban agriculture alliance, i'm confident that we can accomplish the many goals that are outlined in the ordinance and do our part to make this city even better. thank you. >> thank you. i just have one comment based on that, not a question to you, but i think one of the things that i certainly want to recognize or all the city departments that have been doing good work on this. and as we centralize the coordination of the strategy, i think it is important that we continue to encourage the work of all the various individual agencies. so, to that end, i do plan and colleagues, i've circulated a quick amendment to you to add additional whereas clause to the ordinance that states that the intent of the ordinance is

to help bring in-scale urban agriculture activities throughout the city by maintaining the [speaker not understood] agency and established urban agriculture initiatives while at the same time fostering enhanced inter agency collaboration and providing more centrally coordinated institutional support to the urban agriculture community. i think it is important as we centralize again, the whole point of centralization all the parts of the city are doing their piece. so, i do plan to offer that as an amendment to this resolution. i think we have one final presentation from the planning department. thank you for being here. >> good afternoon, supervisors and staff. my name is diana and i am the food system policy manager for the san francisco planning department. i wanted to just say that the planning department is very supportive of urban agriculture in the city and as you know, beginning in 2011, we passed planning code amendments at the fine urban agriculture land

uses and also allow for the sale of produce from production sites directly. and the planning department also worked very collaboratively with all the other departments who have already been mentioned today and really enjoyed that experience. and we also enjoyed participating in the development of the urban agriculture strategic plan and fully endorse its findings. i wanted to just mention that the planning department's goal for sustainable food system include increased access to healthy food and the urban agriculture program is certainly a strategy that helps us achieve that goal and will help us achieve that goal. so, i am here to profess my support for the resolution and for the city's continued support for urban agriculture. thank you. >> okay, thanks. and unless there is anyone from the city administrator's office, why don't we now go to public comment. i have a couple of public comment cards. i want to first acknowledge eli [speaker not understood] from spur. [speaker not understood] from

the san francisco urban agriculture alliance. and then andrea i think it's jag win from the white spring community garden. and anyone else who would like to speak in public comment, if you can please line up on the right-hand side of this room. eli. thank you, supervisors. my name is eli zegas, i'm the [speaker not understood] program man erupt at spur. and i'm here in support of the resolution. as the recreation and parks department pointed out in their presentation, we feel that the department has a number of strengths that makes sense for the program to be housed there and we're also encouraged by what you've heard, that the department sees the program as supplementing and coordinating among agencies and also serving all types of urban agriculture, not just community gardens. alongside our support, i want to highlight that there is only one year of funding for this program and i think a lot of us

had hoped that the program will be successful and we'll be working with the departments to do that. but come next spring as we prepare for budget talks, i'd really like to put it on the board's radar to have a hearing similar to this where we can see the goals of the work plan that will be submitted in october are being met. if we are having success, and if so we can find more permanent funding to keep the program going. and if we're having issues, addressing the issues. so, that's the one suggestion we have, is calling an informational hearing six to nine months after the coordinator is hired. other than that, we very much look forward to working with rec/park and seeing this move forward. it's been a long process coming forward. thanks to supervisor chiu for your leadership and i hope you'll support the resolution. thank you. >> thank you. why don't we hear i think antonio and then [speaker not understood] also from sfuaa. hi. so, i only have some quick comments because in general we

are obviously very supportive of this moving forward. i think the first comment is that we have seen this be delayed a little bit and we'd like to see some sense of urgency on the part of rec and park department on the clear job path for the person being hired before actually hiring so they can hit the ground running. we have all the [speaker not understood] issues about the particular aspects of implementing the ordinance. so, we thank melinda for presenting some of those and we hope those will be clearly delineated. the only other pieces that we're interested in promoting is just additional funding hopefully in further years and we do believe there is plenty of funding sources available private and public to ensure this program continues. and then the last piece is just that as melinda mentioned also, we're interested in participating in the hiring process to ensure we have the best kind of job description and the best candidates being sue leerthctiontioned for this position and so we look forward

to participating in that. so, thank you guys for supporting this ordinance and get thing program going. thanks. >> next speaker. hello, i'm andrea jag win and i am a long-time, decade long community gardner in san francisco [speaker not understood] community garden on puc land. and i do support this resolution and the legislation and thank you for bringing it forward. it's long overdue in san francisco. but i'd like to just make a comment as kind of an average person who isn't involved in the stakeholders meetings and the city agency world. i hope that the emphasis of this legislation is placed on providing things to the people who are involved in urban agriculture, that the money doesn't get sucked up into the city agency world and a lot of

positions and monitoring and process and bureaucracy and all that stuff. rec and park is a great institution. community gardeners don't need them to build $5,000 race bets. we can do that ourselves for a 16th of that cost. so, i really do hope that the focus is on pushing things down to the people who are receiving food or growing food or doing whatever and not getting sucked up into government spending. and also that the focus is on finding new land for urban agriculture, a la supervisor kim's comments and hopefully that will happen through the inter agency process, but the work plan and the monitoring of this project needs to be around land for urban ag. thank you very much. >> thank you. let's hear from our final speaker. hi, good afternoon, supervisors. thanks for taking the time to

discuss this important matter. my name is julia [speaker not understood] and i am the stewardship manager at the san francisco parks alliance, also active member in the urban ag alliance, and also a volunteer co-manager at alemany farm. i'd like to thank the board for allocating funding for this position. i think it's important we have coordinated efforts. going forward, i'd like to reiterate the importance to find additional funding for the position. it's funded for one year, but i think going forward it's important to continue funding for one -- well, for many reasons. one, as far as quality of candidates, if it's just looked at as a temporary position, i think that's going to impact the quality of candidates that apply for the position.

