tiny cities, richmond and el monte a few years ago, but we expect them to pour huge amounts of money to mislead san franciscanses. we'll be fighting back with science, commune edward jones ~ education, and shape s.f., also the danger of bad food and drinks as well. we'll send a message san francisco is not for sale and we will not allow you and your lobbyists to continue your decades of harming the health of our children and our communities ~. many of you know that i'm a parent of a 13 year old girl, a teenager, and i know directly that big soda targets heard and adolescence with targets them with harmful energy drinks and sodas. obesity has tripled for my daughter's age group in the past 30 years, and scientists

and studies show that big soda is largely to blame. as a father, i know our families need help when they live in environments saturated with sugary drinks that are aggressively marketed everywhere children and families turn, like billboards on top of people's houses in the bayview or on our buses, or saturday morning tv. as a san franciscan, i also share our collective desire to make san francisco more livable for families and to continue to be a city that sends stands strong in protecting the public's health and allows all of our neighborhoods to thrive. as a local legislator and a law maker like the left of us, i also believe that nothing we do is more important than protecting our children's health and the public's health. we're lucky, as i mentioned, that we have strong coalitions for health equity and food access in our neighborhoods, especially in the bayview and the tenderloin. but it's growing in many other neighborhoods, too. and they've been building alliances with doctors, health experts and scientists.

some of the best science in the world from ucsf researchers and the center for vulnerable populations and many other pediatricians and ucsf to yale university's center for food policy and obesity studies. they've all helped us develop this measure as we're moving forward today. the science is crystal clear. big soda is causing significant harm to our health and economy. a number of us have held a hearing, and i commissioned a report in december that shows that in san francisco sugary drinks are responsible at the very least for over $50 million of harm to our city's economy. and that's just for obesity and type 2 diabetes alone. so, there's a lot more for oral and dental health, liver damage, and heart damage as well. so, we know the economic harm of big soda and we know that it's much, much higher than that number even from our report. the sugary drinks fee we're proposing today is a reasonable and responsible first step in mitigating the harm.

2 cents per ounce, it's a tax of two pennies per ounce for drinks like this and it's levied on distributors, not on small businesses. the legislation is written so that the revenue generated more than $30 million a year will be used in the most equitable and resourceful ways to counter the many health problems sodas cause. i'll just hold up this picture of a can of coca cola 12 ounces. it probably would raise the cost maybe a quarter, but i don't know if you could see the sugar cubeses lined up. some people measure it in teaspoons or in packets of sugar. that's about 15 sugar cubes in that one can of coke. and i think researchers that malia cohen and supervisor wiener and john avalos and i have been working with really are documenting and showing what the best research on how that's harmful not just in the ingestion of that drink and eating a lot more, but also in its long term effectses on

people's health, not just with diabetes, but also obesity and other diseases that harm people's way of life. also, our measure will create an accountability mechanism, an independent 13-person steering committee of public health leaders, parents, students, community members will be responsible for ensuring that the revenue is spent fairly. and again, it's about 40% to the san francisco unified school district for physical activity and health and nutrition programs, about 25% to the recreation and parks department for parks and physical activity and recreation and about 25% to the department of public health for continuing health education and about 10% to community-based groups for health work and physical activity. i also wanted to say that a significant amount of the money will also go to alternatives like drink tap water fountain stations especially in neighborhoods that don't have

good access to fresh and clean water that i think is the best alternative to harmful drinks. the measure requires that communities most affected by the harm from sugary drinks will be prioritized. it will increase access to healthy foods and physical activity, both in and outside of school, especially in neighborhoods that need it the most like the bayview, like the tenderloin, like the mission, like chinatown. our growing coalition is strong and diverse and rapidly growing and it now includes senator mark leno and assembly member tom ammiano. the author of our public education in richmond fund and healthy s.f., so, we're growing every day with support from our neighborhoods. and the legislation carries on san francisco's long tradition of passing local laws to protect our families and our public's health. big soda doesn't share these concerns. big soda is already spending as much money as possible, scheming to defeat us and to protect their corporate profits. we can make history together in san francisco. philadelphia couldn't do it.

