they live at the same address. >> maria lives at 177 lilac street..., no? >> no. sorry. >> confidential information. >> i am sorry. >> they live at the same address, that is why i am confused. >> they are siblings. >> they are siblings. >> yeah. >> brother and sister. >> so, just for your neighbor's sake, is this the total amount of people who own your place? >> no. it is just two of them. it is jose and then, romero. >> okay, thank you very much. >> i believe that is... sorry. >> i am sorry. >> so let's entertain a motion. >> i would like to entertain a motion. >> yeah. >> i am going to have the entertaining the motion, and so the motion that i would like to

make is approve this permit, and i would like to strike number 2, since we do not have... i would like to strike number 5, because it is covered by, number 8, and strike number 6 because it is covered by, number, eleven and strike number 7, because it is covered by 7 in the good neighbor policy. and 8 is covered by ten and three in the good neighbor policy. and 10 is covered by, number 5 and so i would like to strike all of those and i would like to add the condition in number 1 1 to be kept up to 30 days. and strike the last sentence that says that the electronic surveillance will be made available to the police department upon request. and strike number 12. >> number 12 is strike. >> it is struck.

>> so, and then, 2, i realize that things have been better sound-wise, recently but they not not been having live entertain sxment this is a mixed neighborhood and so i would like the limit the hours of entertainment to 11:30 on week nights and 12:30 on weekends to be reviewed in a year, if things go well. >> friendly amendment? >> yeah. >> so, everyone get all of those >> okay. >> could i do a friendly amendment? >> we need a second first? >> no. >> second. >> go ahead. >> i was wondering if you would include in there like the english speaking person answers the phone as part of the condition? >> so i don't think that that is actually something that i would entertain. i believe that what i think is that the people who are working there, should be able to

understand enough english that when someone calls and says that it is too loud, what they are to do. but i think to put those sort of it is a little insensitive, but i think that certainly staff will be able to understand complaints when they come to the phone and however they reach that agreement will be fine as long as the neighbors are not getting people who cannot respond. because that is would be breaking the good neighbor policy. >> for the purpose of discussion and when i talked to the security guard do you speak english? and he said no, i then, he walked around with me and i turned around and asked him a question and he understood me and responded in english and i said that i thought that you didn't speak english and so i think that there is a level of fear among this group of folks that that is a protective shell that they don't understand. so i agree with you totally on

what you just said for sure. >> i have a question. >> so it is 11:30 on the week nights, >> correct. >> and that is sunday or monday? >> i would go with sunday. >> sunday, through... >> through thursday. >> and just friday and saturday, going to 12:30 a.m.. >> correct. >> for a year. >> for a year. and then, i think that it will be fine to review it again. but i think that you know, it should really, have a time to kind of work itself out. >> sure. >> was dl a second? >> any other discussion, commissioner lee? >> i mean, that i, i mean the weekday thing that i am okay with, i mean, 12:30, i mean that it is kind of taking, you know a big, you know, a pro-active role, but i mean that i am thinking that we just supported what the permit

officers said and maybe we review it in six months. and if there is still, and if there are complaints then, we can go to the extreme of 12:30. i just think that he is entitled to at least give it a shot. , you know? and support the permit officers request or recommendation, but it is, we can review it in six months and then it comes up again, we can go ahead and recondition it to 1:00 and i think that 12:30 is the extreme. >> i don't know if anyone feels similarly, if not, we can take it to a vote and one other potential compromise is that we could shorten and go with the hours that it feels too extreme from a year down to six months. >> i would shorten it to six months but i would like to stick with those hours and i will tell you why.

after the meeting, i was encouraged myself to limit the hours of operation of entertainment to eleven and 12 for six months. but because of what has gone on here and the responsibility of it and i felt that we would be able to give them leeway and i would also shorten that to 6 months to review that. >> all right, so you have to revise, his motion, or can we just... >> can someone else make a friendly amendment to his motion? >> i will, okay, someone other do that? >> yes. so, i will make the friendly amendment that it is, that it will be from 11, or until 11:30 sunday through thursday evenings. and until 12:30 on friday and saturday. for 6 months. and then it will come back, does it come here for a review? >> yes. >> okay. >> and then it will be accepted

and does the accept that? >> great. >> and let's take this to a vote. >> okay, this is the motion is to approve with the police conditions striking 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 12. one and 12 were already struck by the station and to limit entertainment times to end at 11 p.m., and sundays through thursday. >> and 11:30 p.m. sunday through thursday and 12:30 a.m. friday and saturday to be reviewed in six months. >> and yeah, as well as number eleven. the last sentence. >> yeah. >> the last sentence of eleven. >> and triking the last sentence and making it... >> yeah, right. >> thank you. >> all right. and also, i would just want to say that the green cross has agreed to help them do more community out reach and has really taken an interest in helping them out and so i do feel confident that they will do more community out reach.

