to note that in october of 2012 we approved the conceptual plan already. so, this matter has been before us in terms of what was planned and this is to let the contract and we adopted findings and mitigation measures associated with the mitigated negative declaration as well. plea. >> i have two card. i have kelly and anastasia, please, in either order. ~ please hi, my question is what's wrong with the city and what's wrong with rpd? whenever there is a project that is tree removal. this particular [speaker not understood] intends to move -- i'm not political. now i'm coming here to talk [speaker not understood]. i don't want to be here. with this project and the

removal of 59 trees, which are in no way in the project -- [speaker not understood]. how much does it cost to remove each tree? i didn't go -- i only looked at this yesterday. didn't go [speaker not understood]. it's not online. you have to go somewhere and look. but how much each removed tree cost the city? like how much pollution it doesn't absorb? how much c.o.2 is going into the air? how much co2 is not going to be observed? ~ and you know, you pay -- i don't know, maybe if the project had been a consultant, we pay consultant to [speaker not understood]. but if you don't remove the trees, you don't [speaker not understood]. i don't know if any of those trees are hazardous. quite often the case, if city wants to do a check, [speaker

not understood], take it out. and again, i mentioned before then there is the project for greening the city. they are asking for bid and one of it is promoting the planting of trees in the city. friends of urban forest is planting the trees of the city. rpd is cutting the trees because they don't like the kind, not because they are hazardous. i don't know about the 59 trees. 21 of those are going to be removed. 21 is two-fifths. is it possible to remove the trees and give the trees to forestry and [speaker not understood].

thank you. >> i might point out as a matter of information the packets are posted online and there is a description that the trees were evaluated and were deemed hazardous under the standards for the department, just as a matter of information. next speaker, please. >> kelly. sfgov, there's a video again. i put this up so you don't have to look at my ugly mug. this project, the [speaker not understood], is for the construction of the infrastructure or an sbrn artificial field. it is specifically designed for an sbrn artificial field. it should be noted coincidentally perhaps in less than 24 hours from now issues with the toxic materials being

used in infield fill such as this are being adjudicated in the superior court of the state of california. these hearings will touch upon the insufficiency and completeness of the rpd's negative declarations, the mitigation monitoring, and the reporting program as well as c-e-q-a issues regarding synthetic fields. in contrast to the reports provided by city field and the rpd, public health professionals have provided irrefutable evident to this commission. the rpd and the sponsors of this project, to show that the infill that is to be used in this project contains material that has been found by the state of california to be toxic and cancer causing. this is well posted. easily accessible information. additionally, the materials have been found to be carcinogenic [speaker not understood] international agency for research on cancer. approving this contractual agreement mere hours before its

health risks are being adjudicated in superior court is clearly not in the best interest of its intended users or the families of san francisco who will not only be exposed to it but will have to replace it when time comes for that. especially for the children of the adjacent shared and elementary school, hundreds of kid in their oceanview neighborhood. i believe that it is reasonable for the families of san francisco that they would best be served by not rushing through this contractual decisions till after a hearing about the fundamental materials being used. for future web searches, i'd like to insert some keywords. chemical sensitivities, [speaker not understood], childhood cancer, city fields foundation, carbon black, must go lighting, pisces incorporated, fisher builders, zinc leachate, [speaker not

understood], retaining walls, public private partnership, polley aromatic hay drone carbons, [speaker not understood], and mercury poisoning. ~ and i'd like to acknowledge patrick canon as well is here. >> thank you. >> is there any other public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioners. >> i think we need to do these resolution -- the resolution, do you need to read the title of the resolution? >> i'd be happy to. when it's time to make a motion, if you decide to approve, you will be approving the resolution in your packet and that title is approving the award of construction contract for the [speaker not understood] and levee ward athletic fields renovation contract. and adopting findings under the california environmental quality act c-e-q-a. >> is there such a motion? >> so moved. >> second. >> moved and seconded. all those in favor. >> aye. >> so moved.

