understand that there's - there will be restraining order problems but we have to dedicate resources adequate resources to keep those rooms open. i mean, if you're going to really truly enjoy this venue re enjoy all the improvements we'll made we have to provide that guarantee. i can't be - i hope i'm being very forceful about this and it's understood that those facilities have to be opened. i've been operating senior programs or community center for seniors and disabled and that's one thing we won't theretofore that when participants come to

our center they'll have rooms that we can use they have to be able to have accessibility. so i just want to make myself heard loud and clear we need those facilities open >> i would second that commissioner mcdonald. >> i think the general manager said to speak to that. >> can i jump in here commissioner and respectfully you've gotten letters i want to let you know it includes a large room behind the boat house and the hours are posted and they include disabled rooms. and there was no r50678 restroom

in there before so that's been added is an ad add size room but we have had in like all our parks issues with that behavior. i'm going to be blunt we'll had people put feces and damaged the toilet i think a little bit of our frustration might be miss directed we've had an obligation to fix a room before it can be opened up for the public. it's not intended for people who purchase things in the boat house. we're working with the tenant to insure that room is safe for all. >> thank you. >> commissioner mcdonald.

>> thank you, mr. mick kins. is there any analysis about the entrances not just the fact there's increased upgrade age but who's using it. not that there's more usage age but we're pricing our community members out of access. on paper it looks good but folks and community can't afford to participate >> i think we have two pieces of evidence. the first is fraepg the previous concession charges those for two years without commission authorizations and that gives us the sense there's community support for this. when we went to that rate

there's not a large groping drop off. and second is that we have this available pricing structure it's not a new peak rate attempt it's a dynamic pricing. we've seen a lot of our amenity you locals don't necessarily go there anyway because they can expect a line if they go to the boat house before whereas in the winter in january they could have a beautiful 75 degree saturday and we'll have those lower rates so the visitors and the locals can attend >> thank you. do you have i guess a data whether we're talking about a rate mister but who is using the

resident vs. visitors >> we have a comprehensive survey of visitors now. >> thank you. and a seeing no other questions can i entertain a motion >> second. move forward and second all in favor?. opposed? hearing none it's unanimous. we're on golden gate yacht club extension of lease. >> good morning nick. the item you have before you is a 24 year extension for the golden gate yacht club for the marina yacht harbor. a little bit of background the golden gate yacht club the city entered a lease in in 92 for the

nonprofit yacht club we did a first amendment inform the lease. as i'm sure you're all aware the city implemented a renovation of the yacht west harbor. as part of that renovation all the slips within the harbor were reconfigured including the slips that had been leased to the golden gate yacht club. eventually our lease with the golden gate yacht club allows 3 hundred and 59 linear space within the yacht harbor. with this reconfiguration that happened during the renovation project their slips and this did

he missed place sz no longer showed what the slips looked at in the yacht harbor. the yacht club had negotiated a lease that kept intact their biggest spaces that the city was goothd to provide and we made a number of other amendments. the first amendment that we made was extending the term of the lease. currently the lease conspires in 2017 and there's a 5 years estimation option the the proposed amendment would eliminate the 5 year lease and it would carry the lease through 20041. that is similar in term to

extensions we've got with the st. francis yacht club and two of our other nonprofit clubs. the rent would be increased - the minimum rent would be from 54 thoughts a year to 85 thousand dollars a year the 10 percent would remain in effect. the before mentioned space they previously receive 4 hundred and 59 space and there are no slips that show this linear feet so to fulfill this we'd be increasing that birth space.

furthermore, the yacht club would make improvements to increase accessibility to the club. they include putting a new bathrooms and elevators to access the upper floors to the clubhouse and also the installation of a new public access ramp to access the adjacent piers next to the clubhouse. the total value is approximately, $600,000. although it should be noted the club will receive a rent credit for half of the costs for snaufl the access ramp. we have established a maintenance fund so we don't get

into a situations where at the end of the a lease term we have a property that has been somewhat negligent and under the proposed lease the club will be good thing to present the grow revenues each year into a maintenance fund. the club will be able to expand those are fund for the yacht club optional with the approval of the general manager so we keep invest in property so we're not at the end having a building that needs work. we're most excited about the inclusion that the yacht club provide educational activities on site.

as i'm sure you're all aware it's a challenge recreationally for the city. the yacht club is in a unique position to provide youth programming that likewise kids to access the waterfront and electron about the sport of sailing and the yacht club actually is the provider they're the only provider that works directly with san francisco schools to provide the after school sailing programs. there are a number of city schools and for the first time they're going to do. we obviously will work with them and make sure outlining all our youth have an opportunity to participate in those programs. their relatively low-cost

programs and no one is turned away we have scholarships. >> we do have public comment. valerie. >> morning commissioners i'm a member of the yacht club and also i run the golden gate youth sailing program for the high school team racing program that we offer. not all our kid are raceers abusing but we encourage kids to come in with their parents physical support to form teams and represent their high schools through intersclifk sailing throughout california. we currently have leo, mission

and balboa we had gateway and city arts last year. we're expecting another high school to come and the kids bond with kids from different kinds of schools whether public or private. we reach out to the public's but occasional we get a few privacy it's nice to see the kids form lifelong bond. i personally volunteer at the treasure island and a try to identify some students who basically h have maxed out at their program. and we take if kids that have no ability whatsoever of whatsoever whether they have money or not to get them on the water and

learning to trust each other and he teams among teams to share the assets. we have only so many resources. i'm splitting up the conciliations so we can get 25 kids per session. it's a hundred dollars per session and the sessions are 10 weeks. we do have scholarship money available and i help get the kids in wet suits and footing derives if they're not able to get their own. it's funded through members and guests donations. as you know i'm in favor of this

