can report and say that you did it with the community. how in the hel are you going to move on and keep using fillmore or whatever and the way that the agency and the prior agency done to us? okay. bottom line, i am jumping and praying, immediately, that i could sit down and talk with the president and the executive director and the people who are in charge. to find out how we are going to move forward in a way that we can work collectively. because this is not going to continue no more. i am on this case. they are doing this 27 years, and i am not a lawyer, but i have got so much documents to say what you are all doing is not what you are telling the governor. it is not your fault. but if you continue on, you are going to be put in that category as either one are two that i am filing on and conspiracy? now, i am talking for real, and

just like joe hinesfield and if you don't do the right thing and sit down at the table and talk about the fillmore situation, and immediately. you cannot continue on, i volunteer to see everything thatvy been involved before you all were involved with the jefferson put together what they called the mass lease and you are all spreading millions of dollars from there to now, there are obligations that you all owe us, and the community. and if not the community, sure enough on me. you know what this calls sweat equity and i have been doing this for 20-something years. now, these obligations that you are talking about is that you want to assent and sacramento and you need to sit down with the community and not only in this side, but the bay view side and i just lift up the document that say what you did in the bay view was put together for years ago. and this is the first federal agency in this country, and you would not know if the last

director? ace washington. and so, i am taking that and flipping and flopping it and calling community reform. because everything that is doing good right now is called community driven and anything that under mind it, i am going to recognize it and you call it the point system. and got in the is and the dots and so i am hoping and praying that when i make the phone call next week we can sit down and talk because this can't go on like this. >> thank you. >> do we have any other cards? >> no. >> thank you very much. >> okay. i am going to again, a poll apologize, i am going to step out in a couple of minutes. >> first is, i understand that the little bit of tricky because of the long range plan due in november and the timing issue there and do we anticipate any changes to rops

13, 14, b from the long range property management plan, for example, you know, our disposition of south beach harbor and would that impact any money that we would need in the first half of 2014? i mean, we have been talking about could there possibly be disposition costs? not knowing the timing of how long they will be taking to approve it? >> yeah. >> yes, it is possible. and we have not come up with any hard numbers now that will be that we have put on yet. and i don't think that we have talked through specifically the south beach harbor and we have been talking about appraisals or other things that we need to move forward with any dispositions. >> right >> so i guess that is what i am getting and i through that out as an example. but i can see how the long range property manager plans would either increase the costs in the form of meeting and appraisals and other

consultants or whatnot or decrease the costs from potentially having to dispose of or otherwise, do something with the property that you had planned to spend the tax increments on the bonds. so i guess that the reason that i asked the question, is i am just trying to get a sense of whether or not dof would sort of delay, rops. b. because, they see something in the long range property management plan that does not jiv with what they are seeing in terms of the signatures on rops b. and i mean anything is possible with dof and our past experience with them is that they have had to tend to sort of divide and conquer when they had reviews and sometimes the two parts don't necessarily communicate between each other. and so we found that with the rops and due diligence review process that there were two separate teams working on them. but that is a good question to think about. and see if there is anything that we might want to include.

and we do have an administrative budget that some of these things could be captured, but, we have not heard anything to date that would indicate that they might, you know, delay, a rops approval because of the long range property management plan and okay, thank you. >> going over questions? >> mr. ellington? >> yes, turn your mic o >> so the different funding sources here. >> and i know that the bond proceeds and are connected to certain items on the rops, but what are the are there any restrictions on the reserved funds and what the reserved funds can be used for? and what are the other funds and what are categorized as other funds? >> and so there are restrictions on those reserves depending on where they originated from. the prior tax increment and

balances from say mission bay, are restricted from the agreement, or etc. and there are, depending on where it came from, there are restrictions, and then, the other is or has a variety of sources and so, i would say, it is a lot of developer payments, and so, for instance, in the shipyard, you know, the depositers and reimbursing or in transbay, the developer is making the payments that will be used for the affordable housing through a payment, from them verses using the property tax and that is what in that category as well as the state and federal grants as well. >> they are just lumped altogether. anything that is not prompt property tax is not reserved in the bonds. >> okay. >> thank you. >> okay. >> i mean, this is a pretty thorough and i know that the over site board will have the more specific questions because they are going to go line by