new york city couldn't do it. richmond couldn't do t. but i think we can do this in san francisco. and i think as we build this coalition, it will mean more public health and community organizing and community education for the future ~. so, i ask, colleagues, as this moves forward that you join us, the six of us, in this historic campaign. and i thank all the coalition members that came out to our kickoff in the bayview on saturday as we continue to build passive equitable soda tax in san francisco. thank you. the rest i'll submit. >> thank you, supervisor mar. supervisor wiener. >> , madam clerk. ~ thank you, madam clerk. i had the pleasure over the last number of months to work with supervisor mar and cohen and avalos and a growing coalition in the community to move this measure forward. i think today is a very, very important day that we have, one, unified measure that i think is going to have ~ significant health benefits for this city. i think it's important,

colleagues, as we engage in this dialogue at the board over the coming months, to really keep the big picture in mind, and that is the explosion, particularly of diabetes in this city and around the country. we are moving to the point whereas many as one in three americans will have type 2 diabetes. kids are getting diabetes. it used to be called adult onset type 2 diabetes. now kids are getting it ~. large numbers of kids and adults are now pre-diabetic and that number is growing. and this is having huge consequences for our health care system now and it will have even greater consequences for our health care system in the future. it will increase insurance rates. it will have significant cost for tax payers because of the disproportionate impact on low-income communities, it will put stress on our public health system in san francisco. so, this epidemic which is

being fueled by sugary beverages is going to have direct fiscal consequences for our entire health care system and for the tax payers of san francisco. we have a responsibility just like we have on many other health issues tobacco and its link to cancer and other health problems, to take action to try to keep our community healthy and to try to make sure that our health care system stays on track. we did this with tobacco by increasing taxes on tobacco to reduce smoking and to use the funds to try to educate people and to have health programs to make people healthier. it worked beautifully. it worked exactly as intended and we've seen that with the reduction and decline in smoking rates. we need to do the same thing here. these beverages are giving people diabetes. it is -- they're fueling our diabetes epidemic. i also just want to stress how

broad our coalition is. i know that in the past in some other places there has not been as broad a coalition as we have built here. and i think that is because public awareness is shifting even as we speak, and has been shifting for a while now to understand how important this issue is. a coalition includes numerous public health organizations, san francisco medical society, the california nurses association, the american heart association has supported sugary beverage taxes. education groups like the san francisco board of education and the san francisco parent pac and park groups like the trust for public lands. the coalition is growing by the day. this is going to be a won doctorful opportunity, not just to move this proposal forward, but to increase public awareness and education even higher than it is today. so, i'm very excited, colleague, to work with you and

others to move this proposal forward. i also my second introduction is not nearly as positive. and i am submitting an in memoriam which i hope we can do on behalf of the entire board for stu smith who passed away late last night. i think many people in this room knew stu and his partner and soul made dave earle and they had actually contacted our office yesterday because they were having trouble getting an appointment to get married. and, so, we helped get them access to the clerk's office to get an appointment and unfortunately stu passed last night. stu was a bay area native, born in palo alto in 1940. he opened a variety of small businesses and served as senior management high publishing, high tech and media companies ~ owned. he had been a lifelong volunteer for causes ranging

from st. anthony's to san francisco firefighters toy program, the shanti project, positive research center, applied aquatics institute, san francisco publicity club, and we also appointed him as a board to the lgbt aging task force where he was a very productive member. stu was extremely active in shanti and served four terms as board chair. he helped keep that organization strong. shanti was a key, key part of his life. recently he he chaired the executive council at the san francisco para transit coordinating council. he was also serving as the executive director of tin pan alley productions and he wrote a column for the bay times. he hosted several shows including the drag show and the face to face on s.f. common. he was also very active in the recovery community and served on the advisory board of the castro country club ~ which was

silver space in the castro. stu had a lot of energy. i think probably more energy than a lot of us. it was just unbelievable how many different things he was involved with. i would never -- it's just always amazed me how much he he did for our community. he received a lot of awards for his volunteerism, has worked in the community, including the james [speaker not understood] spirit award, the [speaker not understood] award from sfmta and the kqed local hero award in 2013. stu was unique in our community. i've never met anyone quite like him and this is a huge loss for our community. and, so, i request that we as a board adjourn in his memory. the rest i submit. >> thank you, supervisor wiener. >> actually, if we could do that me fa in memoriam on behalf of the full board that

should be the case. [gavel] >> thank you, mr. president. supervisor yee. ~ >> thank you, madam clerk. colleagues, today i'm introducing an ordinance to address neighborhood concerns around the cluster of medical cannabis dispensaries in the ocean avenue corridor. ocean avenue is included in the green zone and the current zoning allows medical cannabis dispensaries, but neighbors in the ocean avenue association have expressed concerns around the number of dispensaries both existing and proposed on the corridor. the ordinance creates a 500-feet buffer around existing dispensaries to avoid clustering. this legislation is identical to supervisor avalos's recent approved proposal for the mission street corridor. i want to thank supervisor avalos for allowing me

