to the end the cap will be $3 million we're not going to say there be $3 million to cap i'm okay with that if that's the way it works and that's my understanding >> colleagues, any further questions? >> at this point open this up for public comment. i have a number of speaker cards. please lineup against the wall and as soon as you hear your name couple u come up and speak (calling names) so, please come on up you'll

have 2 minutes to speak today >> at the for your attention. i'm deborah i didn't i'm a local line procure and i've made my career working in san francisco over the thirty years. this is a very important program. a few years ago when my son left the nest i decided to stay here and grow san francisco and, you know, keep everybody working here that's my goal. with the rebate program i'm able to tell folks around the world about this they're interested because truly even though san francisco is san francisco having that extra entitlement makes a huge difference to each

year e exceptionally all the people i work with to be gainfully employed and that speaks for myself too >> thank you. next speaker, please . if you have are here to speak on item 3 i might have called our name wrong but go ahead and speak >> i'm jim i'm a former san francisco commissioner and here to speak in favor of the rebate. i'm not going to get into the detail. but one of the main things about filmmaking in san francisco is that it will continue to not only create jobs here while the film is being made but the re1i7b8 films. so there's many things filmmaking creates thousands of

jobs and brings in moifld jobs. i was first appointed in 96 and we saw a boom a lot of filmmaking but we need that rebate program actually, we need more than that. there is no cap over across the country and we're losing out we need to protect that industry. thank you very much >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm ed i'm here on behalf of the of the teamster's. net flick are delivering programs service to cable and network television.

they're helping to fragment an audience such a tom cast tv the net flicks budget has really approved and they've attracted 1 billion more subscribes and amazon series by the time to say being filmed in san francisco and los angeles. amazon is spending million dollars dollars. the original web the time that people spend on traditional viewing is declining. 18 to 24 years old this is a continued to decline. this is for internet companies to lure the views. the bottom line this is an

emerging force and it's incumbent for us to stay ahead of this endeavor. thank you >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm madeline. i work at an independent production company in los angeles and we have a movie that's shooting in san francisco soon with alexander scarf and it takes place in san francisco. now that i've been up here dislocating for locations it's remarkable you can't create that landscape it's a competitive place likes up in canada to

recreate san francisco or other cities elsewhere and the rebate is making a huge difference in our finance plan it's making us able to come up here and shoot the movie so i'm in support it. thank you >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi. i'm here or in on behalf of the actors as well as producers. we're producing a web series so we got to come to the area and we realize we're missing out because we can't be part of the rebate program. we're going to be shooting a film in marina county and going into the south bay because we're able to get better deals.

we're shooting this pilot to get a budget ever maybe $400,000 to shoot our whole season. we really want to shoot in san francisco. so it's forcing our hand to do other things. i can't tell you how many movies i've been on they come in for 1, 2, 3 days they get their establishing shots and go to canada or new mexico or new york so we don't get jobs. i go down to la to get more work we can't get the work up here. but i see more and more film companies that are actually interested in coming up here oh, but if only san francisco would give a little bit more here.

thank you very much >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello i work for sagging air force traffic i represent 4 thousand actors. some production means union jobs for hotel and restaurants workers while shoots are in town. we have day players and not the budget folks coming out of little bay area. i want to read a statement due to an auction i'm unable to come to the meeting such is the life of over 4 thousand members. we live from job to job so secure health coverages. each project that comes to the town is our lifeblood. please expand the rebate program.

web series are the wave of the future and let's not lag behind. we have to make sure we're not priced out of the market. we need this for the better time of the community as a whole. katherine howe local president of sagging, air force traffic >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm janet. i'm on the sag conservative. i'm a sag actor. i see your competition is louisiana. a sag actor wants my vote now so i've been seeing a lot of movies their filmed in louisiana louisiana don't have a cap so why do we.

