applause. thursday, november 21, please be advised the commission doesn't tolerate any disruptions and when speaking before the commission if you care to please state your name for the record. i'd like to take roll at this time >> (calling names) commissioner sugaya is expected to be a little bit. first on your calendar is for

continuance. the sharp parks safety infrastructure improvement and inhabitant xhachlt project is in a negative desolation is proposed for december 25th. item 2a and b for the cases 1900 19th avenue are proposed for indefinite continuance. commissioners furnished on our consent calendar item 7 for the case at the 1650 mission street is also prototype for tubs to december 12th. under your regular calendar commissioners item 15 amendments to the planning code impact exceptions ordinance is being proposed for continuance to december testing initiating.

the item under consent and under the regular collapsed if you choose to you could consider those continuances when the matter is called or deal with them now >> let me go ahead and open this up for public comment for the items for continuance. (calling names) >> like to remind the members of the public the public comment is recycled for the matters of continuance. >> thank you for calling me up. we actually have submitted some additional comments on the project in writing. 0 they're under submission to you in the packet and generally, we have some concerns about the project but look forward to

discussing our concerns and the appropriateness of the document on the date it arises. >> one of the concerns i have - >> the other microphone. >> oh, sorry. i just wanted to express my other concerns about the expansions of the pumping project in terms of the >> sir this portion is restricted only the matter of tupz to those matters. >> oh, okay. >> if you'd like i can speak to that under public comment. >> then i will. >> one more speaker card jared. >> jared stein? okay. any additional public comment on

the items proposed for continuance. seeing none, public comment is closed. sxhord >> yes. i have a question about i don't think anyone is in the room but i had a question about item 15 is that the supervisor is asking for the continuance. >> actually, the staff is asking for a additional analysis to be continued until the twelfth. >> yes. the twelfth. >> well, then with that i'm going to go ahead and move items 2a and b as specified item 7 to december 12th and item 15 to decembe december 12th. on that motion to continue.

(calling names) >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you under your content calendar those are routine matters will be with no separate discussion unless the members of the public or staff requests and the matter should be removed and considered at a future hearing. item 3 at 240 to restraining order request for condominium subdivision and on the next one at 223 through 27 a guerrero street is for condominium subdivision and the next is for

1624 a through 1624 request for condominium subdivision. item 6 for 1095 market street request for an amendment to the conditions of a previous condition under planning codes. item 7 has been continued and a item 8 for 14 one hundred t amending section 1010 the ordinance for the planning code >> open this up for public comment on those items item 6. >> my name is is ed i'm a retired senior citizen i speak against a 10 year extension. >> sir at any time just to pull

it off content and we'll hear it on the regular calendar. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioner antonini manufacture move to paragraph 6, 4, 5 and 8. >> i was going to pull item 6. >> so we'll hear item 6 on the calendar. >> very good commissioners. then on the matter of item 3, 4, 5 and 8 under your consent calendar there's a motion and a mechanic commissioner antonini. commissioner moore and president fong. so moved commissioners that passed unanimously 6 to zero and item 6 will be considered under

your regular calendar. that places you under the matters for the draft minutes. >> any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> contra. i have two small comments >> commissioner wu. i have one change i'll submit them to the secretary >> commissioner antonini. move to approve with provisions >> second. >> on the motion to adapt the draft minutes & as recommended (calling names) so moved, commissioners, adjustments 6 to zero and places you on item 10 xhirgz

commissioners comments. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you 3 trips to noerld there are a lot of similarities between our cities particularly in terms of tourism and i saw virtually no greatest, trash, no one sleeping in doorways or on the streets my entire visit to new orleans. we went to all parts of the city including seeing some of the devastation from katrina. there was only one panhandler that asked for money. there was a huge convention of the ophthalmologists so obviously there were a lot of people from out of town.

a couple of things expressive parks were closed on all the parks. they have a lot of streetcars in addition to the famous charles streetcar they've got a lot of streetcars on canal street and the historic streetcars as what we have in san francisco they're extremely well run and very successful and it's something we should look like as an extension to the areas of the city because people enjoy riding them. it's not just to get someplace but the manner. their popular and the other thing that's there are that's successful is the spur doom and the baseball arena next to it. it was refreshing to come out of

