jane kim as a child care provider, my name is deepa mehta, i work for family youth and child care center as an after school coordinator, most of my experience has been in the after school field and the ece field which is early childhood education, i've been working in the tenderloin community for three years now, in addition to working at glide, i'm in the tenderloin safe pathway commission, safe passage provides safe blocks to 400 youth daily for the after school hours. i think i would be a good candidate for the child care council because i would bring diverse toy the the youth and bring the after school perspective to the group, and there's not as much representation from the after

school field on cpac, so i feel i would bring that perspective. thank you again for your consideration. >> okay. have you ever attended cpac or do you know what they do? >> yes, i'm currently attending cpac and i'm currently a member? >> what would you like to see get done during your term? >> i mean, currently right now, cpac focuses a lot of their attention on the ece field and budget priorities around there. i would like to see after school be brought up during those sessions and maybe budget priorities around the after school sector as well. i don't hear that a lot so that's something that i would like to see. >> okay. >> and thank you. >> deepa, how long have you been serving? >> i started in the middle, so

i think it was about a year and a half. >> okay. >> i didn't do the full two year because i took over for someone else. >> someone else's term, so a year and a half? >> yes. >> okay, thank you. >> thank you, any other questions? seeing none, any public comments? come on up. hi, erica. >> good afternoon, supervisors, my name is erica and i'm the coordinator for the san francisco child care planning and advisory council, on behalf of cpac, i would like to say that deepa mehta comes highly recommended, as program coordinator for glides, toddler, preschool and after school program, her voice is unique. most of our other child care provider seats represent a family child care home or an after school program but with deepa, we get a 3 in 1, it's

not only a diversity of age groups but ethnicities and as a family resource center, her voice also represents a program that's connected to services for the entire family. deepa was previously filling in for someone who had resigned so this would be her first opportunity for the full term, cpac has a diversity of stakeholders but we strive to have a diversity among our own membership, she is the only cpac member who is east indian and is one of our youngest members, she has regularly attended our cpac members, for the voice she bring as a child care provider that serves toddlers, preschoolers and after school youth, she would be a tremendous asset and i hope today you move her recommendation forward. >> thank you very much, any

other public comments on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. i see supervisor kim from district 6 in which this seat has been sold for, he's recommending ms. mehta on this seat, so let's see, i guess because of your residency outside the city, so we have residency requirements, so can we have a motion to waive the residency requirement for mehta? >> i would like to speak to that item. . ing okay, go ahead. >> so, it is one of my personal policies is to not support waivers for residency waivers unless under special extenuating circumstances.

i just wanted to i guess wanted to just take a moment to express, i think the purpose of this body is to allow san franciscans an opportunity to begin to have a voice and a representation on the policy discussion in san francisco, so i don't know if there's room for a conversation here on this body, but i am leaning towards not supporting your residency waiver because i think that we have a lot of talented people here in san francisco and i'm not convinced that the list was exhausted of talent that lives and can represent district 6 as well as representing san francisco. i do value the fact that she represents a constituency, the east indian constituency which i believe is a constituency that is not normally represented in san francisco politics, but i don't know if anyone else shared any other thoughts.

>> supervisor breed? >> i also am not inclined to support a residency waiver. i do understand that this is a recommendation for our district 6 colleague and she recommended this individual and i do have a lot of respect for glide and the work they do, so i'm inclined to potentially support this, but i just would need a little bit more information from the district 6 supervisor as to why this was brought before us, you know, in terms of -- i mean, clearly, this applicant based on her experience is qualified, clearly she's working with a great program and doing really some great work, but i do also as supervisor cohen expressed have a real issue with what residency waivers without understanding a compelling

reason why we would waive this particular requirement, so i think we should consider continuing this item until we can have a little bit more discussion or information from supervisor kim before we move this forward. >> so, i guess my feeling is that generally i'm also not inclined to always automatically support waivers for residency, although this committee has done that several times, but usually there's a reason for it, and in this case [inaudible] and the fact that you represent a group of people that is not really represented

in the commissions and bodies and also the supervisor made her recommendation, i would have supported a waiver, however, there's enough concerns about what the reason is from this body that we will -- there's recommendations to continue this item, so maybe supervisor kim could then reach out to the members of this body to explain further why she would want to have you than somebody else that isn't living in san francisco. i don't think any of us are doubting your qualifications except for the fact that you don't live in san francisco, so i think there's a motion here by supervisor breed to continue this to the call to the chair. >> yes, i would like the second that motion. again, i want to reiterate to

give us a better understanding to talk to our colleague. thank you. >> okay. so, any objection, then the motion passes to continue this. let's see. madam clerk, can you call item number 5. >> hear ring to consider appointing one member term ending november 19, 2014 to the bias cal advisory committee, there is one seat and one applicant. >> mr. allen unfortunately, i don't think he's here, was not able to attend today but has reached out to our office to express interest, maybe he reached out to my staff, i'm not too sure if he reached out to me, supervisor cohen, would you like to share? >> sure, i just wanted to thank you, i just wanted to say this

is an applicant that i am putting forward and also i just want to highlight a native san franciscan, he's a basketball coach and they have teem pictures this afternoon so we can do one of two things, we could vote the matter and continue it to go forward because i think we should fill the seat as soon as possible, but if not, we can continue the item and mr. allen has agreed to come to our next committee meeting to present on his behalf, but this is again a vacant seat number 10 appointed by the district 10 supervisor, and so this is who i'm putting forward. >> supervisor breed? >> i'd like to make a motion to support -- >> can you hold on. >> public comment. >> sorry. >> it's okay. any public comment on this mat ?er seeing none, public comment is closed. now you may make a motion.

