war and these are some of the faces you might recognize from the united states senate. >> thank you very much. let me ask if there -- thank you very much. let me ask if there are any other members of the public who wish to speak in general public comment? seeing none, general public comment is now closed. [gavel] >> colleagues, why don't we now go to item 30, which was our closed session. madam clerk, could you please read that item? >> item 30 is motion that the board of supervisors convene in closed session on march 4, 2014, with the mayor's office and the department of human resources pursuant to san francisco administrative code, section 67.10(e), and california government code, section 54957.6 regarding negotiations with labor unions representing city employees. >> thank you. colleagues, could i have a motion to go into closed session?

motion by supervisor breed, seconded by supervisor mar. is there any public comment on whether we should go into closed session? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> colleagues, without objection, let's go into closed session. [gavel] >> ladies and gentlemen, if you could please step out of the room, we do have a closed session on this item regarding an update on our labor negotiations. >> ladies and gentlemen, colleagues, we are now back in open session for our board of supervisors meeting of march the fourth, 2014. colleagues, could i have a motion to not disclose the information we just discussed in closed session? motion by supervisor farrell, seconded by supervisor campos. without objection, that passes without objection. [gavel] >> madam clerk, could we please go to our adoption calendar? >> item 31 through 35 are being considered for immediate adoption without committee reference the a single roll call vote may enact these item unless a member objects, a meater can be removed and

considered separately. >> colleagues, would anyone like to sever any of these items? i'd like to sever item 35. and with that, could we take a roll call on items 31 through 34? >> supervisor yee? yee aye. supervisor avalos? avalos aye. supervisor breed? breed absent. supervisor campos? campos aye. president chiu? chiu aye. supervisor cohen? cohen aye. supervisor farrell? farrell aye. supervisor kim? kim aye. supervisor mar? mar aye. supervisor tang in tang aye. supervisor wiener? wiener aye. there are 10 ayes. >> those resolutionses are adopted. [gavel] >> and, colleagues, madam clerk, could you call item 35. >> item 35 is a motion authorizing preparation of written proponent and opponent ballot arguments and rebuttal ballot arguments for submittal to the voters at the june 3, 2014, consolidated statewide direct primary election. >> colleagues, just want to note on this item for the first

ballot measure, it would indicate that i would manage the proponent arguments and i want to ask if there is anyone who would wish to control the opposition argument to the waterfront development height increase initiative. okay, there is none. i'd like to entertain a motion that we delete lines 17 through line 24 on page 2. can i have a motion to that effect? motion by supervisor farrell, seconded by supervisor yee. any objection to that? without objection, supervisor campos has a question. >> a question. so, this is the ballot initiative to which [speaker not understood] were collected? >> correct. and, so, in such a ballot measure, the proponent arguments would be managed by the individuals that submitted the ballot measure. the question for us is whether anyone on the board of supervisors wants to manage the opposition arguments. i have not heard, no one has indicated they wish to do that. so, if we delete this, it would

just be left up to the department of elections and they would be, i believe, a randomized [inaudible]. >> in terms of the proponent? >> the proponent, it would be the sponsors of the measure. so, the individuals that submitted the signatures to the department of elections. >> okay. >> okay. so, on the motion to amend -- mr. -- >> just to clarify supervisor campos's question. the municipal election code is the order of priority. people and entities that submit arguments, if the proponent -- if the board of supervisors submitted the proponent argument for that waterfront measure and the proponent did not submit a yes argument, an official proponent's argument, then the board's argument would be the official proponent's argument. so, you're not precluded from doing it, although in the usual

course, the proponents will submit the official argument. >> any further questions? okay. on the motion to amend, we can do that without objection? that should be the case. [gavel] >> and on the underlying motion as amended, if we could do that actually -- the house has changed so we need to take a roll call vote. madam clerk. >> supervisor yee. yee aye. supervisor avalos? avalos aye. supervisor breed? breed aye. supervisor campos? campos aye. supervisor chiu? chiu aye. supervisor cohen? cohen aye. supervisor farrell? farrell aye. supervisor kim? kim aye. supervisor mar? mar aye. supervisor tang in tang aye. supervisor wiener? wiener aye. there are 11 ayes. >> motion is approved as amended. cleveland cavaliers >> could you read the memoriams. >> today's meeting would be adjourned in behalf of the late mr. franco man sin i, for the

mr. edward zach and at the suggestion of supervisor cohen on behalf of the entire board of supervisors, for major kurt chun you lee and ms. jean lun. >> and madam clerk sly any more business front of the board? >> that concludes our business for today, mr. president. >> ladies and gentlemen, we are adjourned. [gavel] oor >> i would like to call this meeting to order. please respond when i call your name.

commissioner link ton, madam chair johnson, present. mondejar is absent and all members are present . the next regularly scheduled meeting. commission meeting will be held on tuesday march 18, 2014. at 1:00 p.m.. please be adviced that the ringing of and use of cellphone, pagers or other similar sound producing electronic device. are protected at this middle east meeting. please be adviced that a member of the public has 15 minutes to make pertinent public comments on the agenda item unless the commission

adopts a period on the item. the member of the public who wish to speak to the commission please provide a card and commit the -- submit the card. there are no reportable actions. the next order of business is unfinished business. first the consent agenda item 5a. approval of minutes regular meeting of february 4, 2014. >> do we have any comments? no speaker cards. >> everyone should have received minutes in their packets. any questions? >> commissioner? >> yes, i was absent from the day of the minutes can i abstain?

