certain height and bulk restrictions. so your question might be more to the point of development factors that still are an entitlement and review process >> right. >> that's continued. >> i guess the answer is because this is somewhat of an unused process and i understand the policy behind it i agree with it. but it's untested yet if a developer you know how that kind of entitlement proposals works afterward and how did he people are seeing how the developer pays for one hundred percent of the t dr >> what's been tested is the city entering this market. t dr is not an untested produce. we see the t g r energized

developments. most current is the transbay project where the t dr facilitated maximumizing the project. we see about one hundred foot for the marketplace. it's one hundred thousand it's variable based on the market kindly but that gives a sense of traction load out in the community >> thank you. >> sure. i was mentioning the proceeds they're required to go back into the donor site it has intoxicate a restoration or other project it's very clear what the project is that goes to the part of the certification 0 process.

as you know, we anticipate budget challenges as we're dealing with the rising cost market and the unforeseen conditions that are typical on any historic preservation but to an extreme discovery. so therefore it was felt this would be an ideal property to kick start our foyer into the project. we know we have a project and a budget challenge this is an opportunity to secure revenue on a prosperity. we know we're not going to change in terms of what's on that site. so or so evasion efforts that's in the legislation to set a minimum acceptable t dr price and that's $25 a square feet.

we have robust requirements built into the legislation come back to let capital planning committee and this committee on a quarterly basis to continue to keep you advised to the pace of the process or lack thereof. and then based on the recommendation from the budget analyst we've put into the board foil an amended form of legislation which also includes the reauthorization of the midway point of sales. so this requires us to return to this body and the board when we're approaching the 2 hundred and 50 square feet of the board. to check into the marketplace and continue to the second half. i really see this memorial project as a pilot. the city has a potential for t dr but we need to take care how

we enter the market because we have you such a great volume of t d railroad. much of that is coming from a report it was produced this summer lead by a city capital and planning took the lead in putting a consultant team to be looked at the t dr markets to understand it's dynamics and this legislation reflects the concerns that were expresses in that report. a cell of t dr has to be prepared to act on a market opportunity. this is by its nature a reactive program. i usually come to i with a transaction in another party and you know what the price it going to be. this is exceptional we're selling anything to unknown

parties elsewhere. it's to enhance the memorials restoration project. that's why we're seeking a one-time authority so we can very quickly strike. we'll bring you back to earlier and in the spring of 2013 when hyperglycemias needed t dr remaining increment that he they approached the city and we try to move as as quickly as possible to sell the t dr but we were not able to act fast enough. literally the weekend they struck a deal to secure the t dr at the same price from the city. that lost opportunity focused our team so we want to structure

a program that's reactive enough. the planning committee approved the plan. i'm joined by elizabeth and others from t p w and a supervisor >> i want to thank beth murphy for being here and walking to the $154 million project and thank you, mr. updike for the simmer reports. i have a question i know that other historic preservation advocates how are they involved in the process in the summer report in the t dr that's a question >> i'm not sure exactly of the

outreach that the consulting team did but i know they interviewed a number of stakeholders on both sides of this issue. one concern is development but the the other is the city entering the marketplace as a seller and other competitions to facilitate their restoration. and so in that respect there's some choices that need to be made so we move forward cautiously so we don't influence that market to a great degree. there's competition in a marketplace. there's legitimate questions raised by those who want to sell t dr they have flexibility and we have set a floor on pricing

that's firm. there are avenues who can be explored for development rights to sell. the public nature of the discussion has been at the capital planning committee and, of course, this process today and a could you comment on the budget analysts recommendation amending tow cutting it down to 5 hundred and 50 thousand gross square foot and come back to the board >> all right. supervisor we're comfortable with the 1.1 million square feet of the t dr to the planning department but a reauthorization for 5 hundred and 50 thousand square feet so the amended documents are in the file if you choose to accept the recommendation we're comfortable with it. >> okay. if no other questions

we'll move mr. rose to our report and break after this item. >> mr. chair and members of the committee on the bottom of the page we report that the number of t dr traktsdz can't be specified. to sell 1 hundred 1 million square feet can't be estimated. in addition the 1 million square feet plus can't be determined therefore the timing of the t dr procedures to be realized can't be calculated at this time. on page 10 of the report the net procedures of up to $1 million square feet plus would be used psychologically for the memorial complex but that is subject to the approval of the board of supervisors. so our recommendation 0 a that's