>> i would like to make a motion to appoint my ka* allen to seat 10 for the bicycle advisory committee? >> i would like to say that even though he wasn't able to show up whereas in the past, almost everybody that didn't show up, we didn't appoint, but because -- i will defer this call to supervisor cohen who's making the recommendation, and also looking for me personally, when i looked at his resume, i feel like mr. allen is very well qualified for this position, so supervisor cohen? >> thank you. i would like to second supervisor breed's motion and also let you know that i can assure that he come out and have an opportunity to meet you, have an opportunity for you to meet him face to face as the proverb goes, kick the tires and look him over and ask

whatever questions you would like, but i would to second breed's motion. >> and i won't his tire. >> okay. >> so, without any objection, the motion passes. . >> great, thank you. >> madam clerk, item number 6. >> item number 6, hearing to consider appointing one member, term ending june 5, 2017 to the treasury oversight committee, there is one seat, two applicants. >> okay. mr. katam, come on up. i would like to -- would you like to make a few comments? >> good afternoon, supervisors, cato from the supervisor's office. i know that the chair has requested and we are amenable to a continuation to the call of the chair for this individual. we have received an application

just this week and we need additional time to review their application. as you may be aware, administrative code [inaudible] and further the stated purpose of the committee in the enabling legislation is to involve the deposit toers's and the county treasury of the oversight of the funds so we'd like to take the time since that person has stepped forward and we've only known about it recently. >> thank you. any public comments on this item, seeing none, public comment is closed. in an effort to assure the applicants are all reviewed for this seat, we have -- can we have a motion to ko*n this item? >> so moved. >> okay, with no objection, this motion is passed. the motion is to the call of the chair. right? >> yes. >> okay. thank you very much.

okay. madam clerk, item number 7? >> i'm the number 7, hearing to consider appointing one member term ending february 23, 2014 to the citizen's committee on community development. there is one seat and two applicants. >> okay. let's see. ms. augustine called to inform our office that she is not able to attend today's meeting and is no longer interested in this seat. mr. pearl, would you like to come up and say a few -- mr. penn, would you like to come up and say a few comments. >> good afternoon, supervisors, i'm miquel penn, i came here to go to san francisco state and ended up staying here for the last 23 years because of the beauty and diversity of the city. i'm before you now for a seat on the citizen's committee on

community development because of my work experience, passion and belief. my work experience, i'm a workforce development professional working mostly in the construction field but also in what we would consider in-use jobs. i was sector coordinator of the city build academy, construction program manager for mission hiring hock, managing our redevelopment job placement program and also working in the ins and outs, supervisor breed, i'm sure you know in the cbo union, i wear a lot of hats and picked up a lot of experience in workforce development. one thing i can say about workforce development is the beauty that san francisco has with the diversity of organizations serving all of san francisco. i also had the privilege of working with the redevelopment agency in building affordable

housing across the street from somac, the west brook plaza which is affordable housing location run by mercy housing that provides a dignity for folks and i believe this is one of the issues i'm extremely passionate about. i believe that san franciscans do need affordable options in housing, especially the population that this committee would serve, and then the economic development piece, i was fortunate working in mission hiring haul to experience the redevelopment build-out of the 6th street and the build-out of the small businesses and i think that the economic development piece is essential for providing people with the opportunities and living out their dreams. it's an honor to be considered for this position. i feel as a person that san francisco's given much, i deserve to give something back and i open myself up for any questions?

>> any questions from my colleagues? seeing none, thank you very much. any public comments at this point? come on up, two minutes. >> hello, supervisors, my name is carry win ford, on behalf of miquel p*in, he was construction manager for mission hiring hall which he's very dedicated, put a lot of us through school to get us where we're at now. i'm here dressed from work. i just want to say this he's a great candidate for it and i really think he would do well, especially as many for us he's brought forward to a new career, that's pretty much all i have to say. thank you for your time. >> thank you very much.

