>> >> >>

good afternoon, welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors meeting of july 23, 2013. please call the roll. avalos, breed, campos, present, supervisor chiu, present, supervisor cohen, present, supervisor ferrel, present, supervisor tang, pre, and

wiener. mr. president, all members are present. >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen please join us for our pledge of allegiance. clooegs colleagues we have the june 18th minutes to prove. the minutes are approved. are there any communication? >> i have no communications, mr. president. >> can you read the consent agenda. >> these items are considered routine and if a member objects

an item maybe removed and considered separate. >> would anyone like to separate any of these items? >> okay. roll call vote? >> supervisor avalos, breed, aye, supervisor campos, aye, supervisor chiu, aye, cohen, aye, ferrel aye, supervisor kim, aye, tang, wiener, aye, yee, 11 ayes. >> the motion is approved. >> madam clerk can we call the item 17, proposed budget. >> the clerk: appropriating budgets for if i feel year-ending june 30, 2014, and

2015. the salary in ordinance numerating positions in annual budget for the fiscal year ending june 14th and 15. >> can we do these two items same call? >> these items passed. items 20. >> approving and authorizing the lease and management of botanical garden for waving fees. updating the fees for the east and west harbor and establishing a facility rental fee and repealing obsolete provisions.

>> roll call vote. items 19 and 20. avalos no, breed aye, campos no, chiu, aye, supervisor cohen, aye, ferrel aye, kim, aye, mar, no, tang aye, yee aye. >> those ordinance pass. why don't we call item 21 and 65 >> item 21 is an ordinance amending the code to clarify certain procedures provided for appeal in exemptions and

neglect ever deck largsz revising noticing procedures for environmental impact reports and negative declaration for plan area projects exceeding 20 acres. and item 65 is an ordinance to repeal to the environmental review officer to consider an amended review of a modification does not require a new decision under the california environmental quality act. item 65 was considered by the land use and economic development committee at a regular meeting on monday july 22nd. >> supervisor kim? >> thank you, this is the final piece of legislation that has come before the full board. the legislation was initially introduced by our office along with supervisors campos avalos,

mar and yee. as one final piece of the appeals process that members our advocates fought for. this is around specifically when an exempt project is modified and therefore is referred by a city department planning for the ero for a new look and the ero determines that it fits under the current exemption. this allows a member of p be to actually appeal to the ero and what it may or may not have under the public setting. this is a last piece under very delicately balanced set of legislation reform to the ceqa process and keeping the entire party in coalition together. so i do want to again thank our city attorney, chiu, supervisor wiener and planning for continued work on asl cts

of this legislation together and look forward to passing those both pieces today. thank you. >> supervisor wiener? >> thank you, mr. president, colleagues i want to thank you again last week for the unanimous assets of the legislation that i forward and i hope will result in a significant improvement to the ceqa process in a clear deadline specifically triggered by the first approval of the project. i think it's a significant step forward. regarding the trailing with the legislation sponsored by supervisor kim, i will be supporting the legislation today. although i don't believe it to be a necessary in terms of having good process, i understand there is a dire for it and for how it is drafted and what i introduced to the

committee yes, i'm uncomfortable supporting it. in terms of contact, the issue of modification, is the issue of debate and discussion for months. there was a concern by some folks who were opposing my legislation that something could be modified and there would not be an opportunity to appeal. supervisor kim's original legislation provided for effectively an appeal or potentially an appeal every time a modification occurred and i thought it would make our process even worse than today. i allow multiple appeals. i want to thank supervisor kim for really modifying that modification provision and i'm comfortable supporting it because what it basically does

is it allows people who are concerned or believe that a modification should result in a new categorical exemption to ask the.ero to take a second look and providing information and really taking that second look. this appeal to the ero will not stop the project from proceeding and will not stop construction. it is not an appealable decision and can't be further an appealed. given all that it will not slowdown projects which have been approved which has been a big problem for projects in the city and i'm comfortable supporting it. >> thank you, colleagues, unless there is any further discussion, let's take a roll call vote on item 21.

the clerk: avalos, breed, aye, chiu, aye, supervisor cohen, aye, supervisor ferrel, aye, supervisor kim, aye, mar, aye, tang, aye, supervisor wiener aye, yee, aye. >> can we take on the first item with same call? item passes. >> madam clerk, call item 22. >> the clerk: item 22. moss skoen expansion project. supervisor avalos?