duplicate this. this ordinance has already been endorsed by the ocean avenue association and my office has reached out to gather feedback from all neighboring stakeholders. i want to acknowledge that the planning department is conducting a comprehensive study of the medical cannabis dispensary and i hope this legislation can go hand in hand with the outcomes of the study. the rest i submit. >> thank you, supervisor yee. supervisor avalos. >> thank you, madam clerk. colleagues, if you recall back in october, i discussed here at the board a problem we were having in the excelsior district with online sweep stakes gaming facilities. we have three in our district where there are computers that have a type of software that is used for actually gambling. the sites attracted a lot of petty low level crime in the neighborhood, making people

feel very, very unsafe. this past week we had a really great turn of events. the city attorney, based on the work that had been done in the community by community members -- in particular, the ingleside police station under captain fulvey and staff jennifer choi and the [speaker not understood], came up with a settlement that is going to do wonders for that particular part of excelsior on the corner of mission and excelsior street. the main problem facility is net stop. under the settlement they will have to close their doors within 60 days which will be april 1st, and the proprietor will not be able to have any similar businesslike net stop in san francisco for five years. also, the settlement attacks the software company that provides the software for internet gambling. they're called figure 8 and they will not be able to provide any kind of software or

work in the state of california for five years. so, it's a very significant settlement that we have and i just want to thank the city attorney's office for their work, in particular jennifer choi. i also want to thank the mill side station and captain folvey and their team for the work building the case against net stop. in particular, i want to thank many members of the community who worked very hard to raise this to an issue that will be taken up by not just my office, of course, but by the station and by the city attorney's office. so, bernal heights neighborhood center, the excelsior action group, leader in the edia, excelsior district improvement station, and [speaker not understood] neighborhood association, in particular want to thank gordon mckellan and angie minkon who played a large role. also my children's school is about a block away from there as well and our school played a role also.

i helped mobilize a lot of the media support we got to shed light on what was happening in the neighborhood. and, so, today i'm actually introducing a resolution that is in support of legislation that's working at the state level that will close the ability of online internet sweep stakes gaming to operate in california. and, so, this resolution will be before us next week for the adoption for our committee reference calendar to make sure we can send a message to the state of california that we actually protect our neighborhoods and our business corridors from these predatory type institutionses or companies that are preying on our communities. so, i'm really excited about the settlement and it's actually brought a lot of great deal of relief to the neighborhood ~ and a great deal of pride back to the neighborhood about how great the excelsior district really is. i'm also, based on my introduction for last week, i'm

asking the city attorney to draft language for the children amendment. i'm requesting a hearing to discuss the children r city collaborative going on between the nowctionvtion gaytion ~ foundation, and the mayor's office, about their progress for reauthorizing the children's fund and publication and richmond funneled. i want to make sure we're working as a team in this city to have a real strong approach ~ to supporting children and families in the years to come. i look forward to working with you, colleague, and looking for your leadership in helping to make this happen. i think it's a joint effort that i want to be involved in, but i want to make sure we're working, bringing community together with our work here, our offices and with the administration and the foundation community as well to have a great stake in how we can improve the overall system for children, youth, and families in san francisco. and in particular, i want to acknowledge the work that many of my colleagues have already

done in the children youth and family arena. in particular, eric mar and of course supervisor yee who has been in the field for decades. and i want to acknowledge his expertise and work closely with him as we move forward to making sure we can do re-authorization in a way that's going to be unique and really expand a way to provide children and families as an experience here in san francisco. and the rest i'll submit. >> thank you, supervisor avalos. supervisor campos. >> thank you, madam clerk. i want to thank supervisor wiener for doing an in memoriam for stu smith. you know, i got a call yesterday the same way that supervisor wiener and his office got a call from stu's friends. it was stu's wish before he he died that he could marry his long-time partner david. and i woke up this morning,

having talked to -- to -- to his friends about being on call to rush to where stu was this morning to marry him. and, of course, to wake up to the news that stu did not make it through the night. anyway, i think it's just a reminder that we can't take things for granted. i know that we were not able to officiate that wedding, but as far as i'm concerned stu and david have always been a unit and will always be spouses for life. i have a couple of items, and the first item is an item that we have been working on for

quite sometime and i want to thank hillary ronan of my office for all the work that she has done and i want to thank the number of women's organizations that have been working on this issue with us for the last few months. i am also very grateful to my colleagues who have co-sponsored this resolution. supervisors tackverctiontion, farrell, wiener, mar, avalos, and president chiu. it is a resolution that highlights the importance of women, girls, and transgender women's health. we say that we actually had worked to make this resolution a possibility last month. but because of the timing of some of the changes with affordable care act, we were not able to do that.