>> yes. any other questions? seeing none can i get a motion on the minutes? >> i move. >> second. >> thank you very much. madam secretary e please call the role. commissioner ellington, mondejar, absent, commissioners sing, rosales. >> thank you very much. call next item. item 5b. a pennsylvania authoring a 1st amendment to the personal service contract with public financial management with pennsylvania. >> is there any public comment? >> i have no speaker cards

madam chair. thank you very much. this item, the contract was for the report that we received on yerba buena gardens and we reviewed this our session and i got it from the packets previously. this is to account for their actual cost to complete that project. are there any questions about the contract with t sm? if there are none i would like to entertain a motion and second. >> i move. >> second. >> madam secretary. please call the roll. >> when i calling your name please vote. commissioner ellington, commissioner sing, vice-chair rosales, >> thank you. call the next item.

>> 5c. adopting environmental review findings pursuant to the california environmental quality act and conditionally approving a combined basic concept and schematic design for an institutional building to be built by family house block 7 easton mission bay south to provide temporary housing for families receiving medical treatment. >> good afternoon commissioners, good afternoon to members of the public. this you for attending. commissioners, if you recall you approved a 4th amendment to the mission bay south last june that enabled the youth change on block seven that would provide for the institutional use, the family house project on this particular block. you have also as companions review approved a schematic design for block 7 west for units

related to cc project on the balance of the block. the next stage in the process for block 7 east is to do the same thing to consider and review schematic designs for the block. with that i would like to turn the presentation over to catherine rilely from the mission bay to present on this item and as well as the project sponsor and project architect. okay. if you can turn on the project or. >> good afternoon, i'm catherine reilly from mission bay. the plan before you is the schematic design for

block 7 east for families for children receiving treatment primarily ucsf and you approved the transfer of this property to family house. after i give the overview, the architect will present the design of the building. if you have a chance, feel free to come down and look at the model. so this map basically gives you a location. we have block 7 west located here bounded by third street to the east, mission bay blvd north to the south, china basin street to the north and then there is a private public walkway that will be between this project and the block seven, the related cc units project to the west. it's located about 5-6 blocks from the new hospital which is under construction here. and will include 80 guest room

suites office and activity space, parking spaces and seven more than is required as well as four bicycle racks with additional space with about eight bicycles. there will be private open space on the podium and other residential amenities to serve the residents. the project is located centrally to transit and open space. 22 line will run from 26th street up and loop the block in front of the building and connect with 16 street bart station. the t line runs along third street and there is a station about a block 1/2 to the north and then there is also a station for the t line directly in front of the hospital and there is an entrance to the hospital in front of that station. the cal trains station is a few blocks to the north and several bus lines to that area as well. mission

bay runs their own shuttle and house is working with ucsf to have parking next to the hospital. ucsf has 129 parking spaces now and will increase to about 4,000 in the future and this is a similar arrangement to what they have currently. the current housing locations don't have parking for families and they have worked with families for other outside locations and looking for the shuttle system to connect between the two. also by the time the projects open the children's park about a block 1/2 away will be completed and there is project is directly across from the commons park. at this time i would like to turn it over to richard stacey from stacy architects and he'll review the design of the building.

>> good afternoon, commissioners, i'm richard stacy architects. the lead architects for family house. if you could switch to that overhead. on behalf of family house i want to express how pleased we are today to be presenting the schematic design for the new building in mission bay. with the new ucsf hospital scheduled to open about a year from now family house is looking to open the doors as soon as possible. as catherine just reviewed family house is located at the intersection right in the heart of mission bay. the site is inappropriately located where the ucsf campus meets the new residential neighborhood. on this site plan which by the

way, has been oriented with north to the left you can see the site for it's conditions. katherine actually reviewed those. the main entrance to the family house will be facing mission bay commons while the parking entrance is at the other end of the building of china basin street. moving to the typical upper floors you can see how it's organized. an arranged in two room l shapes that hug the streets corners. each group of 10 rooms forms a mini community with their own common area and those include kitchen dining and living and play areas. while the guest rooms face outwards toward the city, the primary common areas are centrally located in the

interior corners of the l shapes where they along with the main hallways have used the landscape courtyard. additionally two other areas have strategic locations. at the intersection of third and mission bay commons, the east floor provides views up and down the commons and forms architectural featurement at the other end of the building, an office and computer room provide a secondary feature at china basin and third. down on the ground floor, the building kors most -- covers most of the sight around the perimeter extending along third street with parking and utility spaces are tucked midline on the walkway. at the mission bay commons in, the main entrance leads to a

large reception in the area with waiting and meeting rooms indicated in redch . from there the grand stage leads to the corridor and in yellow extends to the third street. the courtyard level at the second floor is similar and typical to the upper floors. here the ground connections to the foyer team and faces the courtyard. turning to the street elevations you can see a clear differentiation between the more solid upper floors and the more open and ground floor along third street. the combination of color panels, clear and translucent glass and provides corners on the

building. on the upper floors, the ritdz -- rhythm of the guest windows and deep window seat areas. at the main corridor special living room is highlighted by a metal sunscreen. signature orange color. along the mid-block pedestrian walkway the building opens up to the landscape courtyard along the mid-block walkway. alternating areas of green panels hides the stairs and parking garage walls. planted with vines, these screens will visually connect the landscape and courtyard with the mid-block walkway.