and then also obviously the needs that this is addressing will be ongoing. so, in order not to lose the progress we've made so far, they just continue the funding. and then just reiterate the spirit of collaboration between city agencies, nonprofits and the stakeholders, community stakeholders in general. and i would also advocate for having one or two representatives from the urban ag alliance be involved in the hiring process. thank you. >> thank you very much. are there any other members of the public that wish to speak in public comment? mr. chair, i think we're at the end of public comment. >> public comment is closed. [gavel] >> again, i want to thank everyone that's been involved from the city end to the community end. colleagues, as i mentioned before, i have an amendment i'd like to assert as a whereas clause. as we're centralizing the development of an urban

agriculture strategy, that there will continue to be coordination and enhanced inter agency collaboration. so, if i could ask -- i'd like to make that amendment. >> any discussion? okay. without objection we'll accept the amendment. [gavel] >> with that, colleagues, i appreciate making the motion to move this out of committee with recommendation to the full board. >> without objection? that will be the order. [gavel] >> thank you, colleagues. and thank you to the community. >> okay, thank you. madam clerk, can you please call item number 4? >> item number 4 is a resolution granting a revocable permission to san francisco state university to occupy portions of the public right-of-way to construct and maintain a pedestrian tunnel below winston drive to provide a safe and accessible connection from the main campus of sfsu to the site of a new recreation wellness center, and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the general plan and the priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. ~ winston drive >> mr. kwong. >> thank you, john kwong [speaker not understood]. tunnel under winston drive to connect two portions of the campus. if you can give me the

overhead, please. please note that the location -- this is lake merced boulevard, this is winston drive. san francisco state has -- campus is divided by -- >> one moment, mr. kwong. can we please close that door back there? thank you. >> as you can see -- >> why don't we just wait for people exiting. okay, go ahead. >> thank you. as noted, this is lake merced boulevard. this is winston drive, san francisco state has portions of this campus divided by winston boulevard. one of the issues is they want to interconnect these two portions of the campus on both sides. the distance from the intersection at lake merced boulevard to the approximate location is approximately 350

feet or so. so, what's been happening is obviously students and other people that use san francisco state would jay walk across winston drive with san francisco state being determined that is not the safest for its users. what san francisco state wanted to do in this case is to construct a proposed -- is they are proposing to construct approximately 120-foot pedestrian tunnel that crosses under winston drive to interconnect the two campuses. a plan view -- >> actually, i think should we be calling 4, 5 and 6 together? >> encroachment facilities with different [speaker not understood] and they all require different resolutions to the board. >> why don't we call items 5 and 6, and then, mr. fong, you

can present seriatim. >> item number 5 is resolution granting revocable permission to atlantic richfield company to occupy a portion of the public right-of-way to install and maintain four soil vapor extraction conduits connecting to two new vapor extraction wells crossing under broderick street fronting 2 richardson avenue, conditioned upon the payment of an annual assessment fee, and making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the general plan and the priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. ~ extractions item number 6 is a resolution granting revocable permission to jeremy ricks to occupy a portion of the public right-of-way to extend an unimproved portion of greenwich street with a privately maintained driveway to provide access to a new garage at 1281 - 1283 greenwich street; to install additional landscaping and public access improvements within the unimproved portion of the greenwich street public right-of-way between hyde and larkin streets, conditioned upon the payment of an annual assessment fee of $4,433.00; and making environmental findings of consistency with the general plan and the priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. ~ greenwich street >> thank you. you can continue, please. >> as i was stating, in this case, san francisco state being a good steward, determined they want to provide local pedestrian safety to access different areas of the campus across winston drive. they applied for a permit to install a pedestrian tunnel that interconnects the two portions of san francisco state. they have applied for the major street encroachment permit has been reviewed and been deemed

to be in conformance with general plans. the city agency food task has reviewed it and determined it is appropriate. we had a director's hearing after notifying the general public. there has been -- the director has determined this is an appropriate use of the public right-of-way and is recommending that the board -- the committee here move this forward to the full board for approval. >> okay, thank you. why don't you continue with the next item. you can do all three and then we'll take public comment. >> to richardson avenue is requesting a major street encroachment permit for the installation of vapor extraction facilities. ~ 2 richardson it is believed to be either a gas station or industrial area that the health department and the property owner have identified contaminants entering the soil and this is one of the methodologies to

remediate the contaminants. the applicant has applied for, again in this case, an encroachment permit to place these facilities in the public right-of-way. this was reviewed by planning, determined again that it was in conformed with the general plan. this was short term while the mitigation is being taken care of. [speaker not understood] reviewed it and determined it is also in conformity. the department held a public hearing on this. there were some comments from the public inquiring as to what this really was about when it was explained to them, they were comfortable with it. ~ the department requested again in this case, the committee move this forward to the full board with recommendations. >> okay. and then the final item. >> the final item is for 1281 - 83 greenwich street. the project sponsor, the owner of that property as part of this permit is requesting to

reconstruct the -- an improved portion of greenwich street to create a garage on his property and get vehicular access to it. as part of this, they work with the community to install a variety of landscaping improvements in the area where the property owner will maintain. this was reviewed again by both planning and task and both have given approval. again, we had a public hearing on this and -- with strong community support and we recommend, the director in this case is recommending that the committee move this forward to the full board with recommendations. >> great, thank you, mr. kwong. >> thank you. >> okay, is there any public comment on either item 4, 5, or 6? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> president chiu, can we have a motion on items 4, 5 and 6? >> happy to move those items.

>> with recommendation? >> with recommendation. >> okay. and we will take that without objection. [gavel] >> mad amount clerk is there any other business before the committee? >> no, we have no further matters. >> then we are adjourned. [gavel]

(clapping) >> are you a parents that's unemployed and struggling to pay child support we have teamed up and positions