>> supervisors, naught with bright line, i want to speak in strong support for gi k*el penn for this committee, i have known him for several years and his workforce development expertise, he's a very thoughtful community advocate, leader, she's very, very brilliant in what he does in terms of moving the community development mission in workforce, but i think what's really interesting about him at this committee is he has a passion for affordable housing and what's unique i think about his experience not only in knowing that this is a very important issue at the moment for san francisco and for our communities is he's helped to build affordable housing and i think that's an important expertise he'll add to the committee because that's one of the big moments of the time, so i can go on and on about him about what he'll do and what he's done and with work with limited english speaking communities and making sure

[inaudible] but i know he'll do great and it's best if you move forward the appointment. thank you so much. >> hi, my name is stella bisera, general manager of hiring hall, we strongly recommend miquel penn for the seat on the citizen's committee on community development. i'm going to speak candidly about him, i've worked with him over 3 years, i saw him serve on the hrc committee, i worked long hours with him, helping clients, working with employers, developing projects, working on proposals and he's got heart, loyalty, hope for the community.

he's never lost that personable approach, people can come up to him like carry, he has a lot of support from the community, they trust him. he's very valuable to serving many of the folks from various districts in san francisco. it was an honor to work with him, i miss him as mission hiring hall but i work with him on a new project now and he's still helping people and you never forget the people that helped him get to where he's at and i know he's going to do big and her better things so please consider him, thanks. >> thank you, any other public comments? seeing none, public comment is now closed. mr. penn, you know, i just met him today and i feel really good about this nomination. he's got so much energy and,

you know, his experience on all the different levels he brings in makes him a perfect candidate for the community development slot, so supervisor breed? >> thank you. i just wanted to say a few words. i didn't know mr. penn personally, but i know of the work that he's done at mission hiring hall, oftentimes over the years, it's the go-to place in the western addition in terms of job training and job opportunities and they've been an incredible partner in helping us to get folks employed and also keep them employed and i know mr. penn had a lot to do with that work so i really appreciate and value someone who has that sort of experience on a committee of this nature because of the importance of making sure that the members understand just really the kind of communities that they're working with as well as understand the needs of

the community so that we're creating the best policies necessary to serve those communities so i truly value what i know he will bring to the table and i'm happy to move his name forward. >> okay, so there's a motion to move forward his approval to the full board with recommendation. is there a second? >> second. >> no objection, motion is passed. congratulations. okay. wow. can you please call item number 9 through 12. >> actually -- if the clerk can call item 11 separately before you go into the closed session. >> right. >> item number 9, 11 and 12 are items regarding existing litigation, supervisor, would you like me to call item number 10 separately? >> yes. just call item number 10 and he's going to --

>> correct. item number 10 is a resolution authorizing the tax collector attorney to file suit against responsible relatives to recover value of services rendered at hospital facilities operated by the department of public health. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney, sorry to interrupt the calling of the items. item 10 is an item that was sponsored by the tax collector. it's a resolution that requires board approval to allow the tax collector to pursue a certain claim for a recovery of funds. the item probably should -- will be considered in closed session by this committee at a future date, but today it was scheduled on the agenda under the settlement portion of the agenda and because this item isn't a settlement, we'd recommend that the committee continue this item to the next rules committee meeting when you can consider it in a

separately agendized closed session. >> okay, any questions about that, colleagues? >> no. >> seeing none, can somebody make a motion to continue. is there any public comment on this -- which item, all of them? just 10, right? >> 10. >> any public comment on item number 10? seeing none, public comment is closed. can i have a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair? >> so moved. >> no objection, item will continue. so, is there any public comment on item number 9, 11 and 12? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, is there a motion to convene a closed session? >> yes, so moved. a motion to convene a closed session. >> second? with no objection, the motion

is moved. members of the public, we will now be convening closed session, if we would ask you to klaoez leave the

>> madam clerk, is there anything else on the agenda? >> no, sir. >> if there's nothing else f*ufrt, this meeting is adjourned. thank you very much, colleagues. >> the committee voted to forward items 9, 11

>> all right. good evening, everyone this is it's november 19th i'm bryant tan the point of the commission. if you'd like to make any public comment? make sure to turn off our cell phones or put them on vibrate. and thank you to the sftv for broadcasting this. we can go ahead and start with roll call >> audrey joseph. glendon hyde. we have quorum i did get a late

e-mail from naomi akers she couldn't attend. all right. so we don't have a huge agenda hopefully, we'll keep this under an hour. the first thing is any public comment? this is for anything that say you feel protons to the business of the entertainment commission. seeing none, public comment is closed. moving on to item 2 is the rough and approval of minutes november filth. commissioners i don't know if you have any changes to make if not happy to entertain a motion >> i move to approve. >> second. >> audrey joseph is there any public comment from the minutes

of this last meeting. seeing none, supervisor hiding. audrey joseph. barbara campagnoli. item 3 report from our executive director take it away director king >> good evening i will make this short. hello. i'm going to mix this up. and talk about something we talked about latin last night. a buff of us went to the lesion project and the heritage sf a nonprofit they added writing to new bars and restaurants to their program and we assisted in putting the event go together

last time. it was full probable 50 or 60 people. there were owners felt legacy bar that showed up. some of you might know this gentleman talked about writing a with book and we offered our assistance in offering our information as well as skwg for phone calls folks who worked behind the bar. it's neat e neat he wants to hear steroids from people who work trudging along every night to keep the bars and a restaurants here. the criteria is 40 years plus and there's 75 of them. that's a lot. they got some coverage and if you guys i