at the upper floor the primary material is sliding. this will clad the projecting base in the recessed areas. providing transparency alternate metal panels that hide utilities and garage areas. the primary building corner will act as a skrim will provide a dramatic effect both during the day and when back will -- lit at night. i want to now turf -- turn to the landscape design. the ground floor landscape provides a setback for the common corridors. a special paving planting and benches to provide the seating at the building entrance opposite the park. while the other street side of the building raised in sunken planters provides

storm water management. the building is occasionally recessed for mini gardens. at the court level the courtyard is a large infinity loop for guest of all ages to interact and experience the space. one end of the north loop is a special area and the southern loop for barbecues and gathering, the smaller loop for seating areas. last thing i want to mention several features the family house hopes to have. one is a sun shade on the left which is a structure at the seating area adjacent to the main entrance. on the right, the second floor on a sculptural

tunnel would combined with enhanced experience with the courtyard. that concludes our presentation. i would like to acknowledge our team of architects today. please stand up and be recognized. thanks, everyone. i would be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you richard. the blocks design was presenting to the mission bay cuc meeting and they were supportive over all for the projects. the suggestion was how to increase security in the building and along the edges. the responsibilities of the design is to make sure to locate

parking further from the entrance of the garage and paving along the garage entrance to help identify the pedestrians and charissa like to be careful as they cross over the sidewalk the developer family house will comply with the agencies contracts and the policies and will work directly with george bridges throughout this process. to date they have achieved 48 percent small business enterprise profession rate for professional consultant that is 48 percent of assistance f be and 14 on minority and 13 percent women owned businesses. to avoid double counting, we have assigned both in one category or the other. this development the developer is committed to an acquiring the goals to

payment of the prevailing wages and work force hiring goal. in concl cl ugs -- the conclusion the staff recommends the findings for this project and we conclude going forward for the design review. this concludes staff presentation and would like to appreciate the work that was done by staff and recognize that andrea morgan and the rest of the house is here and available to answer any questions. >> thank you. any comments on this item? >> one speaker card. corrin woods. >> good afternoon, i chair the mission bay advisory committee. we are very excited to have this project move

forward and excited to have this family house become part of our community and we encourage you to support it. >> thank you. no further speaker cards? >> questions, comments from fellow commissioners on this item? >> i just want to know that there is another project for the city before? >> yes. we've done an existing project that includes two buildings. one is right across from the hospital and the other one is a few blocks away from the inner sunset. >> what is the amount, how much is the value of this project? >> this current project? >> yeah. >> i'm going to invite alexandria to answer that question. >> good afternoon commissioners. i'm loshgen county. the estimate project is $40.5 million. just over

40 million. >> thank you. commissioner ellington? >> can you turn on the mic. >> sorry, i forgot to press the button. you talk about the overall construction on the timeline and the next steps after assuming we approve this. >> i'm going to talk about the next step and talk about the phasing. once you approve the design today we would work with family house going forward to do design development and construction drawing and with staff approval then they would do construction. assuming they don't change anything that various -- varies from the design approved today and still related to the project,

some technical stuff to fully implement the mpa. but from a design standpoint, this would be the one time you would see them. i will turn it to lark for timing. >> we anticipate mobilizing on-site in july and start august and occupy the building in december 2015. >> there is 80 units? >> there are 80 units. there -- three different bedroom types. there are suites to accommodate families and single room. there are 42

parking spaces on site. >> if it's all for the unit where do they park? >> commissioners, i'm alexandra morgan director of family house. we've secured an agreement with ucsf to use a number of parking spaces as needed for families that are not able to park at family house. as i understand there will be two parking garages that are owned by ucsf and our families will be able to park there for free. >> okay. >> one last question? >> commissioner ellington? >> you cut me off. >> i didn't say anything. >> so the entrance, the main entrance to the building is on china basin? okay. >> it's on mission bay north boulevard on mission bay and commons.

>> is there an entry? you can see through the windows? >> yes, there is quite a bit of glass on third street. you will be able to see in the building but there is no entrance. third street wasn't an appropriate place for an entrance. there is no street parking and no place to drop someone off. it's better on mission boulevard. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioner ellington if you look at the model there, the long side, that's third street. >> i know which side third street is. i didn't know which side this was. >> mission bay blvd is in front of us and china bay is behind. >> thank you. >> you're welcome. >> just a couple questions. so i know in the memo that we all received there are some caveats to approvals that might have to happen to keep lo