>> thank you. we are on item 13, general public comment continued. is there anyone who wants to make general public comment? seeing none, this item is closed. item 14 is commissioners matters. commissioners? >> [speaker not understood]. >> any public comment? seeing none, this item is closed. 15, new business agenda [speaker not understood]. any public comment -- i'm sorry? >> i'm sorry, i didn't see -- commissioner, would you like to say something? >> no. >> did you want to finish your sentence? >> no, i was just going to ask if there was any public comment on that item. that's all. >> seeing none, that item is closed. >> no, i would like to make a comment on new business agendas. >> okay. >> item 15, and that is that i

would like to strongly urge the department, department staff to hold that meeting regarding the beacon street hill trail and to report back -- to hold that meeting with a community and to report back to us as soon as possible? i think that people in that neighborhood have been very patient. and i think that we should proceed to at least at minimum have a meeting out there and to try to bring some resolution to that item. >> will you note that for my next agenda setting a meeting

with the general manager? >> thank you. any other commissioners? okay. so, 16 is communications public comment. seeing none, this item is closed and 17 is adjournment. >> moved. >> second. >> moved in second. all in favor? >> aye. [adjourned]

>> hello, i am with the san francisco parks department serious we are featuring some wonderful locations in your and very own backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in san francisco with someone special. we are here at the lovely and historic palace of fine arts, located in the bustling marina district. originally built for the 1950's exposition, the palace is situated along san francisco's waterfront. it is ada accessible and is reached by the 28, 30, and 91

bus lines. with its rotunda, columns, uncut the reflecting waters against the eucalyptus trees, it is one of the most romantic settings for special dates, and memorable proposals. it is also a perfect spot where you can relax with that special someone while listening to the water and fountain in the lagoon. beautiful to view from many locations, and inside is an ideal place to walk around with your loved ones. the palace is the most popular wedding location in the city park system. reservations for weddings and other events are available at strecpark.org. shakespeares' guard and refers -- has plants referred to in shakespeare's plays and poems.

located near the museum and the california academy of sciences, shakespeares garden was designed in 1928 by the california spring blossom association. flowers and plants played an important part in shakespeares literary masterpieces. here is an enchanting and tranquil garden tucked away along a path behind a charming gate. this garden is the spot to woo your date. appreciate the beauty of its unique setting. the cherry tree, the brick walkways, the enchanting stones, the rustic sundial. chaired the bards'w ro -- share the bard's words.

the garden is a gem to share with someone special. pack a picnic, find a bench, enjoy the sunshine and let the whimsical words of william shakespeare float you and your loved one away. this is one of the most popular wedding locations and is available for reservations. shakespeares garden is 8ada accessible. this park is located at the bottom of a hill. it is a secret garden with an infinite and captivating appeal. carefully tucked away, one block from the bottom of lombard street, it makes the top of our list for the most intimate picnic settings. avoid all tourist cars and parking hassles by hopping on the cable car. or the 30, 45, 41, or 91 bus.

this garden was designed by a the landscape architect thomas church in 19 to -- 1957. grow old with me, the best is yet to be is inscribed at this gem of a park. a lush oasis anchored by gazebosanchoreddekcs, -- gazebos, anchored by decks. this is the place to tell your family the love you share. reservations are available for this hidden gem. i am jamie hopper. until next time, don't forget to get out and play. for more information about reserving one of these romantic locations, or any other

location, call 831-5500. this number is best for special events, weddings, picnics, and the county fair building. for any athletic fields and neighborhood parks, 831-5510. you can also write us. 501 san francisco, calif. 94117. or just walk in and say hello. and of course you can find more information and reach us at sfrecpark.org. >> say the pledge of allegia e allegiance.

of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. mr. vice president i'd like to call roll please. (calling names) and also, we have a quorum and a also the chief of police gregory p, sir. good evening ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the wednesday of the san francisco police commission. thank you for joining us this

evening. let's call the consent calendar >> receive and file action request and receive a ticket valued at the $244 for mr. kevin president of the verses cast for the youth engage program. and the request to be received if mr. norman new zealand resident arrest for presentation for the avoidance in locating a laptop >> the 7 tickets are to go to the kids in the tenderloin and the $50 certificate was for a great deal officer. >> move to accept. >> okay. i'll move to accept. motion made by commissioner

khan. public comment on the consent calendar items. hearing no public comment. all in favor of accepting the it items listed under the consent calendar say i. all opposed? any extension. those items are accepted by unanimous consented. >> the public is well, to talk about the subject matter of the commission. they shall address the commission as a whole and not individually. under police commission rules of order the police nor commissioners are required to

respond to questions presented by public. individual commissioners and police and occ personnel shall refrain from entering into discussion >> ladies and gentlemen the microphone is open for public comment. do we have any public comment? yes, ma'am >> thank you, commissioners. he's the cute it guy in the room. i'm coming to bear and bring again glad tidings. i want to contend the police department on the up your alley and it was handled and you did receive the accomodation.

