our regular calendar on 13 abc d eshlgs f g and h fornix case numbers 461 u at caramel at that street at 68 caramel let street and other addresses. peers street case no. 2214 on peer street and case 59 u at the for make street and 6656 tow make street and 1772 vallejo street. those are all consideration for

adaptation for resolutions to recommend approval for the act. requests. >> good afternoon. commissioners susan parks deputy department staff there's the 8 contract item b-66 arrest ma let and 66 powers and item 64 peers and item abduction 66 to task that are designated under article 10 to the parks district. the 8th district at large and final contract is 7222 vallejo. as you know once you make your recommendations those are will be recommended to the board of supervisors. this allows owners to answer into contracts with historic

presentation authority. for the length of the contract in order to apply for the act they must be on the national register. commercial properties must be valued between 5 millions. the need for exemption must be supported by the finding of the historic report. it's a 10 year contract that renews automatically every year. symseveral of the contracts were submitted to the planning department. the designation was approved in may 2014 after the deadline. a second deadline of september 3rd was for the third district first year it was delayed at the time of dismissing on may 1st. all the applications have on forwarded to the recorders

office for their property take evaluation. your paths have the evaluation and the assessors officer are working to resolve this. this is exhibit c in our packets. the evaluations will be evaluated. we are by the red error of the approval process. the applications are expected to be completed by the end of this year. i'll talk about the applications and we will be available to take our questions at the end. so the first property is 50 can't remember legality it's been designated in the land park district it's a two-story built

house with the quote-unquote ann shingle citywide. the property was fully rehabbed at the time of purpose two years ago. the project sponsor has developed a cycle of annual inspections in a longer-term cycle to be performed as necessary per this includes painting and would do trim as needed inspection and repair of the stairway and the decking and windows. the property is currently valued under the $3 million threshold. the staff recommended approval to the board of supervisors for this million dollars contract based on the following items that's it tights a valuable

resource the contract is appropriate and keeping that with the secretary rehabilitation standards. the second property s 66 can't remember legality also contributors to the land park area it's built in 15 hundred in the quote-unquote ann streamline. this involves historic replacement of driveway rot and replacing the would do windows and a repairs to the revolver and repairs of the historic siding. and inspection based on a structural engineers report. no changes to the side it proposed. it is a kindly of a long-range term cycle to be performed as me. the maintenance of the window siding and or in ment take and

foundation. the property is valued under the $3 million threshold. the staff recommend approve to the board of supervisors for this mill contract. based on the following. the property is a designated historic resource and after reviewing the plantation they find this in co-op with the secretaries standard. next is 70 can't remember legality also part of the labored district a one and a half story built in the 15 hundreds. the rehabilitation program involved repairs to the siding and new roof and installing a duplicative gutter that is shared on the street. that will have a runoff that

damages. maintenance plan involved the cycle and a long-range term maintenance cycle as necessary. the window siding and the foundation. property is currently valued under the $3 million threshold. the staff recommend approval f to the board of supervisors for this contract that the property is a designated resource and after reviewing the application the department finds the contract appropriate and in co-op with the secretaries standards. the next property is 56 pier street all landmark directive to a 2 and a half story building

and in the quote-unquote ann citywide reminiscent of the style. the property was fully that rehabbed prior to the application and no changes are involved. it is for a long-term maintenance cycle to be done has necessary per the repair is the roof and siding and ornament the property is valued under the $3 million threshold and the department staff recommend approval to the board of supervisors as this property is a designated resource and after reviewing it the contract is appropriate in co-op with the secretary of interiors standards. next is 64 peers also a contributor to the landmark

district. a 2 1/2 frame house built in 1505 in the quote-unquote ann style. the rehabilitation program involves railing and painting the historic would do siding which would have the repair of the wooden glass window easy repair of the windows and repairing the siding and framing. and remediating water by installing a trench drain and installing now revolver drains for nearby houses. no changes are proposed. the maintenance inspectors to be performed as in her it addresses the revolver and windows and or

nottion and drainage and the foundation. the 0 property is valued under the 3 appeals they told her and it is recommended for approve for this mills for the following reasons after reviewing the application and work plan the department finds the applicant to be in keeping with the secretaries standards. the next property is 56 potomac it's a contributor to the labored district. the one and a half story house built in 1909 in the queen ann style. it was the home of george moore and his family. it involves reconstruction to the front stairs and repair and

replacement of the wood windows. no changes to the proposal. the maintenance plan is involving the gutters and drainage and repairs and inspection at the foundation. the property is currently valued under the $3 million threshold and department staff recommended approval to the board of supervisors for this contract based on the following. the property is a designated historic resource and after reviewing the plan the department finds the contract to be in keeping with the secretaries standard. the next property s 66 pa toxic also part of the landmark district built in 1899 by encountering moore and charles. the rehabilitation plan involves

painting to the woodsideing and including the shingles and reroofing and installing new windows and replacing windows at the front of the house and rep emancipation proclamation r replying the foundation. 90 the maintenance plan includes maintenance of the would do siding and stair and or nottion and drainage and the foundation. the property is currently valued under the $3 million threshold. the staff remedies recommend approval to the board of supervisors for this mill contract based on on its a designated historic resource and after reviewing the reports the contract is in co-op with the secretaries standard.