0 baseball game 60 thousand were on foot. there's a little bit of parking to the north but most people come to new orleans and a attend the games in that manner. it's unfortunate we 0 won't have an arena but not for the next thirty years when we'll have a football stamped in san francisco. it was enjoyable and the other thing the restaurants do extremely well, as you might expect but they actually have some dress codes which is refreshing to see. men had to wear a sports coat. those weren't high-end places but there's a certain standard they've have to otherwise i'm

glad to be back the heat and humility are hard to took >> any additional comments or questions. commissioner that places you under the announcements >> just one announcement commissioners, i wanted to let you know about the final open space of the general plan. we've been working bart and that was released two days ago. we'll come to you next month to initiate the process and looking february for action after several other public meetings and he recreational park commission. and related to that there will be an open house on december 04th from 7:30 on market street. that will be a joint open space >>yes. and at the green

connections project that has been finalized rrlsz from december 4th from 530 on market street. that concludes my announcements >> commissioners that places you on item 12 for the board of appeals and the historic preservation commission. >> good afternoon here to review the supervision reports there were a couple of things passed. the first was supervisor avalos that would create medical cannery dispensary and the second was the supervisor avalos companion ordinance which requires the commission to bring

a report on the cd regulations in san francisco. but only as that permanence to planning and land use. it's been amended our previous deadline for your commission was by january and the new deadline is may. at this point stiff buildings we'll be able to bring the draft report in january. there were a number of new ordinances i want to share. the first would amend the alcohol use district and this would allow a certain type of bucolic 0 license for a winegrower. the second ordinance, of course, the first one was introduced by supervisor cowen and the second was was a new acholic beverage riefk district.

the third is proposed charter amendment that was introduced by supervisor avalos, mar kim and yee. it's the entity amendment that would make comfortably entity a core goal of the agency. also there was a hearing request about the status you have infrastructure oversight. we've been involved in this and it's part of commissioner weiner's project. and lastly supervisor kim introduced the controls that will governor the areas around south market. she introduced the previous version and this new version seeks to do the same thing but the intent is to give long-term

tenants an opportunity to learn about rental proposals so they have an opportunity to appeal. all the ordinances the last item is going straight to the board of supervisors land use committee on monday and director ram (laughter) is making arrangements in that hearing you are about to give that concludes my report and a commissioner antonini >> mrs. rogers thank you for your report. i'm not sure what the measure is for entity regarding the mta >> it would require public hearings and require on engaged analysis evaluating the mta services and the appropriation for the transportation fund that

would be priority tied to mitigate the prosecutors that l have been identified in the entity analysis and establish an inspection general and limit the fair increases in the customer price index and establish the 18 and under not be charged. there was a number of items on there it's a draft charter amendment >> and we'll see that. >> we'll bring things for discussion prior to the finalizing for the voter. >> i'd like to see that. there's a lot of adversarial parts on that. >> thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> i have a question regarding

third street and alcoholic liquor license. i'm unaware of people growing wine in san francisco but it might be new >> yeah. there was introduced. i have a feeling it's more not for a vineyard >> is commissioner borden. >> people grew grapes back then but we have pictures when the streets were red from the wine. >> that's amazing. >> a little fun thing. >> commissioners, i do have a report from the zoning administrator from the board of appeals they met last night and heard one case a large proposition for a 6 story

dwelling unit. the mitigated desolation was appealed to the planning complexing commission that was upheld and the larger project was approved. the negative desolation was appealed to the board of supervisors and it was upheld at the board of supervisors on october 21st. the appellants made the same arguments as they did regarding this negative authorization and two were upheld and that was 3 to zero. the board held what was assumed to be the final permit alter presidio to make minor improvements, however, it was withdrawn and the planning commission may find it interesting because the appellants filed a review the