that's one question. the other one is i work bet a the other day it's going to be filming mainly in la they're up here for a total of a week. i was wondering do the police get time and a half for that. i'm not sure if they had, you know, they get fed so well, and they move cones like a few times (laughter) and i'm not a huge fan i mean, i love texans to meet them personally but it's my opinion sometimes they screw up administrations so i was just wondering if that was something pledged by the last mayor that we get time and a half. i'm thinking there's ways to do

this. >> thank you. next speaker, please good morning islam erica perez. i'm a actor in the bay area. we're very happy when they come and shoot a movie unfortunately, we only get background work because they don't want to pay all the taxes. yes. i support in but i also support my coworkers here janet mentioned why is there a cap. if we want them to come and spend their money on hotels and restaurants ail those businesses and they will - the more movies that are made here the more money the city will make as well. so we like the extra work but we

want more. i don't want to be a sieve actor with an extra job i want to be a thooifr actor and not wondering how to get to la to make a living in what i do >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm rosy i'm working on a web series. i developed this production with 3 other women producers slashing actors who are tired of going down to la. so we created this and i'm the producer who development the budget for is it and merged had some talent from la. this is truly about living in the bay area in developing that

budget i realize there are a lot of obstacles so people shoot movies elsewhere. the tax incentive likewise small budget such as a ourselves to bring talent here and merger the talent here. it builds the community you the after the community and builds self-sustaining artists. i'm an after the at heart. i think that lowering the permits on a daily basis would be a huge difference. when going through this budget i think this sometimes, people pay an after the versus paying for a permit or paying for food that's what it's about

>> thank you. next speaker, please. >> gm i'm joanne i'm an assistant with the local stage hands union in san francisco that supplies the technical support for film production here in san francisco. we are all obviously in favor of this to pass. i want to give you a few brief numbers. i had our office run some figures and from 2011 to current end of the year 2013 october. the film productions loan not commercials has generated to local 16 members over $13 million in wages, health and welfare and pension it go to help working families here and thank you >> thank you. next speaker, please

>> more than i'm john morris. i've been a member of the director guide for 20 years. a lot of those years i've worked at home, however, the last year's i've worked in georgia, louisiana and massachusetts. the film business used to be a california now boston and detroit and other cities are beating us. la has been losing a lot of work not just so far. alcatraz was mostly shot in canada not in the bay area. to connote with the other states we need to up the ante. we need to increase the incentives. it will provide jobs for many, many san franciscans.

like you've at the scene we've got electricians and actors and stratosphere and other folks. we look to this for income and san francisco, california make the money by luring this away from other cities. i support our incentives and increasing your incentives thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> i'm still here for item 3 but the film industry is one of my passions too. movies made in california and new york but cal are very aestheticly beautiful to watch. i want to add that because of the internet this is an opportunity in inner city. we have a lot of filmmakers the

youth filmmakers and i want the rebate group to consider it for them too >> thank you very much (clapping) are there any other members of the public who wishes to speak seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues thank you for listening to this. me personally as we think about our diversity in san francisco certainly its important to have a diverse rebate film program it helps our city and it's vitally important and more than anything else it's important to see our city on tv and i hope to have

your support. any other questions >> i move a positive remedies and we have a second without objection. >> police vehicle mr. clerk call item number 2 and the administration code to establish the donations for the purpose of holding event to open meetings with the capital projects at the san francisco international airport thank you mr. clerk. sorry lost any agenda here >> good morning, chair and members of the committee i'm with the san francisco airport. the airport is seeking our approval for the cities amendment code for a previously expired term for our opening

event and to establish a pro tem's and event and marketing surrounding projects. included in the airports capital improvement plan. in the next 10 years the projects included are scheduled to open including the new terminal 3 in january of 2013. the completion of a new traffic control tower and in fiscal years the possibility of a new hotel. the airport expects to host opening events as their completed and anticipates fundraising that will help to defray a substantial proposition of the costs. we will submit to the board of

supervisors an annual review of any pro tem of promotional events and agrees with the analysis report to amend the ordinance to seek board approval for any solicitation or acceptance of fund over $100 million if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions. >> mr. rose to your report, please. >> members on page 12 of our report we report that the airports 13, fourteen budgets includes the services contracted with the m line company and according to the airport there is an existing $7 million agreement for up to seven years a million a major to provide the

