pledged by the last mayor that we get time and a half. i'm thinking there's ways to do this. >> thank you. next speaker, please good morning islam erica perez. i'm a actor in the bay area. we're very happy when they come and shoot a movie unfortunately, we only get background work because they don't want to pay all the taxes. yes. i support in but i also support my coworkers here janet mentioned why is there a cap. if we want them to come and spend their money on hotels and restaurants ail those businesses and they will - the more movies that are made here the more

money the city will make as well. so we like the extra work but we want more. i don't want to be a sieve actor with an extra job i want to be a thooifr actor and not wondering how to get to la to make a living in what i do >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm rosy i'm working on a web series. i developed this production with 3 other women producers slashing actors who are tired of going down to la. so we created this and i'm the producer who development the budget for is it and merged had some talent from la.

this is truly about living in the bay area in developing that budget i realize there are a lot of obstacles so people shoot movies elsewhere. the tax incentive likewise small budget such as a ourselves to bring talent here and merger the talent here. it builds the community you the after the community and builds self-sustaining artists. i'm an after the at heart. i think that lowering the permits on a daily basis would be a huge difference. when going through this budget i think this sometimes, people pay an after the versus paying for a

permit or paying for food that's what it's about >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> gm i'm joanne i'm an assistant with the local stage hands union in san francisco that supplies the technical support for film production here in san francisco. we are all obviously in favor of this to pass. i want to give you a few brief numbers. i had our office run some figures and from 2011 to current end of the year 2013 october. the film productions loan not commercials has generated to local 16 members over $13 million in wages, health and welfare and pension it go to

help working families here and thank you >> thank you. next speaker, please >> more than i'm john morris. i've been a member of the director guide for 20 years. a lot of those years i've worked at home, however, the last year's i've worked in georgia, louisiana and massachusetts. the film business used to be a california now boston and detroit and other cities are beating us. la has been losing a lot of work not just so far. alcatraz was mostly shot in canada not in the bay area. to connote with the other states we need to up the ante.

we need to increase the incentives. it will provide jobs for many, many san franciscans. like you've at the scene we've got electricians and actors and stratosphere and other folks. we look to this for income and san francisco, california make the money by luring this away from other cities. i support our incentives and increasing your incentives thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> i'm still here for item 3 but the film industry is one of my passions too. movies made in california and new york but cal are very aestheticly beautiful to watch. i want to add that because of the internet this is an

opportunity in inner city. we have a lot of filmmakers the youth filmmakers and i want the rebate group to consider it for them too >> thank you very much (clapping) are there any other members of the public who wishes to speak seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues thank you for listening to this. me personally as we think about our diversity in san francisco certainly its important to have a diverse rebate film program it helps our city and it's vitally

important and more than anything else it's important to see our city on tv and i hope to have your support. any other questions >> i move a positive remedies and we have a second without objection. >> police vehicle mr. clerk call item number 2 and the administration code to establish the donations for the purpose of holding event to open meetings with the capital projects at the san francisco international airport thank you mr. clerk. sorry lost any agenda here >> good morning, chair and members of the committee i'm with the san francisco airport. the airport is seeking our

approval for the cities amendment code for a previously expired term for our opening event and to establish a pro tem's and event and marketing surrounding projects. included in the airports capital improvement plan. in the next 10 years the projects included are scheduled to open including the new terminal 3 in january of 2013. the completion of a new traffic control tower and in fiscal years the possibility of a new hotel. the airport expects to host opening events as their completed and anticipates fundraising that will help to

defray a substantial proposition of the costs. we will submit to the board of supervisors an annual review of any pro tem of promotional events and agrees with the analysis report to amend the ordinance to seek board approval for any solicitation or acceptance of fund over $100 million if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions. >> mr. rose to your report, please. >> members on page 12 of our report we report that the airports 13, fourteen budgets includes the services contracted with the m line company and according to the airport there

is an existing $7 million agreement for up to seven years a million a major to provide the general services and it commends on june 11th. on page 13 of our report the airport obviously can't estimate the total amount of private donations for the capital improvement promotion. the amount of the funds endured will likely advisor in accordance with the airport capital improvement will have a spate account within the fund. and feinstein on page 1315 as indicated we ask you amend the