been stated here today obtain page 11 of the report we recommend you amended the proposed so the 12krishgd property will be submitted to the board of supervisors and immediately upon reaching the sales of $50 million square feet to adjust the sales price and a recommend you accept the proposed remedies as amended >> thank you, mr. rose. we'll open this up for public comment anybody wish to comment on this particular item? >> supervisors i'm a historic he prestige speciality. i've been involved a number of years. i'm really concerned about this. i did not know about this until

sunday afternoon and i spent a lot of time in the clerk's office yesterday. i appreciate mr. roses report. i'm deeply concerned about the 2 hundred plus million. that's the same amount left out there from individuals that haven't sold. the mayor's office of economic development has 5 hundred thousands of those that they have not be able to put on the market yet. i'm concerned there's a lot of latitude given to the city attorney's. last year the planning code when it was revised there are wasn't a change instituted that allowed

for the report on highway t drs are going. but i'd like to hear from the planning department what they know. i know that supervisor kim has legislation working through you - may i continue, please and you have 30 seconds left >> with respect to st. bonding vascular and old st. marys is going to be flrd. i don't know how many t dr just to the veterans building. when the mint got the right to sell the t drs other public buildings could do that if they - okay. thank you very much ma'am, >> at the. appreciate it. anyone else left for

comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor mar. >> i wanted to say based on what ms. plat is saying can we continue this until the next meeting so ms. platt and other other folks could add to this. >> we're actually now right on time for a contempt for the swearing in so i'm going to ask in the middle of this a recess. we'll come back. so can i have a motion for a recess >> actually, i think it's reasonable to get more information to continue until next week then we'll go into recess there. >> i think we have good

responds to those who have raised the issue so we can revolve our concerns and come back with the you mention final proposal for next week. >> so we'll have a motion to continue this okay everyone wee recess from our regularly skerltd meeting. congratulations to carmen chewing. madam clerk we'll continue with the agenda. item 4 is the resolution establishing the appropriation for the 2013 and 14 fiscal year >> good morning, madam chair and mercedes benz. this is an annual resolution this is posed before the board

of supervisors for approval setting our appropriations limit based on the state constitution. the limit is adjusted on a cost of living and other things. the controller calculated it for the maximum limit is 4.28 builds and our calculations is resourcefully 2.7 billion so we're under the limits. we typically bring this resolution to the board when we set our tax rate and this year it's detailed but we're still within the book ends of the state requirement to approve that resolution. we recommended you approve it >> colleagues, any questions.

>> mr. rose can we go to our report, please. >> police vehicle prohibition we recommend approval. >> colleagues if there's no other questions we'll open this up for public comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. is there a motion to approve this item. commissioners, can we take this without objection? clerk call item 6 >> it's the resolution approving the emergency contract are for the environmental clean up & of soil and water and the run away safety area of the flight 214 with an amount not to exposed a certain amount and a thanks for being back. happy new year. the item before i is an emergency soil contract with clean harbors and environmental

services. the airport engaged the services of clean harbors in the aftermath of the asian crash over the summer for work totaling $871,000 plus for services involving 9 clean up of the airfield. as you know asian on a flight missed it's approach at the san francisco airport and damaged the seawall and run away u way areas. one of the direct impacts of the crash and the emergency response on the airfield was some contamination of the soil in the drainage system with the jet fuel and the fire chemical.

the top 6 inches of contaminated soil was to be removed prior to the work to repave the damaged pox of the run way. this was necessary this work had to be done before we opened runway 28. it provided the clean up of the storm drablg. the cleaning of the pump station and the treasurer storage of the contaminated material and other work required before we could do the work to open the runway. it will be paid for by the fund that was approved by the board of supervisors. the amount we're requesting here for this contract will be included in our claims

associated with the crash. originally the airport commission was notified this this emergency contract wouldn't succeed 20th century $1 million since then we've got invoices totaling 8 hundred thousand plus which the the amount the budget analyst recommended you approve today. if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them >> thank you, colleagues any questions. >> okay. thank you very much. mr. rose can we go to our report, please >> mr. chair and members of the committee on page 26 we point out on table one on page 27 they've submitted invoices and the environmental clean up work in the regrading of the work was

completed on september 19, 2013. as was testified it will be paid from the maintenance appropriation boards and the airport will seek reimbursement from the airlines. mr. gibner points out we should change the language slightly where we say to reduce the interact amount we shouldn't specify an amendment of the contract but acknowledge that the contract amount will be reduced by the $128 million down. the board didn't amended the contract but you should our recommendation is to amend the resolution to amend that amount.

