approving a mo u >> i neglected to mention that marie's group is pulling together that information and we'll be coming back to share that information. but one other area of - area of input you'll have as projects are developed it's in the actual loan document and it will all the marketing requirements for this project that the city staff will help implement. you'll have the opportunity to see who are the preferences and what's the outreach, you know, and if there's additional specifications needed that's an opportunity for you to be insuring it's clear. what the process niece to be before they get to the market and start building the project even >> is there a way to receive a

report for example, what are the demographics and how have they produced. >> yeah. they're working on a 2013. >> we do have those numbers we're putting together in a report form. i can just tell you that we do so a need in doing in improving our outreach to our community groups that are serving the groups in the areas where properties are being developed. so we're working with meeting and h f cd who have actually incorporated helping folks in

the rental get into the rental market. our fiscal in the past has been in homeownership and we have the homeownership counseling. it's the same information that our folks who are trying to get into a rental need. i've heard in the two months i've been here is - yeah. folks are getting in the lottery and their number gets pulled and they don't have the credit or the savings or their other issues that stops them from being successful. so we're working and talking with our community partners to provide the resources to folks before they get into a lottery so they can succeed and the only way a person with a certificate

would be one of those barriers so if we can get to folks inform breakdown those barriers they'll be able to be successful. we are working on a portal that's what we're calling that. this portal we're in the beginning stages of developing a one stop shop where folks what a could come and find out about those opportunities they're here and there and we understand there's an issue to be able to - we're - we're in a city with the technology of twitters and - >> 9 hundred approximately. >> but we don't have the technology to house all of our

affordable housing in one place yet we're working on that and simplifying the process to get into the lottery. those are things that are on our plates as we move forward and i'm happy to meet with you >> i might suggest a prequalification proposals, you know, if folks are applying they think their certify of preference means something and they wait until the end of the line and frankly that's pretty amazing to me how long the certificate of preference has been around and that people are still getting stopped and we're going about extending the program to grandchildren and i'm in favor of that.

i just think we need to do better it's disheartening to hear folks are still coming to those meetings and talking >> commissioners i'd like to make a quick comment. one of the things i've noticed in my time at hunters point a lot of the people with the certificate of preference were fiscally on the opportunity of hunters point and some of the buildings were in the western edition. increase blessings or may or may not there's things in the air where people are picking up on but no more to go. so as places come up to move into some more in san francisco >> and they have to qualify to

get in. >> well, the community partners are working on the financial assistance. i love our idea of prequalification. >> you have all those things the portal and the technology is that part of the 2345078 budget so if it's not we need to add it. oh, there's a cfo who stood up >> we're currently in the 5 hundred thousand not currently planning on charging for the portal you'll get it as a benefit. >> yeah. that's a good from the about so long as it gets down

we've been talking about this for we've been here for almost a year. >> people will have been talking that for longer than that. >> i would vote for adding it to the budget. >> i love the thinking benjamin we call it a freebie it's not that. i had a quick question i know i want to get into our next item. so can we see - i was going to make a comment about adding more daily to the items that commissioner rosales mentioned. i would probably is that may not be necessary if we could see a forum of the report i don't know if we can do that. but there are forms of reports

that are mentioned here if we could get those that would alleviate my concern. i don't have a current form we could graft and bring bra again. we have what we submitted to the state a lot i'll warn you those are volumes. but we can have reports. in the direction either one or the other reports that represent for the most part what is produced or an all that can be added to the report itself. which ever is easiest. but don't give us something

you've given to the state that's not that helpful >> okay. any other questioning commissioners. okay. this is not an action item that will be coming back to us for approval in the future. with that, you i'd like to move to the next item >> item 5 c workshop on fiscal 2013 and 2014. madam director >> thank you, madam secretary. commissioners that is standard practice to do a 6 month look back. i know it's good preparation for the budget again we're working with the staff in terms of where the receiveables are and how we balanced them and our director of the finance will walk you

through it. it's good forbid the rob's presentation >> thank you director and chairperson johnson. i think you have a memo in your package. but i'm very glad to have an opportunity to look at where we are in the middle of the year and see if there are any problems on the horizon. this year did indeed a lot balanced at this time of the year there's still 5 months to go but we'll be able to make it through with the funds we have on hand. we have using one time limited revenues to balance so in the future we'll have to keep in mind. we'll have options to replace those but we may need additional