she is a force to be recognized with. she might be about that tall but with her command voice of here's to herd pedestrians onto the sidewalk. she was able to get the fair participants and the merchants to pack up and move out. i've never seen my neighborhood get returned to itself as quickly as sergeant frazer was able to do that. i couldn't find a port a potty on the sidewalk. i also said she had a situation arise which she handled quite well. there were a couple of nudity

people who engaged in public activity. she told them they're not allowed and they got irate. well, she's by herself. likely someone from so-called security. came and excelled those guys from the fair and their band for life. as things turned out i saw loose o lots of folks. everyone was very well-behaved. i want to thank you. that was the right number of officers and if those jerks filed a complaint against sergeant frazer you've got my accomodation. when i went to the gay pride fair.

not having barriers around where people were dancing was good. and i think about a propriety for tenants who are harassed by folks. i'm having to find another place to live. i'd do it again >> thank you. any further public comment? >> good afternoon, commissioners. i'm betty actually man a retired san francisco school district teacher. i a hate to put a damper on anyone but i have to say this.

i moved into a new apartment building 701 golden gate avenue. on franklin and golden gate. since i've been there since march 1st i've been raped in my sleep over 20 times. i've acquired henry he's viruses i've been stalked and trespassers have come into my place. i've been hit with some type of concealed weapon. i've been stalked by cabs and trucks and cars. they honk horns and some of them walk faster or try to hit me.

everywhere i go noise abounds and people have high conversations. i have people turn their backs on me in unity. they stare at me and start reading books and emit some kind of substance from their body that tries to hurt me. i've been cyclely represented in my that apartment building. it seems like nobody wants to deal with that. i've called the police several times and that's been down. i've had to go to occ. now i do nothing but try to live my life. i found out i'm a target. however, this target is not going away. i'm devanilla protected by god

and he's the one that says whatever's going to happen if he wants me to go away or die. i need help. i've written countless letters to countless organizations and they do little you things. oh, you need a microwaive oh, i see this - i need the people to stop coming in and raping me. i found out they're trying to kill me as i sleep while i'm in the remedying period. but i need help. i need help >> thank you, ms. tillman. >> any other public comment? >> all right. seeing e seeing

none, public comment is closed. >> listen item 3 a the chiefs discussion updating the police commission recognize. >> grand jury before i go into our right activities i want to speak about a circumstance that occurred 7 years ago. last week we heard ms. paula brown more times then i can count. i see her at the hall of justice and i don't want the public to think that the department has been less than cooperative. we had a homicide 7 years ago so

i've invited our investigation buyer to give you a brief update and to make again, a very public plea for any information that would move this case along. >> good evening inspector. >> good evening. my name is is hector i'm the commander of chief investigations. i'm here to talk about the update. as the which kind of mentioned 7 years ago today a 17 people was shot in the intersection of barkers street >> can we just stop you and acknowledge his mom ms. brown just joined us. >> some witnesses were at the

scene and provided the officers with a partial description pr there were a bunch of people at the scene. he was trapped to the hospital where he died. the investigators were the first assigned. they met with ms. brown and interviewed approximately 21 witnesses within a few days. the witness we spoke with counsel identify the suspects. the two investigators canvassed the neighborhood and ms. brown organized vigils and marks to try to keep this in the public's eye' d for additional witnesses. the ballistics were identified and all were met with negative results. investigator mahoney will

continue to work with the narcotics officers and other investigator units. investigators obtained a reward for information. they kept ms. brown updated and provided her with avoidance. paulette brown has met with the city leaders and chief of police and leaders as well myself and other members of the police department to keep the case moving forward. ms. brown understands that this may be difficult. she has maintained the case in the public eye. several broadcasts have been remembering the public of the

reward and no tips. ms. brown came forward and presented a list even if names. she requested updates on the case and we provided those updates. we met with her and inspector jones has continued to meet with her and i have met with her in the past. we tried to do the best we can to follow-up and she understandss we're trying to do the best we can. investigator john miller has the case she met with him today. we did another announcement to put the case in the medias eye in an effort to get witnesses to come forward. we continue to follow up on this case. the homicide cases have no