general services and it commends on june 11th. on page 13 of our report the airport obviously can't estimate the total amount of private donations for the capital improvement promotion. the amount of the funds endured will likely advisor in accordance with the airport capital improvement will have a spate account within the fund. and feinstein on page 1315 as indicated we ask you amend the ordinance on page 9 and 10 to change the airport frequency reporting from quarterly to

annual we think annual would be sufficient and quarterly is not needed and specify those reports of the sources and da donations received. we recommend you change the approval of resolution of any donations to be inconsistent with the provision that requires the board of supervisors approval to extend the grants as well as the recent prevention fund. and we recommend you approve this proposed ordinance as amended >> colleagues, any questions or comments? anybody wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. that were colleagues, we have some proposed all the time.

we can do so without objection. and i know a number of people are here for item 3. it's going to take a while we have a number of people but we're going to call item 4, please because there are a number of folks who need to go back to work >> item 4 resolution authorizing the lace of 199 ooefgz street to use as storage for the period of 2013 through fourteen. >> mr. updyke thanks for being here. >> today, we seek our approval of the southeast corner. in the a 17 month lease with one, two year options to extend. the rate is 75 thousand dollars

per month. the property should seem familiar it's the site of the bakery that was close in 2005 when intrastate companies went bankrupt. there were industrial uses on the property. the property is a potential site for the proposed traffic company relocation project that's under the facilities the justice facilities improvement program. which you'll see as the g. o bond package going to the voters in the summer of 2014. it's roughly 1 hundred and 5 square feet with a significant parking garage for motor circles and cars.

this project is flaw at this point. should this site be democratable and should the voters approve the bond the city must be in a position to secure site control immediately they were. this is how best a establish that led us to the all the time and that's a lease with the purchase option. another option would involve a cost but not the view so we choose this one. should the city decide to use this option after the g o bond election and after the evaluation is vetted and approved. it's interesting we've been clearing the way for the

wholesale produce project we have a pressing and immediate need to store vehicles at this site on 19 adams. a that's within the zoning of public works dr 2. the site contains 44 thousand 2 hundred and 10 square feet on the roof. you have that in our package of $19 per square foot per year. it was adopted in fiscal fourteen and 15 for this lease if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions. we'll move to our budget analyst report >> members on page 20 of our report we report that the cities costs including rent for the

proposed lease for the 17 month period from august 1st, 2013, through august 2014 would be the fund that have been appropriated by the board of supervisors in the 13 and fourteen and fourteen, 15 budget on or page 21 of our report we noticed that the proposed lease to purchase the 1995 evans facility would require the board of supervisors approve as mr. updyke stated. >> colleagues, any questions seeing none, weeping we'll open this up for public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, any questions or

comments? >> this is item 5201413 and fourteen consolidated plan goals. >> okay. we have brian chu from our mayor's office. >> good morning brian chu with the mayor's office housing committee development. as we do every year we take this opportunity to simply review the 5 guiding principles for our rfp that is our way of raefgs the fund for our energy solutions entrant and our house file if a aids program. again, as you see our 5 goals are family goals that are self-sufficient and neighborhoods are stable and homeless individuals live in long-term housing and there's

housing that is permanent and their tlooif in the community. those are in line with our 5 year consolidated plan. i use this opportunity to give you an up to date to talk the funding levels. as you know we're on a continuing resolution with congress, however, the actual enemies that have been authorized going forward for neiman the president's budget request bill and the senate bill just to give an idea for our house file if a funding is all 3 versions are relatively flat although the house has a slight decrease the homeless programs would be flat across the

programs and this is for new affordable housing there would be a decrease from 9 hundred 98 million down in the house version was funded and perhaps most dramatically on the community block rent program that effects the largest number of our nonprofits it's a tad over $3 billion and the house reduced it down to 6 billion so almost a .45 persecute. i doubt that will go forward. in some ways i feel it is probably going to be another version of people coincident agree on anything that was