and the last property item 8 is 1772 vallejo street as landmark 31 the 3 story basement house was built in 1871 and f it is for the property owners they submitted their application which was required as the project quoted the $3 million threshold. this department staff has reviewed the proposed plan and it includes two buildings a mansion and a cottage at the rear of the program. it's all structural evaluation as a mansion removing masonry which i am that is not visual from the street and improving

the drarnl the feasibility study for upgrading the unreinforced foundation and repairs to the revolver and the historic millwork of the historic cottage. no changes to the youth are proposed. it includes a long-term cycle to be performed as necessary. it is for the window and or nottion and a shutters added in the foundation. the staff recommended approval to the board of supervisors for this mill contract based on the items the property is a designated historic resource under article 10 and after reviewing the work plan it is in co-op with the secretary of interiors standard and it is an

article 10 landmark. the report demonstrates the art to be performed for the property. that concludes my presentation i'm available for any questions you have. michael is also available from the recorders office. two sponsored are here amy and john for 772 and then also i think we have a public comment on van lay. >> just so i know how much do

you have to present for timing wise. >> oh, okay. >> let's see i'm shannon ferguson. this is a >> closer to the mike. >> i'm here to ask the commission to rem the mills act contract. just to give you a little bit of background there are two 2rib9 properties the house and

cottage. the congressional is in the top photo. what's important is the garden setting it's relatively unaltered from when the port family lived there for a one hundred years. you can see the garden in the historic photocopy on the bottom. we've focused on two key issues site drarnl and structural reenforceme reenforcement. the site suffers from poor drainage. also proposed is foundation reenforcement it's a full brick foundation that's been impartial reinforced in the 1990s, there's

a treatment on the basement there's some disadvantage that's in the upper left corn. the majority of the foundation is tainted in the upper right and some areas are exposed and the com has an unrrsz foundation. other scopes of work include repair and painting of the exterior elements and replying the roofs and right back the windows on the congressional and house. so this is expensive structural work is needed to prefer the house from future damage from earthquakes. the prosperity owner intends to use some fund for that the work

>> thank you. >> i'm john i don't have much to add we have a lot of work to do to prefer this home and if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them. thank you. and we have a second spokesperson - no, we don't. commissioners >> public comment. >> commissioners, do we have any questions for staff or sponsor? commissioner johnck >> on the 56 pa toxic was that a rear view? that was a front view it look strangulations. >> it's been stookd to the landmark district for association. >> right. okay thanks. >> commissioner hyland. >> i have a question on the evaluations for the tax base. can you gives a kwikz thirty

second i understand that was about a 40 percent reduction but those are greater than 40 percent >> i'll let michael from the assessors office take that question. >> i'm from the san francisco assessors office. the assessors are required to valet those property which is by the purchase price and a inflation anted added etch year the second is by comparable sales and the third approach we look at the income but there are certain items from that approach that are restricted. the board tells us we can only

cap it at 4 periods of time and non-owned we add a 2 percent and we add an armingtion value. because of the restricted value unless the property was purchased many years ago it's going to be the lowest value that's what we're required to use. so if the property was purchased at the high value obviously the restricted value will be at a reduction >> any questions. seeing none, we'll go to public comment. one speaker card. mr. buehler. >> good afternoon commissions mike bourl with san francisco heritage i want to say we're

interested to see 8 applications if i'm not mistaken that is about double the number of contracts in inform. just a little bit of history for the newerer commissioners i'm pleased that 7 applications are from the landmark district it's a reform for the city. i applaud staff for its effort. we worked closely with tim and supervisor weiner in drafting the legislation to make it easier for owners to assess the legislation and i want to applaud 1256 for helping with that and the applications today is reflective of that. where respect to 1772 vallejo

i'd like to talk about the heritage history this application. john marianna who was brief before you actually contacted me over a i don't know when he was negotiating to purchase the property wanting to learn about the prevention resources that were available to him. he's been diligent in following the new requirement of the new legislation having selected a you consultant off the list we provided him and i feel that h s f r could be a model for other properties that exposed the limit. i, you know, hose conducted his own research the california research among other repowders and he's expressed interest in

donating a part of the land. with that we strongly support all the applications before you and recommend them to the board going forward >> thank you marry comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. and back to you, commissioners. commissioners. commissioner johnck >> i move approval of all 8. >> they can be called altogether. >> i second that. >> commissioner hyland a comment. >> yeah. before we vote i want to acknowledge supervisor weiner and those presentation districts it's a good day to come before us. >> and the speed at which it came forward is fantastic and

gives cause to all the mind staff put in explaining to the neighborhoods the vajdz. any other comments before we vote? seeing none, >> commissioners on that motion then to adapt a recommendation for approval for items 13. sdmild. commissioner johnck. commissioner johns. commissioner matsuda. commissioner pearlman. commissioner wolfram and president hasz so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that unanimously 7 to zero >> and director ram. >> thank you to the staff there's specific timelines and deadlines i want to thank you and we're happy to make this work with you. >> fantastic and we'll bring this meeting