>> great. >> and all right, on that motion, commissioner perez. >> aye. >> commissioner akers? >> aye. >> commissioner hyde? >> commissioner joseph. >> aye. >> lee. >> yes. >> campagnoli. >> aye. >> and president tan. >> aye >> so moved. >> all right. >> the motion passes. >> good luck, and we will move on to item 8, commissioner comments and questions. >> commissioner hyde and then commissioner joseph? >> i just wanted to say that this morning i found out that stew smith who was a local..., i don't know, like, and i am not sure an activist but he did the drag show at which was a public access tv show and i was able to appear on it twice and he was someone who started out not understanding drag queens and then went as far as

promoting them and working with them and really becoming a very vibrant person in the community who ran for dccc several times and he will be missed by the community. >> and in addition, he did a lot of work with people with disabilities he was a great guy, there is no question about it. >> yeah. >> and for me, february 24th, castro theater, the nighty awards, san francisco night life awards. bye a ticket and come. and so that is what i have to say to everybody in this room and everybody listening in tv land, it is a great show honoring our industry. and i expect, everyone to be there. and you can go to www.niteyawards.com and it is to buy a ticket or you can go

to the event. it benefits sight and sound which is a 501 c3 california non-profit and whose mission it is to promote and support music and the arts and the creation of their content. and i am done. >> all right. >> any other commissioner comments or questions? >> and let's take public comment on the commissioner comments and questions, seeing none, we will move on to the last item which is new business requests for future agenda items. >> anything? if not, >> to adjourn. >> this meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> the next regularly scheduled

meeting on february 18th at

1 o'clock p.m. and announcement of the electronic devices pr please be advised that the pages and other electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting and you may be asked to leave the meeting for electronic devices. and c the announcement for loomentd of the public to comment they can make up to 3 minutes unless the commission says otherwise. it's strongly recognized that the people fill out a speaker card and submit it to the commission secretary. the next order which business is the report of elections taken at the previous closed session meeting marry madam chair >> thank you very much.

we don't have any reportable actions i don't think. yes. okay. sorry. that was confusing. at our previous closed session we discussed the issue of the commission appointing a general council. the commission decided to appoint mr. jim more and more relays for the executive director for the direction for a permanent planning session for a general council >> the next business will be matters of unfinished business we have none and next did tell me 5 for comment and regular agenda. item 5 a. approval of minutes special meeting of january 7, 2014,

>> everybody should have received a copy of the minutes. any public cards >> mr. washington. >> yes. now will be more appropriate time than any so you'll know my position. is that none of you personally but at you directly because you represent the mayor which is over the whole city and county everyone including us african-american black negroes. as it relates to your minutes january 7th in which you had your meeting at the hunters view i pleaded that you come out to the community specifically the western addition but happen you

came out to the bayview and i hate to say it it looks like we're following the pattern of the old regime. the broken promises this wait, wait, wait. well ladies and gentlemen i'm going to a imprudent present to you the redbook. i'm sick and tired and having enough i'll be 50 years old this month i spent half of my daylight life i have 3 generations. i have a moral obligation and i'm going to use every opportunity on the government channel. i was quite responsible for the government channel doing the tape. so let me go on i have a minute and a half. i'm appalled not at you ail but

appalled at city hall how they've neglected and how conspires has been involved in the last 50 or so years dealing with an agency but it's the same old game controlled by city hall and now you're responsible to the state. i am going to show you i've been to the state. back in 2008, at the first redevelopment agency has done damage to my people. that's a continuance of what we have shared here in this california here in san francisco in the history of african-americans being here. i'm appalled as a great, great grandfather to tell my grandkids

nothing can be done but how about us other than the airlgz and others. what's the phrase i can't think of the phrase but you talk about we're still last. i'm here today and it will be my campaign thought this month i'm going to the state and i'll be filing against this agency trust me. thank you very much are there any other speaker cards >> i have a none. >> are there any comments or changes requesting for the minutes commissioner ellington. i have a question on the minutes the second to the last prairie want to make sure this statement

is correct it says that mr. bridges is responding to a question of m g e of the local businesses and it represented $4 million but you - i'm not sure that's a correct number so we don't. i'm raising it, it's off >> through the chair it looks like a typo we'll verify the exact dollar amount. >> okay questions or comments. if there are none i'd like to entertain a minutes approval on the jab 7. so moved >> thank you very much a second? is there a second?