>> thank you, at the committee last week i asked for a report from dpw how we are going to be showing the expansion project that we make sure we hire locally and hitting our strong marks for participation. i was wondering if dpw could be here to share? >> good afternoon, supervisors, supervisor avalos requested the project data for both san francisco general hospital rebuild and the moss skoen renovation. there was an lbe goal set at 1 percent and --

18 percent and it exceeded 20 percent. for local higher we reported 18 percent. we were mistaken because the renovation had both public and private funds that supported the project. we were able to go back and request some data because there was no cpr's collected from on the privately held contracts. we were still able to get some data and the current numbers that we are seeing is it exceeded 22 percent. >> that was for what year? >> that was the project came online in -- 2010. >> okay. so that was the time when we were actually at 20 percent in terms of our local hire ordinance and before it passed. i appreciate that. i want to make sure moving forward for very large projects that we are going to have an

estimate for local business enterprise, a goal that will be based on our past experience that is going to be strong and make sure that local business enterprises are going to get inclusion in that project in the same for local hire. >> absolutely. >> thank you very much. appreciate you coming in. >> colleagues, can we take the same item, same call? without objection, this item passes. >> item 23. >> the clerk:. southeast water pollution control plant at 750 phelps street. >> colleagues, can we do this same house, same call? item passes. >> next item. 24.

>> the clerk: health right. resolution retro actively approving amendment to the contract between the department of public health and health right to 18.5 million. >> colleagues, same call? this resolution is adopted. >> item 25. >> the clerk: west bay housing corporation. extending to june 30, 2018, and increasing the amount to $25 million. >> same house, same call? this resolution is adopted. next item, 26.

>> the clerk: med impact health care systems. >> same house, same call? this resolution is adopted. next item. >> seem ens medical solutions. authorizing the don't enter into a contract. >> same house, same call? this resolution is adopted. >> the clerk: item 28: declaration of emergency northshore force main. >> same house same call. item

passes. >> next item. >> the clerk: crest wood behavioral health seventh and mental health management. >> same house, same call, this resolution is adopted. next item. >> 30. the clerk: mayor's earth day breakfast. >> same house, same call, this resolution is adopted. >> item 31. >> the clerk:

>> same house, same call. this is adopted. >> item 32: community scale renewable energy integration central corridor eekey district. >> same house, same call. this is adopted. >> next item. 33 >> same house, same call. this motion is adopted. text 34? the clerk: budget and legislative analyst services. >> supervisor ferrel? >> thank you president chiu. i

want to state publically and as i said before how much i appreciate mr. row's work and that of his colleagues and look forward to a relationship and i hope we have everyone's support. >> supervisor mar? >> i wanted to thank mr. rho and hi staff but also the legislative analyst report has done amazing work. i don't know what we would do without their insightful and independent analysis of the budget. as the preparation of the legislative analyst report, a number of them and others have been, it's been wonderful to work with them. i really appreciate their services and don't know what we would do without them as a city. thank you. >> supervisor campos? >> thank you, very much, mr. chairman, i was joking that it's really hard to approve an item without having a budget

and legislative analyst. this is the catch 22 that we find ourselves on this one. it is of course absolutely fitting that this is what is before us. the thing i appreciate about mr. rho 's work that time and time again we have put out the bid and they have risen to the top. it's because of the quality of the work and the integrity with which they approach it and it really is impossible to imagine the board of supervisors without the work of mr. rho's and his firm. >> colleagues, same house, same call. this motion is an approved. it is now 2:30. i would like to reco