ordinance on page 9 and 10 to change the airport frequency reporting from quarterly to annual we think annual would be sufficient and quarterly is not needed and specify those reports of the sources and da donations received. we recommend you change the approval of resolution of any donations to be inconsistent with the provision that requires the board of supervisors approval to extend the grants as well as the recent prevention fund. and we recommend you approve this proposed ordinance as amended >> colleagues, any questions or comments? anybody wish to comment seeing

none, public comment is closed. that were colleagues, we have some proposed all the time. we can do so without objection. and i know a number of people are here for item 3. it's going to take a while we have a number of people but we're going to call item 4, please because there are a number of folks who need to go back to work >> item 4 resolution authorizing the lace of 199 ooefgz street to use as storage for the period of 2013 through fourteen. >> mr. updyke thanks for being here. >> today, we seek our approval of the southeast corner.

in the a 17 month lease with one, two year options to extend. the rate is 75 thousand dollars per month. the property should seem familiar it's the site of the bakery that was close in 2005 when intrastate companies went bankrupt. there were industrial uses on the property. the property is a potential site for the proposed traffic company relocation project that's under the facilities the justice facilities improvement program. which you'll see as the g. o bond package going to the voters in the summer of 2014. it's roughly 1 hundred and 5 square feet with a significant

parking garage for motor circles and cars. this project is flaw at this point. should this site be democratable and should the voters approve the bond the city must be in a position to secure site control immediately they were. this is how best a establish that led us to the all the time and that's a lease with the purchase option. another option would involve a cost but not the view so we choose this one. should the city decide to use this option after the g o bond election and after the

evaluation is vetted and approved. it's interesting we've been clearing the way for the wholesale produce project we have a pressing and immediate need to store vehicles at this site on 19 adams. a that's within the zoning of public works dr 2. the site contains 44 thousand 2 hundred and 10 square feet on the roof. you have that in our package of $19 per square foot per year. it was adopted in fiscal fourteen and 15 for this lease if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions. we'll move to our budget analyst report >> members on page 20 of our

report we report that the cities costs including rent for the proposed lease for the 17 month period from august 1st, 2013, through august 2014 would be the fund that have been appropriated by the board of supervisors in the 13 and fourteen and fourteen, 15 budget on or page 21 of our report we noticed that the proposed lease to purchase the 1995 evans facility would require the board of supervisors approve as mr. updyke stated. >> colleagues, any questions seeing none, weeping we'll open

this up for public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, any questions or comments? >> this is item 5201413 and fourteen consolidated plan goals. >> okay. we have brian chu from our mayor's office. >> good morning brian chu with the mayor's office housing committee development. as we do every year we take this opportunity to simply review the 5 guiding principles for our rfp that is our way of raefgs the fund for our energy solutions entrant and our house file if a aids program. again, as you see our 5 goals are family goals that are

self-sufficient and neighborhoods are stable and homeless individuals live in long-term housing and there's housing that is permanent and their tlooif in the community. those are in line with our 5 year consolidated plan. i use this opportunity to give you an up to date to talk the funding levels. as you know we're on a continuing resolution with congress, however, the actual enemies that have been authorized going forward for neiman the president's budget request bill and the senate bill just to give an idea for our house file if a funding is all 3 versions are relatively flat although the house has a slight

decrease the homeless programs would be flat across the programs and this is for new affordable housing there would be a decrease from 9 hundred 98 million down in the house version was funded and perhaps most dramatically on the community block rent program that effects the largest number of our nonprofits it's a tad over $3 billion and the house reduced it down to 6 billion so almost a .45 persecute. i doubt that will go forward. in some ways i feel it is probably going to be another version of people coincident agree on anything that was

status quo. we'll be releasing just before thanksgiving the proposals will be did you before the christmas break and returning to you probably in mid-april in budget and finance for you to have a chance to review all our funding recommendations and we do every year >> okay. thanks many chu colleagues, any questions or comments? let's open this up for public comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, we have a motion to move this forward. okay mr. clerk call item 3 >> have the human relations agency to enter a loan agreement