>> so to be clear we're not touching the contract but did reds to essentially to add to the substance. >> and then approve the recommendation as recommended. >> are you okay with this. >> the airport is okay with that and i'll get the clerk's office to remedy the corrected amount. >> thank you very much. you've been around here before. any other and a open this up for public comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we have a motion to approve the amendment as suggested by our budget analysts. and the motion to approve the amendment >> all right. madam clerk, call item 7 >> item 7 is the retroactively

arthur's the management on behalf of city for the bay area to having spent in the amount of 6 hundred and 90 thousand for less security through the california office of emergency services. >> great. thank you very much we have a colleague here. >> i'm from the department the emergency management. this is for the securities initiative grant. as you, you know, it's a terrorism grant and that's why this is before the board of supervisors today. they pay for equipment for first responders around the bay area. we include this grant but before we knew how much money we were

going to get this year we estimated a little bit good low and the department of the homeland security gave his money above the budget so this is an expected amount for the balance of the money. in san francisco this will support the outreach teshlz where we help folks get ready for a disaster and the website is in 5 languages and we'll be able to expand that and the funds will pay for the cyber security and other purchases for firefighters and police officers and other first responders around the bay area. it provides no additional jobs if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them >> supervisor mar. >> i have a quick question

thank you for explaining this. what kind of multi lingual languages are available and is it on the internet >> thank you for that question supervisor mar. >> yes. for the physical approaches we have smaller much more brief information than what we used before. we have this in english and spanish and chinese and russian and vietnamese and the website loose translates >> any other questions. we don't have a budget analyst report 0 so we'll open this up for public comment. we'll close any public comment? can i have a motion to approve item 7 madam clerk, is there any other business before us

>> no mr. chair. thank you. we're adjourned >> the public wants to access particular information about your house or neighborhood we point them to gis.

gis is a combination of maps and data. not a graphic you see on a screen. you get the traffic for the streets the number of crimes for a police district in a period of time. if the idea of combining the different layerce of information and stacking them on top of each other to present to the public. >> other types of gis are web based mapping systems. like google earth, yahoo maps. microsoft. those are examples of on line mapping systems that can be used to find businesses or get driving directions or check on traffic conditions. all digital maps. >> gis is used in the city of san francisco to better support what departments do. >> you imagine all the various elements of a city including

parcels and the critical infrastructure where the storm drains are. the city access like the traffic lights and fire hydrants. anything you is represent in a geo graphic space with be stored for retrieval and analysis. >> the department of public works they maintain what goes on in the right-of-way, looking to dig up the streets to put in a pipe. with the permit. with mapping you click on the map, click on the street and up will come up the nchgz that will help them make a decision. currently available is sf parcel the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map of

san francisco you can search by address and get information about any place in san francisco. you can search by address and find incidents of crime in san francisco in the last 90 days. we have [inaudible] which allows you to click on a map and get nchldz like your supervisor or who your supervisor is. the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's office of neighborhood services. you can drill down in the neighborhood and get where the newest hospital or police or fire station. >> we are positive about gis not only people access it in the office but from home because we

use the internet. what we used to do was carry the large maps and it took a long time to find the information. >> it saves the city time and money. you are not taking up the time of a particular employee at the assessor's office. you might be doing things more efficient. >> they have it ready to go and say, this is what i want. >> they are finding the same things happening on the phone where people call in and ask, how do i find this information? we say, go to this website and they go and get the information easily. >> a picture tells a thousand stories. some say a map

>> good morning and happy new year to everyone, welcome to the transbay joint power authorities meeting for january ninth,. >> lloyd is absent >> lee. present. >> metcalf. >> sartifc. >>se