day of the hearing. >> good afternoon. commissioners tim frye to share with you the outcome of historic preservation commission hearing they granted a certificate of appropriateness at delores street landmark number 37 to allow for 3 temporary classrooms to remain on the ground for 10 and a half years until they could expand to they're new location. there is approval by the commission you'll see that item open a future date. the commission unanimously agreed to approve the st. merchandising under article 11. the building in red brick and

cast concrete it's a 4 story building by chuck bassett. the building was may be seated in 196311. aside for meeting the classification the building fulfills one the goals of the work program in recognizing significant modern movement and the final recommendation will be before the board next year. i want to talk about the filling broke cottages it was approved a koouch years ago. as you know the work has stopped. we met with the project sponsor on monday and they're waiting for the outcome pending legal action regarding the project. assault the sponsor are working

on some security measures for the property. we're hoping that work can commence shortly but i want you tongs we're working closely with the architect to make sure that the site remains in good standing and we'll keep you posted on the progress and >> finally, i talked to the greatest board the board had questions or comments regarding the pressures for guarding greatest abatement on the landmark properties. they're trying to find because of victims of the vandalism to report those crimes to the sfpd. we along with the commission reiterated our willingness to work with the board in finding ways to a collaborate more

closely and start discussions on p dw and keep you updated. that concludes my remarks >> tim can i add something. >> sure. >> deputy city attorney. just to add on the 1338 we had an oral automate in front of the court of appeals. the oral you argument went well, and the court of appeals lifted the construction and they haven't given their final decision in the case that's a positive sign >> okay. >> commissioner, if there's nothing that will place you under your general comment portion of the calendar not to choed 15 minutes. at this time the public may

address the matter in the jurisdiction. with respect to the items your item will be addressed at that time, it comes up. we have several speeders >> (calling names). >> could i have the overhead? pull down. >> i'm from the san francisco information clearing house. i've e-mailed each commission a paper and supporting documents. on a critically important question i would hope would prompt a public hearing on the part of the commission. it's promoted by an economic

barometer done by the controller that lays out housing starts, new construction and condo costs from 1997 to 2012. in those 63 quarters condo prices flsz in the 44 quarters and in 41 of those quarters new construction actually increased over the previous quarter. i'm not sure talking about a cause all relationship. are this goes to the point that new construction is not lowering housing costs in san francisco. as this graphic she's between 1960 and 2010 our population increased by 20 thousand we built a lot of new housing projects. how come housing isn't cheap.

one of the reasons is new construction is only about 18 percent thought you unit for sale in san francisco in any given year. that's the the existing hours are solid it's exiting hours. so if we're talking about controls - if we're talking about affordability. roughly between 2008 and 2013 half of the houses came under some kind of price control and around thirty percent is affordable housing and the rest is public housing in section 8 but that constitutes 52 percent of the housing unit in san

francisco that are under some sort of price controls we need to have an intelligent discussion of what goes beyond face based assertions. thank you >> thank you. patricia. i came to talk about demolitions. we need to really rewrite the demolitions dignifies within the code because there are so many loopholes especially with the fact of demolitions. the famous 2727 barker street was supposed to be a remodel they demolished everything but one wall. where this goes into something calvin talked about there's so

many illegal evictions and your eliminating third legal units just by the say so of the developer. there should be some causes that said first of all, if you have demolition that you should have 3 reports that show you have to demolition it. and on the legal units they're saying they have to prove they say they aren't and a perfect case was the greenwich cases the guy handed you a 1917 thing and that said there was enough units

you guys voted it down. you got it from the board of appeals it was a legal unit and he got evicted >> this is why the middle class and the younger families are being kicked out of the city because of behavior like this. the big point out we need to rewrite something on depiction i'll didn't you have some wording and you've got to find a mitigation on the opts that were grand fathering in. people are being thrown out period. they're saying their illegal and they're not what can we do about the middle class and families there being a kicked out right and left because of the

loopholes. thank you. >> i'm sorry linda chapman. >> linda chapman speaking first, as a member of the land use committee. this week at the meeting there was an unanimous vote to repel the larkin. the land use chair made a remark about the fiscal sponsor. a cry went out like a spontaneous cry of disgust because neighborhood associations don't do this and this is the end of our land use