and, so, we are mindful that february is a very special month, a month, it's black history month. and in this spirit, we also want to focus on the disparities to health access that disproportionately impacts women of color and african-american women in particular. african-american residents in san francisco unfortunately face an alarming difference in health compared to other ethnic groups, including the fact that prenatal death rates among african-american residents is a staggering 5 time higher than that of other ethnic groups. and through this resolution we want to highlight the importance of ensuring access to health care for women, girl, and transgender women. and the timing of this is important because the affordable care act is about to go into implementation and

there is a very clear and approaching deadline of march 31st. and, so, it's really important for us to make sure that between now and the time that that deadline comes that we sign up as many women, girls, and transgender women into the affordable care act. and it's going to take the effort of the entire city family, not only government, but community-based organizations and all of us as residents of san francisco to make sure that we do not leave a single woman, a single girl behind. the second thing this resolution does is that it acknowledges the importance of health coverage to women's health and encourages all women, girls, and transgender women in san francisco to sign up for the insurance that is provided through cover california for the expanded medi-cal program.

and to urge them to please not wait. and if that if you're not eligible for any of those programs, luckily we live in san francisco and thank you, tom ammiano, we have healthy san francisco that will cover many of the women, girls, and transgender women who will be left out of the federal program. the third item that this resolution does is it puts san francisco, and specifically the board of supervisors, on record as supporting the women's health protection act of 2013 which will protect a woman's right to choose and the ability to determine for themselves when to bear a child and pregnancy. as much as we are proud of the work that we have done in san francisco, there is a sad fact that there have been a number of laws in other parts of the country -- 68 laws -- restricting access to abortion

in 2013 alone, and the state of california was actually the only one of the 50 states that actually expanded abortion access, unfortunately, and the remaining 4 states the right to that access was limited. and we also declare this month women, girls, and transgender women's health month in san francisco for the purpose of enrolling as many women as we possibly can in health care. the next item that i have is an item that deals with the construction of a very important project, which is the sutter cpmc cathedral hill project. and i know that i in my district have received a number of inquiries about the status of the project and it's one of those projects where we're very

proud of the work that was done at the board of supervisors with the mayor's office, with the help of lou girardo to get us to a settlement of that, of the differences in that project. and i just am calling for a hearing simply to provide the public, including my constituents a status report on where the project is. and i want to thank supervisor farrell, supervisor mar for their co-sponsorship. now, finally, let me say that i'm very proud to introduce an ordinance that deals with the very important issue of displacement. today i'm introducing legislation that will directly give tenants in the city and county of san francisco some protections in the unfortunate event that they face eviction under the ellis act. what this resolution does is

that consistent with the case law that has recognized the right and the responsibility of jurisdictions to help tenants who are evicted stay in the city, this legislation gives tenants in san francisco who are evicted under the ellis act the chance to continue to live in our city. the reality is that under the current existing law a tenant can receive no more than 50 to $100 in the event of an ellis act eviction, and the total for a unit -- for one unit cannot be more than 15,000. anyone who knows the state of affairs of the rental market in san francisco knows that $5,000 is simply not enough to allow these tenants to be able to stay in this city. and while it is true that we

collectively not only on the board of supervisors, but working with the mayor's office -- mayor's office are working to reform the ellis act in sacramento, and that's an important piece of this strategy. as that work continues, there will still be many san franciscans who will be displaced so we have to do something at the local level to ensure that they don't have to wait for the state to finally tweak the ellis act the right way. in the meantime, we need to make sure that we help these residents stay in san francisco. as of june 2013, the city-wide median rental rate was $3,314. that's according to zillow.com. the median home prices in san francisco has recently topped $1 million, and the average listing price for san francisco homes for sale on trulia was $1.6 million for the week

ending january 15th. on top of these figures, 42.9% of san franciscans are rent burdened meaning that they pay 30% or more of their income on rent. and, in fact, in some parts of the city, on the east side of this city, the percentage of their rent burden is even worse. you have 57% of residents in these parts -- in this part of the city, including the bayview, visitacion valley, that are rent burdened, and 54% of residents in the financial district which include soma, potrero hill, mission, but also meet the rent burden definition. it is urgent that we act today to help evicted tenants to continue to live in our city, and more specifically what this piece of legislation does is that it follows the example of what happens at the federal level when the federal government engages in eminent

domain. the analysis of what is paid by the federal government looks at the market, and in this case we believe that consistent with the case law, if the objective is to do whatever we can to mitigate -- to mitigate displacements and how tenants stay in san francisco, it makes sense that the calculation of relocation costs be based on an analysis of the market. i am grateful to the controller's office for their help, their technical support in making sure that we get to the right calculation. i also want to thank the san francisco apartment association, which even though we have our differences of opinion, have provided input on this legislation. and we look forward to continuing to work with them as the legislation moves forward through committee. and i also want to thank my colleagues, supervisor ne