to renovate the bed for a homeless shelter. >> okay. colleagues that has been introduced and we're joined by our colleague in district 100 so supervisor cowen. >> thanks everyone for coming out and i you appreciate you inviting me. i'm not able to stay for the entire public comments i wasn't prepared for f this to be called before item 3. this is first came to my attention when the human agency and hope asked me to offer a resolution for a state grant fund. at the time i expressed my

concerns about the facts i saw no discussion about the proposal prior to the city submitting their application for new york with the property owner. we're accepting money from the state for a facility that's going to have an impact on a neighborhood a that's it there's been zero conversation around. it's next door to the consult of human services also known as mother brown's kitchen. it's an asset in the community and doing work that not that i can recall has been left undone. they permitted the need services to a population that is struggling. rex their contributions mother brown has been embraced for years. there's a big difference between

diane that mother brown currently provides and a 24 hour shelter. given there's been no outreach process with the application i personally conducted two community meetings and salty heard more concerns about the proposal then support. this issue has split the community. all the concern you may hear today, i have - i still have a number of concerns that are to be revolved. the city should have conducted outreach and engaged stakeholders about this proposal before they applied for the state funds. no one that i spoke with participated in the process. it's not acceptable to conduct no community process around it and frankly i don't think of any

community it would be tolerated (clapping) second issue of concern is the site use and appropriateness. the site those funds have been secured for doesn't currently have residential uses so there's been a zoning issue we have to deal with. the city is going to have to rezone this rfp and it's a process that raises several concerns l about the public works dr space. i don't know if anyone has had an opportunity to read the proposal. i have heard a number of different reports proposed for the site it's only recently i've seen and it's not clear was it 24 hour drop in center is going to look like.

the city is - i recently heard that the city is going to close other shelters in the bay view. province e providence which it's open there's been very little conversation and i've yet to receive the facts. the khan proposal makes it difficult to support or noted support it. i want to say that the bayview has homeless services we have a shelter and to my knowledge its not to full capacity. we have services provided by mother brown that assist homeless citizens this is not a

new issue not a classic in my backyard. we're talking about a community that is embarrassing a very fragile population. we have a misdemeanor done meal program and i've not seen any appropriate existing services whether examinations is warranted. no detail is point number 5 sorry. no detailed on how to address the negative impacts on the neighborhood. calls for services and please services not only to mother brown but to friendly liquor store. this is where the city is pouring million dollars dollars and public safety and quality of life enhancement and finally, we're good evening beginning to

get our fair share of resources. in the last few months we've had two robberies on the corner. i'm not saying this is a cause-and-effect i'm highlighting the friend of mine effect we're highlighting a fragile part of our population in a fragile community. we know there is an impact of having - i haven't seen there's loitering or funds for public safety. i firmly believe this proposal there would be a significantly

more talk about this. alley i know that many of the neighbors are ready to have a discussion about the homeless population. my inability is not about being homeless. i think we have have a citywide conversation in how to provide better services across the city so all of san francisco, california shoulder the responsibility of serving others (clapping.) also, we need to have a conversation citywide about the involvement of neighbors and advocates should be at the table but that conversation isn't happening and the cities secured the funds there's no flexibility to discuss alternative locations

because the process the city conducted that's why i'm here today. colleagues, you know, because of this issue i've articulated earlier and despite the specific nature of the grant i ask you not support in item. you can hear the passion in my voice i support this item (clapping) so the neighbors >> excuse me. excuse me. everybody we have a policy of no applause here if you wish to support or have option we have a well tried-and-true procure i can wave your hands but please

everyone in this chamber and be respectful of everyone in this chamber we deserve a comprehensive evaluation and an open dialog if not we can have a discussion on another location. let's be clear this is not an indictment whether their honoring their mission or not this is an opportunity for us to begin to have a serious dialog around community planning. and if you guys are going to move it forward at least not with a recommendation. mr. chair, i have some questions for the sf s a when it's priority >> we have a few speakers. >> good morning, supervisors. director of human services director agrees. we