the zoning of the pdr d, if that's the current zoning, if some of these makers could use that kind of space, if they met the definition of the zoning as a way to fill up other space that isn't full right now. an encouragement from the department to look at the periphery of showcase square relative to these new uses you're talking about. >> i would -- to counter what commissioner pearlman said, i'd say we start regulating or we don't do any of it, but once it's written in a code i think it's unfair for us to -- somebody who goes through all the steps, the code says if it's a landmark you can have these uses and they go through all these steps and then turn around well, we don't think your building counts, then we should have explicitly excluded it.

otherwise it's very confusing. i think it's very unfair to owners to /sutd suddenly go through these steps and find because there's a desire to keep the showplace intact that we would turn their building down. that's my comment. >> thank you. commissioner johnck. i appreciate the discussion on the issues here, but i do believe it meets the requirements for landmark status in a very big way and i support the staff recommendation to designate the landmark and i will make two amendments to advise me on where to make these amendments, but i'd like to like numeral six to delete the word appears and put the word meets.

>> motion? >> seconded. >> thank you. >> commissioners on that motion to adopt recommendation of approval as amended to remove in item six, appears to, and change the word meet to meets. and adding publicly accessible interpretive display to the project. >> just to clarify to make sure the recommendation is clear for the board of supervisors, i would recommend that the commission -- recommend the ordinance be amended to require a publicly accessible display as part of the landmark designation, that way the city attorney can put that language directly into the ordinance to enforce it. >> fine, agreed. >> is that acceptable to seconder? >> yes. >> on that motion, commissioner

johnck. >> yes. >> jones. >> yes. >> matsuda >> yes. >> pearlman. >> yes. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz. >> yes. >> that motion passes unanimously six to zero. there are no other items on your agenda. >> thank you.