line. nothing jumped out to me and i definitely bring it up to somebody if it does and does anyone have any? >> i don't have a question, but, i again, i am intrigued to see or perhaps understand and maybe this is not the point, where we talk about this, but there are a couple of items related to the western addition, outstanding loans. by, yosi, with josi, and with the resoles and the (inaudible) long and 1300 fillmore and i understand why they are on this schedule. and just so that the folks are not confused and members of the public are not confused as to why the matters might appear here, perhaps we should have some explanation. >> so, tracy ren olds or real

estate director will come up and address that question. >> commissioners, i'm the manager of the real estate group. the loans, yes, the loans are on the rops and you can see that we put them on, and they don't involve any payments out because they are loans, and but, those agreements along with the other development agreements that don't involve the payments we made a decision many months ago to put every obligation that we can think of on the rops even if it doesn't involve a cash flow out and so those, that is why they are on there and that is why there is no, and there is zero, on there. >> but those loans are continuing to be active. and monitoring them and a couple of them, should be amended soon. and so i am planning to bring

an amendment two of them before you. and for your consideration on two of them. the rop loan went through a bankruptcy process and came out at the other end with a different structure which is being followed at the moment. and so the loan continues, the yosi one is tied up in the bankruptcy proceeding. and then, the other two sheba and 1300, there is a couple of loans, associated with those, entities. and 1300, they are both making payments, but slightly different than what their loan agreement actually says, which is why those are the two that i will be bringing and amendments to you as soon as i can, probably after the property management plan. but we will see, as fast as possible. >> great, thank you. okay. >> thank you, very much. >> and there is not an action item. so i think that we can move on

to the next item. >> the next order of business is item 7, report of the chair. >> oh, that is me. >> i do not have a report this week. >> the next order of business is item 8, report of the executive director madam director? >> thank you. madam secretary. commissioners, just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that we are having a meeting on the 17th of september, and it is our regular meeting day. and but we have a special meeting time as our secretary indicated at 4:00 p.m., in the community and it will be considering a number of items that are actually related to urbabeuena and transbay. and that cons includes my report. >> the next order of business, questions and matters, madam chair? >> okay.

>> anyone on the questions or matters that we can see sfgovtv is here until further notice. taping all of our meetings and i hope that we will get the people to tune in. >> okay. thank you very much. >> next item is item 10, closed session. >> 10 a. under the california government code, section, 54956.9 and confers with the legal council for the existing litigation and the 765 market street and residential owners association, et al verses all persons interested in the matter of the validity of the resolution on the community investment and infrainstruct stur and of the success and agency of the redevelopment agency of the city and council of san francisco and two, resolution, 8, 13 of the over side board to the redevelopment agency of san

francisco. et al superior court. >> i guess that we will go into recess, sorry. to the public comment? >> yeah. >> okay. before we do that, do we have any public comment? generally for you? do we not have no? >> no. okay. >> and thank you. >> okay. so i believe that we do stop taping. i see, that. perfect. >> and i am going to go into the closed session. and thank you very much. >> and so the question is complete and we are ajournd at 3:12.

♪ >> thank you for coming to the talent dance performance and talent show. [ applause ] >> today's performance and talent show. ♪

>> public recreation has every bit of the talent and every bit of the heart and soul of anything that any families are paying ten times for. >> you were awesome. test,

test, test, test, test, test test >> good afternoon. welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors meeting of fess test september 13th.

colleagues everyone welcoming week madam clerk please call the role >> (calling names) mr. president, you have a quorum. >> thank you supervisor yee has asked for a motion to be excused. without objection he'll be excused and ladies and gentlemen, let's join in the pledge of allegiance.

of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. colleagues we have a number of board meeting minutes to approve from the june 21st, june 27th, special meetings of budget and finance meeting the june recess meeting as well as the july 9, '23 and the 9 board of minutes. without objection those meeting minutes are approved. mr. president, has the members of the board of supervisors on august 22, 2013, correspondence was received from mark farrell communicating the local energy pursuant to section 31 hundred

and the mayor is to declare a local emergency and this matter will be for your consideration and that includes any communication >> items one through 3 those items are considered routine if a member would like an item removed he or she may. >> item 3. on balance of the matter could you call the role