okay. okay. you can still second it then we'll take a vote. who knows >> okay. i'll second. >> thank you very much. madam clerk, please call the roll. >> >> commissioner members commissioner ellington is absent. commissioner mondejar >> i abstain. >> commissioner singh. >> yes. >> commissioner rosales. >> yes. >> chairperson johnson. >> i. madam chair the vote is 3ize and one abstinence. thank you very much call the next item >> the next order of business is regular agenda 5 b workshop on a memoranda of the mayor's office housing for the implementation of the retained housing discussion. madam chair.

excuse me. madam director >> good afternoon, commissioners and members of the public. commissioners you know you have exorbitantly obligations in the project areas and for did you affordable housing obligations the with respect housing obligation. this workshop is a precursor to our budget and really confirms an existing practice through budgets you've approved and the working relationship with the mayor's office of housing and the housing community development ass and is successor that will take our assets and obligations. not that i recall the board of supervisors asked the commission to and oc i staff to collaborate

with the housing obligations so once we've taken our public comment we'll certainly file a written report to the board of supervisors how that collaboration is working. with that, i'd like to ask sally to present >> good afternoon commissioner. i take it my pleasure to present the workshop with the mayor's office housing and community development. the retained you housing obligations. so your agenda important the workshop is first of all, i'll go over some background on the various steps posted solution that led us here. i'll visit the key principles that shape our efforts to create affordable housing in san francisco and specifically through this mo u. i'll give an overview of the

funding we have in place so we understand the projects that will be implemented. i'll go over the mo u structure itself and that will lead to the discussion of the various roles and responsibilities of each party. i have some preliminary budget estimates that we'll continue to refine. i'll be asking the key management staff to introduce themselves and give a brief overview in relation to the mo u. so with the background again, we're all familiar with february 2014 was the rotation of the agency that was through the bill of a b 26. at the time the city was the successor agency and the city

took a function and designated the mayor's office of housing development as the successor agency that was done through the board of supervisors 11 dash 12. in june of that year there was a clean bill as 1484 and when it take effect the agencies are separate allocations and the separate agencies may have separate obligations. and so the city took steps to implement a b 1484 through the successor ordinances 215 dash 12 that created this commission. it also staibd establishes an demolition that is oc ii was

retaining and those relate to the major improvement projects like the bayview and transbay and our replacement obligation is for the destruction of over 6 seven hundred unit and your arrangement to replace those. it included a requirement that oc ii and the mayor's office work together to lay out how the two parties will relate to each other and our responsibilities in implementing those retaining housing obligations. in november of that year the state took some action that illuminated the responsibilities. and we turned in our low moderate view that november and in october of that year the

state can be and they invaleted the low and moderate income and dwrikd those to be returned to the successor agency and they determined the successor agency need to pay over $110 million to the state. not that i recall we went there an exhaust process that include did audit of our restricted fund a that process concluded with the state determining only $10 million needed to be paid through the d dr process and that was again $10 million out of leveling million dollars. and then through that we got our finding of perplex. we then embarked on our

long-term project and we did a confirms of housing assets that transferred. while all of this was clarifying the agency we did want to clarify with the state that a certain large number of assets did transfer to the city of housing assessor so we did the confirmation action. we've been working with the staff quite a long time and we're pleased to be here to take over the mo u and i'd like to decide the process. you know, in san francisco there are a number of guiding lights, if you will, that help us determine the how the when and the why the concern projects and policies should be done and go into effect and on the citywide

basis we have the consolidated plan that has the housing golden's and requirements. for occ i we have our redevelopment plan the actual contracts we acted open to provide the affordable housing and the income levels. all that being said that helped to create a path for what we want to make sure each party is responsible for and we keep in mind those as we develop new projects. your retained projects in hunters point shipyard and our replacement obligations. we as the successors agency retaining those obligations we believe those are just as

important as other obligations in our contract so we wanted to lay utility i anti what are the principles. so first of all, the assumption is in general the occ i and our contract and workforce policies apply but on the other hand, we want to recognize our past and current practice of under writing we've shared a practice of guidelines and agencies and used the mar office of housing so this codifies our past practice and where our current practice we attached to the draft. we're defining that our promotions are you ours until their completed and completed to us means it constructed but

occupied by that target population and the other key privilege is recognizing the mayor's office housing of development has capacity that can help us and assist us in implementing our large obligations. there's a large part that talks about how to light those services but separate from that oc d has their own role to play as the housing successor. our plan as we complete projects we'll transfer them to the housing successor so we need to cod so it's a smooth transaction. we'll make sure we have a partnership throughout the

project. in your paths you received a large spreadsheet that has a summer. i've caught the errors and i've tried to provide you with that. overall it gives us a flavor for the large number of the projects and our project areas. and we have nearly 4 thousand you units that on active pipeline. the majority are affordable. you'll notice there's a difference between the affordable units there are manager units that may not be income restricted but over 4 thousand units by 19 projects. and in the active pipeline there are over 18 hundred units we're working on. th