>> anyone else who would like to make public comment? >> good morning, everyone i'm jim rubin. i'm a lawyer at the club but i'm also on the board of the golden gate yacht club. i'm here because the rest of the board is here >> don't you have anything else today. >> they're out there keeping their fingers crossed that we can have another day of racing. specifically thank you to nick we've spent a lot of time but it's a pretty detailed lease and we had to go through a lot of items. it's important to us with the

end date we want to be able to say we're going to be around awhile and i want to thank the gentleman who helped get this done. valerie is unbelievable. i've heard about the sailing program. i don't think anyone else on the waterfront is doing it but it's a real cause within that club. so, please do vote for our lease extension and thank you and any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed >> nikon the maintenance fund would that include some of the dredging because along the areas further toward the moulth where the wave is that's right where

the sand drops will the maintenance fund cover the dprenl of that. the maintenance is designed for the yacht club and not for the city itself. we'll have to deter to our capital committee but in the more for the - >> we do have planned for the dredging. >> commissioner i've spent some time on this we're going to have to do regular dredging it's the reality of the bay. and we're aware of that and we're going to have to figure out how to fund that one >> thanks. >> seeing no other questions entertain a motion. >> move forward and second and a all in favor? and we're now on

item 10 south park 345 shadow. >> margaret. i have some overhead. she has on overhead >> i'm with the planning division this is to recommend to the planning commission that the new shadow cast by proposed project will not have a significant or adverse impact 350ur7b9 to planning code the sunlight ordinance. i'm joined by a plainer in the project and i'll go over the projects shadow on the nearby south park. >> good morning diego sanchez

the project on brandon street it has office space and off street parking space then a 5 story high building to the finished roof. the project is one block south of south park near an alley. the project under the planning code is subject to the following. the infrastructure impact fee and the transit free and the capitalizing child fee and the linkage fee. it is approximately 4 pointed $5 million. the project will seek authorization for to the planning and office allocation and finding it the shadow in south park is not effecting this

project >> i'd like to give it back to ms. bradley. >> south park as you know is t a beautiful park it's been one acre it's a tree lined park that includes benches and playgrounds. the project let me - go ahead. a little hard to see. here's the project in black. the shadow kaftsdz by the project is outlined in red and the park is outlined in green. this is on november 6th it's the first time that appears on the park in any manner. the shadow is cast from october to february in about this area. it lasts for roughly 5 to 15

minutes on an average of 7 minutes before 8:30 in the morning. the park is heavy shadow at this time. the next couple of images show the same - show the parks throughout a couple of the days in the september 19th it lasts for 10 minutes bus it's in a larger area. and here's the last night it's hone in the park it's february 19th. after - since the capital committee meeting that heard this on agriculture 7 the project sponsor has met with the community representatives and

has updated some on site public place the project sponsor is on hand to answer any questions >> with that we analyzed the project with guidance from the 1989 memo and the day is in the early morning the shadow is completely finished by toukts in the moerpg the time of year is late october to february. the duration of the shadow is roughly 7 minutes but last no longer than 17 minutes. the size of the shadow of the largest square footprint. this is between the picnic. it's settings he remedies that

you find this shadow is not adversities to the use of south park. i'm available for any quiz >> thank you very much. >> we have public comment. alice rogers. >> hello again commissioners. i'm here to a withdraw my personal objection to this project and to thank commissioner or commissioner low specifically for his the pause button this so the neighborhood could engage a little bit more but we appreciate the opportunity. and as a side matter i want to thank our pd for all the extensive efforts. thank you commissioner low

>> oh, i apologize other public comments. >> good morning president and members general beginnings berg pits me again. i wasn't the attorney on this project until after you had your last meeting i was the attorney on a adjacent proonl project that got approved thirty days or so again. we at kilroy had a great interest on this project. i interfaced with some folks and we made some changes. you heard accident equaling withdrawal of the motion

>> moved and seconded all in favor? >> so moved. >> we're now on item 11 golden gate park community. commissioners i want to make a few opening comments. as your aware of the board of supervisors this past summer designated rec and park department as the lead upper agriculture for the lead in san francisco and that was based on our miranda right of the community gardens program. we're excited to be making progress on say golden gate

garden. it's one of the mandatory was to establish urban hubs throughout the city and the farm has been our first farm and we think of a hub as being a combination but it's an educational workshops and other things that gardeners can get around. we hope to develop a few more in the coming year. so i'm going to turn this over to ms. bachman >> good morning commissioners and a secretary applying ma listened with the capital deciding division and programs manager and interim point person, if you will. (laughter). >> she's got all that on per business card. i'm the i'd like to go into a

daily about the process for spanish the new community comparison at golden gate park and with the help of our imply corridor amy who's here as well. thank you to amy he's a project manager that's been krortd the community aspect of the commensurate garden so this presentation on the folks who expressed interests as well as our plot allocation. this slide shows some illnesses that the garden looked like. you can see a lot of raised bed and our sort of standard rec and park to share information with visitors.

so n in perpetration during construction of the garden we initiated a e-mail for sfmta for folks to express interest and in may we did american people online survey to ask them give me frantic evangelist information to find out their experience so we could take our conceptual plan to meet the needs of the public as much as possible. of the 2 >> i pledge allegiance to the flag and 11 individuals that were on the wait list 1 hundred and 37 respond and it's 65 percent response. we had this on our page and we found their comments were the

same as the waiting list members. waiting for our presentation. so how did we administer e-mail to the current list of folks who expressed interest in the garden. here we have some demographics on age and gender half were been the ages of 35 and 55 so a third of our folks on the list were from a young list. majority caucasian and down the list. where did the respondent live by zip code but 60 percent in the