(calling names) there are 8 i's >> those items with finally passed item 3. item 3 is an ordinance amendment chapter 59 to establish a healthy food retailer incentive program to help with the healthy food retailers >> supervisor mar. colleagues i want to thank many different people especially jane kim for being the co- sponsor of this i think historic ordinance that will make our corner stores more homeopathy and david chu and supervisor campos. this will create and oversee an assistance program for

convenience store act a.k.a. fresh foods. it will help reduce tobacco and alcohol for focus. this will be for grassroots food assess and food guardians from the bay area and also the tenderloin corner store coalition and the tenant leaders in supervisor jane's district interest it those organization are supporting others in addition to help promote healthy eating. i wanted to shout you tell if t n d c and the vietnamese justice center for examining this

effort. i look forward to seeing a day when all san franciscans can have access to affordable healthy food. thank you. thank you supervisor mar. with that madam clerk, please call the roll (calling names) there are 10 i's >> the ordinance is passed. why don't we move to our roll call >> supervisor you are first to nouns items. week it's good to see you hope

you have had a nice holiday. i'd like to begin by talking about an item that i am co- sponsoring with supervisor wiener and i want to thank supervisor wiener and that's a hearing request that specifically calls on looking at san francisco priced fiscal and ignorance shortcomings as outlined in a 2010 from the office of the controller. we want to know the steps including the shortcomings that were raised and how pride is doing. pride as i know st. is one of the largest and well known pride frontals, in fact, last hundreds

of thousands of people attended pride in san francisco and celebrated the supreme courts rules on same-sex marriage. the mix of the lgbt pride celebration committee is to educate the world and complimentary the culture. i think it's important 44 for us here in city government it s to have a good working relationship with that organization. going back to 2010 when i was relating a new member of the board there were some issues of the performance of pride and a pride came to me and supervisor to ask for the city's help. we certainly have noted we wanted to help by in order for us as a city to know how to help pride it was important for us to have an understanding of how

pride was performing. i want to thank ben the controller and his staff because at his request they performed a fiscal and ignorance audit it looked at pride as an o. at the time, many of the issues that ever found included there was a deficit of $225,000. there was issues of the ignorance including the roles that the members plated in terms of the funds raised. another item that was identified in the report was inconsistent methodology and out-of-date when it came to contracts and agreements. many of the agreements that pride had with its vendors were oral agreements and nothing

outlined what was expected of the pride and vendor. we want to know how well pride has done in terms of adding the issues. it's been almost 3 years civilians that report came out and it's important to insure the viability of the organization and it's a appropriate time to have a hearing to discuss how the addition is doing. the second item i have is a hearing request that i'm introducing on the a type of task force. as i know the task force recently released it's recommendations to insure the population living with hiv and aids into a boarder system of care to become available because

of the implementation of the affordable care act. we as a a state and a country are getting ready to finalize the implementation. it's important for us to understand how the hiv and aids population will be impacted. i'm requesting this be heard at the safety committee. the last item i have is a sad item it's in memorial for a very special person. i actually think that many of my colleagues in this room take the opportunity to see him in person and that is jose. and jose the absolute widow that

passed away a few days back and it goes without saying that jose was a hero an icon in the lgbt community. he has in a throughout his life come to represent the very best of the lgbt community but the very best of san francisco. so a little bit about him he was a veteran who performed at the black cafe. he was a co-founder of several lgbt organizations including the society for individual rights, sir as well as the lead for civil education. we know him more recently because of the fact he was essentially the founder of the external court and a to this day

you can see the impact he's had because of the important really that the court plays in the life of the lgbt community he was born in 1922 in san francisco. that he enlisted in the army and stayed in berlin where i was active in that is right and returned to san francisco in 1947 hoping to be a teacher but was arrested on immoral charges and involving something that supposedly happened at the st. francis hotel. he was fined and not allowed to become a teacher. he became to work and perform at the black cat until it closed in 1963. he's most commonly sighed for

being the first openly commitment to hold a seat in 1961. 1961 when just a mere act is acknowledging that you were gay was a defiant actress. at the time the local democratic party iowa was so afraid that jose what win a seat that they found a dozen commitments to run against him to make sure he didn't win. he borrowed a suit and ran under the watchword equality even though he came in 89 out of a field of thirty candidates not

even a dog catcher after that time didn't go and talk to the gay community. heather - i'm gay and i'm proud that a gay man placed that role. he proclaimed himself a widower and called the court of san francisco it became the international chiropractor system that elections its own yes, ma'am price and interior in new mexico.