property taxes. i want to point out where with your using that. the big picture we budgeted with curb on. we expect to actually draw less property tax increments in particular we should use other taxes first and so we also have reduced claims because we have reduced experiences so we have less disbursements coming in. so some of the significant pieces of why we're one and a half million under budget our staffing is under budget a

that's because of vacancies we've budgeted for we have 7 vacancies and we have 2 positions we're in the process of filling. that's the reason for the savings there. at the beginning of the fiscal year we weren't sure how many staff we were going to need and there's plans for doing more and quite a significant you budget of one-hundred plus million and as you heard the actual costs are coming in lower than. and this projection allows for 6 hundred and 50 thousand maybe less but we're allowing enough for the rest of year that will be seven hundred thousand in savings for budget.

finally, we have a considerable amount of center for legal and accounting services we weren't showing you sure how many audits we were going to get from the state we're coming in lower but we paid off invoices and we settled all the old ones that liquids us to clear that. there are minor savings like insurance as it turns out and major savings for renegotiating the software licenses. so, so we're trying to control our costs. we're reduced our prosperity tax increments and our staff doesn't charge as much as in our budget. we have some carried forward reserve funds we are trying to

use up in this period and that's what is part of what we're using as our balancing. we want to clear those as we're required to by the state to apply towards our current expenses. i mentioned sort of of the a one-time or limited funds identifying $1.5 million it's on the bottom of that table that includes grants funds but that's limited. we're using taxable bond savings toward the managing of projects those will be used up within a certain amount of time. we have in the transbay we've purchased some leases for the parking lot operators that will

be used and as soon as we can. so we're using that that will go away next year. we're trying to keep in mind that. that's the main picture i want to provide at the six months point if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> do we have any public comment on this item. >> i have one speaker card. washington >> i sure hate to cast a shadow over our of months review because i have a whole new prospective. since our inception since our transfer from is redevelopment agency quite frankly you haven't dulg done nothing for us. for the community in which

that's most impacted by the redevelopment agency you've done nothing but yet you're in the southeast of the city where the rest of us are where that community is stalling so fast they can't see it theirs in a coma. i have a remedy for the city. i have a document in which i requested back when the ocean was first opened. this is partly because you're talking about money. you need to put the money aside for the lawyer's fees. i don't understand i really can't. i mean, i'm n i mean, i'm n i mean, i'm not pointing at you. but you were examining to the

agency now you're sitting right there and maybe that's your job to sit in the seat and look at the countries poor you've met with me a couple of times. no resolution or nothing. i've come up here a number of times requesting you to come to the community but that's okay the oversight committee that's over you all. most of the city has been counseled more than anybody. are - the individual that's on there olsen lee and those folks ahead of the community so is that why mayor ed lee put it together so it would look good that you guys have someone over your committee. i see this happening over again. i've been around 2 seven years

you all. i see the same thing but in a new era. ladies and gentlemen, i have enough material to give briefs for young lawyers. maybe people outside the city don't know what's going on. it's boum you've gots got the technology oh, san francisco is so nice but if they knew what you are doing to use black people. this is unacceptable. any other speaker cards >> there are no speaker cards. >> thank you very much. this is we'll have a lot more discussion on that item any specific questions. one quick one. the six months preservation that's the current - >> yes. the premeditation and deliberation projection through the rest of the year based on

the data. >> okay. thank you very much for the wonderful presentation. seeing no comments on the administrator budget it is not an action item and the next business is 5 d the workshop on the recognized payments for july 14th and 2015 - 2016 discussion >> commissioners that's that time again to recognize the schedule payment process as you recall the state resolution law requires the action submit those payments schedules so every single payment we're contemplating in the next period beginning in we're - june

through december of 2014 must be identified on that schedule. so it's simply allows expenditure authorities again with our approval and in many cases the oversight board pursuant to the dissolution law. with that, i'd like to ask the deputy director to walk you through this item >> good afternoon. so i will begin on our agenda for the raps 2014 - 2015 workshop. i'll briefly go over the basic terms to we're familiar with that and go over our timeline and i'll do in breakdowns of totals by funding source and by

project and program areas so you'll have a sense of brown where the men is going. i will go over the numbers that are in your paychecks since that time it was a process we're continuing to update projects and finally, we'll get to a final version and report balk 80 back to you with the numbers and finally, i'll talk about our next steps. again, the raps background peer required by 1836 to have our obligations approved. so far as we've approved 5 to date. and last year d u f made the a period raps in the a and so

therefore the next raps we're reviewing is raps 2014 - 2015 a. so just with 2013 - 2014 b raps the upper state stayed consistent and they've permitted us with a template that has our obligations filled in by the geographical obligation and we fill in the notes. but the whole item placing plat worksheets and not all in your packet but there's a summer. there's a report of cash balances that looks like the 2014 - 2015 a and b we're still working on that. the raps detail you have the actual item numbers and bans the

funding we're requesting. the report period adjustment we refer to this is a the true up so the july to december period concluded at the end of the december so its estimated. that will be prepared and we'll provide that to you in final form. so it's the raps detail is what you have in front of you. our timeline march first is the statutory requirement so march third is the official last day to submit a raps for the department of finance. 45 days the state department of finance makes an noticeable determination you have 5 days after that to appeal any of it

and that processes wraps up by mid may then they make their june 1st property tax distribution occurs for the property tax funds. that's the general timeframe for a raps. our timeline in order to meet that we're here doing a workshop and next monday we'll have at yours respectfully, workshop and on february 21st will be the boards action and we'll submit to the department of finance that day. so the funding will be the same in the last raps we have bond precedes and we've concluded the prior balances as well as any balances that are left over from our anticipated mission bay 2014 bonds your approved.

we're provide for detail in the reserve column that is the rpp f you haven't spent as well as the balances you were allowed to keep your spotted to identify those. and grants and other fees and property tax fund and number one admin this is the tax increment number one usage and the funds is set at a maximum of 3 percent fiscal years allocation of property tax. so again, the withdrawing way the raps is organized we began with agency wide line items at the top and our number one housing obligations and followed by the housing obligations.

the south beach they were off of raps and now got back in. we went to our bond lines and we have unfortunately, a bit of a hodgepodge of new lines because d u f says you can't use a new line number so we don't keep to the project area sorting. now the spreadsheet we can do the groupings if anyone wants to see the project areas obligation. so your current and the draft before you we circulated that the total occupational of funding from july to december it 2 hundred and 24 millions. a lot of things rolled over and in many cases we're hedging our best and on 2013 - 2014 now

we're expecting to take the action to comment those funds in july so we may put that on july to december raps to allow us to the flexibility of a swing of a month or two. our new request is 55.67 million for the number one rp t f and for a total of 57.11. again, we're refinancing those numbers as we're using the ac a in all ways we can. so this give us a summer of by program area of the total fund being requested. so we have under 6 million for our admin and property

management costs and we put in a projection if we do get under a mp m approved we've included funding. we have debt service along with other - >> hold on one second has our gene gone off. okay tleerg >> thank you. >> so the debt service and in the shipyard we've have a total of 9 million that includes our document costs and the fund for the district for the federal economic development administration advertisements and federal and state finances the vast majority are for disbursements so this is in terms of matching the federal

grant. many mission bay on the number one housing see as the draw down will carry forward and mission bay north and varies consult costs and in transbay we have construction costs with the folsom off-ramp and various consultants in western edition some costs with the fillmore and the garage and that site and yerba buena center there's the 706 mexico museum and the arithmetic center those are in yerba buena capital improvement costs. in housing we have a total of under 63 million that is funding phases even if alice griffith and the parcel west and that would be the next new one, if we

can issue an rfp this and transbay block 7 and 8. and then some we have 2 million looked for the costs for the top beach and the harbor for the operations and debt and that's to two hundred and 24 million. so just looking at a breakdown of our rfp requests that's what the state is most interested in. you can see the 57 point plus million we had a small amount requested new year in our staffing. again, the majority of that is for debt service on our bonds and we have a small amount for our shipyard. the mission bay housing t